Reddit Reddit reviews Holy Writ as Oral Lit: The Bible as Folklore

We found 6 Reddit comments about Holy Writ as Oral Lit: The Bible as Folklore. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Christian Bible Criticism & Interpretation
Christian Books & Bibles
Christian Bible Study & Reference
Holy Writ as Oral Lit: The Bible as Folklore
ISBN13: 9780847691982Condition: NewNotes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Check price on Amazon

6 Reddit comments about Holy Writ as Oral Lit: The Bible as Folklore:

u/Tiarlynn · 4 pointsr/reddit.com

The title for this is a bit misleading; the whole Bible is a collection of written folklore. My (very sadly deceased) old professor wrote a book with tons of examples of this called Holy Writ as Oral Lit. Gilgamesh, being folklore as well, has some parallels to the Bible; think of it as the difference between humans evolving from an ancestor in common with apes as opposed to from apes.

And a nitpick with the article: Gilgamesh is actually a legend. Myths are explanations for how the world and certain things in it came to be, while legends are narratives about an occurrence. For instance, Genesis would be a myth, but Noah's Ark would be a legend. Another common misconception is that either phrase gives a qualification of veracity; neither is synonymous in a scholarly sense with "lie" or "untruth."

I can't remember specifically, but I believe the flood actually appears in several other legends of the time. Since the area was the "cradle of civilization," it's not terribly surprising the story got around to other cultures.

</annoying pedantry>

u/Meph616 · 3 pointsr/TrueAtheism

Read it, fun story. I really like the part where in Atra-Hasis it states that the flood was a river flood. Then to Gilgamesh it evolves to the Sea was flooded. Then Noah, the next in the chain, it's a Worldwide flood that covered even up to the mountains.

Genesis 7:17-20

  • 7:17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
  • 7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
  • 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
  • 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.


    River flooded, to Sea flooded, to World flooded. Essentially what we have here is oral tradition from generation to generation, and each generation embellishing on the previous one to make it sound bigger and better. Sort of like the game of Telephone one plays as a kid.

    A really good book on these kind of situations is by Alan Dundes - Holy Writ as Oral Lit.
u/metanat · 3 pointsr/DebateAnAtheist

I got kind of lazy with the links, but anyways here is my collection of Christianity related books, links etc.

Listening:

u/notmyformerself · 1 pointr/atheism

Holy Writ as Oral Lit: the bible as folklore if your mother believes the bible is the direct word of god this might be a good book to start her on. It's a short study of biblical contradictions with an emphasis on considering it as folklore and not holy writ. It's a super quick read and may just plant some seeds of doubt without being heavy-handed.

u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/skeptic

You haven't annoyed me at all: I enjoyed looking all that stuff up, as I haven't done it in a while :)

I don't have a booklist to hand, but I can recommend this video: The God Who Wasn't There

IIRC there is some bad logic in there, but I did look up and read a couple of the books which are mentioned in the film, which were interesting. A good one was Holy Writ as Oral Lit which shows the parallels between the stores in the Bible and folklore.

u/TonyBLiar · 0 pointsr/Christianity

Which is precisely the point. There is no "good evidence" that the alleged Jesus of Nazerth existed at all. The entire Jesus story does, however, rather neatly fit the patterns in folklore reserved for every hero warrior god throughout every major civilisation—many of which predate middle-eastern literacy by thousands of years.

The "good evidence" Christianity continually asserts as its authority on which to speak, is—without exception—internal apologetics which presumes scriptural teaching to be authentic and correct—when in reality biblical scholars have long since given up trying to differentiate between genuine texts, such a St. Paul's letters to the Corinthians and the deliberate misinformation spread by early Christianity's main opposition—i.e., the Pagan Hoards whose traditions and rites were hijacked and commandeered by Christianity itself.

http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Writ-Oral-Lit-Folklore/dp/0847691985

If the rising from the dead of a composite character from folklore is the tenuous link between Yahweh's existence and everything attributed to him being true or false, you can at least see why so many of us choose to come down on the side of science and rationalism?