Reddit reviews tulpa complex (Japanese Edition)

　　I need to make a few points before I start:

　　I'm a Chinese user, and I use about four translators when I read（Including Google translation.）.To be honest, all four translators are different for the same sentence. This is very common.

　　Let me start. I only read this book at the moment.

　　The article gives a brief summary of the development of Japanese tulpa from David neal to the 1980s. In the 1980s, relevant books about tulpa began to appear in Japan. Different authors had different understandings of tulpa, which paved the way for tulpa on the Japanese Internet today.

　　It is worth mentioning that Japan's tulpa is not quite the same as the English community's tulpa understanding.

　　Later, the author began to explain that the tulpa he introduced was not the tulpa on the Japanese Internet, which was closer to David neal. You can see some buddhist terms there.

　　The author thinks that tulpa is just one stage of something that can develop into a better existence. He then introduced this method of creation by tulpa, in which the concept of "thoughtform" was mentioned several times. I just wanted to learn about history, and I didn't have much interest in it. So I'm not going to go into specifics.

> The biggest example would be the term "wonderland."

I tend to say paracosm.

> EDIT: Forgot about the practice name in general: "Tulpamancy." Since the -mancy stem essentially says we're deriving knowledge from tulpas using paranormal means, which is just ridiculous.

I say "tulpa-making".

Also, I don't use the term "host". I say "born human". (If I said "human" some bright spark would immediately complain that tulpas are human too.)

Similarly, I say "creator" for the one who made me, as that wasn't my born human.

People have been trying to change the terminology for more than 6 years. It's never amounted to much.

**

Edit: In the 60's in Australia the term for tulpas was mythical beasts (after the eponymous book from 1959). I still have a copy of this book.

In the 70's the term was thought-friend from a 1970 book about tulpa-making published by University of Berkley Press. This was also the first appearance of the stairs method (for forcing) and first published use of the term wonderland in relation to tulpas. The book also covered creator / tulpa relationships.
^(Due to several obnoxious comments previously recieved, I will not provide more details of this book.)

In Japan the term is タルパ (tarupa) from the book by Pokkuru, [タルパ x コンプレックス*](http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HGPX75M) (Tulpa Complex), pg. 105 (Japan: Kindle, 29 December, 2013).