Reddit reviews Little Tyke: The True Story of a Gentle Vegetarian Lioness (Re-Quest Book)
We found 3 Reddit comments about Little Tyke: The True Story of a Gentle Vegetarian Lioness (Re-Quest Book). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Used Book in Good Condition
You think animals don't have a conscience or morality? You may want to take a look at this
This
And also this that just warmed my heart today
For the record, not everyone was raised in the social environment that gave them an edge for taking things head on. I don't think it's fair of you to speak like you know how to solve everyone's problems and that they just need to toughen up. Their own coping mechanisms may just be the reason they continue on. As someone going into social work, I hope that you have an experience that broadens your views, in a way that I probably won't be able because hey, I'm just one stranger on the internet.
Have a good day~
I'll thank you for enforcing my inference that secularism is a magnet of some of the rudest, most arrogant people I've ever come across. I'm absolutely astounded as to how you expect me to take you or your tired masquerade seriously when not only have you failed to refute my worldview, but instead have to rely on tired polemics and question begging premises to even muster a response among a bombardment of petty insults. Regardless of our differences in worldviews, I must offer my contention that I feel sorry for anyone who feels the need to be the source of such vulgarity. Even if you think I'm wrong it's just simply disappointing that you fail to treat me like a proper human being.
You insist that the sources I provided are unsound because a few of them are uncited when the purpose of those articles is to serve the role of a historian; collect uncontroversial evidence that can easily be verified by a Google search and make an inference. The Wikipedia articles cites the inferences of experts and the scholar I linked demonstrated that the premises made by those experts are unsound. He thus refutes their inference. Simple.
I did neglect that /r/Creation is private, so I'll put /u/JoeCoder's comment here:
Dimensions and capacity of the ark:
Which species:
Number of species and genera:
Why it makes sense to count genera and not species:
Size of species:
Insects/arachnids/myriapoda:
Food storage space:
Water storage space:
Food for carnivores:
So it seems possible to me. Using the numbers above our ark is 44% full. We still need room for ramps and passageways after all. And some stretch room of course."
Your other claims are superfluous at best, completely irrelevant at worst.
> Elephants, birds, insects, dinosaurs... how?!
I don't identify as young earth creationist and am undecided about the flood (particularly because I know so little about geology), but I disagree that ark logistics can serve as a valid argument against it. I spent a Saturday afternoon a few weeks ago looking into it for myself and this is what I came up with. Copying from my notes:
Dimensions and capacity of the ark:
Which species:
The word for "animal" is ובבהמה (be-hay-maw', Strong's 0929), which means a beast or large quadrupedal animal.
"creeping thing" is הרמשׁ (remes, Strong's 07431), which means "a reptile or any other rapidly moving animal"
The word for "breath" is נשמת (nesh-aw-maw', Strong's 05397), which can translate as "breath" or "intellect/soul". The NET footnote translates it, "everything which [has] the breath of the spirit of life in its nostrils"
Number of species and genera:
Why it makes sense to count genera and not species:
Size of species:
Insects/arachnids/myriapoda:
Food storage space:
Water storage space:
Food for carnivores:
So it seems possible to me. Using the numbers above our ark is 44% full. We still need room for ramps and passageways after all. And some stretch room of course.