Best dslr camers according to redditors

We found 1,926 Reddit comments discussing the best dslr camers. We ranked the 446 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.

Next page

Top Reddit comments about DSLR Cameras:

u/Panzerx · 33 pointsr/Filmmakers
  • Canon T2i
  • Rode mic
  • 50mm lens
  • Tripod

    Dslr cameras are the best thing in a price range of $4000 or less. The canon t2i is lower end but has huge bang for buck. You really do want an external recorder for them. Dslr audio is horrible but that rode mic will really improve it, just not as much as external recording. The 50mm lens is the best starting point it is very cheap but looks great. You need a tripod for a dslr because they look horrible hand held unless you have a good stabilization rig or steady cam.
u/cialowicz · 20 pointsr/photography

So:

u/HybridCamRev · 14 pointsr/Filmmakers

> I'll probably end up getting this or a t5i.

Glad I could help, but even if you don't end up getting the BMPCC, I would avoid the T5i.

I started with a T2i and quickly switched to mirrorless cameras.

Here's why.

Canon DSLRs in this price class lack:

u/kabbage123 · 11 pointsr/videography

I'd take a good hard look at the Panasonic G7! It's got really impressive specs and is the best value for an entry-level DSLM. Plus it just dropped a few hundred dollars in the past 24 hours.

u/phloating_man · 10 pointsr/videography

Budget Rig

I mainly shoot internet video for my daughter and events.

  • Canon EOS M (~$330 USD)
  • Fotodiox EOS M Lens Adapter (~$60 USD)
  • Sigma 30mm f1.4 (~$500 USD)
  • Tascam DR-60D Audio Recorder (~$215 USD)
  • Azden SGM-1X Shotgun Mic (~$170 USD)
  • Neewer CN-160 LED Light (~$30 USD)
  • Nady 351VR Wireless Handheld Mic Kit (~$120 USD)
  • Vello Triple Shoe Mount (~$25 USD)
u/readysteadyjedi · 9 pointsr/funny

> And that is at least 3 or 4 thousand dollars of gear she is holding

How do you figure? It's a 70d which is $999, probably has a kit lens on it so make that $1350 total. Even if the flash is a 600EX (which is unlikely for the entry level "enthusiast" Canon DSLR - it would literally be half the cost of her camera), that's only bringing it to $1950 total (realistically (if her flash is even Canon) she's got the 430ex at $250 making her total $1600), nowhere near "at least 3 or 4 thousand".

> Also, on a Canon like that you wouldn't be looking through the viewfinder to fiddle with settings when the body has two screens and about 250 buttons.

Also it's worth pointing out that anyone with half a clue will fiddle with settings looking through the viewfinder - that way you're learning how to change settings on the fly while composing the shot rather than staring at the back of the camera like an amateur while you miss the shot - this is actually the reason it has "about 250 buttons (actually 30 tops).

> This is just a rich girl going all out for instagram.

I think you might be the one without a clue here.

u/brunerww · 8 pointsr/videography

Hi /u/itsdavyh - I'd pick the [$1698 GH4] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I9GYG8O/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00I9GYG8O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) over the [$999 70D] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DMS0GTC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00DMS0GTC&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) (it's the 70D that is $700 cheaper). Here's why:

  • The GH4 has a viewfinder that actually works when you're shooting video (the 70D's viewfinder is blocked by the mirror and blanks out)
  • The GH4 has a headphone jack so you can monitor what the camera is recording in real time (with the 70D, you have to hope the camera isn't picking up that air conditioner hum in the background :))
  • The GH4 records for hours continuously for school plays, sermons, speeches and other events (the 70D has to be restarted every 30 minutes)
  • The GH4 has color bars, your choice of shutter angle or shutter speed control, SMPTE time code and master pedestal control (like a video camera) - the 70D has still camera controls

    Here's some 1080/96p slow motion from the GH4:

    Here's some 4K: http://vimeo.com/90840341

    And here some downloadable 4k: http://vimeo.com/90683855
    Download it [here] (http://vimeo.com/90683855/download?t=1398627714&v=240400011&s=1d1974a20913758bda453ad29472bafb)

    If you're primarily a video shooter and can afford the $1698 price tag, the choice seems pretty clear to me.

    Hope this is helpful,

    Bill
u/HybridCameraRevoluti · 8 pointsr/videography

Hi /u/MrFreeTania - at your price point, I would consider spending an extra few dollars for the [~$335 Canon EOS M with the 22mm f2 lens] (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A/?tag=battleforthew-20) for good low light performance.

This is going to be the most camera you can buy for your money. It is a less expensive version of the Canon T4i - without the mirror and optical viewfinder which are useless for video.

Here is what this camera can do:

Fashion (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/72938179

Live music (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/75122636#t=38s

Skate: http://vimeo.com/80326419

Travel: http://vimeo.com/55604121

Travel: http://vimeo.com/61150313

This camera will give you the best bang for your buck at your budget level.

Good luck!

HCR

u/JimboZii · 7 pointsr/videography

Maybe go for the G7 Its under your budget and comes with a lens

u/TheConcave · 7 pointsr/longboarding

I want a camera for filming and editing, but my budget is around $500. My friend has a gopro, so I don't see point in me getting one. There is three cameras I'm looking at right now, but I'm a noob to this stuff and could use some help.


Nikon 1 J1

Nikon D3100

Canon EOS Rebel T3

EDIT: Forgot to mention that I'll also need money for a tripod, and that would have to come out of my budget too

u/jonjiv · 7 pointsr/personalfinance

This is highly dependent on your price range, but if you're going to be in it for $500 prizes, I'm going to assume you'd like to spend less than $1000.

In that case, you can't really go wrong with a Canon dSLR, especially the t series, their entry level camera. I think the newest version is the Canon t5i, but the t4i and t3i also shoot high quality 1080p video and you'll be able to find them for cheaper.

The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera is increasingly popular in that price range, but I wouldn't recommend it to an amateur. It has a fantastic image but a high learning curve.

Nikon dSLR's are great too, but if you invest in Nikon lenses as a videographer, you're going to have a bad time. The majority of video camera bodies are manufactured for Canon mount lenses, so if you ever want to leave Nikon, you're kind of stuck or forced to use lens mount convertors.

With all of these cameras, lenses are arguably more important than the camera itself. With the Canon, the best bang for your buck is going to be a Canon 50mm 1.8. It's a cheap lens, but it has a great image for the price and is great in low light. If you can afford a good 2.8 zoom lens like the 17-55 2.8, go for it, but it's often near $1000.

u/rob79 · 6 pointsr/GoodValue

A lot of older DSLR's are a good deal. I mean, the T3i /u/smoothcam72 suggested is really great, but as a beginner you'd probably be just as happy with a T3 which can be had for less. ($386). That would let you squeeze in another (used) lens and still stay under your $500 budget.

The thing with a DSLR is that you should put as much money as possible into your lenses and the body should really be just "good enough" (unless you want to go pro). Not only will your lens really impact the quality of the photo (more so than the body) but they also don't lose value (as much). A good lens now will still be a good lens in 20 years, whereas that T3i (or T3, or whatever) will be totally obsolete.

Since you're hiking you'll want a good lens for landscapes I would imagine. The kit lens will definitely get you started, but you'll probably find yourself wanting to get a new lens before you want a new body.

Don't get caught up in megapixels either, the T3 is 12.2MP, but honestly, are you planning on blowing up your stuff to poster size? You could make quite a large print from a 12MP image.

EDIT: For reference, you can print a 12MP image as a very high quality 8"x10", whereas an 18MP image gives you similar quality at 11"x14". Not a huge difference.

u/Edward_the_Penitent · 6 pointsr/travel

I got this backpack (mine is green though) before setting off on my first backpacking trip back in 2012. Before that whenever I'd travel I always had a duffel bag, and I didn't realize I was doing anything wrong because I didn't know there was a lot to think about nor did I know that "backpacking" was a thing real people did - I thought it was just in movies like The Beach, or for rich kids who "do" Europe over the summer before/after college. Then I went on a short trip to the east coast with a friend of mine who made fun of my duffel bag and decided to investigate. I think the subsequent googling even led to my discovery of this very message board circa 2010/2011.

Anyway I typically fill that thing up and that's that. No checked bags unless I'm going scuba diving, then I have this bag which has my mask and fins, of course, as well as any extra things I can cram in there that I don't feel like carrying around.

I'll usually bring two pairs of shoes. I'll wear the bulkier ones on the plane (my comfortable but kinda stupid looking Keen hiking boots, if I am in fact hiking), and then a comfortable pair of walking/everyday shoes, which for me right now are these sick Nike SBs. Then I pack two pairs of pants (one jeans, one hiking), one pair of shorts, swim trunks, about five t-shirts, a long sleeve thermal, socks, underpants, and a windbreaker. This is all depending on weather, of course, but generally the above applies to everywhere.

Add to that my camera with two lenses, my dive computer (if applicable), a headlamp, a handkerchief, various toiletries, and a manila envelope full of a copy of my itinerary/confirmation #s/passport photocopies/etc. That, I believe, is everything.

u/i_enjoy_lemonade · 5 pointsr/videography

Alright, I guess I'll be "that guy" since one of us has to.

OP, those camcorders are solid. However, as a videographer, I do all of my filming on a Panasonic Lumix G7. You can get one for $600 on Amazon. If you're willing to spend a bit more, you can spring for either the newer Lumix G85 or the GH4 which can be found for around $1200.

These cameras are much more suitable for videography, here's why:

  • Interchangeable lenses. This is huge. As you continue to improve your craft, you will begin to learn about using different lenses to achieve the "look" you're aiming for. You can't change lenses on a camcorder.

  • Removable media. They uses SD cards, whereas some of those camcorders have built-in hard drives. That's fine, but if you ever find yourself "running and gunning" as I do, you will need to use multiple SD cards.

    Here are some of the images you can achieve with the Lumix G7.

    As far as audio goes, I use the Rode VideoMic Go. It's not too glorious, but it gets the job done.

    It should also go without saying that yes, these things take monster still photos as well.

    I personally edit on a Late 2016 MacBook Pro with the 2.6 GHz Intel i7 and Radeon Pro 460 graphics. You will be just fine editing on something much cheaper, like a Mac Mini or iMac.

    If you're looking for something cheaper, check out Apple's Refurbished Mac store. There also is always /r/buildapc. You could build a monster editing PC for ~$800.
u/masondaugherty · 5 pointsr/videography

I know it's been stereotypical to jerk off to the Panasonic G7, but after using it for two years as both a dedicated video and photo camera I've became extremely comfortable using it and can vouch for its superiority. This is the first camera I recommend to family and friends, and at $500 nothing can compare to it.

I'd recommend with the spare cash picking up the 25mm f1.7, its fabulous for the price and produces some amazing results.

Heres my website if you want to check out what I've done with the camera.

u/TheLivesOfFlies · 5 pointsr/AskMen

This one WARNING NSFW!

u/thesecretbarn · 5 pointsr/photography

I'm sure others will chime in with different suggestions, but here's how I would spend it:

Canon T3i, body only: http://amzn.com/B004M170YC

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens: http://amzn.com/B0007YZLFS

It's a little over your budget, but not by much. If you're willing to spend a little more, I'd upgrade to a 60D. Eventually you'd come to appreciate the extra control dial and better autofocus. http://amzn.com/B0040JHVCC

The cheap kit lens that can come with cameras will produce acceptably sharp images, but will severely limit you in terms of your ability to get good photos indoors in less than perfect lighting. A good lens that opens up to at least f/2.8 is far more important than the camera body you choose- if you go Nikon or Pentax or Sony or whatever, try to budget in a nice bright lens. I have this Tamron, and I love it. It's very sharp, and is a fantastic deal.

Whatever camera you end up with, go jump on /r/PhotoClass2013 so you know what you're doing when your child shows up!

u/BAStartGaming · 5 pointsr/letsplay

Hey Crimson! I have a pretty good amount of experience with camera work for my gaming videos!


I'm not sure what your budget looks like, so I'll start with the cheapest solutions first.


I would suggest the most easily obtainable camera for live action stuff would be just to simply use your smart phone! For example, the iPhone camera shoots with a Sony CMOS sensor in full HD! Just make sure you stabilize it on a tripod or flat surface because the auto image stabilizer is pretty terrible at times. Secondly, if you do choose this option, I would highly recommend using a different audio source. Smart phones traditionally don't always have the best audio recorders on board.


A web cam is probably your second best solution! Full HD cams can run about 50-100 bucks, but they usually get the job done. Though again, with all these recommendations, I'd suggest you use an alternative microphone for audio.


If your not willing to use cheaper alternatives like a smart phone or a webcam, then I think your best bet would be the GoPro. These products are massively popular for a reason; they can provide BEAUTIFUL footage if used correctly. You can probably find one of these bad boys USED for under 200 on craigslist. For the relatively small price tag, this is one of the best all purpose cameras on the market.


Finally, if you have a decent budget at your disposal, I'd suggest the T3i. If you only plan on using this camera for rare occasions, then I'd advise against purchasing it. However, if your hoping your channel would rely heavily on live action content, then this is it. This is your solution! It might end up running you a little over 500 bucks, but this is the camera a majority of youtube creators have been using. There is a slight learning curve, but when you get the hang of it, your videos will look fantastic.


Like I said though, never use the on board audio recorders these solutions provide for you. Buy a separate microphone if quality is a big concern for you in your videos!

u/Residue · 5 pointsr/pics
u/SolMarch · 5 pointsr/M43

A full frame sensor does not guarantee good image quality, so the comparison is really based on how different cameras process the video.

The GH4's 4K recording uses 1:1 sample from the sensor, so image quality is very good with low aliasing or moire. Other cameras (especially ones with higher MP sensors) may process the video differently (e.g. pixel binning, etc.) which causes more noticeable aliasing, moire, and a loss of detail.

For example, the Canon 5D MKIII's HD output is noticeably softer than the GH4's (or GH3's, or GH2's, etc.) HD output, and the GH4's 4K IQ only widens that divide even further.

At the same time, the HD and 4K output of Sony's a7S II (another camera with a full-frame sensor) is quite good in comparison to the GH4's 4K output when downsampled to HD.

u/crucialmuzic · 5 pointsr/Beginning_Photography

What's your maximum budget? Does it have to be a mirrorless camera? You might like the Canon EOS Rebel T5i

u/justfred · 5 pointsr/Cameras

That price seems too high for a 3300 kit. It's only $450 (US) new. Used, great condition, should be around $300.

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-1532-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Focus-S/dp/B00HQ4W1QE

I'd suggest buying online, factory refurbished, instead, or waiting till you can find it at a better price.

I'd also suggest a "prime" lens, either the 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.8, as a lot better way to really learn photography - they take sharper photos in less light with better depth of field, and you learn to zoom with your feet.

u/Noobasdfjkl · 5 pointsr/photography

Essentially a total newbie here. I'm looking at either a D3300 or a Rebel T5 for what will probably be exclusively outdoor shooting. I have no idea if I should get something cheaper and get a better lens (wouldn't even know where to start with lenses), or go mirrorless, or anything else.

I'd like to keep it under $500, and I know that probably limits me pretty greatly as far as equipment.

Thanks in advance.

u/CallMeByYourDogsName · 5 pointsr/videography

I’m gonna go against the grain here and say that there are plenty of cameras you could’ve gotten that are better for video than the t7i. Not to say that you shouldn’t have bought it, but I will say that you should’ve done your homework. Don’t be spontaneous with your purchases. I did the same thing as you and bought a cheap camera, because I just wanted anything to get myself started.

Here’s a list of cameras I would buy before buying a t7i:

Panasonic G85 - $700

Panasonic G7 w/kit lens - <$500

Sony A6300 - <$800

Used Panasonic Gh4 - $600? Maybe

If you could save a little, I’d go for the GH5 or the BMPCC 4K or the XT-1, or maybe a used Sony.

There’s so many options out there. I’m not trying to get you down or anything. I just think you can do better for the money. You can probably get great footage from the rebel. It is true that you have to have a good eye for film. But it doesn’t hurt to have some nice machines to help along the way. Good luck, friend.

Edit: I like what one of the people in the comments said. Go shoot your videos. It’s only a waste if you don’t use it.

u/ItsMeEntropy · 4 pointsr/photography

I was going to recommend a Canon, but I don't think there are any Canon DSLR bodies under $700 that can do 1080p@60fps (Only 30 fps). So your choices for #1 would either be the Nikon D3300 or the Nikon D5300. Image quality wise, they should be exactly the same (they use the same sensor), however the D5300 has a flippy screen (useful for video), a better autofocus system (for stills), and wifi. I don't usually recommend the D5300 over the D3300 because I don't find these three features worth the $200-300 difference in price, but in your case it's what fits your criteria: D5300.

Disclaimer for camera #2: I'm not too well versed in Nikon point and shoots (and point and shoots in general), so I don't have as much confidence in this recommendation. With that said, point and shoots, especially in this price range, tend to all be very similar in feature sets and performance. It's going to be a bit tricky to find a point and shoot under $300 with 1080p@60 FPS, I'm not sure if it even exists. The closest Nikon camera I can find is the Coolpix S7000, 1080 @ 60i.

u/QuickAgISTheFlash · 4 pointsr/videos

The Canon 7D (the one he has) is $1,168.

Source: http://www.amazon.ca/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B002NEGTTW

u/imnotminkus · 4 pointsr/self

$849 is the list price/MSRP: Amazon

u/blabus · 4 pointsr/Watches

Thanks! It's taken with a Canon EOS M, which you can find crazy deals on all the time, such as http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A

u/way2funni · 4 pointsr/AskPhotography

longtime DSLR owner here: you don't want a DSLR because they are bulky and you will end up worrying about it getting dropped, knocked around etc.

You want a 'big sensor' in a compact body. Sigma DP 1 and DP2 started this a few years ago and now they are getting common.

I would get something like this Canon M

It has the same APS-C sensor as it's DSLR brothers and you can exchange lenses but it's the size of a compact.

Same output quality as a DSLR (RAW is available) but it doesn't make you a target and you can put a skin or camera armor on it or just duct tape the branding and logos and become invisible.

They had these on sale a minute ago for $299. Watch for it to drop again. For $299 USD with a nice fast f/2 lens it's a steal. I wouldn't pay $500 for it.

Edit: Here is another example of the type of cam I refer to : a APS-C sensor in a compact body with some lens swap ability (usually needs an adapter) CLICKY These are on sale now in the US. These and others may be avail in your price range elsewhere if you are aware of them and look for them.

u/jam6618 · 4 pointsr/videography

u/pastramiswissrye is totally right in that lights, sound, lenses, and media are all more important than the best camera.

My personal favorite camera in that price range is the Panasonic G7 and a good 12-35 lens. The G7 is like the little brother to the GH4 as it does 4k and just is missing some of the more pro features and is $600 for the camera. The lens is another $600 but you could just use the kit lens and upgrade your lens later.

Continuing with what Pastrami said, you should have good audio, lights, and media storage, in addition to the camera and lens. For audio, the rode videomic pro is a good all-around shotgun mic that you can put on a boom pole for good short film on location sound, however you will need someone to help hold your boom pole.

For lights, a good reflector will help you use the sun as a light when shooting outside on location for a short film. If you are in a studio, this four socket CFL light kit will go a long way to help. I personally use one of them and they are great for the price. Just pop in four cfl bulbs and you are good to go. If you would prefer LED lights which are smaller and don't heat up as much, but are pricer, you can get this LED studio light kit.

On the media storage side of things, you are going to want to pick up a few of these 64GB U3 SD cards for use with your G7 or any other new camera you get. Especially if you plan on shooting in 4K.

If you are going to shoot in 4K, your file sizes are going to go way up and you are definitely going to need to get more hard drive space on your computer. You may even have to upgrade your computer to handle 4K video editing. It all depends on what you have and what you want to do.

On the editing side, I personally use Final Cut Pro X on my Mac. It is $300 but a great piece of editing software, used by pros. If you are on a mac but don't want to spend money, just use iMovie, it will probably do what you need it to do unless you edit in 4K. On the windows side, some people use sony vegas, some people use AVID, some people use premiere pro, there is a bunch of them out there and you kind of just have to choose one. (I have never used any of them)

Like he said, there is no canon r6i. I assume you mean T6i, but you still need to do some more research. I hope this helps!

u/provideocreator · 4 pointsr/videography

Uh, the Panasonic G7 goes for $500 right now on sale, so it's actually cheaper. The nice thing is the 4K video with that option. You can crop in and use that to stabilize your video, allowing you to achieve more cinematic video.

I've also never been convinced by Canon's low light performance for any of the Rebel cameras.

u/DumbQuestion17 · 3 pointsr/photography

Hi,

Newbie. I'm looking for a good camera to take good pictures & video of my son.

I've read a bit & watched videos on the G7 and I'm leaning towards it.

There are two versions of it on Amazon and both are on sale for just under $600.

  1. This one is the G7KK:
    https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-G7KS-Mirrorless-Camera-Silver/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1492010703&sr=8-2&keywords=panasonic%2Bg7%2Blumix&th=1

  2. This one is the G7KS:
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0106CF62I?psc=1

    I like the second option because it includes a battery, bag, tripod, exc and I have none of these items.

    Is there a drastic difference between the G7KK & the G7KS?


u/dufflecoat · 3 pointsr/Cameras

> I'm interested in a camera that can shoot 1080p-4k video and possibly have autofocus during video.

