Reddit reviews Intro Stats (4th Edition)

Title: Intro Stats 4th Edition
Author: Richard D. De Veaux
Edition: 4th
Publisher: Pearson
ISBN 0321825276

https://www.amazon.com/Intro-Stats-4th-Richard-Veaux/dp/0321825276/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1517519610&sr=8-1&keywords=intro+stats+4th

> See the word should and potentially? That's them playing with economics to make it sound like it works out.

Yeah sorry that's not how economics work and you highly misunderstood: if you want to talk about the future, you need prediction based on current and past data. Economics as a science offers these tools. The paper looks at how refugees have impacted the host society in the past and can make accurate decision for the future. There is so much evidence regarding this, that I could keep posting all day. If your school or university offers access to research papers for free, I can link you a few more in depth articles in English or German.

Also, if you want an easy itroductiona bout statistics, I recomend you Intro Stats

https://www.amazon.com/Intro-Stats-4th-Richard-Veaux/dp/0321825276/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511295288&sr=1-1&keywords=intro+stats+4th+edition


>Not to mention the article goes on to talk about how refugees working the same job as a native are payed less and somehow this is seen as good.

>So creating a caste system with serfs is a good thing? Why not pay the refugees the same, instead of destroying workers rights and the middle class.

>The second link is about how paying people less and threatening them with deportation if they don't comply is a good thing. Nice that you like slavery.

Workers are yes paid less than natives, but natives then move to higher paying, more skilled jobs naturally (please read the article better :) ). It's bad for the refugees, but not for the natives and overall economy.

No, I don't support "slavery". OP was complaining that refugees are bad for the economy, he wasn't concerned that they are treated worse, was he now? It's nice to see that your argument revolves around putting words in my mouth that have no value to the discussion. :)

>Also in Canada we have a ton of evidence that show refugees have a hard time finding work, especially legal work.

Yes, bravo! That's they key there. Refugees can be an asset, and are an asset if they are integrated by society in the workforce. It's up to the host country to:

• Set up lanugage courses
  
• set up programs to integrate them into the workforce
  
• offer trainspotters, formal or vocational education
  
• encourage programs that integrates them to society and promote active citizenship
  
  Here's hoe Denmark is doing it (I live in Denmark, am not a refugee in case that matters):
  
• Offers a basic integration education program (integrationsgrunduddannelse) from day one
  
• Offers free language courses up to tree years, with possibility to learn the language on spot during internships and trainships
  
• Offers financial incentives to companies who hire refugees, who in turn pay taxes and contribute to society. This also enables them to have a contact with the locals and integrate easier.
  
  Denmark has taken less refugee following the recent migration crisis, but has experience since has taken much more during the Balkan wars. Refugees don't take the locals job, but create other job opportunities for natives and the unemployment rate is as low as 5%.
  
  
  Also please, please try to diversify your sources. linking a news article is already unreliable, but using the same source multiple time is even worse.