Reddit Reddit reviews Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course by Doug Phillips (2011-10-18)

We found 5 Reddit comments about Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course by Doug Phillips (2011-10-18). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

History
Books
World History
Religious History
History of Religion & Politics
Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course by Doug Phillips (2011-10-18)
Check price on Amazon

5 Reddit comments about Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course by Doug Phillips (2011-10-18):

u/UPPERCASE_THOUGHTS · 7683 pointsr/politics

>The course, called “Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course,” includes 28 hours of audio and visual lectures given by Moore and others, as well as a study guide. The course is available for purchase on Amazon, where “Chief Justice Roy Moore” is listed as a co-author alongside Doug Phillips, Dr. Joseph C. Morecraft, and Dr. Paul Jehle.

Only $29.87 on Amazon, complete with one review about someone forcing their poor daughter to use the course.

>The curriculum was a product of Vision Forum, a now-defunct Texas-based evangelical organization headed by Doug Phillips, which taught “Biblical patriarchy”, a theology that prescribes strict, unequal gender roles for men and women. According a statement on the Vision Forum’s website, “Egalitarian feminism is a false ideology that has bred false doctrine in the church and seduced many believers.”

Uh, huh... and why is Vision Forum defunct now?

>Vision Forum closed in 2013 after Phillips resigned, having admitted to a “lengthy” and “inappropriately romantic and affectionate” relationship with a woman who was not his wife. Shortly thereafter, that woman, Lourdes Torres-Manteufel, sued Phillips and Vision Forum, detailing an emotionally, psychologically, and sexually abusive relationship that started when she was just 15 years old.

Yeah, sounds about right. Roy Moore and his crew are straight out of a William Faulkner novel.

u/DreadNephromancer · 32 pointsr/politics

I mean, the thing exists, and the article has audio excerpts.

I get that the source is going to put some people off and I don't know of any "better" source atm, but honestly if they're going to refuse to believe something this easy to research just because of the source, they're probably going to refuse regardless of which source you give them.