There aren't any DSLRs that can shoot 4K in your price range, but the Panasonic G7 mirrorless interchangeable lens camera does and it's a bit of a bargain with great image quality and features: http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-LUMIX-DMC-G7KK-Mirrorless-Camera/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=sr_1_1

u/mihirpatel14 · 3 pointsr/PanasonicG7

Good find! FWIW, it's same price on Amazon and a bunch of other retailers. In December I was able to snag it for $498 with a $50 gift card at Adorama. Granted, that was part of the holiday sale.

u/Photogurt · 3 pointsr/hardware

What brilliant can they make? Give me some specifics.
Here's a $470 DSLR with a lens and a bunch of pack in crap.
https://smile.amazon.com/Canon-T6-Digital-Telephoto-Accessory/dp/B01D93Z89W?_encoding=UTF8&keywords=dslr&qid=1499764992&ref_=sr_1_1&s=photo&sr=1-1
The lens alone is worth ~$100. A phone costs what? $400 for one with a good screen and a good cpu? How much do you think RED will sell this for? Have you seen the prices of their cameras? A few points

  1. Smart phone has a battery and the camera portion will need its own (dead phone or shit shot count).
  2. Cameras that run android already exist (and no one gives a damn about apps on a camera)
    ex. http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxycamera/s4zoom/
    a much better thing is a full on open OS for a camera where you can script your shutter
    http://www.magiclantern.fm/
    or a camera that straight up runs linux.
    https://www.apertus.org/axiom
  3. A processor running nothing but the code needed to generate images from a grid of photosensors can be far more efficient than a general purpose processor running a general purpose OS.
u/BillionBalconies · 3 pointsr/hardware

> Here's a $470 DSLR with a lens and a bunch of pack in crap.
> https://smile.amazon.com/Canon-T6-Digital-Telephoto-Accessory/dp/B01D93Z89W?_encoding=UTF8&keywords=dslr&qid=1499764992&ref_=sr_1_1&s=photo&sr=1-1
> The lens alone is worth ~$100. A phone costs what? $400 for one with a good screen and a good cpu? How much do you think RED will sell this for? Have you seen the prices of their cameras?

You've linked me to Canon's T6 / 1300D, which is the lowest-end SLR on the market, and which comes with a load of generally quite useless accessories. I'm not sure of the point you're trying to make with that. That you can potentially get lots of low-end tat for less money than something which could compare with something high-end but for less money?

> A few points 1) Smart phone has a battery and the camera portion will need its own (dead phone or shit shot count).

Why do you think that? A modern smartphone can withstand a good 6hrs+ of screen time, and operating a lens doesn't require a great deal of energy. As we've seen in Sony's recent Alpha offerings (which are what a potential Red camera/smartphone would be presumably pitched to compete with, not some shitty 1300D), battery life is an issue, but one which is being aggressively targeted. IIRC, the A9 will do around 400 shots on a charge, and Red's offering will presumably be able to do similar from a single battery. This is a trivial point, though.

> 2) Cameras that run android already exist (and no one gives a damn about apps on a camera)
ex. http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxycamera/s4zoom/
a much better thing is a full on open OS for a camera where you can script your shutter

Again, you're showing me what's essentially a toy. We're talking about quality gear, not some low-end smartphone with a gimmicky zoom lens attached to it.

> http://www.magiclantern.fm/

Magic Lantern is great. It's exactly why a Red smartphone/mirrorless hybrid could become something market-leading. It's the benefit of having high-end hardware and an open software environment. The ML team did amazing things within the limitations of some very crude hardware and software - imagine what someone could do with a rich, modern environment. Again, we're talking 3210 vs iPhone here.

> or a camera that straight up runs linux. https://www.apertus.org/axiom

Competition != negation.

> 3) A processor running nothing but the code needed to generate images from a grid of photosensors can be far more efficient than a general purpose processor running a general purpose OS.

Can be. It's extremely foolish to argue that the limitations of old gear necessarily will be an issue for new technology, though.

---

> What brilliant can they make? Give me some specifics.

I think your fundamental problem is that you have no imagination. The potential for a Red hybrid device is enormous. If you can't see it, that's your problem. It's not a reflection of what the product could become.

u/teamlingy · 3 pointsr/photography

Hey guys.

I'm a camera-newbie that's been shooting a bunch of pictures on my phone for the past year to learn the non technical aspects of photography. I think it's finally time I make the leap and get a DSLR.

My budget is around $500-$1000. I primarily want to use it for photos but somewhere down the line I would also want to shoot video with it. More specifically vlog-like stuff so having a microphone would be a huge plus. However I probably won't be buying anything until around black Friday for the good deals, just wanted to get a head start on research.

I was looking at this and it seems like a pretty good place to start.

Thoughts and recommendations?

u/inverse_squared · 3 pointsr/AskPhotography

Phones are still a good starting place unless you need the advantages of a stand-alone camera. Do you need anything that your phone photos are currently lacking?

What's your budget?

I would look into something like the Nikon D3400 with the kit zoom lens and maybe an optional 50mm f/1.8 lens for product shots.

u/ribslargemeat · 3 pointsr/videos
u/brockwhittaker · 3 pointsr/photography
u/anonymoooooooose · 3 pointsr/photography

ignore this comment, just a temporary step to make sure I have the formatting right before I paste it into the FAQ.

| Price | Used Mirrorless | New Mirrorless | Used DSLR | DSLR
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| under $100 | original NEX 3 (body only) | | |
| $100 - $200 |NEX F3, Nex 5, Nex 5R, Fuji X-E1 (body only) | |Canon 20D, 30D, T3 (body only), Nikon D3100 (body only), Sony A500 |
| $200-$300 | Fuji XE-1, Olympus E-m5 or E-m10 (body only) | | Canon T5, T3i, T2i|
| $300-$400 | Sony A5000, A6000 (body only) | |Canon 5D mark 1, 1D mark 2, 60D, T6, SL1, Pentax K-5 II/III, Nikon D3300, D7000 |
| $400-$500 | Ricoh GR | | | Nikon D3300
| $500-$700 | Fuji XT-1 | Sony A6000, Fuji X-A3| Nikon D700, D7100, T5i, T6i, 7D| Nikon D3400, Pentax K-50, K-S2, K-70 (body only), Canon SL1, T6, T5i
| $700-$1000 | Fuji X-T1, Sony A7| Fuji X-E2, Canon EOS M5, Olympus OM-D E-M5 II (body only) OM-E E-M10, Panasonic GH4 (body only) | Nikon D600/610, Canon 6D, 5DII, 80D | Pentax K-3ii (body only), K-70, Canon 70D, 80D, Nikon D7200
| $1000 - $1500 | Olympus OMD-M5 II, Fuji XPro2 (body only), Sony A7R | Fuji X-T10, Sony A6500, Panasonic G80/85, GX8 (body only)| Canon 7DII, Nikon D750, D800, Sony A99 | Pentax K-3 ii, Canon 6D, 80D, 7D2
| $1500 - $2000 | Sony A7s | Sony A7ii, OM-D E-M1, Fuji X-T2, Panasonic GH5 | Canon 5DIII, Nikon D810 | Nikon D750, D500, Pentax K-1 (body only)
| $2000+ | | Sony A7RII, A7SII | | Canon 1DX II, 1DC, 5D IV, 5DS, 5DS R, Nikon D5, D810, D810a, Df, Sony A99ii

| Price Range | Point & Shoot | Mirrorless | DSLR |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| $0-100 | Budget compacts. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions. |||
| $100-200 | Mid-range compacts and superzooms. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions.|||
| $200-300 | Some older premium cameras like the Canon S100. || Used models 7-9 years old. |
| $300-400 | More premium cameras like the Canon S120, Panasonic Lumix LX7, or Fuji XF1. | Micro Four Thirds systems like Olympus PEN or Panasonic Lumix G | Used models models 2-5 years old. |
| $400-500 ||| Used mid-tier models 4-6 years old.|
| $500-700 | Top-end point & shoot like the Fuji X20 or Sony RX100. | APS-C systems like Sony NEX or Samsung NX. | New entry-level models. Used full frame models. |
| $700-1000 ||| Mid-tier models like the Canon 60D or Nikon D7000. |
| $1000-1500 || Premium systems like Fuji X or premium Micro Four Thirds like the Olympus OM-D EM-5 or Olympus OM-D EM-1. ||
| $1500-2000 ||| Entry-level full frame models like the Canon 6D or Nikon D600. |

u/UdonUdon · 3 pointsr/photography

Um... those are not the cheapest DSLRs released in the last 18 months.

For a frame of reference, "last 18 months" begins in February 2010, and all of the ones listed include the kit 18-55mm.

u/Oilfan94 · 3 pointsr/AskPhotography

Firstly, technique and good skills will take you a lot further than simply buying a more expensive camera. So whatever you do, I would suggest that you put in some time and effort to learning the basics of photography.


That link went to the camera 'body only' for $498. I was surprised that when you click the option to include the 16-50mm lens, it was only $499. Make sure that you get a lens with it.

Personally, I'd be more inclined to suggest an actual DSLR camera. Something like THIS or THIS.

Shooting cars is actually one of the more tricky things to shoot, so it will take some learning and plenty of practice, but that will be much more important than the brand of camera that you get.

I would really suggest getting a good tripod, as that will really allow for higher quality shots, especially as the light levels get low.

u/webdeveric · 3 pointsr/photography

I have the T2i and its great. If you feel like spending a couple hundred more, you could look at the T3i. Its basically the same as the T2i with an updated movie mode and an adjustable screen.

Shopping list.

Canon T3i

Canon T2i - You can get used on Amazon for under $600.

Nifty Fifty

Canon Speedlite 430EX II

u/kelsor815 · 3 pointsr/Filmmakers

Not an expert either, but I'll give suggestions anyhow.

Camera: I currently have a T2i, it does everything I'd ever want when it comes to that "line" of Canons. The T3i and T4i don't seem that worth it for an upgrade to me. The hardware is the same, and I don't NEED a swivel screen, or touch screen. You may be different, so keep that in mind. That all being said, the T3i body is a good deal.

Lens - I don't personally use this, but I've heard nothing but good from it. Not much more to say I guess. If you want a zoom lens for more versatility during these shows, but it's all relative. I get by at the moment with a nifty 50mm.

Memory Card- I have the 16 gig version of this, and it's been reliable so far.

Audio Recorder- This is where there may be controversy. Most, if not all, people on this subreddit, suggest the Zoom recorder. Its more expensive, so it's up to you. Based on reviews, they are basically the same.

Microphone- Not sure if you WANT this. It depends on what "live audio" you want to record. If its a loud concert, getting audio to sound good will be extremely difficult. The loud volumes, and usually boosted lows, don't make for the best sounding live recording. Recording off a mic isn't the best in any live situation in a venue anyway. If this is the only thing you'd use a mic for, then I may hold back if I were you, if you know you can get a direct line-in to your Tascam recorder. That is the best solution. If not, the mic is great and I recommend it.

Rig Setup- Might want to make a PVC stabilizer, but try and make it look as classy as possible, to look professional (Is that possible with PVC?) If you want to record your Mic audio to your recorder, you'll need this and this to let the DSLR hold both at the same time. You'll need a couple quarter inch converters too. Maybe an XLR as well, if you want to get direct audio feed from whatever the venue is playing.

I think I typed enough. And I probably forgot about something. Anyway, try and make sense of my wall of text, hope it helps.

Edit: Forgot to say, this'll add up to about $1450 if I did my math right. Not including shipping and stuff.

u/MasterBaters · 3 pointsr/AskReddit
u/ltredbeard · 3 pointsr/photography

If this is the same camera then I'd go with a mid-level Nikon or Canon.

For $100 more you can get a Nikon D5100. I have the 5100 and use it for night/star photography. Best choice I ever made. Even my local shop recommended Nikon for night photography. They said Nikon's noise cancellation was superior to Canon's, but I've never used a Canon so I don't know for sure.

u/NotABiscuit · 3 pointsr/videos

It says on the video description:

>Filmed with Sony a7s and Canon 5D Mark III RAW

Amazon links: A7S Canon 5d III

Lenses can cost anywhere between $300-$3000 depending on the type. Cine lenses can be a bit cheaper than photography ones since they don't need fancy features like autofocus and image stabilisation. Most video guys prefer to do everything manually.

It's amazing what consumers and amateurs can afford these days as technology progresses!

u/enhues · 3 pointsr/Filmmakers

Might want to look into an EOS-M at that budget.

u/NetoIsaBeast415 · 3 pointsr/food
u/smushkan · 3 pointsr/videography

You could get a GH3, however that wouldn't leave you much money left over for a lens, let alone all the other bits you need.

The camera is one of three parts that make up a quality production; you also need to consider sound and lighting.

If you're just experimenting, then you could go for this little combination:

u/AlisonBert · 3 pointsr/photography

Yes, go for the full frame. I wish I had begun this way. Full-frames have various advantages. For example, you will have more flexibility with the lenses you can use. I love my 85mm 1.8 for portraits, but with a crop sensor, I would have to back up too far from my subject. Same for the 50mm 1.4, which I use for live performances. Full frames are also better in low light.

Canon and Nikon both have excellent full frames. I'm curious about the new Canon 6D, which looks like a great deal: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1368909139&sr=1-1&keywords=canon+6d

u/[deleted] · 3 pointsr/Cameras

Some you might want to look into. All are probably available for less if you shop around, especially the superceded advanced compacts.

1. Advanced Compacts

Both of these offer a reasonable amount of zoom and puts out images that gets fairly close to a DSLR, but are more portable - and in the case of the Sony, actually pocketable. Both of these are last year's model since the current machines go for around $800.

Smallest, not DSLR quality but very good, near-miraculous for the size: Sony RX100 Mark II

Quite big actually but definitely smaller than a DSLR, DSLR-like handling characteristics and pretty close image quality: Canon G1X


2. Compact interchangeable lens

Offers DSLR-class image quality in a much more compact package, but with the loss of optical viewfinder and easy manual controllability. The Sony has a DSLR sensor so offers better image quality, but is a larger package all around. The Panasonic delivers slightly inferior images but with much better portability, since the lenses are a lot smaller as well - not just the body. Micro 4/3rds also has a very healthy lens ecosystem. The Sony, adequate.

Small: Sony A5000

Smaller: Panasonic DMC-GF6


3. DSLR / DSLR-class

You'd be looking at a DSLR for full manual control over the camera, and to this end because they have more physical controls, bigger batteries and are designed to mount bigger lenses etc - they are bigger. It may not be what you want slung around your neck all the time, but these are probably the best class of cameras to learn 'serious' photography on due to the accessibility of the controls.

The Olympus is actually more of an overgrown compact interchangeable-lens given advanced features & controls - think of it as a mini-DSLR. The T5i is a pretty standard low-intermediate DSLR with all the features you'd normally expect a DSLR to have.

Regular: Canon Rebel T5i

Small: Olympus E-M10

If you never intend to buy / change lenses out quite a lot, categories 2 & 3 will probably be a waste of time.

u/Singlemalt_28 · 3 pointsr/canon

In that case I would recommend a body and lens bundle. Someone else might be better at recommending a specific camera but I would look into something like this bundle:

Canon EOS Rebel T5i EF-S 18-55 IS STM Kit for $537

u/Bennyboy1337 · 3 pointsr/photography

I like the other users idea of taking her to a camera store to try out some different type of cameras to see what she likes best in terms of feel and weight. I'm a mirrorless guy, so I'm going to recommend the Sony A5000, it's $350 new on Amazon with kit lens, and she can purchase cheap $12 adapters to use any old lens if she wants to experiment. Check our /r/sonyalpha if you end up going down the sony route if you have any questions.

u/Lor_Enzo · 3 pointsr/japanpics

Awesome, I'll be heading to Kyoto as parter of a larger Asia trip this May and am looking into some mirrorless camera options. If you don't mind...do you have any thoughts on those? Seem to be compact and some of them closer to my price point of $300 or under.

These are some options I have lined up.

Samsung NX300

Sony Alpha a5000

[Olympus PEN E-PL6] (http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL6-Digital-Camera-14-42mm/dp/B00VNW5ALS/ref=sr_1_9?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1453632628&sr=1-9&keywords=mirrorless+camera)

Thanks for your initial response, no worries if you don't have time for my questions.

u/BigFuzzyArchon · 3 pointsr/Cameras

D3300 w/ 18-55 VR II

You can also buy for $500 refurbished which is a great deal as well.

u/decorama · 3 pointsr/Cameras

It sounds like you're looking for a quality entry level DSLR. There are many to choose from. Here are a few:

u/DatAperture · 3 pointsr/photography

KEH.com has the d3300 with 18-55 kit lens for $364. New, it's $446.

That's about a 20% difference, the thing is though, at prices that low, a 20% difference only accounts for about 80 dollars.

u/GuilhermeFreire · 3 pointsr/DSLR

for around this price you don't really have a lot of choices.

You can find a Canon T5 or with some luck a T6

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=psdc_3017941_t2_B01LQMI4V2

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XNTPN8C/ref=psdc_3017941_t2_B00IB1BTWI

or the Nikon 3300

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3300-AF-P-18-55mm-Digital/dp/B01JN28QQA/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1518111206&sr=1-3&keywords=nikon+D3300

And the sony offer in this price range is the 5100, that is a mirrorless, nor a DSLR.



I do prefer the Canon, but mostly because I have a Canon and lots of accessories. I bought a T6 for my sister so she can borrow what she needs.

Used market is a mess... Sometimes you get a Canon 5D for 300, and sometimes you can't even get a T5i... And you never know about the shutter, if it is busted or working fine.

Buy new or refurbished, it is "safer".

I would consider a little bit higher price point and maybe a mirrorless.

u/The_aquacats · 3 pointsr/DSLR

I'm a bit late, but I would go with The [Canon T5] (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-EF-S-18-55mm-Digital/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&qid=1459307464&sr=8-12&keywords=canon) as recommended by a few others in the comments. It's just the best deal for your price range, you'll also need to pick up a decent sized SD card. If she is new to DSLRs I would recommend sticking with the kit lens for now. Save whatever is left in your budget, and use it later down the road when she has a better feel for the camera. People often think buying great glass is the key to great photos. While it is part of the equation later on, a big portion of taking better photos in the beginning is having a good working knowledge of photography along with the camera you are shooting on. Youtube has a ton of reviews, and tutorials on the Canon T5, I would recommend checking some of those out before purchasing.

u/Vinny_Karma · 3 pointsr/AskPhotography

A good starting camera that I started out with, and still use it to this today, is the Sony A6000. Takes great 4K pictures and record's in 1080p. Starting kit comes with 2 lens, 16-50mm and 55-210mm Power Zoom Lenses. Total comes to $750, haven't included shipping.

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digitial-3-0-Inch-16-50mm/dp/B00NO1T55I?th=1

u/j-j-a · 3 pointsr/Photography_Gear

Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera w/ 16-50mm and 55-210mm Power Zoom Lenses https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NO1T55I/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_VZK8BbNGAKRTA

PANASONIC LUMIX GX85 Camera with 12-32mm and 45-150mm Lens Bundle, 4K, 5 Axis Body Stabilization, 3 Inch Tilt and Touch Display, DMC-GX85WK (Black USA) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B079VDF7ZG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_k0K8Bb9FGKVJF

Sony SEL50F18F Full-Frame E-Mount Lens, FE 50mm f/1.8 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DLMD5O6/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_C0K8BbGKX2BWF


These are the easy ones to find. They also show up on Amazons Black Friday deals pages as of today as well as some others.

u/uncletravellingmatt · 3 pointsr/SonyAlpha

For this year that's a normal price, Amazon has the combo available now for $698:

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NO1T55I/

u/InvisibleJiuJitsu · 3 pointsr/videography

I'd go for a G7 or a G85. Do you need to buy a mic etc too, or you already got one? Amazon referral links included

u/bigboiahoy · 3 pointsr/DSLR

I have the Canon 80d and like it. It’s a good well rounder and my only complaint is the low light performance (however the lens could have something to do with this). However I will mention this is $1000. An option I see often (never have used myself) and is cheaper ($500-$900) is the Sony A6000 or the Sony A6300 (or a newer model). These are mirrorless and when you look at the viewfinder and make changes, that is what the image will look like. The A6300 might be more future proof with its 4K video if video is of interest. These would be good photo options from what I can tell (but again take that with a grain of salt since I’ve only used the 80d). If you are interested in more video vs photography another cheaper option would be the Panasonic G7 and is 4K. I cannot speak for Nikon, but they seem like good budget cameras, but may be lacking video wise. But overall the glass will make more of a difference than the camera! Any of these options would be a step up from your smartphone!

Camera links (Amazon)
Sony Alpha a6000
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_7eQkDbQD2A5PY

Sony Alpha a6300
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_5gQkDbYD1ET6T

Panasonic G7
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_aiQkDbKSNBTTR

Canon 77D (80D alternative)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06VSTCWJ9/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_4kQkDbJGAEWNA

Canon 80D
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_ZjQkDbTAJB668

u/SabishiiFury · 3 pointsr/photography

I'm trying to decide on my first camera (mirrorless), any help would be appreciated. These are the options:

[https://www.ebay.com/itm/Panasonic-LUMIX-DMC-GX7-16-0MP-Digital-Camera-Silver-Body-Only-/282733706288?_trksid=p2349526.m4383.l4275.c10](Lumix DMC-GX7 - Used (body only) 260 Eur) - some kind of a cheap outlier.

PANASONIC LUMIX G7 4K Mirrorless Camera, with 14-42mm MEGA O.I.S. Lens - 540 eur. The lens included has image stabilization, but I'm still a little bit bummed about it not having any stabilization in the body. My always trembling hands are my worst enemy. But then I'm probably exaggerating, it can't be that bad, can it?

OLYMPUS E-M10II (Silver) + 14-42mm IIR (Silver) 579.99 €

This (and a sony 6000 + some fuji) was the only camera I got to hold and I was blown away by the way it (and sony, fuji really sucked) sat in my hand, it was just perfect and the fact that it felt secure when held by just one hand left a good impression on me. However, I didn't try any of its functions, and I don't know how good is the lens. I am thinking about this and the G7 as my first and cheapest options. The main things that I have for olympus is that I can buy it here from a physical store and the ergonomics. The G7 though I would buy because it has more features (as in my list below), but I have no clue how well it's going to be ergonomics-wise and how well will the lack of in-body stabilization work.


