Reddit reviews Sea Harrier over the Falklands (Cassell Military Paperbacks)
We found 7 Reddit comments about Sea Harrier over the Falklands (Cassell Military Paperbacks). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
NewMint ConditionDispatch same day for order received before 12 noonGuaranteed packagingNo quibbles returns
Yes. That is: I recall there were two - fundamentally different - schools of thought within the RN/FAA's SHAR-units as of 1982.
For related discussions, see Ward's Sea Harrier over the Falklands.
Curiously, Morgan didn't even try to discuss this issue in his Hostile Skies.
Ok. Interesting. Here's the memoir I read - by Sharkey Ward. There's a passage in it where low on fuel he has to make the snap decision to fire cannons at an argentinian hercules flying a mission back to Argentina.
https://www.amazon.com/Harrier-Falklands-Cassell-Military-Paperbacks/dp/0304355429
He blew the wing off, sending it down. Then 20 years later he gave an extraordinary interview with the son of the hercules pilot, very emotional -
https://perros.metro951.com/2011/04/27/malvinas-para-siempre/
There are so many things wrong in this I don't know where to start. Your knowledge of specifics is dreadful.
> we handed over enough intelligence for the Brits to sink the ARA General Belgrano, killing 323 sailors. Thankfully they did that as a WWII light cruiser would be devastating...to a pack of kittens in a life raft.
It was armed with the same Exocets that sank HMS Glamorgan and outgunned the British fleet. It was hardly benign.
> including failing to press the advantage they had with anti-ship missiles
They used all the air launched ones they had, and made valiant efforts to convert the ship based ones to fire from land, holing HMS Glamorgan in the process. What do you mean?
> it is hard to sink a ship when you don't attach fuses to the damn explosives
They had fuses; they were fused incorrectly.
> Not only did the Brits lose a destroyer to a Navy that could not fuse an explosive
The British lost 7 ships, including 2 destroyers.
> routinely couldn't use their harrier jets for day missions as the Brits balked at the cost of replacing them should they get shot down, and couldn't use them at night
That's simply incorrect. The Sea Harrier was used for night missions throughout the war. See Sea Harrier Over the Falklands by Sharkey Ward.
> Brits handed off Victoria Crosses like they had just rebuilt the Empire to its heyday
Only 2 were awarded.
> Thatcher got to show the boys that a woman can waste humans lives to distract from pressing issues on the home front as good as the boys
She didn't start the war.
> There is a lesson somewhere in all this.
Do your research.
Also: Sea Harrier Over The Falklands, by Sharkey Ward...
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sea-Harrier-Over-Falklands-PAPERBACKS/dp/0304355429
Sea Harrier over the Falklands, by Sharkey Ward. Not just for the GR.3 and FRS.1 performance in the conflict itself, but for the evaluations in the late 70s / early 80s in which Harriers got the better of USAF F-15s among other types.
Also for those interested, this is his book about his experiences operating the Harrier FRS1 in the Falklands conflict.
It's a fantastic book if you're interested in the Harrier or want to know a lot about it.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sea-Harrier-Over-Falklands-PAPERBACKS/dp/0304355429
That's also good if you want to read a pilots account of flying one in combat.