Reddit reviews Statistical Data Analysis (Oxford Science Publications)
We found 3 Reddit comments about Statistical Data Analysis (Oxford Science Publications). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
>You have a very close-minded view of what evidence is.
No, if you think that, you don't understand what I'm saying. Or you don't understand what constitutes evidence in experimental physics. Or both.
>Also, if you are so adamant on defending your view of what qualities a scientist should possess, perhaps you should take a note from your own book and provide some citation, sources and evidence to back up your claims or, at the very least, lessen the credibility of the claims you are trying to challenge?
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2014/reviews/rpp2014-rev-statistics.pdf
https://www.amazon.com/Statistical-Analysis-Oxford-Science-Publications/dp/0198501552
This is how physicists do data analysis. Feel free to read them and educate yourself.
>Rather than just outright dismissing it as a "joke".
Criticisms have been given time and time again.
Cowan.
What kind of beginning are you looking for? With your math background, if you want to look at the statistical interpretation side I can recommend Glen Cowan's book on statistical data analysis. It's very readable and is written with particle physics examples. I use it myself!
https://www.amazon.com/Statistical-Analysis-Oxford-Science-Publications/dp/0198501552