Fujifilm X-T20 Silver+XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS II Black Lens 790 €

This has APS-C (I don't really know if there's much difference between this and 4/3, but still nice), but doesn't have an in-body stabilizer. And only tilting lcd, and that's it? Wait why am I even considering this...

Panasonic Lumix G85 961€

Things that make me consider Lumix G85:

 - Environmental sealing. I Would absolutely love to use my camera in rain and snow. Or can it be done even if there is no sealing? Neither my phone or headphones had ever had any issues, and they're constantly under pouring rain.


 - Fully articulated display. I don't even know why I want this - I'm not a big selfie fan, and I don't film videos, but just the thought of someday wanting to and already being able to do so with the resources already under my possession makes me feel a tad bit "future proof"... I've never had a "real" camera so I don't know what things I could think of doing with it. What if not having such a screen would limit something I'd want to do at some point, for example taking a picture of something on ground level, or stealth mode?


 - Image stabilizer. I've read that having body stabilization is a lot better than having a lens stabilization, and I myself would feel a little bit more secure knowing that I can buy any lens and not be limited to only those that have inner stabilization.


 - Possibility that there are some new technologies in it that you couldn't find in older models (taking still shots from a 4k video, for example, or


 - Battery saving mode)


It's all good, but is it worth paying twice for all of this? 

Is there something else I might be forgetting right now? I'm leaning towards G7 right now.. I'd probably pick sony a6300 if it only had touch screen (navigating through menu with only buttons has been a pain in the ass in my experience)

I want to use it for travel and occasional portrait/landscape photo

u/maradonuts · 3 pointsr/photography

The Panasonic G7 can shoot 4k video and it's under $600 right now with the 14-42mm lens.

u/pmexplore · 3 pointsr/NewTubers

I will try to keep this short and to the point even though your question is quite in depth.

What is vlog? 
Its a Video blog. There are various types of vlogs. Some youtubers like shaytards and casey neistat are really good storytellers. So they post their day to day lives online sharing interesting parts of their day. 

What are the unexpected challenges of making vlogs? 
For many you tubers who vlog without setting boundaries and respecting those boundaries have ended up in broken relationships. 2014-2016 I have seen some long time you tubers (some who have been doing it from 2006) ended up separating or divorced because of this. So choose wisely.

What camera to use? 
The nikon d7000 you have is a good starting camera for entry level video Production. But it is not a good vlogging camera when you are starting out. It is too heavy for the initial vloggin application.


Any one of the three cameras that she wants would suffice for her application. I currently use the sony rx100 mVI. 

This is my recommended list for vlogging cameras. If you have good budget.

  1. Sony rx100 mV http://amzn.to/2gilEAC
  2. Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II http://amzn.to/2gh0Btq
    the list below might be an over kill. But will allow for her to grow into higher production value in the long term.
  3. Canon EOS M5! http://amzn.to/2hcEB52
  4. Sony A6500 http://amzn.to/2gHGTIp

    Make sure you get a gorilla tripod or a flexible tripod that she would find it easy to carry around and also a ton of third part batteries. You can find them cheap on amazon.

    For video editing. I would suggest starting with Sony vegas movie suite. http://amzn.to/2gHJoua
    This is what I started on after doing Movie maker for years. It has plenty of built in tutorials with guided editing within the application. So you would learn some advanced techniques. This will prepare the mind for other complex systems like hit film final cut and adobe. Sony’s editing software is really robust. they are just not good at marketing it well.


    Hopefully I answered all your questions. If I missed something or if you need clarification do not hesitate to reach out. 

Good luck!

u/makedamovies · 2 pointsr/videography

I'm looking at a few different suggestions for you right now for other gear, but if you're serious about the A6500, it's on sale at amazon for $1200 right now: https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B01M586Y9R

Thought you might want to know, I'll post some other idea if I have time.

u/acm · 2 pointsr/Denver

Thanks for the follow!

This was shot with a Canon 70D with a Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM Lens.

That said, I have some additional thoughts on gear. You truly can't go wrong with any Canon, Nikon, or Sony kit these days. My camera is 5 years old, and I've been looking to upgrade for a while now. The successor is the 80D for $1k. It's a great mid-level crop sensor DSLR that has some sensor improvements over the 70D. The 90D is supposedly coming later this year too.

If I wasn't already invested in Canon lenses though, I'd take a hard look at Sony. The a7iii just came out and has some really impressive specs at a decent price. It's $2k for just the body, which is a bit over your budget. Sony also tends to charge less for the body and more for the lenses than Canon, so in some price comparisons they can seem cheaper. a6500 is within your budget, with room to buy a lens or two. I'd recommend going to a camera shop or somewhere where you can get your hands on the gear and see what you like and dont like. A couple times a year Mike's Cameras brings a ton of gear to the Denver Zoo and lets people try it all out. That'd be a good event to check out.

Hope that helps!

u/admiraljohn · 2 pointsr/AskReddit

> what camera I should buy

That depends on your budget and what kind of photography you want to get into... if you just want to take snapshots of, say, your kid's birthday party then a good point-and-shoot camera, like this one would probably work fine. If, however, you want to get into more serious and specialized photography, you almost have to get a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex, which means you're looking directly through the lens when looking through the viewfinder), and that can run you anywhere from $500 to more than $2000 for the camera itself with no lenses. If you're wondering, I shoot with a Canon 40D and a Canon Rebel XSI. My father, also a Canon shooter and my main source of advice shoots with a Canon 7D.

> what lenses

Again, it depends on what kind of photography you want to get into. I shoot primarily airshows and birds, so I have two telephoto lenses (A Canon 400mm-L series lens and a Canon 70-300mm IS-USM lens). If I wanted to get into macro photography I'd have to invest in a macro lens, and if I wanted to get into, say, portraits, I'd have to invest in a fast portrait lens and also some decent lighting.

Shift6437 recommended /r/photography, but honestly this question gets asked so much over there you're likely to get a bunch of "this gets asked every week, lrn2search" responses. I'd suggest you take a look at /r/photoclass to get a handle on the basics of photography.

EDIT: Formatting

u/magus424 · 2 pointsr/photography

Well if you want to stay in the same line, the 60D is ~$880

Or there's the T3i for ~$670

Both still use EF and EF-S lenses, so your existing lens will work just fine on either.

e: I have the 60D and love it - the articulated LCD alone is quite helpful, but the T3i has that as well - my main decision maker was the button layout and feel of the camera - I liked holding the 60D much more, and thought the button layout made more sense.

u/koldingfilms · 2 pointsr/videography

No problem! You can buy an adapter for the G7 which will let you use Canon lenses, but you'll lose some functions, such as reliable autofocus. But otherwise there are plenty of G7 lenses that you can get for pretty cheap.

MagicLantern is a 'hack' that will enable the 60D to record RAW video at a resolution of 1734x976, which is not even 1080p.. Whereas on the G7, you can record 3840x2160 (4k) video without having to hack it, obviously.

I'd say go for the G7, and definitely not the 60D, which is by the way still more expensive.

u/doggexbay · 2 pointsr/Filmmakers

The Sony RX100 has a great reputation as a budget video camera, but it's a point & shoot so it might not make the best option depending on what you want to teach. I think you can get a couple of Canon 60Ds on your budget if you want to teach camera-work specifics.

Do you want to teach cinematography or storytelling? For camera specifics, you might want to shop for more sophisticated cameras than the RX100. If you want to teach storytelling techniques, then you don't need a 60D for video; just about any smartphone will do. Depending on the smartphone, a few 60Ds may be cheaper. :)

u/t3ch1 · 2 pointsr/videography

Thanks for the info. The point A and B will be close to the same focal plane.

Someone recommended this camera:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y/

or the more expensive:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B0040JHVCC

Do you have any favorites?

u/incrediblegraphics · 2 pointsr/AmateurPhotography

(DSLR camera) Canon Rebel T3, $299 most places. 12mp, 2.5" screen, comes with 18-55mm lens.
I've had a bit of experience with this one in the past. Gives you great quality for the price, can blow up pictures to at least 20x30 poster size easily and fairly simple controls, buttons and settings (which includes a completely manual option also.)

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-18-55mm-Movie/dp/B004J3Y9U6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1406170143&sr=8-2&keywords=t3

I personally have the Canon Rebel T3i right now though. (also a DSLR) It was around $650. 18mp, flip out screen (great for filming yourself if you want to flip the screen toward yourself), video capability in 1080p HD, 3" screen on the back, comes with 18-55mm lens also but totally worth the upgrade. It's more for serious artwork if youre looking to publish, photoshop or sell anything. I highly recommend this or any of the Canon Rebels.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B004J3V90Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1406170173&sr=8-1&keywords=t3i

u/polkadotsunday · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
  1. Canon EOS Rebel T3 SLR camera
  2. I've always loved taking pictures and deep down inside want to be a photographer. In high school I even took two photography classes and loved every second of it.
  3. No, I'd be sad. One day this or another SLR will be mine.

    Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds - great song by the way.

    Thanks for the contest!
u/traal · 2 pointsr/pics

> Only thing you lacked was a $50,000 camera and lighting kit.

Or a $500 camera, $106 lens, and $516 worth of lighting equipment.

u/alfabetsoop · 2 pointsr/photography

Canon T3

There it is on Amazon. As you can see, a little over your price range. But a quick search on eBay...

Canon T3

That's a pretty damn good deal. As a Canon fanboy, the T3 is what I think you should upgrade to for your first DSLR. Great camera and decent kit lens for that price.

u/batfacecatface · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
u/av4rice · 2 pointsr/photography

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/2ay48p/questions_thread_ask_rphotography_anything_you/

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/wiki/index#wiki_what_type_of_camera_should_i_look_for.3F

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/wiki/index#wiki_which_dslr_should_i_get.3F

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/wiki/index#wiki_which_mirrorless_should_i_get.3F

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/wiki/index#wiki_how_do_i_specify_my_price_range_.2F_budget_when_asking_for_recommendations.3F

> one that will last me a long time

How long? Are you talking about physical longevity before it breaks? Or meeting your needs over a certain period of time? What will your needs be / how do you anticipate they will change over that amount of time?

> I've been thinking about getting this one but there is also this one which would be best to get?

Either is fine but you might as well go with the T3i if you can afford it. It's more feature-rich.

> Does it really matter the Megapixel difference?

Depends what you shoot and what you're trying to accomplish, but probably not. I shot for several years and got good results with fewer pixels than either of those cameras have. People have been able to take great photos with less.

u/Gackt · 2 pointsr/photography

Here's the deal. Upgrading to a canon g12 is cool but it's still a P&S with a crippple manual mode.

So one of your others option is interchangeable lens cameras like micro four thirds cameras or DSLRs.

Don't be scared of getting an dslr, entry level ones have automatic (P&S style) modes just like your old point & shoots and will take much better photos with the same amount of easiness so why cripple yourself if size isn't issue? You also get access to amazing lens and go manual when you need it, most of the time most photographers are shooting aperture priority/shutter priority anyway.

Micro four third cameras have much better quality (9 times the sensor size) than P&S they are kinda small but size isn't an issue as you said so the problem is than a capable MFT (micro four thirds) camera like the Panasonic GF2 cost as much as an entry level Canon (T3) which takes pictures just as good as the $1700 Canon 7D only it has slower pictures per second and worse autofocus. And you also get access to the amazing catalog of canon lenses which is much better than MFT lenses currently available, everything I said about Canon also applies to nikon I just simply don't know the model numbers. Remember DSLRs are not harder to use than MFT cameras, and in fact, in manual mode DSLRs are actually easier due to the interfaces used. Also better autofocus=easier

Sony NEX: similar to MFT, a bit better, but pathetic choice of lenses, and overpriced accessories. You can use an adapter to access the Alpha mount lenses by sony/carl zeiss but you lose autofocus and still have to deal with the shitty body. Size isn't an issue to you so something better between MFT and common DSLRs is Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology cameras, they have the same quality of DSLRs but lack an optical viewfinder so whatever you see through the EVF (electronic view finder) is delayed so not good for sports but not a problem for you, also cheaper and offers the 10 frames (photographs) per second shooting found in $1500+ cameras (hell, the $1700 7D has only 8 FPS) for the same or sligthly cheaper price of an MFT camera or an entry level DSLR.

TL;DR Size isn't an issue for you so get an entry level Canon/Nikon/Sony (preferably nikon or canon) DSLR, they have easy-mode shootings so don't worry about that and you can get cheap lenses for screwing around with no worry then upgrade later to better ones. Same quality of a $1700 dslr but less FPS and slower/less accurate autofocusing (though still faster than P&S). $150-200 more than a g12. _If you don't wanna deal with interchangeable lenses stick with P&S and get a Canon SX13IS if you need the zoom or the G12 if you don't.

Any questions please ask and I hope I helped you.

u/michaelscarn112 · 2 pointsr/astrophotography

I posted earlier about what camera would be good for widefield AP. Just found out my girlfriend has this camera: https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-18-55mm-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B004J3Y9U6

Would this be good?

u/BillyTheRatKing · 2 pointsr/photography

If you positively cannot wait to get into a dedicated camera with manual controls and interchangeable lenses, you can get a used Canon Rebel T3 with a couple lenses on Amazon for $200. It's not the latest and greatest and your phone might actually give better results in some cases. There are some other suggestions in the buying guide too.

u/camopdude · 2 pointsr/WeAreTheFilmMakers

I was going to suggest a Canon as well, maybe you can save up for this one.

You can get it on QVC for 6 easy payments. It doesn't have an audio input, though.

u/BloodyFaceKillah · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
u/apileofhobbies · 2 pointsr/boudoir

Let me know if this doesn't belong here

So I get asked what camera or gear people should get to start out.

My usual answer is this: anything. The camera itself won't help you with your rules or techniques. You have to develope your eye for that.

The main difference between an expensive camera and a cheap one is image quality and flexibility with your settings

I have a lot more on this but I'll leave it with that for now. I'm sure people will chime in below

https://imgur.com/a/yLXhSZp

This photo was taken with a 5ish year old crop sensor camera. And a $140 lens

Canon EOS Rebel T3i Digital SLR Camera Body Only (discontinued by manufacturer) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004M170YC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_vS9nDb8B31D5A

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X8MRBCW/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_Cu-nDbZWEEDT3

u/Thrash3r · 2 pointsr/photography

Here is a T3i for well under your budget. This will leave you many hundred for lenses.

u/iCHRYST · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

I got this recently and I love it.

I'm not a pro, in fact, I don't know a great deal about photography but it's been vary enjoyable using that camera and all the photo's come out clean and sharp with a 50mm prime lens.

u/cia1120 · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
  1. New Nikon

  2. It's a huge upgrade from the one I have now, and as we've discussed before, I have a broken flash and a broken lens... Whomp whomp.

  3. I would be okay with not ever getting it. I cant miss something I never had.

    Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds!
u/Karmakerosene · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
  • It's expensive, but a nice digital camera would make spring more enjoyable! I already have one, and I can't wait to take awesome pictures when it gets warmer.
  • My favorite part of spring is not having to wear my winter jacket, not freezing my butt off when I wear of skirt, and walking outside with heels on and not having to worry about slipping on the ice!
u/jessemaner · 2 pointsr/photography

Wondering if either of these are good deals?

T2i with things for $299

Nikon D5100 $291

u/kickstand · 2 pointsr/photography

Get a Nikon D5100 and this book.

Or ... go to your local public library and look for a photography book. Dewey Decimal 770.

u/onepennytoomany · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I can top that.

I have a Canon EOS 5D Mark III

u/TheMadOneOfSB · 2 pointsr/canon

Used 5DIII with the 24-105 STM refurbished.


https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B007FGYZFI/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all

I recommend the Andorama listing, they're a solid seller with a good rep.


https://www.amazon.com/Canon-24-105mm-3-5-5-6-Certified-Refurbished/dp/B0178HMEN8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1510875997&sr=8-2&keywords=24-105+stm

Within your stated budget, if barely, and gets you into full frame. You could get a 6D, maybe try your luck on the Best Buy sale, but I'm not really a fan of the first gen 6D, Canon kneecapped it to protect the 5DIII.

If you can stretch your budget a little, grab a used 24-105 F4 L instead, or maybe wait until black Friday/cyber Monday and see if you can grab one on the cheap.

u/TheRambleMammal · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

  1. The Canon EOS 5D Mark III 22.3 MP Full Frame CMOS with 1080p Full-HD Video Mode Digital SLR Camera (Body)


  2. Because I like to tell stories. I'd use this camera for professional photography and filmmaking purposes and someday I may even start a small production company!

  3. It really depends on my situation in life. Right now, it would be an enormous game-changer in terms of my professional needs and would give me an opportunity to compete with some of the bigger players in the market. In the future, my career situation may be different. If I never got this item, I'd be okay with that... but that's because I'm usually "ok" with my given circumstances at any given moment in time.

    "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds
u/Terrikly · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

This is a big step up from the Canon 30D that I have now. I would love to get the quality this little baby provides. I shoot more for fun but sometimes I get a wedding or portraits here and there to do.
I will not die if I don't have this. I might die if I ever got to have it though. Not sure the following link will work.
"Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds"

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=DERATFVJ39H3&coliid=I3BJ4VZQB52H54

u/frostickle · 2 pointsr/photography

If you want to help out the photography subreddit, buy through amazon using these links:

Here is the Canon 5D Mark III Body + kit lens. $4,299.00

But a real killer wedding photography kit for someone with unlimited funds would be:

Canon 5D Mark III Body only. - $3,464.00

24-70mm f2.8 lens - $2,179.98

85mm f1.2 lens - $1,999.00

600EX Speedlite - $579.00 (Be sure to get a diffuser for it, and/or learn to bounce.)

Amazon gives us a % of the profit when people buy from these links, I plan to use the profits to fund prizes for photo competitions, and other projects to improve the /r/photography community.

I haven't been pushing the link very hard though, and so far we haven't actually gained much money at all lol.

Of course - if you can get a better deal from someone who isn't amazon, e.g. a local seller or adorama, keh, or if you want to buy used,
please buy from them.

You can re-sell the kit 24-105mm kit lens later if you wish. You probably wouldn't want to have the 24-105 AND the 24-70. The 24-70 covers the same sort of area, and is better in low light, and gives you better bokeh control. (That sharp-subject-with-a-soft-background look)

Some prefer the 70-200mm f2.8 over a 85mm prime lens... This might be easier to use, but if she learns to use the prime lens, her photos will be better.

Tip for buying canon cameras - buy a cheap broken one on ebay for less than $100, then ask canon to trade it in for credit towards a new Canon camera. It's their loyalty program or something. I'm not a canon shooter, so I'm unfamiliar with it.
***
Nikon is just as good as Canon. Pick whichever one your friends/family have, so you can share batteries, lenses, flash units etc. and they will be able to show you how to use the controls because they will be more familiar with their own system.

If you want the killer Nikon wedding kit, get a D4, 24-70 f2.8 and 85mm f1.4

Also, if anyone criticise you for buying thousands of dollars of gear for a beginner..... well, haters gonna hate. I'm sure a lot of people are jealous of your wife right now (myself included). But this is what happens when you pursue a career and earn money from something other than photography, and THEN get into photography.

It is much more comfortable to study something where you can get a job and earn money, then buy expensive cameras, than to study photography as an 18 year old in college, work part time, and spend 90% of your money buying a cheap camera!!!

u/gtlogic · 2 pointsr/photography

5 seconds of searching yields...
2999 Canon 5d iii

Look at what you can do, to absolutely demolish the IQ from the fuji:

$1,573.00 Canon 6D

$899 sigma 35 1.4

$894 sigma 85 1.4

Total: $3366.

These are top of the line lenses, better IQ than the L equivalents for the 35 and very close with the 85. These will destroy the IQ of the fuji, for basically the same price.

You get better IQ, better depth of field control, better light.

u/Dani_Californication · 2 pointsr/nolangonewild

Love the use of polaroids from a real camera, not some lazy cheap digital camera

u/CajunBindlestiff · 2 pointsr/videography

The 5n has no mic input, do you want sound?
For that budget I would definitely go with with the Eos-M and 22mm lens because of its mic input and fast lens. You can find one used on Amazon for under $250. Be sure to update to the latest firmware for better autofocus or use the Magic Lantern firmware for expanded functionality.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B008NENG1A/ref=sr_1_3_olp?ie=UTF8&qid=1458002627&sr=8-3&keywords=Eos-m&condition=used

u/papatonepictures · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

A Canon 6D.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U

When I was getting started, I started with a DSLR that was not a full-frame camera. A year later, and being someone who's very into portraiture as you will be, I had to upgrade to a full-frame sensor. I wish I had started with something higher-level that I could grow into, instead of something entry-level, that I grew out of. Now I have two cameras...but one of them doesn't get much use at all.

The 6D has most of the features that the 5d Mark iii has, but costs less. It's pro-sumer camera. It's a tiny bit more expensive than what you're looking to spend. But it'll be worth it.

If sensor size isn't a major concern, you could, however, take a completely different tack. Photography isn't much about the camera. You're going to need to learn about many things before you'll really know what you want in a camera. Since you're doing still photography, you could learn with an older, used DSLR, for about $100. Then, once you have a better idea for what it is you need, functionally, you can spend that big wad of cash burning a hole in your pocket.

The guys at DigitalRev did a good video about this.

http://youtu.be/T4ZvAFCt5Sk

The temptation, at the beginning, is to think that a better camera will get you better pictures (I was under that misconception myself for a very long time). While this is sort of the case, what's actually true is that knowing how to take good photos is what really matters, and you can do that with some VERY inexpensive gear.

u/TheRealMattyPanda · 2 pointsr/gadgets

Using DSLRs as a example.

A Canon 6D is 20.2 megapixels.

To that you can use a Canon 50mm lens for $125 or you could use a Zeiss 50mm lens for $615, both are still going into 20.2MP sensor.

