Reddit Reddit reviews Tamron Auto Focus 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens with Built In Motor for Nikon Digital SLR (Model A17NII)

We found 26 Reddit comments about Tamron Auto Focus 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens with Built In Motor for Nikon Digital SLR (Model A17NII). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Digital Camera Lenses
Electronics
Camcorder & Camera Lenses
Camera & Photo
Camera Lenses
Tamron Auto Focus 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens with Built In Motor for Nikon Digital SLR (Model A17NII)
The popular Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6 Di LD Macro features a built in motor to ensure fast accurate focusingClose-focusing ability - 0.95m (3.1 feet ), focal lengths between 180 and 300mm. Compatible with the d40, d40x and d60 in the mf mode due to the fact it does not have a built in motorThis telephoto zoom will crop in tight or bring distant subjects in close. Angle of view: 34-8There is also an incredible macro mode for photographing small objects up close giving a magnification ratio of 1:2This phenomenal lens comes with a 6 year warranty. Lens hood included for maximum glare protection and increased contrast
Check price on Amazon

26 Reddit comments about Tamron Auto Focus 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens with Built In Motor for Nikon Digital SLR (Model A17NII):

u/iwantatoyota4runner · 3 pointsr/photography

also looking at the Tamron 70-300 but i don't believe it has VR - however the price is right!

https://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17E/dp/B0012UUP02?th=1

and of course there's the Sigma 70-300 too:

https://www.amazon.com/Sigma-70-300mm-4-5-6-Telephoto-Cameras/dp/B0012X61U2?th=1

u/OSUTechie · 3 pointsr/Nikon

I am looking for a decent lens for "sports" shots. Current body is d5300. I have the following lens.

  • AF-S Nikkor 55-200mm 1:4-5.6G ED
  • AF-S Nikkor 18-55mm 1:35-5.6G
  • AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1:1.8G

    I know the prime I have is pretty fast, but since most of the shots I am going to taking will be from a ways back, on the side of a pool deck, etc. I am thinking of a telephoto lens, just not sure if my 55-200mm can handle it. Any suggestions on some entry/amateur ones? Most of the places I'll be taking pictures of will be inside, with not the best light, and chances are not the best for flash.

    Would something like this Tamron 70-300mm be decent? (Also seems pretty cheep compare to some of the other lens I have looked at)

    Budget is less than $500 currently.

    EDIT: Going back and looking, I think the 55-200 is fast enough, just need a longer reach for some of them. At least when outside. See examples from this past summer.

  • One
  • Two
  • Three
  • Four


u/unknown_name · 2 pointsr/pics

The lens is where it's at though. Cool thing is...the lens was very affordable.

u/yial · 2 pointsr/photography

This isn't a great lens, nor is it anything amazing but I own a canon version of it and it is a decent zoom.

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17NII/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1374621730&sr=8-1&keywords=tamron+70-300+macro+nikon

at 135 used, it's not going to give you any award winning shots, but I found it fun to play around with.

u/XeroxSinner · 2 pointsr/beermoney

Saving up for a macro lens for my camera.

Also looking at a cheap starter kit for silk screen. I've got a crafts project in mind that could use a little enhancing.

The problem is I buy books for my Kindle and Amazon take it out of gift card totals first. ^_^ Since I'm paranoid about my SB account being closed, I add my gift cards as soon as I get 'em. On the plus side, I've been earning more in gift cards then I usually spend on books. Still waiting for my $25 card to clear, but I ordered it on 3/27, so if they're going to do it, it should be soon. =D

(Maxed out on $5 cards for March, got enough for a $25 card, have enough now for two more $5 cards but waiting for the big one to clear then I'll redeem.)

u/truckerslife · 2 pointsr/Cameras

I have a tamron 70-300 that has a macro function. Costs around 100 and it works well enough that after seeing how well it functioned my sister bought one the next day.

Tamron Auto Focus 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens with Built In Motor for Nikon Digital SLR (Model A17NII) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_nenvCbFN2HFTH

u/briguy19 · 2 pointsr/photography

You might be able to get an older DSLR with a cheap superzoom for that budget. Something like this is actually not that bad/old of a camera. Pair it with a long but cheap zoom lens like this. But remember that with lenses especially, you get what you pay for. That's not considered a very good lens, but that setup will definitely get the job done. Also, it's not weather-sealed, so don't get it near the water.

u/bigpresh · 1 pointr/photography

For reference, I use the 18-55mm kit lens the D3100 came with, and also picked up the following lenses:

Tamron AF 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2 - I've found this to be a pretty damn reasonable telephoto & macro lens for the price. A couple of photos taken with it, for reference: wet flower (macro), WizzAir jet landing (full zoom), pigeon eating bread (full zoom).

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G - lovely fast prime - I couldn't really justify the extra cash to go for the 1.4 version, but this one has worked very well for me so far. 35mm on a crop sensor like the D3100/D3200 ends up about the same as a 50mm on a full-frame camera. A couple of sample shots: custom motorcycle engine, York gate emblem, Wilmot-Breeden calormeter.

