Reddit Reddit reviews Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

We found 15 Reddit comments about Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Electronics
Camcorder & Camera Lenses
Camera & Photo
Camera Lenses
Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Warning: This lens is not compatible with the Nikon 1 FT1 adapter and the firmware 1.1!High resolution thru use of XLD glassNew USD (Ultra Silent Drive) motor for fast and quiet AFVC anti-shake mechanism for steady shootingDual format Di design for use on fullframe and smaller sensor cameras
Check price on Amazon

15 Reddit comments about Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras:

u/EnnGeeOhh · 5 pointsr/photography

Well, neither of those have VR, so you'll be looking at Tamron

I don't know if Sigma has a version with VR, but personally I have the Tamron and it has great build quality and is amazingly sharp.

u/jimbo7771 · 4 pointsr/photography

For Nikon, the 35mm af-s f/1.8 ($199) is pretty much considered essential. For other primes the 50mm af-s f/1.8 ($220) and the 85mm af-s f/1.8 ($500) are considered to be pretty darn good. If you want a zoom, the nikon ones are fine, but the tamron 70-300 vr is better. If you want an ultrawide, the tokina 11-16mm is good, yet expensive

Unless portability is a huge concern, stay away from superzooms (like 18-200mm lenses)

Af-d lenses are cheaper, louder (no ultrasonic motor focusing), older (duh), and smaller. They usually lack vr.

To start, i would personally suggest a d5100, 18-55mm, and a 35mm f/1.8

u/randye · 3 pointsr/photography

Why not try this? Best of both worlds and on a crop its a 105-450. Tamron has great VC and you can always return. For the price you can add a good teleconverter. Just like Sigma you could get a dog so don't be satisfied of you don't think it's good enough.

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-Cameras/dp/B003YH9DZE/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1341588126&sr=8-7&keywords=nikon+70-300

u/Srirachafarian · 3 pointsr/photography

With your $350 budget, you could get a used Tamron or Sigma 70-300. Be careful, they both have good versions and cheap versions. This is the good version--the bad version will cost under $200 new. That would be a good one to replace the 80-400. It will be a little dark for stage photography, so you'll likely have to play with the ISO to get usable shots.

Alternatively, you can go with a 35mm or 50mm f/1.8 lens. I'm not sure what kind of stage photography you'll be doing, or where you'll be doing it from. Either of those will be very fast and bright, but probably won't get the whole stage into one frame unless you're physically pretty far away. If you're trying to get close-ups of specific actors from fairly close in, the 50mm would be a good one.

u/briguy19 · 3 pointsr/photography

Check out the Sigma or Tamron 70-300. There are two versions, one with stabilization and one without. The version without is really cheap and bad. I got my Tamron used for $250, although I'm not seeing them that cheap now.

Here are a couple of shots I got at an outdoor concert with that lens.

u/UneducatedCephalopod · 2 pointsr/Cameras

The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 VC is great and you can get it used at the high end of your price range (e.g., US version, grey market version).

u/jrshaul · 2 pointsr/Nikon

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-Cameras/dp/B003YH9DZE

Comparable to Nikon, about $100 cheaper after rebate. I might take a grey market Nikon 70-300VR if it were $300, though.

u/eronic · 2 pointsr/photography

Here it is. One of those two is on my list of lenses to get for my D5100, but I'm a broke high schooler so it might be a while.

u/MinkOWar · 1 pointr/photography

I believe this is the latest one

And I agree, this is the Tamron 70-300 worth buying. Used price should be 300-350.

u/Walmartianus · 1 pointr/Nikon

There's some used - like new on Amazon right now under $300.

u/idreamapple · 1 pointr/photography

Thanks a lot! I did a little research on my own and also saw this Tamaron 70-300 lens. Is it any good/almost as good?
>http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B003YH9DZE/ref=mp_s_a_1_sc_1?qid=1421463737&sr=8-1-spell&pi=AC_SX110_SY165_QL70

u/britchesss · 1 pointr/Nikon

Would this be a good choice?

u/Yycdani · 1 pointr/photography

I want to get a new telephoto lens, I currently have a ancient Nikon 70-300 without image stabilization and it's crap, and I am looking at the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD or the Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR

Should I bother with either of these? I don't want to spend that much money on another disappointing lens, but a really good telephoto is way out of my budget at the moment. I couldn't spend more than around $800 CAD (so like $3.50 USD - jokes, more like 500-600USD) and alternatively I just wait and save and take photos with other lenses and of other things. I'm a hobbyist.

u/UndeadCaesar · 1 pointr/photography

Best lens for the money? Or some other AF telephoto completely?

Tamron 70-300mm

Nikon 55-300mm

Leaning towards the Nikon as I've heard better things, but I have the Tamron 28-75 and absolutely love it so there's that as well.