Reddit Reddit reviews International Economics: Theory and Policy (10th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)

We found 3 Reddit comments about International Economics: Theory and Policy (10th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Business & Money
Books
International Economics
International Business & Investing
International Economics: Theory and Policy (10th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
For courses in International Economics, International Finance, and International Trade A balanced approach to theory and policy applicationsInternational Economics: Theory and Policy provides engaging, balanced coverage of the key concepts and practical applications of the two main topic areas of the discipline. For both international trade and international finance, an intuitive introduction to theory is followed by detailed coverage of policy applications. With this new tenth edition, the author team of Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, renowned researcher Maurice Obstfeld, and Marc Melitz of Harvard University continues
Check price on Amazon

3 Reddit comments about International Economics: Theory and Policy (10th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics):

u/[deleted] · 3 pointsr/AskEconomics

You can't go wrong with Krugman, Obstfeld, and Melitz. These guys "wrote the book" on trade, literally and figuratively.

u/Randy_Newman1502 · 2 pointsr/BasicIncome

>It's the closest experience I've got

The fact that you think that is close reveals the shallowness of your understanding.

>The certainty of comments in this thread are laughable.

I find your lack of intellectual curiosity laughable too. I guess we have different senses of humour.

Seriously though, your time would be better spent reading an international economics textbook than arguing with me.

It contains stuff I used to teach 19 year olds. If they got it, I see no reason why you cannot.

It might help you understanding economics issues better than the popular press articles that your diet seems to be centred around.

Goodbye, and have a nice day.

u/Affiliate2 · 1 pointr/Economics

If you're trying to actually make a point, you should try to do it more clearly.
>we don't and the people who absorb the vast majority of the gains use their gains to make sure that we don't.

First of all, false, there have been plenty of policies aimed at doing just what you said we don't. Second, it is unclear who you're implying these people are. I could take some guesses, with varying degrees of specificity, but I still wouldn't be sure. Third, it is unclear what you are implying they do to make sure "we don't." It sounds like you have some point here but for some reason you are taking large tiptoes around saying exactly what it is you mean.

>You can't just arbitrarily treat economic and political systems as separate of each others influence.

Unclear who you think is doing this, because it's not me. Nor is it the economists who model trade, because the political economy of trade policy is quite well understood (a standard reference for undergraduate-level courses has at least an entire chapter devoted to it, for instance).