Reddit reviews Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
We found 3 Reddit comments about Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Philip Kitcher's Abusing Science, Michael Shermer's Why People Believe Weird Things and Massimo Pigliucci's Nonsense on Stilts are all great reads on this topic. I also highly recommend Naomi Oreskes' and Erik Conway's Merchants of Doubt as an examination of how scientific language can be abused to stymie public policy progress on certain issues.
This is certainly part of the philosophy of science. The problem of how to separate genuine science from pseudoscience is called the demarcation problem, and there's not really any generally accepted criteria that apply to all cases. Some people reject the idea that we ought to draw that kind of principled distinction in the first place. Nobel Prize-winning chemist Irving Langmuir has a great talk advocating for a notion of "pathological science" rather than pseduoscience that's worth reading through.
> Fish on Stilts
Helpful note: "Nonsense on Stilts"
Mavketl wrote:
> Fish on Stilts
Helpful note: "Nonsense on Stilts"