Reddit reviews Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia

>help and aid money to rebuild the country after the war right? And NK is such a shit hole today because...?

The reason NK is even intact today is thanks to China's involvement in the Korean War and later supplying tech and aid. China has repeatedly offered to help NK to develop its economy, but NK will not or is slow to open up. Who's fault is that?

 

Also, read about the Marshall plan by USA after WW2 + Operation Gladio + CIA-created European Union.

Now that you understand the underlying rationale for rebuilding you can understand the SK and Japan vassalage now. Now, China is flanked by USA military in SK and Japan.

 

>Don't pretend the reverse wasn't happening in the North because they killed 4x the amount of pro democracy dissenters.

Proof? As far I as I know, the largest numbers of murders in NK came from USA's aerial bombings and later the Korean War.

> I have no doubt that the Jesuits exercised, and continue to exercise great control in world events.

Indeed. You have only to skim through this, an exhaustively-referenced compilation of their recent history, to get a sense of their scope. If or when it takes your interest, you will find it a fascinating read.

>However, it would be pretty accurate to say that the the Jesuits and Knights of Malta are under Masonic control, along with the Vatican.

While I respect your depth of research, and we both share concerns about each of the groups involved, we seem to hold different hypotheses about who is running what. Please allow me to show you some of why I hold the hypothesis I do.

Freemasonic symbols are 'stacked' in front of Roman symbols, which themselves are 'stacked' in front of Babylonian symbolism which has lasted for thousands of years. Jesuit and Maltese symbols are 'stacked' in front of these Babylonian symbols, but lack most of the Freemasonic symbols. And Babylonian symbols of course aren't 'stacked' in front of Roman or Freemasonic symbols, although of course it has many symbols in common because the Babylonians were using them first. Much of this will have to await the exposure of the various groups' symbolism by myself or by others, so our evaluation of this at present is likely cursory at best unless you're already familiar with them yourself.

Jesuitism pre-dates Freemasonry. The Jesuits were founded in 1534, and sanctioned by the papacy in 1540. Albert Pike of Scottish Rite Freemasonry was overseen by Jesuit John Peter de Smet, and published his Morals and Dogma in 1872.

This lecture presents almost nothing but evidence regarding Freemasonry and Jesuitism, and establishes the issue quite soundly. It could almost have been created specifically for you, or others who believe Freemasonry controls Rome instead of the other way 'round. I recommend it, and if you can make it through the first half-hour and still hold your current assessment I would love to hear why. It's followed up by Hidden Agendas if you find yourself as taken with it as I was, getting into the philosophies and doctrines being put out by the various 'secret' organizations and also greatly emphasizes evidence regarding Freemasonry. Once it's established what sort of doctrines they're putting out, spotting their influences becomes a significantly easier task.

>There are lots of Catholic whistleblowers who have exposed this.

I'd like to make sure you're aware of the current effort by the NWO for a controlled, limited exposure of some of their own lower-rung personnel and groups. A 'limited exposure' has been implemented to serve multiple purposes at once: Firstly, it distracts those among the People who believe there's some kind of a conspiracy, and neatly encourages them to limit their scope by assigning bit players as the major principals. Secondly, it gets rid of 'bit players' that the organization had been intending to phase out anyway, using public outrage directed at them to accomplish this agenda. Thirdly, it puts the fear of exposure into their remaining personnel [thus ensuring their loyalty] just as in the West at least their hold has become sufficient to cause them to forbid the usual sex, drugs, and insider trading antics that had tempted them to become personnel in the first place, and instead enforce strict discipline purely by the threat of exposure of those personnel who disobey. It's much cheaper, and ensures better compliance. And fourthly, by inciting concerns of 'conspiracy theory' on a limited basis and then using their own personnel to 'sort it all out', the general public and the current set of conspiracy buffs can be lulled back into a false sense of security once it all appears to be over... enabling the higher rungs of the NWO to consolidate power with no threat of outcry from the People generally. It's a long-term strategy intended to make conspiracy theorists like you and I a thing of the past.

Consequently, at present much of the alt-media bloggers and 'whistleblowers' (that term is one of their symbols, by the way, using "air" and a 'Left Hand' imagery due to the less-than-pleasant tone which results) are no less their shills than the corporate MSM. They know MSM credibility is dwindling; the NWO are the ones who deliberately caused us to become more skeptical of the MSM. But it doesn't automatically follow that the alt-media personalities are suddenly any more credible. If the People don't do their historical research - and I'm very encouraged to find that you do - they're just going to be led around from one set of shills to the next.

> You can look at things like the Vatican's providing assistance to the (Mason-controlled) CIA during Operation Gladio.

Firstly, both the CIA and the FBI were established by the Vatican's Knights of Malta.

Next, I was very encouraged to encounter Gladio... at first. However since I've checked and there are spades of publicly-searchable evidence that organized crime does so much business with the Vatican so as to be mutually indistinguishable from it (something it would rather not become common knowledge, as it seems to like to present itself as a 'breakaway alternative organization' working against the Vatican - an outlandish premise to anyone who's studied their history). So I more carefully examined the symbolism and organizing messaging being put out with regard to Gladio, both in Paul Williams' book about it and in other sources like the recent Archer episode 'Lo Scandalo' which references it. What I gleaned was that Gladio is being used by the NWO as a sort of insurance policy for the ongoing compliance of organized crime groups working with the NWO. Which is just the sort of thing you'd expect from the symbolism, as Gladio is the Italian form of gladius, a type of Roman shortsword. And for the parent group of Babylonian occultists, "blades" reference an effort of theirs to divide the People or a specific group in a predetermined, controlled manner to advance a strategy and increase their own power.

>I am 100% sure that the US was not a Jesuit plot.

An excellent case has been made for the point here. It would also explain why the Treaty of Paris ending the war between the U.S. and Britain was established by agents of the Vatican's Crown Templars on both the U.S. and the British sides... thus reducing its status in law from what would have been an international treaty to merely an internal corporate memo. [Edit: And a massive public fraud which the People will surely catch onto as the understanding propagates via modern information technology.]

>I am 100% sure that the US was not a Jesuit plot. It was done by a secret society still in existence, which planned it out over many years. The goal was to produce a real, free Republic.

There certainly may have been that element to it; they wouldn't have made covert efforts requiring generations to effect if there hadn't been some covert presence in addition to an overt push.

Incidentally, is your hypothesis essentially Lyndon LaRouche's 'British conspiracy'? I'm not asking that to deride you, I'd just like to make sure I understand your premise.

Notice that the 'BBC' had covered the LaRouche effort back in 1980 and again in 2004:

>In 2004, in a segment about the death of Jeremiah Duggan during a LaRouche Youth Movement cadre school in Wiesbaden in March 2003, BBC's Newsnight re-broadcast a BBC interview with LaRouche from 1980, in which he said about the Queen: "Of course she's pushing drugs. That is, in the sense of a responsibility, the head of a gang that is pushing drugs, she knows it's happening and she isn't stopping it."

We may differ on whether the 'BBC' is Jesuit- or Freemasonic-controlled, but either way their usual response is not to legitimatize nor publicize anything that would genuinely expose them. Effecting a 'limited exposure', however, would completely be within their modus operandi.