>He now heads a consulting firm that has telecommunications companies as clients.
Can anyone say conflict of interest?
>explicit assurances from the highest levels of the government that the activities in question were authorized by the president and determined to be lawful.
The executive branch can not determine if your actions are legal. That is the sole discretion of the judicial branch.
>He now heads a consulting firm that has telecommunications companies as clients.
Can anyone say conflict of interest?
>explicit assurances from the highest levels of the government that the activities in question were authorized by the president and determined to be lawful.
The executive branch can not determine if your actions are legal. That is the sole discretion of the judicial branch.
"He said it was okay" is not a defense. What's next?? "I forgot armed robbery was against the law"?!?