Or, that Canon 6D is $999 before you get a lens, or you could get this Canon Powershot point and shoot for $209. Both are 20.2MP, but one's definitely takes a hell of a lot better pictures than the other.

u/AaronKClark · 2 pointsr/photography

I'm running a Rebel XT from 2005. I currently have the 18-55 EFS kit lens, a 75-300 EF lens, a 50mm prime EF Lens and a Sigma 24mm Super-wide II lens.

Assuming I could only buy one or the other, would I be better served by getting the 24-105mm L IS USM lens here;

or the Canon 6D here?


u/binary_bob · 2 pointsr/pics

the mark ii is discontinued now, the next gen is the mark iii, but i'd recommend the 6d at this point. You can look up the prices for them on amazon, but for the lazy:

canon 6d

5d mark ii

u/Scolez · 2 pointsr/photography

I'm looking to buy a Canon 6D that is slightly used. I was looking at third party sellers on Amazon and there are some great deals, but these sellers have little to no ratings. Is it best to avoid these altogether and buy from someone who has a lot of ratings?

Here are the deals:

  • $450 Brand New 1 rating
  • $750 Like New 0 ratings
  • $1100 Like New 0 ratings
u/bradtwo · 2 pointsr/Cameras

Hello fellow Michigan(area) Person.... Lake Orion, MI here.

Remember, whichever camp you go with (Sony, Nikon, Canon, Panasonic) For the most part you're going to want to stick with that, so you can move your Lenses (the true investment) among your cameras.

All of these cameras with Shoot RAW.

Canon has the T5i which is in the price range. It has all the manual options available, plus it is very forgiving. 18-55mm Kit will set you back about $650. I borrow the T3i from a friend, it has its moments (Again, I'm not usually using Canons) especially when it came to white balancing. BUT! Shoot Raw and forget about it. I'm sure the T5i has resolved that issue. : http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-Rebel-EF-S-18-55/dp/B00BW6LWO4/ref=sr_1_2?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1451374398&sr=1-2&keywords=canon+t5i

If you want Amateur friendly, I would (strongly) suggest the Sony A6000 series for your price range. While not technically a DSLR (its a mirrorless), Above all, they are VERY compact so if you travel a lot, they are just an awesome companion. To me, I feel that it is one of the best travel cameras that are made, given what you get for the footprint. Lacking a GPS, sadly... but one day soon. I have a NEX3 (Older version) that I've shot so many amazing pictures with. Here is the A6000 This comes with a 16-50MM range : http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1451374561&sr=1-1&keywords=sony+a6000

In the other corner, on the more video side of things (being able to shoot amazing videos)

For 800 I would recommend (as a suggestion) a GH2 kit. Beyond photography, it is a killer video camera (as paraphrased by Philip Bloom). These can be obtained used for the $700 mark on Amazon all day long. This of course is also not technically a DSLR, Micro 4:3.

u/whoneeds_sleep · 2 pointsr/photography

T5i body, 18-55 IS STM, Amazonbasics bag, Sandisk 32GB Class 10 - $749

EF 50mm f/1.8 - $125

Can get other lenses as she starts to get limited by the current ones.


Disclaimer: I might be slightly biased because I shoot with Canon :P

u/sharkie002 · 2 pointsr/videography

Lumix G7 - $500

Won't find a better camera at that price...

u/CameraRollSoundSpeed · 2 pointsr/videography

I wholeheartedly recommend the Panasonic G7 in that price range. It's not a camcorder, but it records 1080p video continuously (outside of Europe only by default, see /r/PanasonicG7 for a way to enable unlimited 1080p recording with a European model), has full manual control, and even records in 4k (with a time limit of 30min, again there's a workaround over at /r/PanasonicG7). It's also pretty good in low-light, and usually goes for around $500-600 with a lens included if you shop around. Right now, you don't even need to shop around if you live in the U.S., because it's on sale for $597 from Amazon, B&H, Adorama, and all the big camera stores. This is hands-down the best camera you can get for under $750, and is very well recommended around here.

u/zvoidx · 2 pointsr/Panasonic_G80_G85

Same with the G7 and 25mm F1.7

u/Liquid_Fire_YT · 2 pointsr/Filmmakers

I'll let someone with more experience in those matters answer the first 2 questions, but I think I can really help you with the third question.

If you don't yet have a camera, I would recommend getting one and spending a few weeks getting really familiar with the manual controls and the exposure triangle. Start by filming everything in sight (Nature, People, Cars going by on the road, etc.) and also watching tons of tutorials about exposure / framing / editing / color grading / etc. on Youtube before attempting to shoot anything with a narrative. This is just my personal opinion, and I'm sure some people will disagree with me, but I've found that process worked for me to get the basics down rock solid so when I wanted to shoot my first 2 minute no budget short film with a narrative, I had a much better idea about what to do with Audio / Lights / Framing and was able to pull it off much better because I knew what I was capable of with the Camera. This is just my 2 cents, feel free to jump head first into making a short film first if that's what you are set on.

Here are a few good tutorial videos:

Exposure:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8T94sdiNjc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAt4315-uH4

Lighting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_Sov3xmgwg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqeCHzk2RdA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVIbirzZn0M

Recording Audio:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAb-hV2uBj4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9cP1WHL0Zo

There are plenty of other amazing tutorials on youtube and all over the internet. If you have any questions about filmmaking, chances are there is a detailed youtube video explaining it.

As for the Camera itself, I would highly, HIGHLY recommend the Panasonic G7 Mirrorless camera. You can find it here on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Mirrorless-14-42mm-Megapixels-DMC-G7KK/dp/B00X409PQS/

I currently use it as a beater camera to shoot Youtube with, but that doesn't mean it's a bad camera at all. It's actually a really amazing little device. It is an amazingly sharp and versatile little camera that packs way more punch than a camera of its size should be able to. It shoots extremely crisp 4K video at 100Mbps, and the little lens it comes with is amazing for an included kit lens. Even if you don't have a 4K monitor or plan on delivering content in 4K, it still really helps due to the increased bitrate of the files and the increased clarity and sharpness of 4K video, so when you downsize it to 1080p, it can look really, really good.

Here is the pansonic G7 operating at its very best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf4skunfRv4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cXwpckBMBg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jHsXSV-FCk


I would probably recommend not getting a consumer camcorder like the one you posted, due to its fixed non removable lens and possible lack of critical manual controls, but I've never used that camera so I can't speak more than that. In my opinion it would be better to go for a real DSLR or Mirrorless camera for film making instead of a consumer camcorder. I haven't used any of the Canon DSLR cameras for filmmaking, but I'm sure any highly rated ones on Amazon or BHPhotoVideo are just fine.

u/nevermore369 · 2 pointsr/Photography_Gear

70% Video 30% Photo: Lumix G7

70% Photo 30% Video: Used Canon T6i

100% Photo: Used Original Sony A7
and
Sony 28-70


I have used all of these cameras and this is what I feel would be the best way to get started if any of these ratios are relevant to you. One thing to keep in mind is the 100% photo combo goes a bit out of your budget but it’s the cheapest full frame I could find that isn’t 10+ years old. It may not mean much to you now if you are just getting started but if you use that camera and get used to it over years, you’ll be glad it’s full frame once you start to understand the technical things about photography.

Please ask questions, I love answering them.

u/wheresmywonwon · 2 pointsr/Cameras

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00X409PQS/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1498131514&sr=8-1-spons&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=lumix%2Bg7&psc=1&th=1

Just bought this camera myself but in a bundle with lenses because that's what I wanted. Watch some YouTube videos on Panasonic g7 reviews. Might help.

u/bondjaybond · 2 pointsr/videography

Panasonic G7 - $597.99

u/Ostomesto · 2 pointsr/photography

2 questions regarding photography in general.

  1. When is flash best used. I often find the issue that when taking quick shots of people (As in they are not posing or set up for the photo) the flash often ruins the image with excessive brightness, surprising the subjects, among other things. When shooting outdoors or in dark areas flash seems to completely ruin the mood of the scene and return a extremely bright and awkward photo. Could someone aid me with flash usage, compensation, and necessity of it. Also the use of a slave flash.

  2. I just recently got my first DSLR and lens. Canon T6 and kit 18-55 lens. I am not yet focused on what kind specific scenes I will be shooting. What would be the best investment for my next lens? Macro: I do enjoy doing macro photography and I'm aware that these lenses can double for portrait photography, a wider range telephoto lens: something like a 75-300 mm lens that would allow better portrait shots and allow me to have a wider range of shots I can take, or a wide angle lens: something along the lines of 10-18 mm wide angle, I am in an area that allows for great landscape photography and amazing views.

    I am unsure of which lens would be the best investment for my next step. I will be looking towards lower end lenses as I am in college and have limited funds. Any advice, recommendations, tips, or general information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!!
u/paroxyst · 2 pointsr/photography

I was thinking about getting my dad a "nice" camera for Christmas. Neither of us really knows anything about cameras or photography. Lately, my dad has been into taking nature photos using his phone camera. I really want to encourage it as a hobby because he has a lot of mental health issues and issues with alcoholism. Getting him outside and in the world and away from his demons will be better for him than sitting in his apartment by himself.

I have no idea what to get though. I came across [this] (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-T6-Digital-Telephoto-Accessory/dp/B01D93Z89W/ref=sr_1_7?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1511138171&sr=8-7&keywords=canon+60d) bundle, but I'm not sure if it's worth it or if there is something better I could get for the price.

He won't need anything top of the line, but I'd like it to be a 'photographers' camera, not just a nice one for taking pictures of the family. He is very cognizant of the 'image' of things, and I think having a camera that projects the 'image' of a photographer will cement the hobby a little bit more.

Any words of advice are welcome, I have no idea what I'm doing. Ideally, I'd like to stay in the $500 or below range.

u/JustDoTheThing · 2 pointsr/Filmmakers

I've had some guys grab some of the Canon Ti series (this is a cheap kit) cameras for things like this that came out well. You say you're not worried about lenses, but always worry about lenses. Your glass will completely change the feel of what you're filming. I would sort out what type of shots you want, and then see what lenses make sense (wide, medium, cu?). Whatever camera you go with, make sure you're lighting is on point because that will make even the worse camera/lens option look much better.

For indoor shoots I tend to lean towards booms if you have someone to run it, but lav's definitely work as well, especially if you're a one man crew.

u/Loli_Collector · 2 pointsr/photography

Hello /r/photography !

My sister is looking to buy her first camera for Photography AND Video. She has a budget of 600$ CAD, is there anything good at this price?

I was looking on Amazon Canada and I found some Best Selling camera and I was wondering if those were good for Photo and Video:

u/apmauj · 2 pointsr/uruguay

No sé cuál es tu presupuesto, pero por Amazon Global te podés traer alguna sin mucho lío, yo compré a fines del año pasado una Nikon d3400, y si sos team Canon hay un bundle con la EOS Rebel T6 a $449.00 + $196.06 (envío).

El plus de la Nikon es que trae 2 lentes, ahora sale $546.95 + $163.27 (envío), yo la pague como 50 dólares menos, supongo que si no tenés apuro podés estar al tanto de cuando salga alguna oferta y recién ahí entrarle.

En camel podés hacerle un seguimiento del precio, y por lo que veo, 496 fue el mínimo y se ve que le pegué justito :D

u/SLV1430 · 2 pointsr/photography

Hello all, Need equipment advice on what to purchase URGENTLY

Requirements: Photos for Website and Print for local magazine start up.
Budget: $500 - $800
Preferably from Amazon as we have an Amazon credit card which will enable us to finance. We will use this subreddits affiliate link!

Background/Why we need:
So while the magazine will have dedicated photographers on staff eventually or hired for certain events, to start up me and my business partner need a DSLR to get us started. Although we will eventually have more experienced photographers on board who will have lots of equipment, we still want something that will grow with us, not something too outdated. Video is not a huge concern for us as we have a 4k camcorder. However we will use the DSLR for some limited video shooting. To ensure there isn't glaring differences if we were doing a two camera shoot, SD video will probably not work.

Experience:
I have taken some college level photography classes, but it was a while ago and I have forgotten most of it. We are both quick learners though but "auto focus" and different "camera modes" will be a must.

Needs/what will be shooting:
Lots of "around town" photo shooting in a sunny beach town.
The ability to shoot sports/fast moving images (i know lenses play into this)
standard photography of people we feature in stories
low light environments (we will be shooting a lot of different things in night, so a built in flash/low light capability will be big)

We would like to find a bundle package that includes at least a two lenses. Please keep this in mind.

While most of it will be going online, we need quality good enough for print (non glossy newspaper)

So that's our needs. Please please offer us some help as we have interviews with some people we are featuring starting next week and we also have some stories that require us to compile some general photos of the area we are writing about.

Please let us know what would be best for us to get, remember we want something that will last and grow with us.
What we have looked at so far: although it's all Canon that we are linking, its purely what we have looked at on amazon so far, we are in no way saying we only want canon suggestions

Canon T5i 18-55mm IS STM Lens + Kit Includes, 58mm HD Wide Angle Lens + 2.2x Telephoto Lens + 2Pcs 32GB Commander Card + Battery Grip + Extra Battery + Backpack Case
link here


Canon EOS Rebel T6i DSLR CMOS Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens Bundle (from canon so I imagine all bundle equipment is quality.
link here


Canon T6I EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens + Slave Flash + 58mm Wide Angle and Telephoto Lenses + 32GB Deluxe Accessory Bundle (Are those extra lens' crap?)
link here


Canon EOS Rebel T6i DSLR Video Creator Kit with 18-55mm & 55-250mm Lens + 32GB Accessory Bundle - Another accesorry kit, but shockingly cheaper price for the t6i
link here


Canon EOS Rebel T6
DSLR Camera Bundle with Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens + Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Lens*

  • Now the second lens that this kit includes would be good for sports shots right?


    Another Rebel T6 This one with other bundles but what caught our eye is the wide angle lenses it includes, however are we right in thinking they are not official canon lenses?
    link here


    Please help us guys! We are needing to be able to start shooting photography for articles already being written and for interviews coming up next week!

    All help will be greatly appreciated!
u/mrfixitx · 2 pointsr/Cameras

For camera's it really depends on what brand and how old you want to go. You can typically find a used Canon/Nikon DSLR for $100 or less and a kit lens for $50-100 but they might be 5+ years old. They can still take great pictures but just know that your not going to get the latest and greatest. They are both good brands with large lens selections and a healthy used market.

As for tripods my main advice is try to find a used quality tripod and avoid new tripods that are offered in kits or bundle packages, or that are under $150 (in general there might be some good deals out there). Many people myself included buy an inexpensive tripod and then end up realizing how crappy it is and have to buy a second quality one later which then will last us decades. Whatever tripod you buy should have a removable head and given your price range should be solid aluminum. If the tripod looks like something from this bundle avoid it. Its junk that will only frustrate and disappoint you if you try to use it for anything requiring precision or frequent use.

As for Cameras that will probably be in your price range for Canon (since thats what I know) look for a 40D/50D or a Rebel from the T series ie T2/T3/T4 etc.

u/roland23 · 2 pointsr/photography

I'm looking to buy a camera for my girlfriend, but know very little about what's good and what isn't. She's not a photographer so beginner gear is fine and I'd like to spend around $500 but could go higher if it makes a significant difference in quality. A second lense may be a cool addition but that would push the budget up so a nicer camera is higher priority.

These camera + accessory kits on Amazon look pretty appealling but again I'm uncertain about the camera quality.

Any recommendations?

u/Opandemonium · 2 pointsr/photography

Hey guys...I recently bought THIS Canon EOS Rebel and I need help!
Here is the downlow! (Humble brag) My son is a Freshman and he started wrestling in December. In January they promoted him to varsity! (OMG, I know, this mom is gross.) Anyhow, he is now going to VARSITY sectionals. I used my Bday money to buy this camera, because the boy wants Mom to take pics of him. I'm so lost. I'm trying the "action" shot photo option, but when I travel to sectionals on Friday, he's going to be about 300 ft away on a mat, moving his ass off.

What are the best settings to do his awesomeness justice with what little resources (and zero experience) I have?

(PS - I've watched hours of youtube videos and I'm just not a photographer, so DUMB IT DOWN FOR ME.)

u/GartNJ · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

I got my first camera, Canon Rebel T5i kit, used, on amazon for roughly $250 (US). It's served me super well for a couple years now. If it's your first one, you might as well get a used camera. That way you can see how you like it and still get some great shots, without breaking the bank.

Even something like this used Canon Rebel T6 would serve you well... for $245+shipping: https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01D93Z89W/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all

Happy shooting!

u/acronyms · 2 pointsr/antarctica

At a 300 price point you're basically working with higher-end point and shoot cameras. If your limit isn't a hard one, consider purchasing this. Mine has performed admirably down here through summer and winter.

u/BlacklistedUser · 2 pointsr/photography

Amazon(+ grip)has them for cheaper, but if you know this one is of superior quality and has been taken care it may be worth it. Seems a slightly overpriced for a camera made in 2008, unless they throw in a lens. (and TBH the 4gb card is not worth much and sync cables, charger, battery are standard).

Unless you need the weather sealing of the 50D (i.e. heavy rain/snow/sand) you can go with something like a NEW T6 and get a lens or a NEW Nikon D3400 with lens

edit: I also want to point out while the stock lenses are good for most environments you might also want to save/get some additional lenses (used lenses are a great option).

u/Johnny_2112 · 2 pointsr/Beginning_Photography

The Nikon D3400 has Bluetooth, and would be a fantastic entry level camera. As this is a current model, you probably won't find many used, but it's relatively inexpensive ($400 for basic kit on Amazon).

I started with the D3100 and moved up to a higher model body. It'll do all of the core DSLR type photos you want, then you can decide to upgrade when the time is right. I'm sure there is a comparable Canon model as well.

u/Asofnowyoudie · 2 pointsr/Cameras

If I'm correct (I'm a Canon guy), I believe the D3400 just came out recently, so that is why you haven't seen any sales.
On Amazon, the price of the D3400 with a kit lens is $500, which is a pretty decent sale from the $649 it came out with a few months ago.
As to whether to get the D3400 or the D5200, I wouldn't know as I am not very familiar with Nikon.

u/Espiochaotix16 · 2 pointsr/photography

$300 is honestly really low, but there are some great deals this Cyber Monday for the entry-level cameras, like the Nikon D3400 w/ 18-55mm and 70-300mm lens: https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1511803634&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=d3400%2Bnikon&th=1

I chose this over the basic 18-55mm kit because its currently on 50% discount



u/Ruschnav · 2 pointsr/Mustang

The 3300 is a very solid choice. If you can an extra 100 bucks for the 3400 then go for the 3400. The 3400 has wireless capability which comes in handy more often than you think. And the one I linked includes the Nikkor 70-300mm long lens which is actually a pretty decent kit lens.

Also take a look around for used gear. I've seen some slightly used 5500 for around 500. Check Facebook and Craigslist for some deals.

u/Bester2001 · 2 pointsr/Cameras

The camera that fits your needs best is the Canon 70D
It has best Video functionality and best Video and image auto focus system of DSLRs in its price range. With CANONs STM lenses it has the quietest autofucos motor, ideal video.
Canon 70D vs Nikon D7100 Epic Shootout Comparison…: http://youtu.be/bOM4r1gxsbs
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC

Canon EOS 70D Hands-on Review (filmed with a 70D): http://youtu.be/btaesOmA_ro
I personally have owned the 70D since it launched last year and can testify to the cameras spectacular image quality and ease of use for everything from casual shooting to serious photography. And have shot dozens of hours of video using both Canon STM and traditional USM motor and the difference in the noise level between the two type is not huge but noticeable.
The next best option on a budget would be the Nikon D5300
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00FY3T3TM/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1419056374&sr=8-2&pi=AC_SX200_QL40
I'd recommend getting a 35mm or 50mm Prime lenses for either camera its a cheap lense that produces amazing pictures.
Hope this helps Good luck

u/pajam · 2 pointsr/OkCupid

The shoe camera is just a cheap point and shoot (cheap as in ~$400). The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Although I blurred the background since I had a personal e-mail account opened on the screen and my name was on there. So that post-effect Photoshop blur might make it look nicer because that is causing a possible faux Depth of Field look.

The main photo was taken in studio with a Canon EOS 70D ~$1000 for the body alone. Coworker took the photo as it's a camera for work. Although I do a lot of video, etc. in my free time as well. I'm likely buying the Panasonic GH3 soon.

u/master0li · 2 pointsr/Beginning_Photography

Is your moon criteria because you want to be able to zoom really far or that you feel only decent cameras can do that? I ask because if you don't need a long reach you could put more money toward a better camera/lens that's shorter.

If you don't need long reach and want a small camera a used RX100 will give you great quality for stills and video for under $400. You mention travel so I think for walking around it's great. It's a fixed lens though so you can't get more out of it down the line.

If you're thinking of it more like an investment and you'll grow into it over time you'll probably want to go with an ILC (interchangeable lens camera). Mirrorless will be smaller DSLR will be bigger. Just know that you're buying into a whole ecosystem because because lenses aren't swapable between brands. There are adapters but generally you lose things like auto focus unless you pay big bucks for an adapter.

For DSLR a used Nikon D3300 or Canon T6 is under $400. For mirrorless a used Sony a5000. There's also the micro 4/3's mirrorless systems but someone else would have to chime in for recommendations as I have no experience w/ them.

I should note that all my specific recommendations don't have a ton of reach (can't get far subjects). But what you save on that gets you incredible quality if you take the time to learn. Also w/ the ILC cameras you could get a telephoto lens in the future. You could get a cheaper body and get a kit that has 2 lenses one of which is a telephoto - used Nikon D3100 Kit or used Canon T5 kit for right at $400. You have to swap lens to go long. If you really want that zoom for cheaper or smaller overall size probably look at choices in this article.

