Reddit Reddit reviews Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS

We found 18 Reddit comments about Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Digital Camera Lenses
Electronics
Camcorder & Camera Lenses
Camera & Photo
Camera Lenses
Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS
High performance E mount lens with excellent contrast; Minimum Aperture (F): 22Minimum Focus Distance : 1.48 (Wide) 3.12 ft (Tele), Maximum Magnification ratio : 0.11x, Focal Length : 18 105 mmConstant F4 maximum aperture throughout the zoom range. Filter diameter (mm):72 mmVersatile 27 158mm (35mm equiv.) zoom range. Angle of view (APS C): 76° 15°. Number of aperture blades are 7It is recommended that you use a lens hood to reduce flare and ensure maximum image quality.Focal Length (mm) 11/16 4 1/8 35 mm equivalent focal length (APS C) 1 1/16 6 3/16 inches
Check price on Amazon

18 Reddit comments about Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS:

u/kombuchadero · 5 pointsr/a6000

If you're just starting out, learning to "zoom with your feet" while using a prime is some of the best advice I can give. You'll be a better photographer for it. You'll also appreciate the wide f1.8 aperture for low light.

I can't speak to the quality of the 55-210mm, but I've never been a big fan of the cheap telezooms with variable max apertures (f6.3 in this case when zoomed in at 210mm is disgusting). I can appreciate that it would be important if you want to get kid action shots, though. Just know that you'll need really bright conditions to be able to use a fast shutter speed at a reasonable ISO while zoomed all the way in.

Would also recommend comparing the Sony 35mm/1.8 to the Sigma 30mm/1.4 before you buy. I just got the Sigma a few weeks ago and have been floored by the sharpness. It's about $60 cheaper, too.

If I were in your situation, I'd go for your second option (16-50mm kit + a prime). I have the 16-50mm and very rarely reach for it, but understand that it's nice when you start out to have a range of focal lengths to play with.

Alternatively, just get the a6000 body only + a prime, and once you get a feel for what you type of shooting you do most, rent a wide prime or a better quality telephoto to help decide what to buy next. I wish someone had told me not to waste money on the low-end kit lenses early on. If you get serious about photography, these will just clutter your bag, and camera shops will only quote you insulting offers when you try to sell them.

u/jello3d · 3 pointsr/SonyAlpha

If you can only have one lens at a reasonable price, I'd recommend the 18-105 f4 G http://amzn.to/2i8AJUN Much more versatile for the money, constant aperture, etc. Having a minimum of 28mm would very limiting on a crop body like the a6300. Most filmmaking (especially dialog scenes and such) happens around 30-35mm (20-24mm on the a6300)... I wouldn't want to lose that range.

PS... if you're doing filmmaking or other well-controlled videography, consider manual/vintage lenses and adapters. If you play your cards right, you can get really exceptional quality video for peanuts.

u/AsleepConstruction · 3 pointsr/Cameras

Sony A6000 + the 18-105 F4 for general photography, this should be a good start and will get her a quality lens that will get her plenty of reach. This should be right around $1100ish

down the road she can add these options:

add the 35 f1.8 for great portrait photos with better background separation. Alternatively you can start her with this lens first, being smaller and lighter means she will be more likely carry it around with her.

add the 16 2.8 for hiking thanks to the compact size and theme parks, or just anywhere she needs it in a more compact size.

more size comparisons

u/ETacoisbest · 3 pointsr/SonyAlpha

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-18-135mm-F3-5-5-6-APS-C-mount/dp/B078T2184C/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=sony+18-135&qid=1564230441&s=gateway&sr=8-3

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-SELP18105G-PZ-18-105mm-OSS/dp/B00ENZRQH8/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=sony+18-105&qid=1564230464&s=gateway&sr=8-3

These two lenses. They are out of your budget by a bit.

If $700 is a hard cap, I'd go with the A6000 with the kit 16-50 only and then spend $300 on a Sigma f/1.4 30 mm or Sony f/1.8 50mm when you get an extra $100 available in your budget. I think you'd benefit with a prime as a secondary lens over the 55-210 for your applications.

u/Aerial812 · 3 pointsr/SonyAlpha

You can follow the photographer on Flickr, linked here to learn more about how he shoots and pay attention to the camera data to see what aperture and focal length he uses for each image.

