Reddit reviews Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race

The book "Forbidden Archeology" is incredibly insightful and full of actual, documented examples of items dug up that don't fit with the current narrative. It's a slog to get through because it is mostly academic but, unlike possibly fake lawsuits, it contains hard evidence about this topic. Check it out, I really enjoyed it.

Is this the book?

If so, looks good, thanks for posting about it!

you won't find a better book than this one on this topic:

http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeology-Hidden-History-Human/dp/0892132949/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323101831&sr=8-1

It's as thick as an old telephone book, with a couple of chapters on out-of-place artifacts, with detailed cross-references & footnotes.

Forbidden Archaeology

> Over the centuries, researchers have found bones and artifacts proving that humans like us have existed for millions of years. Mainstream science, however, has supppressed these facts. Prejudices based on current scientific theory act as a "knowledge filter," giving us a picture of prehistory that is largely incorrect.

>This is not evidence.

It sure is evidence. Historical accounts of creation and human activity in the ancient past is recorded and documented by ancient cultures all around the world, are handed down over generations through reliable historians, through a reliable means of knowledge, have no signs of interpolation, and give knowledge of the real world.




>Citation needed.

Here



> There is no way of knowing this


Well, we know from historical accounts that all human cultures have always either buried or cremated their dead. Cremation removes any chance of fossilization, and burial in a certain way does.

And we also know humans have always been burying or cremating by proof of induction, unlike animals.



>How?


In logic, it's called "proof of non-existence by non-perception."

For example, fire always creates smoke, and whenever we see fire we see smoke. Whenever fire is not there we don't see smoke. So if we dont see smoke in the vicinity, we can infer there is no large fire nearby.

So, if species X lives, and always creates fossils when it dies, 100% guaranteed, then when we see no fossils, we can conclude species X didnt exist.

But it is not the case that species will always fossilize, because fossilization is rare. So you cant make that inference.

There have been several archaeological discoveries that were dated to several millions of years ago, highlighted in the book Forbidden Archaeology for what it's worth.

Forbidden Archeology is a great book that details all of the fossils and artifacts that have been discovered but dismissed because they don't fit into the accepted timeline that is written in the history books. If the facts don't fit the theory, they discard the facts.

Well...maybe...but there is significant evidence of human beings, or other sentient species we dont know about (i suppose), existing 50 million - 300 million years ago. Forbidden Archaeology by Michael Cremo is a thorough look at the actual evidence of how far back the human race goes.

I wasn't really pointing out the alien aspect, but simply the fact that we have ignored ALOT of evidence which goes against the current historical timeline. The video was really just a quick way to guage your answer, but i was really hoping to hear if you had heard of

http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeology-Hidden-History-Human/dp/0892132949

this book & what you thought about it?

http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeology-Unabridged-Michael-Cremo/dp/0892132949/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-1633621-5756409?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1181717324&sr=8-1[/url]

an interesting book about finding obviously new things in obviously old dirt. Like a galvanized steel nail in a lump of coal. Or a modern wedding ring found deep within the bedrock.