Reddit reviews SanDisk Ultra 128GB SDXC UHS-I Memory Card up to 80MB/s (SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN), Black

https://camelcamelcamel.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/product/B0143IISD0

Went digging out of curiosity. It appears you're right. This is just the price trend of a 128GB SDcard from amazon.

I hope that, ideally, prices will go down. Especially with this OPs new card showing up on the soon.

Pics!

Parts list:

[2.5" to 3.5" Laptop IDE Hard Disk HDD Adapter] (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0010MKARA/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apap_YO8wtVm8scvfU)

[SanDisk 128GB Ultra UHS-I Class 10 SDXC Memory Card, Black, Standard Packaging] (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apap_djrZQnUHx5fIx)

[Secure Digital SD SDHC SDXC MMC Memory Card to IDE 2.5" 2.5 Inch 44P 44 Pin Male Adapter Converter, SD 3.0] (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DGNYXQ0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apap_nRyMwjVWix8Cg)

24" 40-Pin 80-Wire Ultra ATA 2-Drive Ribbon Cable

I recommend this clip on body cam with built in LCD screen to view videos: https://www.amazon.com/RecorderGear-PC900-Control-Portable-Wearable/dp/B079J6ZPSN?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_ $89.99
I also recommend SanDisk 128GB SD card https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=mp_s_a_1_5?keywords=sandisk+128gb+sd+card&qid=1565986221&s=gateway&sprefix=sandisk+128gb+sd&sr=8-5 for 12 hours recording at $20.69 and lasts you for years.

Total: $110.68 BUT ITS WORTH IT AS EVIDENCE AGAINST BULLIES. When someone bully you show the teacher the video clip on the body can itself and use it as evidence. I use it.

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=asc_df_B0143IISD0/

$40.

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484312575&sr=8-1&keywords=128+sd+card

Hey,

I agree with the Acer Aspire 1, but it isn't too powerful so I wouldn't expect much more out of it other than programming/general use. The storage is a bit small, so you can grab a 128 GB SD card to store everything but Windows 10 operating system. It has a 14" display. It is sadly not a 2-in-1.

Here is the mobile version of your link

I just bought this and it works:

SanDisk 128GB Ultra UHS-I Class 10 SDXC

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0143IISD0/

You are correct, they are from a single youtuber, and he did mention the possibility of a 'quality control' issue on his unit. It may be that the other issues were also defects, and he just did not know it. Thank you for your help!

Bonus question, is this SD card fine for 4k?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0143IISD0/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s02?ie=UTF8&psc=1

0. Repairing it might even be something you could do yourself, if you wanted to try it. Here's a video guide on how to take it apart, and here's a text-and-picture based one. The only problem I foresee is the battery seems to be soldered on, and you'd probably definitely want to change that; but once it's open anyone with the ability to solder could that for you, and it's only taken apart with screws.
   
   
1. It's probably the screen that's messed up, if you can see the contents but with no backlight. I literally just got an iPod (Classic) put back together today that a screen I ordered had no backlight working, and I had to order another one which worked fine.
   
   
2. Probably. Hard drives and batteries are the most common failures.
   
   
3. iTunes wouldn't recognize it, if the hard drive has failed.
   
   
4. I have no idea what the three beeps are, but they're definitely a POST code failure response, to tell you something is wrong.
   
   
5. You can replace the hard drive with a CF, but those are expensive for even the most modest storage sizes. It'd be much cheaper and more effective to get a SD to CF adapter card and an SD card which would run you $40 USD for 128GBs, where it'd be $40 USD to just get 64GBs via CF, and $70 to get the equivalent 128GBs via CF.

Is there a limit on the size or type of SD card that can be used? I'd like to order one like this one but want to confirm compatibility first.

I'm shopping for full-size SD cards for my Wii U ahead of hacking it. It's a 32GB model.

I've found 128GB cards well within my budget so I'm ready to pull the trigger on this one right here but I want to get my facts straight:

• if I format the card to FAT32 and change the allocation size to the right setting, with the right SD card formatting app, will it probably work?
  