That said if you're going to stay on auto mode all the time my recommendations are probably not worth the price premium since you won't get the most out of it. Save some bucks and get a point and shoot that's easier to travel with and you're more likely to take out and use. I will say the quality gap between camera phones and point and shoots is pretty minimal these days. You probably need to spend $300-$400 for the significant jump in quality.

u/darmanastartes · 2 pointsr/UrbexGear

Maybe one of the lower end Sony E-mount cameras?
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G

I've taken photos with a Sony NEX-3N, but the built in flash alone didn't quite cut it in dark areas.

goo.gl/vPnqge

u/goatman2 · 2 pointsr/photography

Complete noob here. How is the Nikon D3300 1532 18-55mm?
Link below, I might pick this up, is this a good investment? Any good lenses to go with this camera, or is the lens that it comes with fine? I want to take clear/crisp/dank pictures ranging from family to scenery, maybe some animals to.
Thank guys

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=BIYNPMQWFCRF&coliid=I35CI2HWZP8D9X&psc=1

u/Rustychipmunk · 2 pointsr/photography

Hi all,


 

I am researching getting a new camera and I have never had a DSLR camera before. I want to buy something nice, but not something so entry level that I'd need to go out and buy a new one again in a couple of years. This is definitely something I will keep for a while.


 

Option 1: Nikon D3300
-https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-1532-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Focus-S/dp/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1485311699&sr=8-3&keywords=d3300
-$450 on amazon with a 18-55mm lens and accessories

 

Option 2: Nikon D5500
-https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Camera-3-2-Inch-Certified-Refurbished/dp/B013RFPOEG/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1485312117&sr=8-4&keywords=d5500
-$600 on Amazon (REFURBISHED) with a 18-55mm lens

 

I would also consider getting a 55-200mm lens for either option for an additional $150:https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-55-200MM-Vibration-Reduction-Cameras/dp/B00RUBK53Y/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1485312649&sr=8-10&keywords=nikon+lens


 

Current thoughts
--The 3300 seems to be very highly reviewed as an entry level DSLR
--The 5500 seems to be a couple of steps ahead and may be worth it to me to spend a little extra for something that will last longer and produce higher quality photos. Does anyone have experience between these two, is the upgrade worth it?
--I care more about the photo quality than touchscreens or wireless connectivity
--Any thoughts on the 55-200 lens?
--I will also search ebay for deals

u/uluru · 2 pointsr/thewholecar

Entry level DSLR's are beasts these days.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=sr_1_10?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1406122675&sr=1-10

24MP equates to 6,016 x 4,000 pixels - that's a lot of detail for a entry level camera!

u/SmileyRileySurfs · 2 pointsr/photography

Need some camera buying advice.

I've been shooting for 3 years, and I don't have my own setup. I normally use my sisters' Nikon L330, or my Dad's Canon SX30IS. Both are non-DSLR, and they look like DSLR's and perform mediocre, but not quite what I'm looking for. My Mom recently gave me a Nikon B500, which I really don't like- simply because it has NO manual settings. I always use manual settings on the SX30, and so now I'm looking in to a DSLR.

I am in to shooting surfing photos/videos, and I've been checking out the Nikon D3300 since you can upgrade to a 200mm lens for just $149. (This would be down the road) On the other hand, the Canon T5 looks almost as legitimate, however it has 18MP to the D3300's 24.2. The canon T5 has a 300mm lens option at just $98, which is extremely fair priced and another purchase for down the road.

As for preference, I don't know the difference between the performance of Canon vs. Nikon DSLR's, and I'd like to hear some feedback. Since I am shooting surfing, I'm looking for the best options for focus and zoom, and long-range quality. I also take a lot of Macro shots, but this doesn't matter as much.

Any feedback is appreciated, cheers!

u/hammad22 · 2 pointsr/photography

Thinking about getting this nikon d3300 . I'm mostly going to be shooting nyc landscape and architecture, and I also want to take some low light shots of the city at night. I'm probably going to start off with the 18-55mm VR ll lens that comes with the camera but if I were to upgrade soon, what lens would be best for my situation without being too expensive (~$250, can go a bit higher if it's worth).

u/finaleclipse · 2 pointsr/photography

What's the exact wording of the venue rules? Last time I tried at a venue, they specifically stated that interchangeable lens cameras weren't allowed. Of course, that means that this isn't allowed in, but this is. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

u/darti_me · 2 pointsr/Cameras

Being realistic with you're budget, I don't think you can get a camera that fits all your wants. What fits your bill would be a Canon 5DMkIII or a Sony a7II but those cost thousands for just the body. But to try to give you some suggestions, try looking at the D3300 (amazon link) $400 on sale. It takes good photos and the kit lens bundled has VR/OIS/IS. My next recommendation would be a Fuji X30 (amazon link). Its small and light plus the lens that comes with it is really good on paper. I'm not familiar with Canon, Sony, Olympus' line up so try to search for those brand cameras within the same price point.

Now things to keep in mind with my two suggestions.

  • The Nikon's res is x2 of the Fuji's (~24 vs ~12). Now this might seem too lopsided for the Nikon but keep in mind that if you're not doing large prints or scrutinizing each pixel then high resolution is not necessary, you'll simply be able to crop more from the Nikon than the Fuji.


  • Both have VR/IS/OIS and shoot at 1080,60p. However the Fuji has arguably the better lens 28-112mm f2.0-2.8 vs 27-83mm f3.5-5.6. The implication of this is that you have more light to work with the Fuji compared to the Nikon. Aside from that with the Fuji you get more reach since the long end of the lens reaches to 112mm vs 83mm. Note that the actual lens of the Nikon is a 18-55mm but keep in mind that its a crop sensor so I simply multiplied the figure with the crop factor (1.5).


  • The Nikon can change lenses, the Fuji can't. Pretty straight forward, you can buy lenses in the future for the Nikon but your stuck with the Fuji's lens.

    Conclusion. Both are great for your level and needs (albeit no 4K video). Personally for a beginner I really recommend the Nikon one since it has an interchangeable lens system which you can build as you progress in your passion.
u/jlaux42 · 2 pointsr/DSLR

In 2015, though, we have this...

Nikon D3300 24.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR

u/Bulldogg658 · 2 pointsr/photography

The L840 is just a point and shoot, it won't teach much in the way of stutter speed, aperture and all of the other control you have with a dslr. It's a little above your budget but the D3300 is $396. It'll teach her a lot more and give her more cool stuff to play with, also that lens will be usable on a better body later.

u/trumps-taj-ma-wall · 2 pointsr/photography

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&condition=used

(bought the zero shutter count one from Alissons Garage Sales;Was in brand new condition when it came.)

This is the link for the D3300 i just bought. I got this with the kit lens and also bought the wireless adapter, a bag, and this http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005197472?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00 accessory kit that had everything to get started, two extra batteries and a 64gb memory card all for appx 520 with prime shipping. I hope this helps if you decide to go the D3300 route...

u/PigeonsOnYourBalcony · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

If you want to get into photography than you'll need a mirrorless camera or a DSLR, something like a Coolpix won't cut it. Basically any DSLR or mirrorless will do the job but something more modern like the Canon T5 is a great choice.


I would recommend you skip those Amazon camera bundles because apart from the camera and the kit lens, everything else is usually crap. The memory card will be slow, the tripod will be wobbly and those lens adapters are garbage. You can get the T5 here for dirt cheap if its refurbished. Also, even those the 75-300mm lens is a genuine Canon it has a reputation for having poor image quality.

u/pigeonchase · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

I'm saving up for a new Canon EOS Rebel T5 camera. It's a few years old model so it's affordable in the camera world, but still a good chunk of change. Slowly but surly though!

The other item I'm dreaming of, but more in an unrealistic way, is a KitchenAid stand mixer. Those babies are legends for baking but it's so much to drop on one appliance.

Super Nintendo, Sega Genesis When I was dead broke, man I couldn't picture this.

u/sa7abi · 2 pointsr/photography

Amazon has 20% off their amazon warehouse right now.

​

There's a good deal on used/like new Sony A6000 at Amazon warehouse!:

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-16-50mm-55-210mm/dp/B00NO1T55I/

​

Sony A6000 body + 16-50mm + 55-210mm : $585.44 -20% = $468.35

Sony A6000 body only: $385 - 20% = $308

u/solitarysen · 2 pointsr/photography

I started out with the a6000. Got the bundle with 2 lenses, the 16-50mm and 55-210mm, which costs 750$ (I know 300 dollars more for your budget is a lot) Although, if you do intend to keep on taking photos, this is a great deal and will definitely last a long time. Here's a link for the camera bundle at Amazon in case you want to check it out.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NO1T55I/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1498343781&sr=8-6&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=a6000&dpPl=1&dpID=41ric%2BbBwOL&ref=plSrch

u/kare_kano · 2 pointsr/photography

No need to blow $1000 on a camera from the get go. Get a used Sony A6000 with kit lens for about $500 and see later if you need anything else. If you want to get more/better lenses you can always do that. If you decide to sell it and get something else you can also do that, it's the most popular mirrorless right now and retains its used value rather well. It's small and practical and you'll be able to take it everywhere with minimal fuss.

Edit: feature overview and video capabilities footage.

u/LukeOnTheBrightSide · 2 pointsr/photography

> I get 5% cash back on Amazon right now also for the next $700 I spend and 1% after that so seems like a good time to buy.

Yes, let the justification flow through you. That $35 you save sure beats the fact that it was $100 cheaper last Christmas. Although I'll give you that the Sony seems to be priced well.

Not that I didn't load up on some stupid shit this month, so I can't really knock you for that!

You've picked an interesting two cameras. The Pentax K2's are, supposedly, some of the most durable and weather-resistant DSLRs around. Sony, meanwhile, has some of the best tech - but isn't exactly known for durability. Choices, choices.

If durability is really important to you, and you like the Pentax, I'd go with that. If portability is needed, go with the Sony. Take a look at the lenses you'd most want (assuming you have enough experience to know) and price them out.

Sony is doing awesome, incredible things with their newest cameras... but the pace of improvement is so rapid, that it's hard to look at the couple years old model. Nowadays, the A9 and A7RIII seem to be just as good as DSLRs... but from what I understand, the A6000's era was still balancing pros and cons.

This sounds like I'm knocking Sony, but I really like them. Their image quality is just excellent, and there will be new lenses for the E-mount. That seems way more future-proof than the A mount, and probably even Pentax. It's just that for when these cameras started, if the smaller size isn't critical, I think the Pentax has fewer compromises and a few advantages.

u/tirsoan · 2 pointsr/Cameras

PANASONIC LUMIX G7 4K Mirrorless Camera, with 14-42mm MEGA O.I.S. Lens, 16 Megapixels, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DMC-G7KS (USA SILVER) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409O6O/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_nZoxzbTXVJND4

Or

Nikon D5300 24.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Auto Focus-S DX NIKKOR Zoom Lens (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FY3T3TM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_g0oxzbDRWAJYG

u/southphoto · 2 pointsr/FFXV

I attempted to answer this question in another thread recently and found this post.

Here are my suggestions;

Not a Rangefinder (No window to look through in image.)
Based on what I am seeing, getting any silver body with a vented hood is your closest match visually.

Based on where the eye piece is and the way he holds the camera I'd vote, one of the following;

Professional;

For DSLR; (more photos for charge)

  • Nikon Df

    Mirrorless; (smaller, but less photos)

  • Olympus Stylus 1 or OM-D

  • Fuji X-T2

    Best Bang for Buck;

  • Panasonic Lumix

    I'd say the lens is a 35mm

u/tclemstudios · 2 pointsr/videography

I live stream podcasts with multiple angles. Someone recently asked me about all the gear I use to do it so I made a list.


Program - This is the program I use to broadcast. You can stream and record at the same time.

https://streamlabs.com/

Cameras

https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Mirrorless-14-42mm-Megapixels-DMC-G7KK/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=panasonic+g7&qid=1558477000&s=gateway&sr=8-3


Dummy Battery for cameras

https://www.amazon.com/Gonine-DMW-BLC12-Replacement-PANASONIC-DMC-FZ200/dp/B01D69P0UG/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?crid=32A1OGUQ5XENW&keywords=lumix+g7+dummy+battery&qid=1558477179&s=gateway&sprefix=lumix+g7+dum%2Caps%2C164&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1


Capture cards - These are used to connect the cameras to the PC

https://www.amazon.com/Capture-Broadcast-Streaming-Grabber-Converter/dp/B0779ZJZX3/ref=sr_1_17_sspa?crid=JC99JTVRO2VM&keywords=capture+card&qid=1558477097&s=gateway&sprefix=capture+%2Caps%2C150&sr=8-17-spons&psc=1

HDMI to MICRO HDMI - capture card to camera

https://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters-Speed-Micro-Resolution/dp/B004C3HZCC/ref=sr_1_10?keywords=hdmi+to+micro+hdmi&qid=1558477350&s=gateway&sr=8-10

Audio Interface

https://www.amazon.com/Alesis-MultiMix-8-Channel-Interface-Headphones/dp/B07D7HKS1H/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=audio+interface+alesis&qid=1558477609&s=gateway&sr=8-5


Microphones

https://www.amazon.com/Technica-AT2005USB-Dynamic-Cardioid-Microphone/dp/B077YPDG5Q/ref=sr_1_30?keywords=xlr+dynamic+microphone&qid=1558477879&s=gateway&sr=8-30

u/AlternateContent · 1 pointr/photography

I snuck it in there, she was looking at either the T6 or D3300 because they were in her budget and liked what she saw. My budget is around 2.5x that (which means I could get either of those bodies and a few good lenses, or "invest" for a nicer body with better/more features), basically $800-$999 for a body and a nice lens or 2 to start, then get her another lens in a few months. I was looking at this kit, which falls in line with the D3300, here, or the T6i set here, but was thinking maybe getting the body and a nice lens separately. I was looking into the 70D with a nice lens because 2 of my coworkers highly recommended it (they do a lot of photography). I believe the D5500 is also pretty good for video though, and seems like a nice option to have, but not a primary concern, and I'm leaning towards it. I've exhausted my coworkers with my indecisiveness. She likes the Nikon because it has a slightly lower crop factor, but the Canon for it's sensor from what I understand.

u/switchup621 · 1 pointr/videography

Sorry, I'm not sure exactly what kind of information I needed to provide.

We will mainly shooting human faces. We would want as little lighting as we can get away with. The main source lighting will be a projector screen which may turn on and off. There will be minimal movement in the video. One issue we have with our current camera is that it takes a moderately long time for the camera to refocus after the projector light has turned back on.

Would something like this work?
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-Pixel/dp/B00DMS0GTC/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1377114008&sr=1-1

u/thenasch · 1 pointr/pics

$800 new, under $700 used. Fairly pricey but not that bad once you get into the context of high quality camera gear.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC

u/5paz · 1 pointr/photography

So I found a 70D on amazon for 779 from KEH, that is the right company you were suggesting right? https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/ol/B00DMS0GTC/ref=mw_dp_olp?ie=UTF8&condition=all

u/GTFHercules · 1 pointr/photography

So I own a T3, and am looking into a body upgrade to do more fancy things like wireless shutters and mirror lockup. The T5i on Amazon is on sale for $600 (body only) while the 70D can be found for $1100 (body only) Given those prices, which is a better buy, and why?

u/ArrogantAnalyst · 1 pointr/Cameras

I think so. As far as i know only the lower end "xxxD" models get rebranded as Rebels in the USA.

EDIT: Indeed Amzon USA has used 70D's for about 500-600 bucks: https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00DMS0GTC?ref_=dp_olp_all_mbc&condition=all&sa-no-redirect=1&pldnSite=1

Be aware that thats just the body. For 650 there are some used 70Ds with a kit lens on Amazon. But that might blow your budget.

u/enexene · 1 pointr/photography

I'm having trouble choosing the correct camera for me. I am a student who travels a lot and want something powerful, yet portable. My choices so far:

-Sony DSC RX100 MI
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1411839797&sr=1-1&keywords=dsc-rx100

-Sony DSC HX300/B
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00BEHRQB4/switctrave08-20

-Sony alpha a5000
http://www.amazon.ca/Sony-Alpha-Interchangeable-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G/ref=dp_ob_title_ce

Which one should I get?
Thank you in advance!

u/higher_moments · 1 pointr/Cameras

When I was in the market for my first "nice" camera without breaking the bank six months ago, the consensus seemed to be that the Sony NEX-3N is the best value in the under-$500 range. Having owned that camera since then, I can say it was worth every penny. With an APS-C sensor (same size as the pricier entry-level dSLRs) and a decent kit lens, I think camera takes pretty respectable pictures (here's one of my favorites, with a bit of RAW editing) and offers as much manual control as you want.

The low price comes at the expense of a few features found on more expensive cameras, perhaps most notably a viewfinder and hot shoe, though this has never really bothered me. I can tell that I'm going to enjoy these sorts of features when I'm willing to spend more on a camera, but in the meantime, I'm satisfied with the control and image quality I have now.

I know Sony has been revamping/replacing the NEX line recently—Amazon reports that the NEX-3N has been upgraded to the a5000, which offers a few more features for a bit more money—so it'd certainly worth doing some research to find the version that fits your budget and your needs. At any rate, I think the Sony mirrorless cameras fit the bill quite well in this price range.

u/LefterisJP · 1 pointr/photography

Hey guys,


This is a rather beginner question as I have no idea about cameras. I have been using Sony a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G) for almost 2 years now taking a lot of photos. I like it but it presents a problem when shooting wildlife or most specifically birds. I somehow ended up liking to take pictures of birds during bird watching so I need something that can help me accomplish this. Need to be able to zoom enough and take good quality pictures without having to go too close. Also would be nice if I can take pictures of birds while in flight.

​

A friend of mine who knows about photography, camera and lenses told me that I need a telephoto zoom lens. He started explaining things about how I can go about making a decision but he used quite a few words I was not familiar with so I kind of lost him in the way.


He ended up suggesting to start with this lens: https://www.amazon.de/Sony-SEL-70300G-Tele-Zoom-Objektiv-Vollformat/dp/B01DLMD7DK which should fit my camera and see how that works for me and the photos I want to take.


The question I would like to ask is if this lens makes sense for my purposes. Are there any other alternatives I should consider? Also ... is photography geat this expensive normally? I was quite shocked to see the price tag.

u/minimalmonochrome · 1 pointr/photography

Thanks for the thoughts MinkOWar! I'm a bit overwhelmed by the options. The more I look the more I think that an optical viewfinder is also a must as this will likely be used in very sunny environments. I wish I could find something just like the Sony Alpha a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HNJWU3G) with one. Considering the Olympus OM-D E-M10 maybe if I can find one? Looks a bit bulkier though, and my bigger issue then is how to pick an intro lens with it?

EDIT:

Maybe the Canon EOS Rebel T6 Digital SLR Camera Kit (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B01CO2JPYS) would be a decent choice? Don't love the look of it but that's getting picky.

u/MinkOWar · 1 pointr/photography

> I wish I could find something just like the Sony Alpha a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HNJWU3G) with one.

NEX6/a6000/a6300/a6500 are that with an electronic viewfinder, at least.

Mirrorless with an optical viewfinder (through the lens, at least) doesn't work, that's the whole point of getting rid of the mirror :)

A fuji XPro1 or X100 series has a hybrid optical style viewfinder, somewhat more like a rangefinder.

u/therealamberrose · 1 pointr/infertility

Some of them were my phone, but the better ones (haha) were taken on a Sony a5100. It's compact and good if you're getting into photography a bit to start with. There are many similar cameras around now, but my husband did tons of research and chose this one (I'd need him to give the reasons why, but its been great!)

He gave it to me for my birthday in March 2015 and I've loved it so far...small enough to go in my purse and take out at bars/events...but great for trips and these landscape type photos. Good quality from its auto settings, but numerous capabilities for changing the settings when needed for a more manual experience. And interchangeable lens capabilities. A fun flip screen for selfies. :) And wifi capabilities to send pics straight to your phone/other device for quick sharing! Oh and it takes video.

It does not have a viewfinder, which is hard/not great for some types of photography.

:)

u/LeviPerson · 1 pointr/photography

Newbie here. Looking for a good camera I can also take when I travel. Should I get the Sony Alpha a5000 or Sony DSC-RX100M III?

I was originally oogaling the DSC-RX100/B but the M III has the flip-up display which I want. It's also +$300 more than the /B. This Black Friday Ad shows the /B on sale for $50 off, which is a pretty piss-poor sale. But it shows the Alpha a5000 for $100 off, which is more appealing. Should I grab the a5000 or is the /B or M III much better?

u/CROMEBOi · 1 pointr/photography

Disclaimer: I'm right with you, I'm a total noob. However, I have put in a good 10-15 hours of research solely on DSLR cameras for beginner and I am also focusing on landscape photography. After all the research I ended up purchasing the [Nikon D3300](Nikon D3300 1532 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR II Auto Focus-S DX NIKKOR Zoom Lens 24.2 MP Digital SLR - Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_2GhKyb00HVR0P)

u/AzuLL · 1 pointr/photography

Hello Reddit, need some advice on camera purchase. Narrowed it down to the Pentax K-50, the Nikon 3300, and the Panasonic Lumix G6. I want to get into low-light, time-lapse photography, action not necessarily a priority. I like the Pentax due to weather sealing, pentaprism. Nikon has good reviews, no low pass filter (is this important?), good lens selection (although not a factor for me). I like the G6 because shoots good video, functions for time-lapse, wifi. I like the idea of mirrorless cameras but according to research they still lag behind in image quality, which is my main priority. Any thoughts/suggestions?

Edit: Priorities are Stills, low-light, landscapes, time-lapse, but video is handy, budget is under $900 including lens package.

u/FloatFreely_ · 1 pointr/youtubers

I use a Nikon D3300 for all of my videos. It's not really known as being a video making camera, but I have it set up on a tripod and I get great 1080p quality.

If you go this route, I recommend snagging an external mic to mount on top for better audio quality.

