Reddit reviews Basic Debate, Student Edition (DEBATE SERIES)

I broke the category into "anti-immigration" voters, not "anti-immigrant" voters, and then i split the category into two subcategories of those who are against undocumented citizens and those who are isolationists.

Skin color is relevant because if you look back to your original question (paraphrased because it's more difficult to quote on mobile) the question is why did Trump get non-white votes. When you ask that question and I give you some reasons and your response is, "but what about these white voters" you're changing your target from the original question to a now broader one. If you're going to debate people, I'd recommend not using these strategies because they don't really get you anywhere. If you'd like to learn more, I have a textbook I'd recommend to you so you can avoid problems like this and ad hominem attacks:

https://www.amazon.com/Debate-Student-DEBATE-McGraw-Hill-Education/dp/0078729947

Finally, if you disagree with me calling Trump racist then you haven't been paying attention to the news this week. Both his words and actions show he is either a racist or he's okay with supporting white supremacy (which really boils down to be the same thing). When a group is out chanting things like "Jews will not replace us" and "Blood and soil" while trying to defend a statue of someone who fought to keep black people enslaved due to the thoughts that they are genetically inferior, and rather than him saying that he doesn't want their support and condemns their violence he says there was violence on both sides and if the left wasn't there providing a peaceful anti-protest that no violence or death would've happened, how can you not think he's racist? Members of white supremacist groups are now out there saying they have been empowered by Trump because he doesn't want to condemn them and feeling emboldened. He sees the same news we do, he knows how they're reacting to his words but he's staying on the same line.