• will the Wii U be able to see and use all 128GB of the card? I understand it will be closer 119.somethingGB in the OS, I'm not talking about that.
  
• will I be able to use it to store Wii and VC games? GCN games, even?
  
  Please don't tell me to just get a HDD right off. I will make up my own mind when I have the info I need. Thanks!

It is, assuming it's the same card: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_IQw-BbNNYDCHT

I had asked something similar to this before, slightly but I wanted to check:

SanDisk 128GB Ultra UHS-I Class 10 SDXC Memory Card, Black, Standard Packaging (SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_Da.SBbDFTDV2S

Would a 128 GB sized SD card like this be more than enough space for larger Digital titles, while leaving a decent amount of space for smaller games? (like VC stuff?)

On top of New Leaf/Tomodachi Life, looks like I’d need 67,698 more available blocks if I decided to go the download route for the 3 Pokémon games (which I might, since it would be easier than Switching cartridges... and then there’s that one time i almost lost my X cartridge...)

Granted I’m aware that I’ll have to format it first before to use it going by another in a previous comment to use it, first... but I think it’ll be enough...?

What speed SD cards do you use for portrait sessions and weddings?

I was thinking about it and I'm not taking high speed-multiple photo action shots so something mid-rage should be just fine.

For instances this 150MB/s
https://smile.amazon.com/Lexar-Professional-UHS-II-Software-LSD128CRBNA1000/dp/B00PLENZPC/ref=sr_1_4?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1483371487&sr=1-4&keywords=128GB+SD+card

VS

this 80MB/s
https://smile.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1483371487&sr=1-1&keywords=128GB+SD+card


I'm thinking the 80MB/s should be just fine.

> I don't know the details either. But, since it mixes your coins with those of other people, who is going to pay whom? Don't you all have to pay to some entity that arranges the match?

https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket

> There is no Ligtning Network on the horizon, and I see no reason to hope that there will be.

Indications to the contrary: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5hvjua/whats_going_on_with_lightning_network/db3dg3a/

> And, again, you would be receiving fees for the service of relaying payments, not for holding the bitcoins. Just as the miners get paid for confirming transactions.

As I understand it, you make fees for creating liquidity which requires bitcoin the asset.

> The bitcoin currency is an extremely abstract entity, that cannot even be exhibited on a screen.

Huh? Are you just using this conversation as a propaganda FUD tool?

When I look at my online bank balance it shows "$xx,xxx", same for by bitcoin wallet. That's not abstract.

> The bitcoin currency was created by Satoshi only because he could not design a trustless network to transmit dollars or euros.

This is pure bullshit. "Chancellor on the brink of bailouts...." He sought to create an uncontrolled asset.

> You missed the point completely. Investing in stocks and holding them is NOT AT ALL like investing in bitcoins and holding them. If you don't see the difference, it is no wonder that you can't see why buying bitcoin is not investment,but gambling.

You laid out 2 scenarios, in both you lose all your money. If your point is that hoarding is different than investing in stocks then yes there is a difference, but bitcoin is different from stocks in many ways, and similar too. You also say "The utility is in the currency flow -- the payment system -- not the currency itself" to which I say, the markets say differently. You also have failed to account for capital flight which is not a "payment flow" but an acquire, move and perhaps sell which requires the asset, not just some asset. Again you are trying to separate the payment network from the asset which you cannot do.

> estimated to cost hundreds of millions of dollars per year in ransom, and cause many times that amount of losses to businesses and individuals.

This may be true, but freedom comes with a cost. If this is the price for truly free trade, its'a bargain. Seems like the upside is people will start to practice better security and backup polcies.

> Most uses are legitimate and beneficial to society, so that their balance is massively positive.

> There is not much data, but

... insert subjective statement to suit your preconceived notion. Let's chalk this up to political differences. You worship the state and central control and planning, I don't.


> Why would they choose one that is a lot less stable than those, and which may lose all its value tomorrow?

Now fallacy yet again, and they might choose it for capital flight as carrying large amounts of cash is much more precarious.