I also grabbed an ancient used Pentacon 50mm f/1.8 prime for £30, but as a lens without a focus motor, it can only be used in full manual. However, it can also produce some good images, e.g. bacon roll, lily flower, laptop keyboard. If you're willing to play around in full manual mode (and I'd recommend it, if you want to learn the most you can about photography), starting with something like that could make a lot of sense.

Hope this helps somewhat.

u/brunerww · 1 pointr/Filmmakers

You can use just about any lens you have in your closet with mirrorless cameras. That's not an exaggeration - several of my lenses are from old cameras I don't use anymore.

My micro 4/3 bodies are the GH1, GH2, GH3 and Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera, but my only native micro 4/3 lens is the 14-140mm that came with the GH2.

The rest of my lenses are classic glass I either had laying around or bought on eBay.

I mount these lenses with inexpensive adapters for [classic 4/3] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&icep_item=251309920054&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg), [Nikon] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002U4QP9O/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002U4QP9O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20), [Canon FD] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003EAVUMK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003EAVUMK&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20), and [Konica] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00899GDHS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00899GDHS&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-2) [Referral Links] (lenses and camera bodies pictured below):

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-gVr8wdjjVyU/UpnGGaj0IfI/AAAAAAAAIS0/dHBNsFcCxGs/w815-h543-no/S1030005.JPG

L-R, front row: [Olympus 11-22mm f2.8-3.5 for 4/3] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2FLenses-%2F3323%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_udlo%3D100%26_udhi%3D%26_nkw%3DOlympus%2B11-22mm%2Bf2.8-3.5%26_sop%3D15); [Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 for 4/3] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2FLenses-%2F3323%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_nkw%3DSigma%2B18-50mm%2Bf2.8%2BOlympus); [Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 for Nikon] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0012UUP02/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0012UUP02&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Links].

Back row: GH1 with [Nikkor 28-80mm f3.5-5.6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000OQM85A/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B000OQM85A&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20); BMPCC with [Konica AR 40mm f1.8] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_odkw%3DOlympus%252011-22mm%2520f2.8-3.5%26_udlo%26_sop%3D15%26_osacat%3D3323%26_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dp2045573.m570.l1313.TR2.TRC1.A0.H0.XKonica%2520AR%252040mm%2520f1.8%26_nkw%3DKonica%2520AR%252040mm%2520f1.8%26_sacat%3D3323%26_udhi); GH3 with [Panasonic 14-140mm f4-5.6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0028Y5GLO/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0028Y5GLO&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20); GH2 with [Canon FD 50mm f1.8] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004FK1NO8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004FK1NO8&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Links].

My closet lenses were "free" and my eBay lenses ranged from $50 to about $400 - all used. They all give different "looks", and I use different lenses for different projects.

You'll have to decide which lens is right for you, based on whether you want manual or auto lenses, what kind of look you want and what fits your budget.

Again, hope this is helpful!

Bill

u/ccurzio · 1 pointr/photography

> Thanks. Obviously I know nothing about cameras but your budget choice is around £800. What makes it better than this for example, which is a quarter of the price? https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_SCyMzbCGADDG3

For starters, that one has a much shorter focal length. 300mm is its maximum, whereas the one I posted goes up to 600mm. Here is a quick comparison of various focal lengths.

The lenses I recommended also have image stabilization, which is important at longer focal lengths. (IS is when the lens corrects for camera shake.) The Tamron you linked doesn't look like it has any kind of image stabilization.

u/Mrhoyo · 1 pointr/photography

Thanks. Obviously I know nothing about cameras but your budget choice is around £800. What makes it better than this for example, which is a quarter of the price? https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_SCyMzbCGADDG3

The photos posted on Amazon look pretty similar to me but again, I know nothing about cameras.

u/MrToastyToast · 1 pointr/photography

I am looking to buy cheap telephoto/macro lens. So far I am set on Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD

Also have seen the used Nikon AF-S 55-300 mm 1:4.5-5.6 popup. Would it be better than Tamron?

Is this a good choice? Any other alternatives?

u/Fergaliciousness · 1 pointr/photography

I have a d5200 and I was looking into lenses. Wondering what your opinions are on these?
https://www.amazon.ca/Sigma-70-300mm-4-5-6-Digital-Cameras/dp/B0012X43P2/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1492707485&sr=8-4&keywords=sigma+70

or

https://www.amazon.ca/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17NII/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1492707527&sr=8-3&keywords=nikon+lense+70

I've been shooting lots of landscape lately and for the price, these lenses seem to be good? Are there any other lenses you guys would recommend?

u/hme61047 · 1 pointr/photography

Hey guys,

​

There are some offers for the D3500, I'm looking for the best and I do need a 70-300.

