Reddit Reddit reviews Pfaltzgraff Sylvia Dinnerware Set, 32 Piece, White

We found 1 Reddit comments about Pfaltzgraff Sylvia Dinnerware Set, 32 Piece, White. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Kitchen & Dining
Home & Kitchen
Dining & Entertaining
Dinnerware Sets
Dinnerware
Pfaltzgraff Sylvia Dinnerware Set, 32 Piece, White
A pattern of raised curls framed by beaded bands gives traditional style a fresh update32 piece dinnerware set, service for eight, includes (8) each: 10-1/2 inch dinner plate, 8-1/4 inch salad plate, 6-1/2 inch diameter (29 ounce) soup cereal bowl and 14 ounce mugCrafted of porcelain, making the dinnerware durable for years to comeUse & Care: Microwave and dishwasher safeIncluded components: Tabletop, Dinnerware, Dinnerware-Sets
Check price on Amazon

1 Reddit comment about Pfaltzgraff Sylvia Dinnerware Set, 32 Piece, White:

u/darthcoder ยท 1 pointr/explainlikeimfive

Let's use cost as a basis for comparison, because it's about the only thing we can use, without detailed study, of total input costs of one thing versus another (all raw material and energy input costs, no recycling or reclamation costs).

A 32 piece dinnerware set from Pfaltzgraff costs $70:
https://www.amazon.com/Pfaltzgraff-Sylvia-Piece-Dinnerware-Service/dp/B01ATQJ3N4

A 44 Count (x5 - 220 total plates): costs $17.
https://www.amazon.com/Dixie-Paper-Plates-Inches-Count/dp/B008R6LO5O

Assuming a family of four, and that the total costs of the ceramic plates is just in the plates (not the cup, saucer or bowl):

Paper: 220/4 = 55 meals. $17/55 = $0.30/meal Forever.
At that rate, the Pfaltzgraff pays for itself in 234 meals.

Less than a year, assuming we only eat one meal a day. Faster otherwise.

Capital depreciation of both paper and ceramic should, in healthy economies, be included in the price of each product - otherwise the manufacturers couldn't stay in business. But considering the Amazon economy, it's possible this is distorted with debt, and hence would require a very thorough analysis of costs from start to finish.

But in a world where economies are healthy, a simple price comparison would should ceramic to be a winner. Raw math says ceramic wins in energy costs (and that cost is including packing materials).