Reddit reviews Women, Sex, and Madness: Notes from the Edge (Women and Psychology)

\> Also lets be honest, do you think anyone is going to remember to wait for that book to come out, so they can buy it and give it a negative review when it comes out several months from now?

Some of us do have that much mental capacity: yes.

And reading comprehension, as well. Some of us know how to read things like calendars, too, sir or madam. (Which latter option I include since I see no reason why a self-respecting male would put so much time and effort into the idea of fighting a man suggesting reviews of a specific feminist author. If a book was indeed destined to "fade into obscurity" then why is it worth your time and effort to try to control others into not reviewing it? I don't get your motives. I can see that some males might be habitually "against conflict" but if that's the case, dude, you seem to be on the wrong site?!?! The whole purpose of this place seems tied to opposition ... but it makes no sense for men to talk other men into inaction, when it was / is inaction by men that encouraged crazy feminist authors to write so many man-hating books in the first place. So I think.)

Your comment about "several months" from now, makes no sense, given that (days ago) when I wrote about a then-upcoming book (which was due out in days from then, not months from then) ... well, it's out, now. Not months from now. (I have no idea where you even confused yourself with that one? Presumably, you ran one upcoming-in-2019 and one upcoming-in-2020 books together, in your mind? Who knows?)

Anyway ... for those with two-second attention spans:

https://www.amazon.com/Women-Sex-Madness-Notes-Psychology/dp/1138614084/

Personally, I refuse to pay the over-the-top, brand-new asking price for that one, at this point in time. I'd rather see if I can get a loaner copy via an I.L.L. ("Inter Library Loan") if/when some major library gets one in, and review it that way ... AFTER I get some books of a NON-feminist nature read, and reviewed. (Such as "The Fraud of Feminism" or "The Manipulated Man" or other good books ... too much of reading feminist books, too soon after another, irks me and makes my comments, here, snarkier than I would like.)

\> Based on what I could find, this woman isn't influential outside of extremely niche feminist circles.

Agreed. Heavily agreed, actually. That was a large part of my point, in fact. But you missed, or perhaps didn't read between the lines well enough, re: my comments about this being a case of me hoping to cause her (and women like her) a deep "narcissistic injury" ... by FURTHER marginalizing her, even in her OWN circles.

I'm trying, as best anyone can, while "talking on a party line," to have "normal women" want ALL feminists to shut up ... all "crazy as hell feminists" to turn their anger on women, instead of men ... and generally get a situation going that's already going, which is that all of the braindead narcissists who hate men need to be bashing each other, for a while, to see how it feels. EMAN67 did a number of prior MGTOW videos talking about second and third wave feminists, clashing ... and I've seen (we've all seen) all sorts of so-called "anti-feminist" women cropping up ... "divide and conquer, without firing a shot" seems to me like it ought to beat any plan that boils down to "disassociation, denial, and dumbing ourselves down". It makes no sense for me to explain what I mean by that when far simpler concepts are going over some people's heads ... besides, why reveal more than hints at strategy, on a public forum??

\> If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and you hate ducks, then let it fade into obscurity.

I have a back issue of Gallery magazine from 1975 that made much the same argument: that feminism was crazy; was seen as such by all and sundry; and as such, was doomed to go away on its own. It didn't. Hence my arguing, as gently as I know how to, that this is not a problem that will rectify itself with no action on our parts.

I don't hate you or anything ... but we clearly don't agree on a lot of points. So be it. I'm expressing myself. You are, too. Others can make up their own minds, as to what they should do or not do. I am just presenting information; presenting some options. If you personally fail to see a book with a title of "Women, Sex, and Madness: Notes from the Edge" with zero reviews as a juicy target for any self-respecting male to review ... then that's your choice. I myself will give that one a miss, for a while. But others ... ??? It seems like a great way to "show men's appreciation" (ahem) to be the first person to review a book written by an attention-seeking man-hater. Or the first dozen. Or the first fifty. Or ... ?? Seems like an easy target, as it also includes "Look Inside" free pages one could read, with no obligation to buy a copy of that book; and no cash to her.