Reddit reviews Insignia NS-24DF310NA19 24-inch Smart HD TV - Fire TV Edition
We found 1 Reddit comments about Insignia NS-24DF310NA19 24-inch Smart HD TV - Fire TV Edition. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Insignia HD Smart TV – Fire TV Edition delivers 720p picture quality with deep blacks and rich colors.With the Fire TV experience built-in, enjoy tens of thousands of channels, apps, and Alexa skills, including Disney+, Netflix, YouTube, Prime Video, Hulu, HBO, SHOWTIME, STARZ, and moreFire TV Edition seamlessly integrates live over-the-air TV and streaming channels on a unified home screen (HD antenna required).Easily control your TV with the included Voice Remote with Alexa—plus, launch apps, search for titles, play music, switch inputs, control smart home devices, and more, using just your voice.Dimensions (W x H x D): TV without stand: 21.9” x 13.5” x 2.7”, TV with stand: 21.9” x 15.3” x 6.8”. Multiple device input/output options: 3 HDMI including 1 with ARC, USB, composite input, antenna/cable input, digital output (optical), audio output, Ethernet.
If I can offer up a possible partial explanation from a non-economist with a strong interest in demography, I think a lot of the "hollowness" people feel today comes from mistaken beliefs about how well-off the typical person of 1950something was compared to the typical person of today.
A surprisingly easy way to start getting a handle on this is to look at old mail-order catalogs in one tab and using the BLS Inflation Calculator in another tab to convert historical prices to 2019 dollars. I tend to focus on electronics, specifically television sets and audio equipment. So, like, the cheapest television set available through Sears in 1957, a 21" black and white TV, sold for the equivalent of $1,539.35 in 2019 dollars. I bought a 60" 4k TV for less than half that price two years ago, so.
Also, people tend to think that strong-union manufacturing jobs were typical back then, ignoring the vast swaths of the population who lived in anti-union states, who toiled in the fields, who tried to scratch out a subsistence living in the pre-Great Society-reforms era, and who were locked out of "good" jobs because of their race. (I've tried asking around about exactly what percentage of the population held relatively-well-paying manufacturing jobs, but I've never gotten an answer.)
EDIT with data! I'm having a manic episode, so I couldn't stop digging. I found a handy breakdown of 1957 incomes, in 1957 dollars. The 1957 median income in 1957 dollars was $4,175; adjusted to 2017 dollars for comparison purposes, the 1957 median personal income was $35,492. Flashing forward, the 2016 median personal income in 2017 dollars was $31,099. So there was a pretty big decline in the median personal income between 1957 and 2016. But the median earner in 1957 could buy 21 cheap TVs, while the median earner in 2016 could buy 236 cheap TVs--an order of magnitude more. So I guess ultimately it comes down to the unsatisfying conclusion that there isn't even really a good way to compare the lifestyle of today to the lifestyle of yesteryear because there are just so many moving parts. (I'm not even addressing the increasing number of earners per household because I'm lazy like that.)