So far, I have had absolutely no problems with it, and don't see myself needing to upgrade anytime soon.

u/carpb202 · 1 pointr/photography

Do you have a link to the $450 2 lens kit? The only one I'm seeing from Nikon is this one: 18-55 & 55-200

u/OhOhOhMyGosh · 1 pointr/OkCupid

My birthday is not too far off. If I can lose 30 pounds by the actual day I'll be so proud of myself. So far it's only been five pounds that I may or may not have gained back over the past weekend. So far I'm starting to watch my carb and sugar intake. I was trying on my summer dresses from years past and noticed that one fits a little loose than it has previously.

As for work, still working on gaining more responsibility. Weird to say that it's almost been a year since starting. Time has certainly flown.

As soon as I obtain the money I'll work on getting the camera. I've narrowed it down to a Canon or a Nikon. Kind of leaning towards the Canon. I liked the weight of it, but the Nikon has ultra-clear images.

u/Haematobic · 1 pointr/TekSyndicate

Found it! It was this one.

Mind you, I'm by no means an expert, and considering how vast the photography world is, I could really benefit from a video titled "photography for dummies".

So far I've settled for a Nikon D3300 and a 35mm f/1.8G lens (which I'll be getting in the near future), which considering my "amateur" status, should be more than enough.

I felt that this video made a better job explaining the differences between ISO levels than his, for instance.

u/crimsonskunk · 1 pointr/SonyAlpha

Without saying anything about lens quality here are some price comparisons.

[Nikon D3300 w/ kit] (http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-Focus-S-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B00HQ4W1QE) $447, [35mm 1.8] (http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-Focus-Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0) $177, [50mm 1.8] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004Y1AYAC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=cpc02-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004Y1AYAC) $197

vs

Sony A6000 w/ kit $650, 35mm 1.8 $450, 50mm 1.8 $250

I'm not trying to say one is better than the other, just making a comparison. On the Sony you get OSS with the lenses which drives the price up. If you are trying to save money though, OSS might not be that important.

u/Praelium · 1 pointr/photography

I took a class recently and used the Canon T5i Rebel, which I really enjoyed. But now that I'm buying my own camera I'm struggling to find the right skill vs price balance.

Is a $600 camera too much for a beginner who just wants to photograph landscapes, night scenes, and everyday objects? In class we used manual mode exclusively -- something with a lot of versatility in that aspect would be great. I also want the basic features so I can learn and explore this hobby without accidentally paying extra for luxuries only a highly experienced photography could use. But I also don't want to be kicking myself 1 year from now for buying such a limiting camera, you know?

I visited a local store and the owner recommended the Nikon D5300.

Nikon D5300 - $500

Nikon D3300 - $450

Nikon D3000 - $150

\^\^\^ I found those other two by reading through this thread.

On top of this I'll need a lens, tripod, case, and SD card. But the issue isn't really price but rather overestimating the quality of camera I realistically need.

If anyone can offer some guidance I'd really appreciate it, because this is stressing me out. Thank you.

u/svengeiss · 1 pointr/photography

I took photography back in college and was pretty decent at it. I'm looking to jump back into the hobby and am looking at DSLRs. I'm looking to get this nikon to start out with. Is this a good choice or do you have another suggestion?

u/Samsuxx · 1 pointr/Filmmakers

I'll link you to this post where someone asked the same thing.
>if your principal interest is video, you should avoid Nikon DSLRs in this price range.
>
>They lack:
>
>- Focus peaking for razor sharp manual focus
>
>- The ability to change aperture in Live View (video) mode
>
>- a built in intervalometer for time lapse
>
>- a usable viewfinder when you switch to Live View
>
>- compatibility with silent, video optimized lenses ([here] (https://youtu.be/DuX8CDaDUaw) is the problem with noisy Nikon autofocus motors)
>
>Instead of a [$496.95 Nikon D3300] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HQ4W1QE/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00HQ4W1QE&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20), you might want to seriously consider the [$515 (with 14-42mm kit lens) Panasonic G6] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&icep_item=321613840675&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg) instead [Referral Links].
>
>The Panasonic G6 has an electronic viewfinder you can actually use for shooting video outdoors in bright sunlight (when a DSLR's LCD is likely to be washed out), a built-in intervalometer, focus peaking, full manual control of exposure in video mode and compatibility with Panasonic video optimized lenses with silent autofocus motors.

Source:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Filmmakers/comments/38xpjf/is_the_nikon_d3300_a_good_camera_for_filmmaking/cryo4z4

u/fludy7 · 1 pointr/teenagers

message me for more details, but the best bang for buck pro-type camera is this one when on sale and a cheaper one is basically this one. you could go cheaper but it depends.

u/ahcomochingas · 1 pointr/mexico

yo compre una nikon D3300 en amazon por 6 mil pesos hace como 2 meses. te la recomiendo.

http://www.amazon.com.mx/gp/product/B00HQ4W1QE?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o07_s00

los precios en este modelo fluctuan mucho. checala todos los dias, eventualmente la vuelven a poner en 6.

u/Joeeeeeey · 1 pointr/photography

Ok, ok. What do you mean exactly with kit lens? Is it just a regular lens? And why not just buying the body + the kit lens all in one?

Here's what I found:
For example if I choose the canon 1200D camera, here it's the body + 18-55mm: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-EF-S-18-55mm-Digital/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1405024144&sr=8-2&keywords=Canon+1200D

Then I would buy the 50mm f/1.8 lens additionally: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-Standard-AutoFocus-Lens/dp/B00005K47X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1405024183&sr=8-1&keywords=+50+f1.8

Or do you mean I should just buy the body: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-T5-Digital-Camera/dp/B00J9SH1ZG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1405024439&sr=8-1&keywords=Canon+1200D


Can you explain me what you mean with shooting in raw?


I would be very thankful if you could check the canon 1200D out :)




u/anthemredit · 1 pointr/photography

So ive always wanted to get into photography since i was like, 9. 7 years, 2 jobs later, and ive decided its time to purchase my first "camera."

My budget is 600$(maybe 10-50$+) ive looked at two cameras so far but i dont know which is better, what to look for, ect. If someone could help me and give me a few more cameras to choose from(with some explanation) it would be very appreciated!

cameras i was looking at:
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_pdt_img_sims?ie=UTF8

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01CO2JPYS/ref=s9_acsd_bw_wf_a_samsungu_mdi?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-6&pf_rd_r=00Z9QT022HA512HQ191F&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=8afab454-36e6-4b02-aaa4-2e52dcb0c416&pf_rd_i=14725218011

u/elijahf · 1 pointr/Cameras

T5 and Nikon D3300 are both $400 new on Amazon, however the D3300 has substantially better image quality.

u/silverblackgold · 1 pointr/trees

Canon EOS Rebel T5 Digital SLR Camera Kit with EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_MrC2xbKKMSF6K.

It was on the "approved cameras" list. I should note that I don't have any interest in photography; this was the only available online class that fulfilled my degree requirements this semester.

u/Bossman1086 · 1 pointr/canon

If you want to buy new, you can get the Rebel T5 with kit lens for around there. You could also go with a used 60D. But that is without a lens.

u/paisleyterror · 1 pointr/AskPhotography
u/silvermavrik · 1 pointr/Gunpla
u/xrjon0609 · 1 pointr/photography

I have the Canon T3i which is a nice starter. And now they have the Canon T5 which is comparable. I would call them both entry level and you can get the T5 in a nice combo pack with a normal lens and telephoto for like $450 on Amazon Prime.

Check it out

u/itsdageek · 1 pointr/teenagers

Saving for College/ Car, imo. Or a camera, if the money is burning a hole in your pocket. (1200D)

u/kosherpuppy · 1 pointr/space

Here's the equipment I used for this image:

Telescope -> Celestron Advanced VX 8 inch ($1199, but smaller scopes are much cheaper, you just need the equatorial mount)

Camera -> Canon Rebel T5 (currently $375)

I also used a free trial of PixInsight for image processing

u/zsaile · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

I wonder if it might be a better idea to get something like this:

https://www.amazon.ca/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B00IB1BTWI

Like you said couldn't hurt to have the same model as them since they have a zoom lens we could borrow.

u/pburgh36 · 1 pointr/photography

Is this a good deal for the Canon Rebel T5? I'm wanting to get into astrophotography and am wondering if this is a good place to start. I posted earlier but it kind of got buried.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-EF-S-18-55mm-Digital/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1427314864&sr=8-1&keywords=canon+rebel+t5#bundle_feature_div

u/ethanbrecke · 1 pointr/ExposurePorn

Looked around some. Is this a good Camera? Click Here

u/tdoger · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00IB1BTWI/ref=sr_1_3_olp?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1526368230&sr=1-3&keywords=canon+t5

This is what I currently use. About to upgrade though. It's definitely good enough for your first few years. And then if you start enjoying photography you just buy a nice lens.

u/jakemoney3 · 1 pointr/photography

Yo man, I followed you on insta a couple weeks ago and you followed me back. Interesting to find out that you have a Sony A6000 and you just bought that lens. I bought the same camera last year with these two lenses and at the beginning of this year I bought the Rokinon 12mm! Some more samples can be found of this lens here all of the west texas stuff was done with the 12mm. Actually, I think the only thing not shot through the 12mm are the colosseum, vesuvius, and the florence street photo.

u/rayven1lk · 1 pointr/photography

Hi guys I was looking for a new camera and across these 2 options on Amazon:

PANASONIC LUMIX G7 4K Mirrorless Camera, with 14-42mm MEGA O.I.S. Lens, 16 Megapixels, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DMC-G7KK

Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera w/ 16-50mm and 55-210mm Power Zoom Lenses

I usually try to shoot some landscape/wide angle shots and want to also try some portrait stuff with great bokeh. Which one do you think would be more suitable?

Open to other options (including something you may recommend besides kit lens) as well as long as they are mirrorless. Budget is around $800. Thanks.

u/julesbagules · 1 pointr/Austin

It was this camera and lens - https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-16-50mm-55-210mm/dp/B00NO1T55I

I don't know much yet about photography, the camera did all the work!

u/UnenthusiasticCat · 1 pointr/EarthPorn

Sony alpha a6000: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NO1T55I/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_eqazzbEG533GV

Panasonic lumix G7 4k: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409O6O/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_Vuazzb1B131P7

Then again i dont know if they are the same type of mirrorless.

u/KILROY_ · 1 pointr/videography

$598 on Amazon

Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera w/ 16-50mm and 55-210mm Power Zoom Lenses https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NO1T55I/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_I8R.Bb5W4JEM0

u/vaxt · 1 pointr/canon

For Canon I would suggest picking up a used 80D.
You could get a 2 lens kit for a Sony A6000 as well, within your budget: https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-16-50mm-55-210mm/dp/B00NO1T55I
If you want 4K Video you can get the Sony A6300 with a kit lens, though you might have to get that used as well.

u/gaaaaaaaaaaav · 1 pointr/photography

Think I'm pulling the trigger on an a6000 for my first mirrorless. Would it be better to get the camera body only, and then pick up a lens, say a Sigma 19 or go ahead and get the package with kit lens + 55-210mm?

I like the idea of skipping over the crappy kit lens, but at the same time, for just $50 I can have the larger lens as well, assuming it's not garbage.

u/mr_frankenstein · 1 pointr/Cameras

The sensor is smaller and it will make a difference. Also, keep in mind that the E-M10 is a low-end camera, while the A6000 is currently the best thing you can get from Sony's E-mount (with an APS-C sensor).

If you don't mind a 2-lens setup, then what do you think about this: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-55-210mm-16-50mm/dp/B00NO1T55I/

It's an A6000 with 16-50 and 55-210mm lenses. It's a $100 difference, but I think it will be worth it.


Personally, I've made the mistake of grabbing a low-end camera and this will never happen again. I have a D3200 when I could have bought a D5200. The difference in quality (image and build) is huge and worth your money.

u/ficus16 · 1 pointr/Cameras

sony a6000 kit

Not sure if this helps you or this kit is available to you but it's what i bought in march and I like it very much!

u/circlenone · 1 pointr/photography

Hello /r/photography !

First time poster here. I'm sure you guys get a lot of posts like these here, so sorry for that. I'm very seriously considering purchasing my first camera over the holiday season, perhaps like a Christmas present to myself. I've always been interested in photography, took a few classes in HS/college, but I've never actually owned a camera before.

I'm actually a retail associate at a store with a sizable DI department and I've found myself hanging around there checking out some cameras and lenses during my lunch breaks recently. I've been doing what research and reading I can but as a potential new photographer its a bit overwhelming to start. Even some of the menus and settings on the DSLRs are confusing.

Anyway. Right now I'm eyeing the Sony a6000 as my gateway into the world of photography. I've picked up and held most of the cameras in our shop and I definitely appreciate the smaller compact design of a mirrorless versus the traditional DSLRs. I'm sure I would be fine with a DSLR and in the end the lenses will be the same size but I would prefer a mirrorless, I think. At this point, my major reservation with the a6000 is what I've read about the E mount lens selection being quite small.

From what I understand Sony is still adding to this lineup but there is a much smaller selection of compatible or native lenses for the E mount series compared to, say, Canon or Nikon. I'm wondering if this might be a reason to consider going with a different camera. I checked out the EOS M3 as well, which I believe is a similar price/specs to the a6000 but I think I would prefer to have the EVF the Sony has. However, I'm assuming the M3 has a much larger selection of compatible lenses.

For what its worth, we have a bundle similar to this in my store https://www.amazon.com/Sony-ILCE6000YB-Mirrorless-Digital-55-210mm/dp/B00NO1T55I which also includes a 50mm prime (I believe its this one https://www.amazon.com/Sony-50mm-Mid-Range-Mount-Cameras/dp/B005NX7HY6 ) open boxed for $599 on the tag, and could possibly get it cheaper. I'm not sure if an open box item qualifies (I would have to ask) but I do also have access to Sony's Premier Rewards program which I could get up to a 40% rebate on the a6000.

However, for the sake of finding some alternatives to look into, lets say my budget is about.. $700 USD before taxes. Could possibly flex it to $800. I can probably get similar accomodations on most brand of cameras and lenses that my store carries. For me, this would be a very large purchase and I want to make sure I get the best fit and I would probably be using this camera for at least 5 years and adding lenses/accessories as I go.

What are some good alternatives to the a6000 in this price range? I'd prefer mirrorless if possible but I'm not totally opposed to a standard DSLR. I like the manual controls (was considering a5100 originally) on the a6000 even though I don't know what most of them do. Prefer to have a viewfinder. APS-C sensor.. not convinced on m43.

My endgoal is to be shooting macro but at this time I don't think I can afford the investment into a 90 or 100mm macro lens as a total beginner photographer. Mostly interested in doing flowers/mushrooms and inanimate objects but being able to shoot small creatures would be cool. Was considering tubes or maybe a reversal ring in the meantime. Also interested in general nature/city photography.

Any suggestions you guys might have would be great. So far the a6000 seems like the best fit for me but I want to explore all my options before making any purchase. Sorry for the long post. Cheers!

u/xAnomaly_ · 1 pointr/a6000

Thanks for the help, this will be a good starting point. I didn't think about getting extra batteries. I just want to make sure that this is considered a kit lens or if it's something else like this.

u/G-3PO · 1 pointr/photography

I apologize for the "what should I buy" question that gets asked all the time, but here we go.

I'm looking at the RX100 M3 and the A6000 with 6-50mm and 55-210mm lenses

I'm a 100% total beginner and I want a camera to capture basically everything (travel, family, outdoors).

From what I can see the RX100 is only better for portability, and I'm 100% okay with a bigger camera for better pictures, but are the two lenses included enough? I'm okay with potential buying one more, but I would like to keep it to the two.

I'm also open to other suggestions!

u/ladiesman2196 · 1 pointr/photography

Awesome! How about this? https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NO1T55I/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I can get a brand new one for 625$ for this camera with two lenses. I am a complete novice so forgive me for asking this question. Is one of those two a prime lens? If not, what are their use cases? Thanks :)

u/Syfilms64 · 1 pointr/SmallYTChannel
  1. My channel/business is called Scrapyard Films. I primarily create video editing tutorials for Magix Vegas Pro but also sprinkle in other tutorials for various other programs. I also have sub categories for my channel including my Let's Play series called Scrapyard Plays which I'm just starting to take more seriously and I'm also going to be doing more game reviews in a category called Scrapyard Reviews (Only reviews 1 game so far). I've had this YouTube account since YouTube was created so I have a bunch of other random videos on there that I created over the past 10 years that don't fit in the niche I'm now focusing towards.


  2. Gear and stuff:
  1. I'm uploading consistent videos to a schedule (every Tuesday and Friday). I'm interactive with all my subscribers. I'm providing the highest quality Vegas Pro tutorials on YouTube. I'm hosting easily winnable, monthly giveaways. I'm trying my best to make you laugh when watching video game videos.


    YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/scrapyardfilms


    Thanks for doing this and sparking interest in people, allowing them to share their content!
u/TrueJacksonVP · 1 pointr/space

Honestly, for the price, look into mirrorless cameras like the current Sony alpha series or Panasonic lumix. They’re great cameras, I’ll link a few in a minute here.

Brands like Rokinon make fairly affordable lenses too.

Edit:

$500

$650

$1000

$1050

Seconding what the other commenter said about buying used. I have a Sony A7s ii that I picked up used for just under a grand and it’s been a great camera for both video and photo purposes. Saving up for a Panasonic GH5s next.

Just make sure you research the the camera best suited for what you’d like to do (video, photography) and make sure the lenses you get fit your camera body or you have an adapter (Sony uses E mount lenses and the Lumix cameras take G or micro 4/3s, for example). Get the right speed SD card (if you get a 4k camera - the write speed should preferably be higher than 95mbps) and figure out the kind of lenses best suited to you (zoom lenses are versatile, but prime lenses tend to have better aperture ranges and depth of field).

There are also tons of blogs and videos that can explain everything you need to know.

u/Balensee · 1 pointr/PanasonicG7

It's a great deal, but it isn't a flash sale, and it's not exclusive to Best Worst Buy.

The price dropped at all of Panasonic's official retailers a few days ago.

Amazon, B & H, Adorama, and all the other official Panasonic retailers have it for $497, many with free shipping and no tax.

Adorama even offers a version with a free accessory bundle. Currently on backorder, but can be ordered now for delivery when back in stock.

u/always-there · 1 pointr/videography

At $500 the Panasonic G7 would give you a nice still camera and 4K video. It will also grow with you as you wish to add lenses, microphones and more. Like when your little tyke starts playing sports you can get a Olympus 75-300 and get shots like this.

u/xiongchiamiov · 1 pointr/photography

I've heard good things about the Panasonic lunix g7 for video. It's at $600 with kit lens on Amazon right now. I have a different m43 camera, and the lens selection for that group is the best of any of the mirrorless systems.

u/arcticrobot · 1 pointr/M43

If you are thinking to get a video capable m43 camera in this price range you would better skip any Oly camera and go straight for Panasonic G7. It has the same price and bundled with free Audiotechnica mic($250 value)

u/trwest77 · 1 pointr/photography

Is $500 a good price for a new Panasonic G7? I just got a notification from B&H that the price has dropped and it's the same price on Amazon. I have a Nikon D3300 but I really want to start shooting video.

https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-G7KS-Mirrorless-Camera-Silver/dp/B00X409O6O

u/teenagers_SS · 1 pointr/SubredditSimulator

But, I strongly recommend the Panasonic G7 for you and will be really easy in the comments.

u/abitipie · 1 pointr/Cameras

Can you stretch to $600? If so the Panasonic G7 will have you covered for years.

u/mike275ms · 1 pointr/photography

Is there a large difference between: "Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body Only (discontinued by manufacturer)" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B002NEGTTW and the newer "Canon EOS 7D Mark II Digital SLR Camera" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1458083051&sr=8-2&keywords=cannon+eos+7d+mark+ii

Looking to pick up one of the above models as a birthday gift for my girlfriend. She would be using it for low light concert photography as well as shooting video for basic Vlogs. As there is a considerable price difference, was just curious on the real differences and if anyone had suggestions on the better choice.

u/eskachig · 1 pointr/Cameras

Way back when I first started, my fingers liked Canons more too - which is why I have them now. This is the biggest decision really, you can easily get a new body, but switching systems is tough. That said, there is really no wrong choice here. Certainly, I have no regrets.

The 70D is seriously sweet. It's a little cheaper on Amazon but not by much. If you want to go with a cheaper body that is also awesome try looking at a 7D - it's about half the price on Amazon. You go back a generation in sensor tech (not a huge deal at all imo) and lose the fold out screen - but you keep the great AF system and get a magnesium and weather sealed body with a bigger viewfinder. If your hands liked the 70D, they just might like 7D even more, and you'd save enough money to get a couple of primes.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B002NEGTTW/

I am a little hesitant about the superzoom. It's an enormous range, and not especially fast. But that seems like a decent price, and certainly a good way to test out a lot of focal lengths. A whole lot of focal lengths. It's not a good lens for someone like me who likes a lot of bokeh and tends to shoot indoors - for boudoir, portraiture, etc I'd recommend something faster without the super-tele end, perhaps like my Tamron. But if you're shooting outdoors in strong light, I suspect it would do really well with obviously enormous focal flexibility. And hell, you're buying it used, can always resell for roughly the same.

An awesome EF-S lens is the pancake 35mm equivalent, turns your DSLR into a great portable X100-sorta :) Awesome for street photography, shooting people indoors, hiking, etc. This one's a Canon luxury, Nikon doesn't seem to have any good pancakes available.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-24mm-2-8-Lens/dp/B00NI3BZ5K/

It's so cheap you actually don't save any money buying it used - one of the only times I'll say that :)

In general, I'd get EF lenses where possible over EF-S, in case you want to jump to full frame later - but the cheap superzoom and the pancake are good EF-S lenses to have.

u/thatonegoodpost · 1 pointr/videos

I think it interesting that $1168 Canadian ~ $925.39 US
but the same product for the US market (.com instead of .ca) asks for $999. I wonder why this is.

u/elusiveemily · 1 pointr/tennis

I used a 7D with the kit lens because I didn't have time to rent a nicer one.

u/kingofnima · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

Just to compare, here is a selection from the Canon side of things with Amazon used prices:
Canon 7d - $990
Tamron 17-50 2.8 - $340
These two are a great basis to work off off and get you to $1330.

