>only that they cannot establish with certainty
Knowledge "is the grasp of an object"; therefore we must begin with objects, not ideas. Thought "is only the consciousness of an act of knowledege". I'm going to take a long shot here and identify your disagreement as stemming from some idealist notion that begins with thought as the first principle of being. To cure that, I recommend this book.
>is irrational
Not quite irrational, but flawed in their reasoning. They have reached an incorrect conclusion as it is all too easy to do.
>only that they cannot establish with certainty
Knowledge "is the grasp of an object"; therefore we must begin with objects, not ideas. Thought "is only the consciousness of an act of knowledege". I'm going to take a long shot here and identify your disagreement as stemming from some idealist notion that begins with thought as the first principle of being. To cure that, I recommend this book.
>is irrational
Not quite irrational, but flawed in their reasoning. They have reached an incorrect conclusion as it is all too easy to do.