Reddit Reddit reviews Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera with E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Power Zoom Lens (Black)

We found 14 Reddit comments about Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera with E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Power Zoom Lens (Black). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Digital Cameras
Electronics
Camera & Photo
Mirrorless Cameras
Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera with E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Power Zoom Lens (Black)
FASTER AUTOFOCUS: Shoot up to 11fps with 425 phase detection auto focus points and 0.05 sec AF speedINCREDIBLE PHOTOGRAPHY: Advanced 24.2 MP Exmore CMOS sensor expands sensitivity and minimizes noiseELECTRONIC VIEWFINDER: Cameras feature a high resolution XGA OLED Tru-Finder for enhanced viewing4K & HD RECORDING: Record professional content with multiple movie functions and full pixel readoutLENS INCLUDED: Sony E-Mount 16-50 mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS retractable zoom lens shoots in stunning detailApprox. 350 shots (viewfinder) / Approx. 400 shots (LCD screen) (CIPA standard)
Check price on Amazon

14 Reddit comments about Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera with E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Power Zoom Lens (Black):

u/provideocreator · 5 pointsr/videography

I would go with the mirrorless camera like the Sony A6300 over a camcorder. Camcorders are usually great for video, but the problem is the small sensors mean they aren't good for low light conditions. Sony mirrorless cameras have improved low light performance, and that one shoots 4K30 video.

u/HybridCamRev · 4 pointsr/videography

/u/ChargeFactor4 - Magic Lantern RAW can give you great results, but the workflow is a hassle, it is still resolution will be less than 1080p - and it doesn't fix the T4i/T5i's lack of a video viewfinder, 30 fps maximum frame rate at 1080p and slow video autofocus.

My vote would be for a [$1498CAD Sony A6300 with the 16-50mm kit lens] (http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B007GK50X4/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=15121&creative=390961&creativeASIN=B007GK50X4&linkCode=as2&tag=hybrcamerevo-20) for 4K resolution, s-LOG, slow motion and lightning fast video autofocus.

The biggest downside to this camera is the slow sensor scan and susceptibility to rolling shutter - if you can manage your camera motion, this is a great camera.

Hope this is helpful and good luck with your decision!

u/Talonicx · 3 pointsr/DSLR

Here's some options that I like, if you don't mind buying used you'll have more room to buy more lenses and any other gear you'll like, but these are all new and all kits which includes the body and a lens. 

If you want to stick with Nikon the D5600 is an amazing camera, the image quality and usability are awesome. 

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VW3KC9X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_M-GNDb4BPTVEJ

If your willing to spend a little more the D7100 is a great camera I can only find the body and not a kit but you could just get a lens separately.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/927106-GREY

You could also buy a Used D600 for around $600-$650 with a low shutter count if you are interested in full frame, then spend the rest on a lens.

For Canon If your on a budget I'd recommend something like the rebel 7ti 

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07P15K8Q7/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_IgHNDb2YN44GR

If you're willing to spend more the 77D is a great option, the first link the the 77D with a 18-55 and the second is a 18-55mm + 55-250mm

 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07KVS93ZF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_KhHNDbV4SY44F
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06Y1YVWLH/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_vFHNDbWGFF6GX

As for mirrorless I recommend these cameras.

Canon EOS M50

 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07TWB61Z2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_kxHNDb2NM14RY

Sony a6300

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_xAHNDbN04X71G

Fujifilm X-T20 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01NCVN74T/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_pCHNDb74CQ8X6

u/bigboiahoy · 3 pointsr/DSLR

I have the Canon 80d and like it. It’s a good well rounder and my only complaint is the low light performance (however the lens could have something to do with this). However I will mention this is $1000. An option I see often (never have used myself) and is cheaper ($500-$900) is the Sony A6000 or the Sony A6300 (or a newer model). These are mirrorless and when you look at the viewfinder and make changes, that is what the image will look like. The A6300 might be more future proof with its 4K video if video is of interest. These would be good photo options from what I can tell (but again take that with a grain of salt since I’ve only used the 80d). If you are interested in more video vs photography another cheaper option would be the Panasonic G7 and is 4K. I cannot speak for Nikon, but they seem like good budget cameras, but may be lacking video wise. But overall the glass will make more of a difference than the camera! Any of these options would be a step up from your smartphone!

Camera links (Amazon)
Sony Alpha a6000
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_7eQkDbQD2A5PY

Sony Alpha a6300
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_5gQkDbYD1ET6T

Panasonic G7
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_aiQkDbKSNBTTR

Canon 77D (80D alternative)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06VSTCWJ9/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_4kQkDbJGAEWNA

Canon 80D
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_ZjQkDbTAJB668

u/InvisibleJiuJitsu · 2 pointsr/videography

http://amzn.to/2BhNuUp under $500 dollar option, and does 4K.


it's big brother http://amzn.to/2A2QNk4 offers better 4K and has stabilisation in body, so great for hand held shots.

next you have the sonys http://amzn.to/2jVDlZj bigger sensor, so a bit more potential to blur the background, but stabilisation not as good and more rolling shutter and overheating issues.


u/Cum_Omlette · 2 pointsr/graphic_design

Just recently started getting into photography because of how influential it is in design (so please take what I say as a grain of salt). To start things off, photography in general is more equipment heavy than graphic design I will say. A lot of people will argue that you can replicate any photo style on any camera, but I typically disagree with this.

