Reddit reviews Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding of Hitler's Rise to Power, 1919-1933

You were responsible for either appeasing, empowering or financing fascism and leninism.
And don't let other redditors be fooled, the Western powers threw even Western countries under the bus, like that one time British bankers did anything in their power to protect the noble independence of central bankers, applying their “gentlemanly” rules and so appeasing the Nazis one last time.

http://holocaustonline.org/bank-for-international-settlements-bis/
http://holocaustonline.org/bank-of-england/
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/how-six-months-before-the-second-world-war-britain-gave-hitler-9-million-in-gold-that-belonged-to-another-country
http://www.globalresearch.ca/profits-ber-alles-american-corporations-and-hitler/4607
//www.amazon.com/Who-Financed-Hitler-Funding-1919-1933/dp/0671760831
http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Secret-Bankers-Neutrality-Holocaust/dp/080652121X?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c
http://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Bolshevik-Revolution-Capitalists/dp/190557035X

Downvote all you like, this doesn't erase the support and finance the fascists received from western bankers and governments until he proved to be a wild card.

>Is that authoritarian and fascist?

It can be authoritarian and not fascist. You know. Fascism has lots of economics tied to it (not always, like José Antonio's Falangists were sorta Trans-class Syndicalist and anti-capitalist, but after the '36-39 war Franco said fuck that and they did as most fascists do. Beak unions, get rid of workers rights, give massive tax subsidies and tax cuts for the wealthy... Like Benny said, he likes to call it Corporatism, stuff that antifa certainly doesn't promote. You can say they're authoritarian for rioting for a troll (though even there I suspect there were some folks in black hoodies who were WAY too organized at the beginning of the protest, lots of agent provocateurish stuff... though now, Mimesis, kids do it 'cause they saw it on in Berkeley...)

​

You don't have to believe me about the fascism and $$$ go to your library and read ; Palmiro Togliatti, Lectures on Fascism (New York: International Publishers, 1976) Daniel Guerin, Fascism and Big Business (New York: Monad Press/Pathfinder Press, 1973); James Pool and Suzanne Pool, Who Financed Hitler (New York: Dial Press, 1978)

>What is your definition of fascism?

Funding by capitalists https://www.amazon.com/Who-Financed-Hitler-Funding-1919-1933/dp/0671760831

>Yet, beyond this diversity, all these fascist regimes had two characteristics in common:

> (1) In the circumstances, they were all willing to manage the government and society in such a way as not to call the fundamental principles of capitalism into question, specifically private capitalist property, including that of modern monopoly capitalism. That is why I call these different forms of fascism particular ways of managing capitalism and not political forms that challenge the latter’s legitimacy, even if “capitalism” or “plutocracies” were subject to long diatribes in the rhetoric of fascist speeches. The lie that hides the true nature of these speeches appears as soon as one examines the “alternative” proposed by these various forms of fascism, which are always silent concerning the main point—private capitalist property. It remains the case that the fascist choice is not the only response to the challenges confronting the political management of a capitalist society. It is only in certain conjunctures of violent and deep crisis that the fascist solution appears to be the best one for dominant capital, or sometimes even the only possible one. The analysis must, then, focus on these crises.

>(2) The fascist choice for managing a capitalist society in crisis is always based—by definition even—on the categorical rejection of “democracy.” Fascism always replaces the general principles on which the theories and practices of modern democracies are based—recognition of a diversity of opinions, recourse to electoral procedures to determine a majority, guarantee of the rights of the minority, etc.—with the opposed values of submission to the requirements of collective discipline and the authority of the supreme leader and his main agents. This reversal of values is then always accompanied by a return of backward-looking ideas, which are able to provide an apparent legitimacy to the procedures of submission that are implemented. The proclamation of the supposed necessity of returning to the (“medieval”) past, of submitting to the state religion or to some supposed characteristic of the “race” or the (ethnic) “nation” make up the panoply of ideological discourses deployed by the fascist powers.

(the above is what trump was up to in his campaigning).



https://monthlyreview.org/2014/09/01/the-return-of-fascism-in-contemporary-capitalism/



The question of capitalist “decay”; the meaning of Lenin’s definition of imperialism as “decaying capitalism”; the role of fascism as a phenomenon of an advanced stage of this process in the period of the general crisis of capitalism; and, in particular, the role of fascism as a retrograde factor in relation to the development of the productive forces.

The question of the “inevitability” of the victory of Communism over capitalism and fascism, and the correct understanding of this inevitability is not automatic, not mechanical, but dependent on the human factor.

It should be explained that the general aim of my book on fascism as to analyze fascism on the basis of the whole present stage of capitalist development, following and carrying forward Lenin’s analysis of imperialism to the present stage, and showing in what sense fascism represents an extreme phenomenon of this process of capitalism in decay, whose guiding laws were already analyzed by Lenin.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/dutt/articles/1935/question_of_fascism.htm

>Can you show me them being debunked?



Well for a start, the stats dont adjust for anything, like proximity, people that live boxed up together are more likely to commit crime, black people are more likely to be boxed up together, white working class are more spread out.

If white collar crime was treated like working class crime the prisons would be full of white people.

The most prolific mass murderers by far in america are elite wasps, murdering people in other countries.The largest financial crimes are perpetrated by white collar criminals, again this is wasps.

Lots more debunking here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fuckthealtright/comments/6xhtog/alt_right_talking_points_debunked_race_and_crime/





The far right tell all sorts of lies, one of those is that Hitler was socialist. He murdered all the socialists in his party, another is scapegoating other races.


Dont trust right libertarian info any more than feminist info.

Let's fix this question.

Ghenghis Khan funded the rise of the Mongol empire, as _____ funded Hitler.

a) Jews

b) Germans

http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Secret-Backers-Sidney-Warburg/dp/0960035869/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1359031876&sr=8-1&keywords=Hitler%C2%92s+Secret+Backers

http://www.amazon.com/Who-Financed-Hitler-Funding-1919-1933/dp/0671760831/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1359031903&sr=8-1&keywords=Who+Financed+Hitler

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar