Reddit Reddit reviews The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)

We found 1 Reddit comments about The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Reference
Books
Words, Language & Grammar
Semantics
The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)
Check price on Amazon

1 Reddit comment about The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory):

u/Kevin_Scharp ยท 2 pointsr/askphilosophy

Yes, it can make one better, but it need not.

Here is an example. Right now, the semantics for the word 'ought' is a hot topic in metaethics. The reason is that lots of philosophical debates about what people ought to do are based on certain assumptions, and these assumptions are sometimes inconsistent with the semantics for 'ought'. Anyway, if you don't know any modal logic and so don't know any deontic logic (the logic of 'ought'), then you will have a hard time following the debate about the semantics for 'ought'. And so you will have a hard time figuring out whether you are making unrealistic assumptions about what people ought to do. See Matthew Chrisman's book The Meaning of 'Ought' for a great introduction and sophisticated treatment.

Of course, not every issue in philosophy is related to logic in such a way.