> The markets said that Madoff's ponzi was one of the best and more secure investments around. For 30 years.

The markets or just a private group of investors that didn't do any due diligence? Gold -> thousands of years.


> But what has actually improved for the users since 2009?

This is a dumb metric. The thing just works and the one major issue is scale which is actively being worked on from here:

Segwit, which includes linear scaling of sighash operations, malleability fixes, reducing the amount of data required by the signature generator and a large 110% onchain capacity increase

Libsecp256k1, which improved signature validation speeds by c7x

A mempool limiting option mode for nodes

Blocks only mode for nodes

Reducing upload traffic

Compact blocks

Opt in RBF - helping the sender increase the priority of transactions

CPFP - helping the receiver increase the priority of transactions

Continued work on the development of LN and payment channel technology

Headers first

Pruned mode

etc.

> bitcoin user experience today is A LOT worse than it was 2 years ago

Funny, in hundreds of transactions I've only ever experienced a single 2 block delay. I'm betting there is a lot less spam though taking up your precious 96GB.

> Suuure. So small that it can fit in the feature phone of any peasant in Burkina Faso. Even Luke Dash Jr can almost keep up with it, almost.

You apparently missed the part about the pruning nodes. Why would a peasant need the entire chain? Oh that's right, this is just about spreading FUD.

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0%3Fpsc%3D1%26SubscriptionId%3DAKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q%26tag%3Dduckduckgo-d-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB0143IISD0

> The blockchain design cannot handle that "required" growth

That's where layer 2 comes in.

> the block size would at least let the system function as it was designed

It was designed to be decentralized. IMO Core's wise to see the threat of evolving bitcoin to Paypal 2.0/Fiatcoin.

> A nomenclature note

I call you butters. Better names might be wall flowers, state worshipers, disruption deniers, shills, bitcoin enviers...

> If what we write (here or in your churches) can divide your community,

I didn't say you "can", but you do "try".

> That is how we got the "Fork of July", SegWit, RBF, CPFP -- and the "fee market" deployed before any "layer 2" network was even vaguely designed.

As I understood it, SegWit, RBF are prereqs and it seems the LN plan is pretty well laid out. Gavin didn't seem competent to me (as a professional software developer myself). He always seemed flippant and indecisive. You didn't respond on the 20MB block idea of his among other things. I try to respond point for point.

> 1) fuck the non-mining relay nodes,

So fuck decentralization then?

What I'm seeing here is that you take every possible negative position on bitcoin. You have nothing positive to say about it despite it at the very least solving a number of interesting and never before solved problems, decentralized trust, permissionless transactions and innovation, brilliant security incentivization. There are undeniable positives like the ability to back up your assets (can't do that with any other asset), send transactions without exposing the keys (as with credit cards) yet you are dismissive based on your other one-sided opinions and forgone conclusions. The market is wrong, everyone who uses it is an idiot, even if it succeeds for decades it will be a failure. That's quite a position.

Maybe it's just that like Professor Bitcorn you stuck your neck out too far too soon and now, rather than eat some crow, be a big man and admit you probably spoke too soon, you are too stubborn and prefer instead to continue to fight and deny and worst of all, to influence those that might have otherwise been early adopters. I'm seeing a lot of reports along those lines here: https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5lkw6q/bitcoin_jumps_above_1000_for_first_time_in_three/?st=IXGBU8NB&sh=e3e1f5f5

It think it might be time for some reflection. Even skepticism is better in moderation.

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-microSDXC-Standard-Packaging-SDSQUNC-128G-GN6MA/dp/B010Q57S62/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484093516&sr=8-1&keywords=128+gb+micro+sd

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Memory-Standard-Packaging-SDSDUNC-128G-GN6IN/dp/B0143IISD0/ref=sr_1_10?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1484093594&sr=1-10&keywords=128+gb+sd+card&refinements=p_n_feature_two_browse-bin%3A13203834011

First two companies THAT I ACTUALLY KNOW ARE REPUTABLE for sd cards at the lowest price i can find. Both 40 bucks. Both dont sound bad at all to me. I guess it depends if you like digital or not.