With that being said, price points can also be a be a bit subjective and relate with your experience level. A professional might consider a $1,500 lens to be cheap, while newcomers might find spending $1,000+ on a full kit to be expensive.

I might be a bit biased as it was the first camera I've ever bought, but I personally love Sony cameras! While Cannon, Nikon and Pentax have made names for themselves, Sony is quickly catching up with their market. In general, Sony's line of cameras are extremely universal, with their e-mount lenses the possibilities are endless. They've even provided lens adapters for many of the top camera companies, if you ever wanted to buy additional lenses.

My first camera was a Sony A6000, and I highly recommend it as a beginner level camera! They have a more updated Sony A6300, but it's entirely up to you and what you plan on using it for.

u/That_random_redditer · 2 pointsr/photography

Hi all,

I've been shooting on my nikon D3200 for almost 4 years now, and I think I'm ready for an upgrade.

My uses are typically landscapes and various nature shots including some macro stuff, in addition to some video here and there, as well as some astrophotography.

Unfortunately my budget is still very low. I can't really afford full frame anything, so I'm staying away from that for now.

My question is, what is a logical step from here?

Is it worth it to upgrade? Should I just hold out with my d3200 until I can upgrade to a full frame from Nikon or Canon?

The cameras I've been looking at are all mirrorless, I've been looking at offerings from Sony and Fujifilm

Namely the Sony a6300 and the Fuji X-T20

I hoping any of you could point me in the right direction

Thank You!

TL;DR Looking for a mirrorless replacement for my Nikon D3200 any help is appreciated

u/kabbage123 · 1 pointr/videography

If lowlight performance is your priority, you are not going to get it with a M43 camera in that price range. You shouldn't compromise on items such as speedboosters, lenses, etc.

I'd just buy this Sony camera instead to get you started.

u/jam6618 · 1 pointr/videography

some say the sony a7sii "makes light", rather it is just great at low light capture and has amazingly clean images/video at a high iso. That combined with a lens with a wide aperture and you get great performance. I would recommend you get a sony a7s mk1 or mk2 or a sony a6300 or a6500, depending on your budgets as all have fairly good low-light performance with the a7sii being the best of them. As for a lens, you could go for an adapter to use your canon lenses but if you do not have a canon lens with a nice wide aperture like f/1.8 or better, it would be good to pick up a lens like that. If you choose to move entirely to sony as so many people have recently, you will want a good all around lens too. Let me know if you need more help!

u/video_descriptionbot · 1 pointr/chuck

SECTION | CONTENT
:--|:--
Title | Chuck S02E03 HD | Bon Iver -- Skinny Love [Chuck's Speech To Sarah]
Description | Chuck: The Complete Collection Blu-ray http://amzn.to/2kudZwM Using my links helps me greatly and doesn’t cost you a penny more! Thanks Guys My camera and production gear if interested: Elgato Pro: http://amzn.to/2k1Alqa Webcam: http://amzn.to/2jnFWWb Mic: http://amzn.to/2kCA1l4 Headset: http://amzn.to/2kCllhB Fancy Camera: http://amzn.to/2kCyyqC Vlog Camera: http://amzn.to/2kCyJm8 If you’re into gaming consider check me out on twitch! https://www.twitch.tv/cassm0ney Bon Iver -- Skinny Lov...
Length | 0:03:46






****

^(I am a bot, this is an auto-generated reply | )^Info ^| ^Feedback ^| ^(Reply STOP to opt out permanently)

u/Rex_Lee · 1 pointr/videography

Well it is selling for $848 on amazon right now, brand new WITH a kit lens...so I am thinking you are not going to get $900 for it.

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Camera-Interchangeable-Digital/dp/B007GK50X4

I guess it depends on where you live, but they are going for $500-$600 on facebook marketplace around me on the low end.

u/PhotoVideoSamplesEtc · 1 pointr/videography

It's $1,148 at both Amazon and B&H for the package that includes the 16-50mm lens. Amazon has it in stock. Perhaps sell the lens if you don't want it or want to save money rather then continue waiting until the body only package is in stock.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1222773-REG/sony_soa6300bk_alpha_a6300_mirrorless_digital.html

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1459114027&sr=1-1&keywords=a6300

You were probably looking at the price of just the body from a third party seller. That wasn't directly from Amazon.

u/Elk_Whisperer · 1 pointr/videography

hohoho, nice

I'm probably going to get it then.

One more question

Would the filters on this: https://www.amazon.com/EOS-70D-Essentials-Replacement-Accessory/dp/B00GXKV2NU/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1473284821&sr=1-1-spons&keywords=canon%2B70d

Go on this?

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B007GK50X4

Or would I need something else? I don't actually know if these filters are universal for cameras or if each camera has specific filters, or if this camera uses filters at all (I don't know if lens and filters do the same thing)