For the first photo, linked here, you will see that he shot this photo at f/11.0 and 57mm. The wide aperture (f11) will keep both the foreground and background in focus. Zooming in (57mm) will compress the foreground and background, which is what makes the hills and mountains in the background more prevalent in his photo.

His photo also appears to have been taken at a low angle, probably on a knee, which will make the truck appear larger and more impressive. Finally, the composition will play a big part in the final image. Pay attention to how the photos that you like are framed, where the photographer was likely standing, and how the image was composed. This matters more than the equipment.

I would also note that he is shooting with a Canon 60D and a 18-135 f/3.5-5.6, which compares similar to your lens, other than giving him more range to zoom in. With the a5000 and your lens zoomed all the way in, you already have the equipment to get this same quality of image. I would just keep your setup and keep practicing and honing your skills before you worry too much about equipment upgrades.

If you are dead set on getting a new lens, I am very happy with the SELP18105G as an all around lens, especially for video use.

u/jam6618 · 2 pointsr/videography

If you want to keep the camcorder style, the DVX200s sound great. If you want to switch things up a bit, you could get 2 Sony A7sii and a few lenses 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

u/HybridCamRev · 2 pointsr/videography

Depends on your budget, but here are a couple of examples of the A6500 with the [$329.99 Sigma 30mm f/1.4] (https://www.amazon.com/Sigma-30mm-F1-4-Contemporary-Lens/dp/B01C3SCKI6//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) on the water:

u/TabascoWolverine · 2 pointsr/a6500

Thank you so much for responding.

​

It was this Sony lens: https://www.amazon.com/Sony-SELP18105G-PZ-18-105mm-OSS/dp/B00ENZRQH8 , which I do my best to keep the firmware updated on, same with the a6500 body. Hence the frustration here. Especially at 4Fstop and ideal filming conditions all-around. In hindsight I should have pushed for more time to get manual-focus ready in that space.

​

I don't mind some sacrifices on quality but the pulsing seems like a very fixable issue. I must be doing something wrong. I need to explore this subreddit further too as it relates to Sony's focusing options.

​

Interestingly, I totally agree with you on the Sigma 30mm art lens being junk with the a6500...at least with video. It's utterly useless on a gimbal because it seems a half second short on communication with the body. Never will go non-Sony again.

u/Adon889 · 1 pointr/SonyAlpha

Yeah not sure, here is the price history on Amazon.

u/Mr_Quagmire · 1 pointr/SonyAlpha

I'm in the same situation and unfortunately there aren't a ton of options, especially if your budget is $400. I think the only thing that fits your budget would be the SEL1855 18-55mm kit zoom. Brand new it's $300 but you can get a gray market / white box for a little over $100 on ebay.

Otherwise, you're looking at $600 for the Tamron or $750 for the Sony 18-200mm or $600 for the Sony 18-105mm.

u/Kendricklucmar · 1 pointr/photography

It all depends on how close you can get to the action. There aren't many great telephoto lens for the E-Mount system so you'll have to look at third party lenses. Since the a6000 is APS-C, you can take good photos with this 50mm f/1.8 if they're close enough but you definitely won't be able to get tight shots unless they're literally right in front of you. You could definitely use this 15-105 f/4 if the field is lit well, but you'd have to bump your ISO up a bit. But sports at f/4 with a APS-C sensor is definitely pushing it.

u/Mr_Romo · 1 pointr/Cameras

Sony. get the A6500 and a sony lens. Maybe the 18-105 F4 if you really want that focal length coverage. That lens isint going to be great for low light but the 6500 is a low light beast. If you really need that fast glass you could go with the sony 35mm f1.8. In my opinion Sony is where its at right now, super portable and blowing anything in its price range out of the water!

u/Pittshadowrunner · 1 pointr/SonyAlpha

Landscape and portraiture are completely different with respect to lens needs. Here's some thoughts, but get ready to open your wallet.

Landscapes will be the Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0783J5BWP/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_XKeHDbA4H058S

Portraiture would be good with with the 50mm F1. 8 OSS Sony https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00EPWC30O/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_6MeHDbSH3FX9K

You'll be served well with the excellent Sony 24-105 G PZ OSS if you want a single travel companion. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ENZRQH8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_bIeHDbD47B6XM