  1. D3500 + AF-P DX 18–55 (350€) on Amazon UK.
  2. D3500 + Nikkor AF-P DX 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR + AF-P DX 70-300 mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR (550€) on fnac.com

    I've seen a 70-300 for 100€ on Amazon : https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=twister_B001RPM7M6?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

    What kit would you buy ? 350€ + 100€ or only the 550€ ?
u/ethanzh · 1 pointr/photography

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17NII/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1412856422&sr=8-9&keywords=camera+lens

Which kind of adapter will I need to be able to use this lens? For a macro lens, I don't think that no AF will be too much of a big deal, because if you're doing macro photography, you're using MF anyway, right? Or am I ill-informed? Thanks.

u/Danyn · 1 pointr/Nikon

Is it really necessary or would I be fine with the Tamron 18-200? The Sigma will cost me an extra $100 after conversion and import fees. Besides the extra 50mm, why is the Sigma better than the Tamron?

EDIT: Just reassessed my situation. I don't think I need something that's 18-2xx. I have a big camera bag and besides it being convenient, I can save more money by purchasing a 70-300. That way my kit lens won't be a waste and I can still use it if necessary.

I think I'll be deciding between these two.

1 and 2

u/I_Game_PC · 1 pointr/photography

I just got a Nikon D3500 with the 18-55mm kit lens. I am looking for another lens that I can do some zooming in with as well as take some macro shots. I found this lens on Amazon but do not really know if it is a good buy or not. Any recommendations? Trying not to break the bank.

u/effortDee · 1 pointr/WhichCamera

Nature photography, do you want to look at the small macro world or zoom in on larger animals?

Either way, a DSLR with a zoom lens (with macro option on it) will be where I would start.

Something where you can get an inexpensive 70-300mm lens like this https://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17NII/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1523837106&sr=8-3&keywords=70-300mm+macro

u/n0gtree · 1 pointr/Cameras

A DSLR at your budget is still an option as well - in fact, more so, if you want to look for telephoto (long range/large focal length) lenses. You can find really good deals on telephoto lenses in store, at amazon or at sites like craiglist - probably because these lenses don't have much use everyday, except maybe if you go to the zoo. For example, for your budget, you can pick up an entry-level DSLR, Canon 1200D - 2014 model - £250 new - includes 18-55mm kit lens (that's the focal length you will be using most of the time), and pair it with a Canon 55-250mm lens for £140. Also, bear in mind, a 55-250mm lens for a Canon really equates to 88mm-400mm in "35mm focal length". As all cameras see things differently, they have been standardised to its '35mm/full frame' equivalent. Now, off course, you can go for the Nikon equivalent, which would be the Nikon D3300 (widely acknowledged to be the best entry level DSLR), which goes for £320 with 18-55 kit lens. And pair it with one of many zoom lenses, such as this one from Tamron, 70-300mm, new for 80£. Also note that when looking at lenses for DSLRs, apart from looking at whether it's the correct mount, also check whether it has autofocus or not. You probably will want autofocus, especially if you haven't come from using manual focus before, and that you will be taking a lot of photos, not just one or two carefully composed pics!

Now, the reason why I didn't mention DSLRs previously is because they are pretty big! So keep that in mind. Also, the telephoto lens from Canon and Nikon are really cheap, even new. Quality wise, the're not 'wedding lenses' which are typically telephoto lenses with a really large aperture. But... they will be completely fine, and exceed, at taking pictures in normal lighting conditions. Given that both Canon and Nikon DSLRs have a large sensor, these budget telephoto lens will be able to take nice photos even in the evening. Also, you can switch out to the kit lenses which should be more than sufficient.

u/lungbong · 1 pointr/Nikon

I have the same camera and had the same questions and settled for one of these:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tamron-AF-70-300mm-4-5-6-Macro/dp/B0012UUP02

Really happy with it.

u/benveniste · 1 pointr/Nikon

I owned the Nikon 70-300mm f/4~5.6 ED until I bounced it off of a sidewalk after getting brushed by an in-line skater. Eventually I replaced it with a 70-300mm VR. The newer lens is better in almost every aspect.

All xx-300mm f/5.6 lenses I've seen share the same challenge. For best results, you want to stop down to at least f/8, and when using these lenses handheld wthout VR you want to keep the shutter speed at 1/500th or faster to minimize the effects of camera shake. Depending on the light and the dSLR, that can mean cranking up the ISO to where noise begins to intrude. The result is a small "shooting envelope" where one can get the best result. For stationary subjects, VR can extend that envelope considerably, but as filyr points out, it does nothing for subject motion.

If you're still interested in a non-stabilized 70-300mm, I'd recommend this Tamron over either of the ones you list:

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-70-300mm-4-0-5-6-Digital-A17NII/dp/B0012UUP02

u/Aytitude · 1 pointr/Nikon

Are you talking about the tamron with or without the stabilization ?

u/jonnyorozco · 1 pointr/photoclass2017

It's not a prime lens but this is what I use and I've really grown fond of it.

It's probably a little bit slow in the autofocus department for what you are looking for but it's a hell of a steal for what you get.