Uhm... don't want to crash the party but does this fit here?
I mean the author is a woman and the blurb actually states, that she wants to take the historical analysis of female prostitution out of the hands of male historians and actually take the side of the prostitutes. Seems to me like she just uses 'whore' instead of 'sex worker' or something else in general.
Please do at least some basic research on an image like that.
Uhm... don't want to crash the party but does this fit here?
I mean the author is a woman and the blurb actually states, that she wants to take the historical analysis of female prostitution out of the hands of male historians and actually take the side of the prostitutes. Seems to me like she just uses 'whore' instead of 'sex worker' or something else in general.
Please do at least some basic research on an image like that.