If you want to spend some more you could add the following:
Canon 50mm f/1.8 - 100
Canon Speedlite 430EX - 235

But to be honest, if your wife is just starting out and money is a bit tight, don't go out spending $900 or more on a body. As most people will tell you, picture quality is mostly due to lenses. Canon t3i, Canon t4i or 60D as well as Nikon 3200 and 5100 are all excellent bodies and have more than enough features to keep her happy. If you get either of those bodies and a decent 17-50mm lens as well as a 50mm prime she will have great tools to learn on with space to grow.

Just like daegon I would recommend to buy used. Most Photographers look out for their things quite well and most of these lenses and bodies are made at quite good quality levels. I hope this helps.

u/Lightning_Ink · 1 pointr/photomarket

Shoulda taken a screenshot when i could have. Looks like they're all gone now.

My bad.

Here's a 7D for cheap, though.

u/dangercollie · 1 pointr/photography
u/Temporarily__Alone · 1 pointr/videography

My Canon 60D manually goes up to 1/4000 in 1080p.

I assume the cheaper t3i would do the same.

u/CricketPinata · 1 pointr/Filmmakers

Here are some cameras i'm used or that i've worked with footage from that are in the "affordable" range I think. This is a decent cross-section I think of a lot of the DSLR and Camcorders out there.

It really depends on if you just want a really basic camcorder to just use as a learning platform (I would consider a used DVX or something if that's the case), or if it's something you want to try to use as a professional rig, and if so what do you want to do with it? Narrative work, documentaries, videography work?

Depending on what you're planning some cameras on this list will be good choices, some will be bad.

If you don't mind spending more, maybe think about the Panasonic AF100, or consider looking into the Black Magic: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/855879-REG/Blackmagic_Design_BMD_CINECAM26KEF_Cinema_Camera.html

Or maybe even a used Scarlet or something.

Sub-$1000 Range:

CANON:

T4i/650D, $600-800 depending on kit and reseller.


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/44077443

https://vimeo.com/44366121

https://vimeo.com/49516874


60D, $600-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/32416450

https://vimeo.com/38775602

https://vimeo.com/15181980

https://vimeo.com/37153340


Canon HF-G10 $900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/22978435 - Various cameras are used in this one, but gives you a general idea to the quality of Canon Camcorders

https://vimeo.com/21301495

https://vimeo.com/6519838





NIKON:

Nikon D5200 $800


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/54991854

https://vimeo.com/60135187

https://vimeo.com/57861628

https://vimeo.com/59832019



D7000, $700-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/25585194

https://vimeo.com/15894774

https://vimeo.com/31984384

https://vimeo.com/17696909



PANASONIC:

Panasonic GH2, $565-950


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/28454865

https://vimeo.com/57878898

https://vimeo.com/22605282

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U9KmAlrEXU - Trailer for a feature-length film shot with it.

https://vimeo.com/33047750



SONY:

Sony NEX6 $800-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/52942499

https://vimeo.com/55598921

https://vimeo.com/56972084



$1000-1800 Range:

CANON:

7D $900-1200


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/25968181

https://vimeo.com/16117083

https://vimeo.com/7764570

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_jWPJwKIE - Trailer for feature-length film shot with it.


5D MK.II, $1400-1800+


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16339841

https://vimeo.com/33342571

https://vimeo.com/4704533

Some 5D/7D comparisons: https://vimeo.com/14832168



NIKON:

D7100


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/62624613

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgVhkZdyP1c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb1FbZcIfvw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR1oZsqhrX0


PANASONIC:

Panasonic GH3 $1200-1500


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/49420579

https://vimeo.com/49944730

https://vimeo.com/54266780

https://vimeo.com/58762647

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fhEazbFKI


SONY:

Sony NEX7 $1140


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/33599712

https://vimeo.com/36845339

https://vimeo.com/36117747

https://vimeo.com/35176255



$1900-2500 Range:

CANON:

XF100, $2500


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16963810

https://vimeo.com/21187597

https://vimeo.com/27391327


5D MK.III $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/56203946

https://vimeo.com/47767166

https://vimeo.com/41657820

https://vimeo.com/37838697



NIKON:
D600 $2000-2500


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/58319404

https://vimeo.com/52952766

https://vimeo.com/49989606

https://vimeo.com/52634062


D800 $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/36305675

https://vimeo.com/56135940

https://vimeo.com/38912704

https://vimeo.com/42065372



PANASONIC:
HMC-150, $2100-2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/9783117

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIRUUnmnMFk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF29YfIKErc


AF100/105
$2500-3000


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16724324

https://vimeo.com/15765280

https://vimeo.com/16000333

https://vimeo.com/30063219


SONY:
VG20 $2200


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/32747038

https://vimeo.com/31024014

https://vimeo.com/37048917



A99, $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/52031763

https://vimeo.com/58012010

https://vimeo.com/50982162

u/DoctorBroBro · 1 pointr/photomarket

Just a tip, but this can easily be found on Amazon by searching Canon 60D Used . I broke the hotshoe mount on mine recently and have been debating buying a used one vs how much it may cost to fix that. =/

u/rsmichaud · 1 pointr/photography

Stupid question, I'm very new to photography. I know my way around my Canon Rebel T3, but that's about it.

That being said, will this lens be compatible with my camera? I'm pretty sure it is, I just want to be certain before I place my order. Thanks in advance guys :)

Links:

lens: http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Professional-Definition-Olympus-others/dp/B00LAXEEC6/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1407697863&sr=1-3

my camera: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-18-55mm-Movie/dp/B004J3Y9U6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1407698242&sr=8-1&keywords=canon+rebel+t3

u/sweetbeauty · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

I'm saving up for this camera. I've also stated doing MTurk, so hopefully that will help speed up the process. Money is pretty tight right now for me though, but I hope to get it by my birthday! :)

u/flamebirdstudios · 1 pointr/hardwareswap
u/MagicalHoneydew · 1 pointr/photography

Thanks for this GREAT advice on looking for a T3 instead of a T3i. This immediately knocks out $200 or so in price and saves me alot!

I have some questions:

buying used lens does it have any issue vs. new ones?

I looked at T3 just for a quick browse and came across these two T3s. I don't understand exactly what is the difference between the two, could you help me?

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-Imaging/dp/B005LW580O/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1396368727&sr=1-2&keywords=canon+t3

vs


http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-T3-Digital-18-55mm/dp/B004J3Y9U6/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1396368727&sr=1-1&keywords=canon+t3

u/blacktoad · 1 pointr/astrophotography

18-55mm IS II. It was [bundled with the camera] (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-T3-Digital-18-55mm/dp/B004J3Y9U6) when I bought it.

Is this something you would recommend upgrading?

u/mathematical · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

> recently I won an cheap Samsung P&S worth $80 which won't charge anymore.

What model is the camera? Can you pull the battery out or do you have to plug in the camera to charge? You can usually pick up a cheap china battery on eBay for $10 or less. It's good to have an extra point and shoot for snapshots when you're not lugging around a nicer camera.

>The camera can be a P&S if you find one better than a mirrorless, since there's no DSLR for $300.

Definitely look for used. I'm not sure how big your hands are, but I shoot a Canon 40D, and I got the Camera + memory cards + portrait grip for $300 over a year ago. With the clearancing of the Canon 60D, they're most certainly cheaper now. I see in another comment you were looking at a T3. You can actually buy a new one right now on Amazon for $299.99. Just as a heads up.

u/kolosok17 · 1 pointr/photography

Hi guys, I am not sure whether this is a good place to post this, so please feel free to delete if it violates the rules.

I am looking to upgrade from a Canon T3 to a smaller, potentially mirrorless, camera. I would like to sell my T3 + gear and use that cash toward the new camera.

What is a reasonable price to ask for this stuff:

Canon EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR Camera DS126291
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-18-55mm-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B004J3Y9U6

Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS II
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-Lens/dp/B000V5K3FG

Tiffen 58mm UV Protection Filter
http://www.amazon.com/Tiffen-58mm-UV-Protection-Filter/dp/B00004ZCJI

Case Logic SLRC-201 SLR Zoom Holster (Black)
http://www.amazon.com/Case-Logic-SLRC-201-Holster-Black/dp/B001TZUS98

AmazonBasics Backpack for SLR/DSLR Cameras and Accessories - Black
http://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Backpack-DSLR-Cameras-Accessories/dp/B002VPE1WK

Generic 58mm Hood

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens - Fixed
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-55-250mm-Telephoto-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B0011NVMO8


Thanks!

u/The_8_Bit_Zombie · 1 pointr/astrophotography

I have a Canon EOS Rebel T3 and a Celestron 114LCM Newtonian telescope. Would this product be all I need to succesfully attach my camera to it?

u/fiskiligr · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

> here's a hibiscus flower at roughy 1:1.

WHOA!

That's amazing ...

I have a few other examples of the kinds of pictures I have taken:

u/RAGEBIKEATHON · 1 pointr/bicycletouring

just got a brand new canon rebel T3 for 370$. the store i work is going out of business!

u/spandex_shmandex · 1 pointr/photography

Thank you!

It’s her first camera (besides her phone) and so I’m not sure of size preference.

Also, thanks for the links! I only Reddit on mobile, and never see the sidebar. I really like the chart showing options per budget.

You mentioned the 600d, which I had heard before in my other post. What do you think about the T3? I found one w/ lens for under $200. Since it’s fulfilled by Amazon, I get free shipping, and if there are any defects, Amazon takes care of it.


Canon EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (discontinued by manufacturer) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004J3Y9U6/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_GRLUDbV4J77VF

u/Eyemajeenyus · 1 pointr/photography

Hello r/photography!
I recently saved up enough money to buy my first serious camera. This Cannon EOS Rebel T3 caught my attention and I keep reading in the reviews that it is an excellent entry level camera. Is that a true statement? I would be willing to shell out some extra money for this T3i if it would be a better buy.
This Cannon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 or this Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 seem like good lenses to go along with them, but are they too much to soon?
Again, this would be my first major camera purchase. Would this be a solid purchase or is there another cheaper camera that would be just as good?

u/caraeeezy · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

Probably the nice camera I have had my eye on. I never added it to my WL because, I mean shit, it is expensive. But I have a passion for live music and the culture that surrounds it. I would LIVE behind a camera if I had one that was nice enough. But mostly, those pure moments when an artist is on stage, pretty much bearing their hard work, their art, their soul to you; those are the moments I wish I could capture (on a device better than my phone).

Then on the other hand, I am an avid people watcher. When I lived closer to the airport, I would go for lunch and sit and watch people pass by and imagine what their lives are like. Or go on campus at a school to the main outdoor area and watch the students bustle by.

And let us not forget the most pure form of beauty there is; nature. I have wanted to do a project where I go to the same place, every day, and take a picture. Same angle, same exact time. And do it for a whole year. I just wonder what it will look like in a time lapse.

u/VKilledTInternet · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

I'm a Canon man myself

u/kmfoh · 1 pointr/chicago
u/LeRadioactiveNarwhal · 1 pointr/photography

> canon t3i

thats a bit on the expensive side for me. I jusrt spent $250 on a new mic setup is this one good for a beginner? http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004J3Y9U6/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A11UAZQJHVFZ21

u/filemeaway · 1 pointr/pics

Oops, yeah, you're right. Although, the ole T3 is only $450. Still not something I'd necessarily recommend.

u/stevensgroupinc · 1 pointr/photography

http://www.amazon.ca/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-Imaging/dp/B004M170YC/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

This camera has such a huge discount on it.

What am I missing? Looking to buy my father an SLR from Canon.

u/scratchnsniff · 1 pointr/photography

So I'm seeing something really strange.
Just noticed something fishy going on with Amazon.

Go to this amazon link
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y

You should see this $100 discount...
http://www.diigo.com/item/image/1ks4o/3h92

Now go to this Amazon page for the exact same thing
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-Body/dp/B004M170YC

There's no one hundred dollar discount.

u/vlmodcon · 1 pointr/AskReddit

It all depends on your budget. I would do this.
Rebel 3Ti Body...just the body:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-Body/dp/B004M170YC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1311808344&sr=8-1

with this lens - Sigma 50mm, f1.4:
http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-50mm-Canon-Digital-Cameras/dp/B0018ZDGAC/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1311808413&sr=1-1

You can learn everything you need to become a great photographer with this combination.

u/BobbyDash · 1 pointr/photography

This.



This.



And this.


If you don't foresee yourself getting into videos, save some cash and go back to the t2i. The articulating screen is honestly the only advantage with the t3i, especially if you throw magic lantern on an sd card.

u/zeisss · 1 pointr/teenagers

Canon T4i is a great choice, but the T3i is almost as good and cheaper!


as well as the D3200.

It really depends on your needs, but they are both great cameras! Do some research into them. I think that this video might help.

u/rkwong123 · 1 pointr/photography

well the t3i is $579.95 for the body only on amazon, the t2i is $599.00 (but you can definitely get it cheaper somewhere else other than amazon or if you buy used)
here's the 50 mm lens

magic lantern is free. its basically a different firmware that you can place onto your canon dslr.

u/harbinger146 · 1 pointr/videos

the camera

I think this is the same gimbal either way it could definitely work on that drone with that camera. The gimbal I use is cheaper, but requires more work on our end.

the lens

I couldn't find the drone he is using in that image, but the one I have was built from scratch and was around 2k. All in all, this stuff can be super expensive, but you can also find much cheaper set ups that get the job done. For a BBC documentary I wouldn't be surprised if each rig is 50k or more, but you can do it at home for under 10k.

Edit: Also, gimbals aren't lens specific. The only upside to having multiple gimbals for each lens is that you wouldn't need to waste 5 min restabalizing it with the change in weight/center of gravity.

u/ccb621 · 1 pointr/photography

Prices on Amazon:

  • T2i Body: $599
  • T3i Body: $579

    Are you seriously whining about saving $20 on a superior camera?
u/SkittlesDLX · 1 pointr/photography

I need a DSLR for a digital photography class. I'm trying to find a cheap one and this seems to be the best so far. I'm a little worried about the age though. Will that be a problem? And is there a cheaper camera I should go for? I want to go into film, so I'd like to have a camera, but I want to do post-production and vfx, so I don't need anything too fancy. Just something to tool around with.

u/mlysne · 1 pointr/youtubers

I use a Nikon D5100. I'm totally a noob and this was an old camera, but it seems to be able to do some "okay" videos...I'm sure the pros out there know way better ones, but this one you can get used in the $250 range.

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Camera-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-Focus-S/dp/B004V4IWKG

u/dancemasterv · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon
  1. Technically, the most expensive thing on my list is an amazon gift card since it goes up to $2,000, but I think that's cheating lol. So the most expensive item on my list is a Nikon D5100 DLSR Camera .

  2. I want the camera since (like many others) I really enjoy photography and taking pictures. I don't have a camera atm except for my phone. Although the phone gets the job done, a nice camera would definitely be ideal.

  3. Yes, i'd be fine if I never got the camera. I'm a fairly simple man who believes that people don't need a lot of things. Heck, I don't feel I need anything on my wishlist at all, even the shampoo. They're all wants. I think it'd be great to have some of these things, and some may make everyday living much easier, but none of it is necessarily needed. I definitely want it, but I don't need it.

    Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds!
u/magicweasel7 · 1 pointr/photography

Photography newbie. Looking to get started and I've decided on a d5100:
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-16-2MP-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B004V4IWKG
Is this two lens bundle or a good deal? Or am I better off getting just the camera and some other len/lenses?

u/shadowdev · 1 pointr/photography

I was wondering if there was any downside if I buy my camera from Amazon or Best Buy. I live in some what small town but there is a Best Buy in town and the financing looks good on the camera - 18 months no interest. Or I could just buy it outright from Amazon. I'm looking to buy a Nikon d5100 amazon link

u/Accipiter · 1 pointr/Nikon

Can someone with this lens tell me where the filter diameter size is located?

I already know what it is, I just need to know where it's printed/etched on the lens.

u/coffee_obsession · 1 pointr/photography

Nikon D5100. Buy used and throw the rest of your money at a tripod.

u/vanillawafercaper · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

I'd love an amazon gift card for my camera fund. I've been saving up for this camera for years now and if I end up booking this wedding, then I'll only be about $200 short of my goal! Thanks for the contest! <3 <3

u/Langly- · 1 pointr/AdviceAnimals

... Someone said it was an EOS 5D MARK III or so, look at http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1333947136&sr=1-1

"EOS HD Video with manual exposure control and multiple frame rates (1080: 30p (29.97) / 24p (23.976) / 25p, 720: 60p (59.94) / 50p, 480: 30p (29.97) / 25p) with 4 GB automatic file partitioning (continuous recording time 29 minutes 59 seconds), selectable "All i-frame" or IPB compressions, embedded timecode, manual audio level control while recording, and headphone terminal."

u/raven12456 · 1 pointr/funny


Cameras and lenses. Its all insured, but it would still really suck.

u/artandmath · 1 pointr/photography

A good tool for shopping on Amazon is Camel Camel Camel, which gives a breakdown for a products price history including lowest and highest price of that item.

Here it is for the Canon 5d MIII, which is at it's lowest price right now. It's a good buy if you are in the market for it.

u/NEfan61 · 1 pointr/videography

Thank you for this information!! This is awesome! My only other questions would be:

  • Does the 32 GB SD Card need to be a specific "class"? Like Class 10 vs Class 4 or whatever.

  • Will this tripod work fine?

  • And will this camera on its own do what I need? I'm looking to keep it simple I shouldn't need to buy any specific lenses or anything right?

    Thanks again for all the help. Once I get those questions answered I should be able to order it all up and get going!
u/voiceofid · 1 pointr/photography

Canon EOS-M

It's the size of a point and shoot, operates like a point and shoot, but it has a DSLR size sensor

$350 will get you the camera + 18-55mm lens

$23 for a Minolta SR to EF-M adapter

$65 for a Minolta 135mm Macro

$35 for a Minolta 50mm f1.7 for portraits

Total spent: approx $475, just one way to do it. There are other ways too, but that's not a bad start imo

u/Skullduggering · 1 pointr/videography

That's this guy?

EOS

u/GTX980Benchmarks · 1 pointr/NewTubers

Here's the camera it has been discontinued since I got it camera

u/polezo · 1 pointr/videography

They're on sale at amazon right now. You can also get the EOS M with the 18-55 for $350

u/Sailorcuff · 1 pointr/photography

So you're saying I should go all in and invest into the 6d with the 24-105 L?

u/nolan1971 · 1 pointr/pics

Right, but that's what /u/Inviditas was explaining. The "trick" to this picture is the settings used and the length of the exposure. Different settings and a faster (or slower, for that matter) exposure would produce a different picture.

Incidentally, OP said that he used a Canon 6D. It's not a point-and-shoot, so there's no "factory settings".

u/atworkworking · 1 pointr/UFOs

Okay, so here is what I have so far:

Canon 6d Body Only - $999 Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled https://www.amazon.com/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ztfUAbQ2EFJEK

200mm telephoto lens - $599 Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000053HH5/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_xvfUAbCW0138S

Gimbal - $65 The OFFICIAL ROXANT PRO video camera stabilizer Limited Edition (Midnight Black) With Low Profile Handle for GoPro, Smartphone, Canon, Nikon - or any camera up to 2.1 lbs. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00S10KFTC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_YxfUAb4K36DB2

Look good?

u/Gaimar · 1 pointr/photography

This? Or This?

I've been looking at upgrading to a full frame, but with the smaller jobs that I've been finding that its easier to focus on what different lenses can get me because body upgrades seem to escalate the price point at an exponential rate.

u/oifoefveteran · 1 pointr/pics

Hey for everyone that has been asking:

Equipment:

Canon 6D

16-35mm Lens

Settings:

ISO 1600

16mm

f/2.8

30-Second Exposure

I slightly turned up the color saturation as well. And thank you everyone for the support! It is greatly appreciated!

u/r08 · 1 pointr/Canon6D

Here are some trends of pricing on amazon. (make sure to click the "3rd party used box." it's right around 1k now for 3rd party used.

http://camelcamelcamel.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/product/B009B0MZ8U?context=browse

u/oxforddude1 · 1 pointr/Cameras

I have a Canon EOS Rebel and love it! I was in the same boat when I bought it as it was my first DSLR, and I found it really easy to learn how to use it and the pictures come out well.
For your budget I would reccomend the t5i over the 600D. It is a little more expensive, but it has video autofocus, shoots faster, better boost ISO, less startup delay, and a touchscreen.
I dont see the prices in pounds, but it falls into your budget.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B00BW6LWO4/ref=sr_1_10?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1406325712&sr=1-10&keywords=eos+rebel

also, I've found this website to be helpful in selecting a camera: http://wizitapp.com/

u/MegsHusband16 · 1 pointr/Cameras

I fell in love with photography the exact same way! Started with my first iPhone which was a 5s and I was in love hah! Eventually decided to buy a canon rebel T3i. A few photographer friends of mine all suggested this camera and it was a GOOD buy! I had it for at least a year before I upgraded to a canon 7D. To this day I still use the T3i alongside my 7D.
Though the T3i is a discontinued camera you can sill buy it on amazon or eBay for pretty cheap along with a kit lens that will be enough to get you started.

I STRONGLY recommend buying something used! Especially for your first camera. Cameras and lenses hold their value and quality for YEARS so there is usually no worry when buying a body used in good quality. Both my T3i and 7D, along with almost all my lenses including my L series lens I got all used! No problems whatsoever.
This is a Canon Rebel T5i it’s an upgraded version from the T3i, which is discontinued and pretty old at this point. The T5i will be a GREAT starter camera! It’s a little out of your budget brand new but scroll down and click USED to see many other used options all within your budget. Select one that’s “very good” or “like new” and you’ll have no problem! Along with the 18-55mm kit lens that comes with you’ll want to purchase one more lens.. the Canon 50mm f1.8 aka ‘nifty fifty’. This is the suggested first lens purchase by thousands. Literally ask a thousand photographers what’s the first lens you should buy and that’s what they’ll tell you the nifty fifty! And it’s only $125 brand new! (The only lens I’ve bought new), though you can get it cheaper for used.

