Reddit reviews The Mountain Men's Three Wolf Moon T-Shirt, Kale, S

Okay, I'll bite. I'm on board with your theoretical goal, and you clearly understand there's only one realistic way to achieve it, though you have dramatically underestimated the degree to which the same money that rules Congress also controls many state legislatures quite thoroughly. I think presenting yourself as a PAC is going to leave you dead at the starting line. Thanks, ironically, to Citizens United and the shitstorms that have ensued for years afterward, even most average Americans are acutely aware that PACs have proven themselves largely untrustworthy no matter the cause, and totally impossible to hold accountable either way. Saying you're the PAC to get rid of PACs will net you almost no support among either people who know what the fuck is going on or the people who see "PAC" and respond with boos and hissing. Those two categories cover a lot of the Americans you're trying to get on your side.

Plus your name makes me think of the weird guy from The Hangover, and when I mentally associate your organization with Three Wolf Moon, well... that's not good. Change your name and choose a new legal structure; I think you'll get MUCH further.

As a separate issue: your legislative language game is strong, and I'm relieved to see that. Had there been any glaring errors in your proposed resolution, I would have immediately dismissed you as having zero chance of success. That didn't happen, so that's good. There are still some minor mistakes in your presentation of the template (for example, your final paragraph mentions Connecticut), and I'd like to see those cleaned up immediately. Opponents and skeptics will jump on any small opportunity to discredit your viability- I know, because that's the sort of thing I would spot and attack.

Additionally, I strongly question your strategy of presenting this template without a resolution clause that specifically spells out that the intended purpose of calling a Convention is to propose amendments that would serve to guarantee free and fair elections as you have envisioned them. Your resolution currently gets 95% of the way there, but then leaves it up to hope and the assumption that surely delegates to the biggest political event in the past century will forgo their own desire for power and do nothing but act with a spirit of goodwill toward men... for the first time in about a century. I understand these state resolutions cannot require or mandate the amendments that would be proposed at a Convention, but, since surely additional amendments will be proposed, spelling out the initial intended purpose as being free and fair elections rather than leaving it up to chance seems to be prudent. Plus, if a few more states start to pass these resolutions and they get media attention, the text will be examined; don't leave it up to chance (again!) that the talking heads will correctly interpret your goal before trumpeting it to their assorted masses. Spell it out for them, literally.

Do you have a shirt to match the Zippo?