Reddit reviews Primarily Logic, Grades 2-4

this might be more appropriate.

>They're all wrong because you lack the tools necessary to comprehend why you're wrong. But that doesn't matter because the courts side with what's actually factual, and not your warped misunderstood version.

Hmm. Patient still shows a complete misunderstanding of the argument. Insists someone is wrong without citing proof or logically proving it.

>Lol? "Cherry Picking". K.

Patient has regressed to Facebook levels of discourse. Only complete word is a quote of someone else.

>Right after you learn how to comprehend. Reading and comprehending what is written are two very different things.

Patient seems to be impervious to the irony of their own statement.

>If you want to be an ideologue with no clue what you're talking about, that's fine by me. If you want to better yourself and actually understand things, and why they are, that's fine be me too. I have no horse in this race. The rulings, all of them, are on my side. The courts agree with my argument, not yours. If you have an issue with it, take it up with the supreme court and the definitions of contemporary English in the 1700's, not me.

Patient has made the false assumption that just because 5 judges misruled that means that it won't be overturned in later years. Has apparently never heard of insert case here.

Patient stands by their cherry picking. Prescribing reading material: Logic

Enter address below and your treatment will be shipped out as soon as possible.