This is a phenomenal professional grade starter DSLR that will last you years! And I promise oh won’t be disappointed with it.

Finally you’ll want to invest in an Adobe Lightroom subscription. For $10/Mo you can get both Lightroom and Photoshop. Lightroom will be your hub for organizing photos as well as editing them. The program is super powerful and can be a bit tedious to learn, but follow some YouTube videos and tutorials like some from Anthony Morganti and you will learn quick! I’ve watched almost all of his videos (there’s hundreds) and every video I learn something new!

Best of luck to you and I’m excited for you to get started in such a great hobby!


edit: oh BTW! Once you get a DSLR you will have total control over all settings in your camera, which you probably didn’t have before on your phone. So the first step with a DSLR is learning how Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO interact with each other. This is how you can get those awesome short depth of field shots you mentioned with the background blurry and bokeh’d. this is a great video to help understand the “focus triangle” and learn how those 3 settings interact with each other! That’s also another great tutorial YouTube channel so I suggest subscribing to them and watching some other of their videos as well.

another edit: btw the 750D you mentioned is a newer version of the T5i. 750D is called the T6i in America, also another great option! I didn’t suggest it because it’s a bit out of tour budget but again I’m sure you can find it used in your budget! If the T6i fits your budget then definitely opt for that option as it’s newer and has a few more features upgraded features, but the T5i is great as well!

u/Toronto_man · 1 pointr/photography

I'm looking to get a digital SLR, and am looking at the Canon Rebel T5i. I have so many questions. Should I get a body only, and invest in lenses later?

I would like the camera to be able to take the weather; be it rain, dirt, and a bit of abuse, as I plan to use it mountain biking and for winter sports. The reason I was looking at the t5i is apparently they have a better processor? Or does that even matter? I'm looking to spend around $400-$600. the link is what I am tempted to buy. And what should I know about warranties if I buy stuff online regarding photography gear, is it still all based on a manufacturers warranty?

https://www.amazon.ca/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B00BW6LWO4/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

u/rrobe53 · 1 pointr/blackfriday

What about the T5i? It seems to have some holiday bundles today.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-18-55mm-Lens/dp/B00BW6LWO4

I'm not a huge aficionado of photography, but I want a good camera that will last several years for vacations, family pictures, and outings etc.

u/L3ED · 1 pointr/photography

Now you're gonna hear a lot of people say to go with Nikon as they have better sensor tech, which is true, but as a Canon shooter, I'm recommending either the 60D or the T5i.

Both are really fantastic cameras that will give you plenty of room to grow into.

If you want to go Nikon, maybe the D5300.

u/Cupcake_Bitch · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

Oh jeez. I couldn't go that high. This is the one I want.

u/Ambitionlessness · 1 pointr/videography

I do plan on shooting outdoors as much if not more than I shoot indoors. You've set my heart on experimenting with the shotgun mic now.

I like the Canon. I was looking at the t3i and now looking at the t5i. This one was the first that popped up. What do you think about it?

It seems lighting is far more important than I expected so that's going to have to be considered now. I'm going barebones in this department for now.

You've sold me on the white balance card too.

And yeah I didn't even think about the bag but I'll need one as well.

I'm not dead set on the fun focus effect yet, I think getting wrapped up in fancy stuff before I've gone out shooting a single thing yet will be a mistake.

Thank you so very much for being so helpful and comprehensive.

u/Synister0 · 1 pointr/Winnipeg

Thanks for the response. I was looking at a t5i on Amazon. http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B00BW6LWO4/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_img?_encoding=UTF8&colid=26HY2DPOEEZOK&coliid=I2Z4EA4F1IFWA6
i was also looking at this Nikon package, http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B015CQLSIE/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_img?_encoding=UTF8&colid=26HY2DPOEEZOK&coliid=I61LD69YZ2BEU
They were on black friday sales for $600 and $800 and I'm hoping they do a comparable sale for Boxing day. I've heard the quality of kit lenses aren't that great though, so maybe it's not the best way to go.
I'll keep reading reviews and try to hit Don's photo in the next couple weeks and see what they can do for me.

u/the_spectacular_wow · 1 pointr/Filmmakers

Thanks for helping! I don't have a lot so far, but I'm in a position where I can buy more equipment.

https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Handheld-Stabilizer-Release-Cameras/dp/B00NJKJ1IA/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1478792372&sr=1-1&keywords=steady+cam

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-Rebel-EF-S-18-55/dp/B00BW6LWO4

http://www.amazon.com/Rode-NTG2-Condenser-Shotgun-Microphone/dp/B00093ESSI

If you can provide with a list of stuff I would need to reproduce something of similar quality, ideally for fairly cheap, I'll happily give you gold for your troubles!

u/xtremedeo · 1 pointr/videography

Definitely would want to get the [Canon EOS Rebel T5i EF-S] (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BW6LWO4/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=dimz04-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=B00BW6LWO4&linkId=d16644d22479b31b1c8f0fb1190611b7) Ranked as the best low budget camera at your suggested price. It has excellent customer reviews with a 4.7 out of 5 star rating.


u/cccpspetznez · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

It's the Cannon Rebel T5i EF-S here.

u/video_descriptionbot · 1 pointr/videography

SECTION | CONTENT
:--|:--
Title | First Sony a6500 Real Wedding Shoot
Description | Full a6500 Review here: https://youtu.be/UrbrsarbP4c Our first wedding shot exclusively with the Sony a6500 in 4K. Full review coming soon. HUGE thanks to wedding planner Monica Richards for helping us with this wedding. http://monamieeventsinc.com Sony a6500 • http://amzn.to/2h11w5r Sony a6300 • http://amzn.to/2h10PcE Follow us http://eyenamics.com/ https://www.facebook.com/Eyenamics https://www.facebook.com/gearglassesa... https://www.instagram.com/eyenamics/ Our Kit • http://kit.com/Eyenam...
Length | 0:04:17






****

^(I am a bot, this is an auto-generated reply | )^Info ^| ^Feedback ^| ^(Reply STOP to opt out permanently)

u/dzetcor · 1 pointr/videography

I think the Sony A6500 at $1,298.00 will be a nice upgrade to your 70D. It can shoot clean 1080P at 120 FPS as you can see in this video shot using the Sigma 18-35mm.
You can use the VILTROX EF-NEX IV to adapt your Sigma 18-35mm to Sony A6500. It cost just $136.00.

u/SecondAvenueSubway · 1 pointr/SecondAvenueSubway

We had a G85 and loved the video quality for the price, but the video autofocus was not great. I didn't realize how not-great it was until we were at a small orgy with some friends and a guy had a Sony a6500. The a6500 tracking AF was (is) far superior. Eventually I saw a floor model or refurbished a6500 and picked it up for about $100 more than I sold the g85 for on Craigslist. One or two of the NSFW videos in our posting history has likely been shot with the G85.

The G85 had a much better touch screen implementation, but the a6500 has considerably better 4K image quality and much better tracking AF. For stills photographers, the difference is likely low, but for video, the Panasonic contract-detect AF is often wobbly and out of focus. In different ways, both the G85 and a6500 are "almost there" cameras.

Edit, forgot to mention that the G85 also has a better rotating screen.

Overall, the G95 looks like a camera that is going to suffer against the a6500, let alone whatever the a6500 successor might be. Already, used a6500s are about $800 - $900. The G95 looks like a little too little, particularly given its weak AF during video performance.

u/Mr_Romo · 1 pointr/Cameras

Sony. get the A6500 and a sony lens. Maybe the 18-105 F4 if you really want that focal length coverage. That lens isint going to be great for low light but the 6500 is a low light beast. If you really need that fast glass you could go with the sony 35mm f1.8. In my opinion Sony is where its at right now, super portable and blowing anything in its price range out of the water!

u/moneybagmeisenheimer · 1 pointr/videography

Panasonic g7 PANASONIC LUMIX G7 4K Mirrorless Camera, with 14-42mm MEGA O.I.S. Lens, 16 Megapixels, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DMC-G7KK (USA BLACK) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_Wy1IBbE9WDWPS
does 4K at 30fps and 1080 at 60fps lens for this camera come relatively cheap.
You could easily pick up a nice prime lens PANASONIC LUMIX G Lens, 25MM, F1.7 ASPH, MIRRORLESS Micro Four Thirds, H-H025K (USA Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B014RD6RC0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_Qz1IBbYWRAZQJ
this cost $147
Everything can be found cheaper used on eBay and the kit lens will probably work fine for what your doing.
And you can dabble in photography on your free time with this setup no problem

Edit: does have mic input options for this camera if you wanna bump your sound quality up

u/jiqqaman · 1 pointr/PanasonicG7

Amazon also has the 14 - 42mm kit on sale.

Panasonic LUMIX DMC-G7KK DSLM Mirrorless 4K Camera, 14-42 mm Lens Kit (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_XyEbzbSW1F5RA

u/thenotoriousFIG · 1 pointr/videography

Everyone here loves the Panasonic G7 for a budget camera. But the newer version, the G85, is probably the best image quality in terms of a budget camera.

u/AMBULANCES · 1 pointr/PanasonicG7

I just bought one today for $550 over at /r/hardwareswap. I have been checking prices on this camera and it seems like it dips every now and then with the lowest price being $497 on amazon June 10th, 2017.

Check this for prices -> https://camelcamelcamel.com/PANASONIC-Mirrorless-14-42mm-Megapixels-DMC-G7KK/product/B00X409PQS?context=search

Try and find a good deal online or wait till it goes on sale! No need to spend $797 for this camera.

u/MechaWill · 1 pointr/youtube

DSLR I keep reading seems to be the way to go, provided I can learn a fair bit about them as I am no camera expert. I'm not sure how much you know about camera gear, but I've been eyeing this deal on Amazon, (Canon EOS Rebel T6 DSLR + Lenses, Memory & Extras for 499.99), would this be comparable, or just a good buy in general? Thank you!

u/franks28 · 1 pointr/WildernessBackpacking

That is a great suggestion. I do know to take full advantage of the money spent on a full frame one needs an equal lens. right now there is a deal on amazon for a cannon Eos Rebel T6 with the standard 18-55 +55mm Wide Lens, 2x telephoto lens and a bunch of accessories for only $470. how would that compare to the SL1 you suggested.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-T6-Digital-Telephoto-Accessory/dp/B01D93Z89W/ref=zg_bs_281052_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=PEPND2KXH9XXHN9M2NW6

my other thought based off some research would be Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera with 16-50mm Power Zoom Lens with Sigma 30mm F1.4 Contemporary DC DN Lens this combo is about 1000. At that money though i am tempted to start looking at the Cannon EOS 6d but thats like 1400 and still no extra lens. Can you help me wade through and give me your opinion. I am willing to carry the weight, my backpacking trips are essentially just big photo shoots for me.

u/InjunJ03 · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

Awesome thank you. Last question, im looking through 4 kits for the STM 18-55 and I'm not sure if any of these have it? (1, 2, 3, 4)

u/WoollyOneOfficial · 1 pointr/NewTubers

The issue is that's a bit too much for me. I don't really want to get into the $500s at all. That's why something like the RX 100 III that doesn't require an extra lense but is a good quality appeals to me.

EDIT or the T6 kit on amazon. But I just don't know how good it's going to be.

u/SemperWolf21 · 1 pointr/photography

What would be the best camera for someone who's just breaking into photography and need something for great shots up close, far away, and has most of the options to edit?

Edit: How's this bundle and camera?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01D93Z89W/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_0sXazbDBGFPQC

u/jkernan7553 · 1 pointr/photography

Really need help buying a camera...so many different options. Originally I was hoping to stay under $500, but that can be extended if necessary (i.e. if the camera/kit is significantly better). Absolutely no more than $800.

Currently looking at this kit. But I'm not too sure if that's the best way to go. Refurbished sounds great to me because of the lower price and little to no risk of a bad product, but the camera itself is worrying me. Is 18MP really enough? Also not all reviews of the camera seem to be spectacular. I'm a beginner so I don't need something absurd, but I'd really like to be able to take profession-looking shots. Touchscreen and a movable screen would be nice too.
Mainly planing to do landscapes, cityscapes, sunsets, and the occasional portrait/closer range stuff.

Advice/thoughts? Thanks!

u/kirkland171 · 1 pointr/Cameras

I would defiantly recommend the canon t6, its a great price shoots amazing photos and videos and also is very easy to use. -
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-T6-Digital-Telephoto-Accessory/dp/B01D93Z89W/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1504739577&sr=1-3&keywords=canon+eos+rebel+t6

u/nuckingfuts73 · 1 pointr/photography

I can recommend something like this. Great starter camera. Just be warned, try not to get discouraged. There's a steep learning curve where you'll wonder why anyone bothers with dslrs at all and why they don't just stick with their phone camera all the time.

But once you get over that hurdle, you have greater flexibility and capabilities

u/GalaxyPhi · 1 pointr/photography

Hello! I am looking into getting a camera for my wife and myself. I haven't had the time to fully research cameras and look though all the guides available here since we are preparing a baby. We would be using this camera for baby photos and family photos, a general/casual use. I wanted to get a camera that is worth the investment with a budget around ~$500.

Ive been looking at bundles such as this Camera and accessories bundle Is it worth it to bundle though? I'd say that this is on the high end of my budget but its not unreasonable if it is worth the bundle. I don't have anything for a camera right now and if I buy a stand alone camera, I need to buy all the accessories as well.

Are there any other Cameras/ bundles that you would recommend?

u/Ilongboardandplaycs · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

No idea if you mean an SLR camera but this should be good. Comes with lenses and filters.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01D93Z89W

u/Slarm · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

You can, but you can't include anything after the actual item number including I think reference links.

So for example a link like

amazon.com/gp/product/B01D93Z89W/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_1_w
would not be okay.

A link like

amazon.com/gp/product/B01D93Z89W
should be fine.

You can pay a lot less on eBay for the same kit, but really, most of that lot of stuff is junk. The telephoto and wide angle lenses (converters) will sort of do what they claim, but at great cost to image quality. Everything other than the camera and 18-55mm lens is essentially bottom of the barrel.

The lens and camera together retail for $450 from reputable sources. Whether the listing you were looking at includes a manufacturer warranty is questionable. For the $30 less you'd pay for one of those kits, you could get a better SD card and a probably slightly better tripod, and a probably better warranty.

u/tpgeek · 1 pointr/Cameras

Nikon D3400 with a 18-55 kit lens. Really decent for the very entry level photography https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE

u/SPYALEX8 · 1 pointr/ExposurePorn

If you're looking to buy new, you can take long exposure photos with any entry level DSLR. The Nikon D3400 or Canon EOS Rebel T6 are both great starting points (I pesonally like the Nikon a bit more). They usually run $450 - $600 dollars depending on the lenses they come with. They both have good ISO ranges (ISO is the sensitivity of the sensor to light) which means you would be able to take long exposures of things like stars or see detail in very dark places.

If those are out of your price range than I would look at used DSLR's like the Nikon D3300 or D3200. They aren't gonna handle low light quite as well as the newer cameras, and high ISO images will be noisier, but they will still easily take long exposures. And really any DSLR made in the last 8 years will be able to take long exposures. If you are trying to take long exposures of things like car trails one of those would work fine. If you are trying to take photos of things like stars I would try to get a newer DSLR.

u/HomeNoble · 1 pointr/Nikon

Hey /r/Nikon,
I am getting ready to start photography, Ive been experimenting with friends/families gear for a bit and I have been looking at this deal :https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KITZKDE/ref=twister_B01MZXMN6T?_encoding=UTF8&th=1


However, it looks like the lense that comes in the two lenses version of this deal for 100 bucks more is actually almost 400 dollars by itself. Would it be a good idea to just pick it up now for the extra 100?

Thanks!

u/poochyenarulez · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

Well, there are three cameras I am looking at

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE/

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D5500-DX-format-Digital-18-55mm/dp/B00RUBJKU8/

They all look about the same, but are each $100 more than the other. I'm just wondering if the $700 is actually worth it over the $500 one. Right now I am using an older point and shoot.

This is what I'll be using the camera for, day light shots of costume stuff I make and sale, low light rave pictures of the tails, and my bunny. Examples https://img1.etsystatic.com/152/1/6870300/il_fullxfull.1179064823_t44d.jpg https://img1.etsystatic.com/149/0/6870300/isbl_3360x840.23609857_pgsttcxz.jpg http://i.imgur.com/d8AaqGE.jpg

u/prettydamnslick · 1 pointr/Cameras

You need a fast prime lens for selective focus and low light as well as a stepper-motor kit lens for videography and general work. A Sony a6000 with those lenses would not be easy to find anywhere near your budget. Otherwise a good choice. A good alternative would be the Nikon D3400 bundled with the AF-P kit lens (=silent focusing during video), which is on a fire sale now for $400, and then shop for a used Nikon 35mm f1.8G DX prime lens when you have a bit more cash ($150 or less). That combo would give you both 1080/60 and great low-light performance. Pass on Canons. The Canon T5i on up would be better for video (better focusing tech), but any Canon in your price range will be a much worse performer in low light. The Sony sensors in the Nikons are simply much better.

u/The_Hashtag · 1 pointr/itookapicture

I've been looking to buy a new one. It has great reviews and it Nikon (IMO) is a solid brand.

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE

u/footrubs · 1 pointr/photography

Is this camera good if I want to take nature shots? Will be used for hiking and backpacking(longer battery life needed).

I've been reading reviews and guides and I'm clueless. I would love to get a quality camera, but am hesitant to buy because I know so little. Other recommendations are welcome. Thanks so much!

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

u/mrpyrotec89 · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

First off; thank you so much for writing this post. It is very informative and i really appreciate the time you took to write this.

my first question is for the body. Should I go with the NIkon 7000 or take this bundle deal with the Nikon d3400. Otherwise I can't find a Pentax k5 for under 500

What are your thoughts on those? Once again thanks for your input

u/AnAngryOctopus · 1 pointr/DSLR

Nikon D3400 DSLR Camera with AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR and AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ywVXAbVTGNSP6

I got this bundle, plus a good monopod, tripod, UV filters, and a remote shutter. I have been shooting the same things you're interested in shooting and have been pleased with my pictures. I would also suggest an external flash, as that's my next purchase. All of this fell into your budget and is better quality than what you'll get in the big sets.

u/Ccmmmm · 1 pointr/photography

Hi.

I was hoping to get some input/advice on a plan to take photos of me proposing to my girlfriend. We are pretty big into backpacking and are going on a 2 day trip to the eastern side of the Sierras (Thousand Island Lakes area) at the end of the month. Just us and our dog, whom she is obsessed with, so he'll definitely have to be in the photo..

Since the place I plan to do it at is quite a ways onto the trail, I'm not seeing hiring someone as much of an option. I was thinking of buying a camera (D3400 or Rebel T6 both seem pretty reasonably priced at Costco/Amazon) and using the next month to try and learn a few things. I don't expect perfect photos, but decent would be nice.

The plan is to use the first day to take some practice couple shots at the location and then on the second day, run ahead and set up the camera to take shots automatically every second or so for a few minutes (I assume I can do this on the camera, but haven't checked yet).

I've seen some pretty cool photos of proposals in front of mountains but am curious about the lenses that would come with this camera and whether they would be suited for something like this?

Here's the camera I was thinking of: https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-70-300mm-4-5-6-3G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=sr_1_9?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1496806628&sr=1-9&keywords=dslr+camera

Thanks!

u/kmanraj · 1 pointr/Beginning_Photography

Can you link me to the Amazon product page for this? I can't seem to find it; I can only find this one, which is the same price as the D3500 with kit lens.

u/Syzygy_____ · 1 pointr/photography

Looked into it abit, they seem nice but definitely on the higher end f the spectrum price wise, especially with some of the lens'.

Think I might pull the trigger on the d3400

u/clickity_click_click · 1 pointr/photography

This should get you started. The canon equivalent is here which will also work quite well. If you want you can add the 50mm f1.8 for either system which will give you beautiful portraits. Don't get your hopes up about indoor action though. Nothing in your price range is going to excel at that. I should note that lenses, and not cameras, are the biggest deciding factor in the quality of the results you will get.

u/Snoopyrun · 1 pointr/india

Till 30000-35000 approximately. Please give me any alternate suggestion as well.

At the basic level, i am not able to find out what is the difference between cameras such as for example:
CANON EOS 1300D

and

NIKON D3400

and say
NIKON D5300

u/Mikegengsta · 1 pointr/photography

Looking to get my first DSLR camera. After some research I've concluded the D3400 is a good choice. How's the price looking? Is there any reason to wait

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KITZRBE

Thank you.

u/IcanCwhatUsay · 1 pointr/photomarket

A6500 used on Reddit : $1150

A6500 NEW on Amazon : $1098

What, do you think you added value to it by using it??

u/odd_affiliate_link · 0 pointsr/AskReddit

It is - There is a bit of a paradigm shift going on right now with videography. DSLRs are about to become (IMO) a very disruptive force in the market.

From FreddieW's (the guy who made the video you linked) FAQ (emphasis mine):

>What camera should I buy?

>Rule 1: If you can borrow a camera, just borrow it! Otherwise, get the nicest camera you can afford. I’m super jealous of all you guys nowadays because almost any camera you can buy is about a thousand times better than what I used to use. Otherwise, look for a camera that shoots HD, and a camera that ideally doesn’t record to tape – that way you don’t have to deal with capturing from tapes, which can be a pain.

>DSLR cameras are currently the best blend of being affordable while still providing a professional quality image. If you don’t take a lot of still photos, I recommend the Canon T3i or the Canon 60D (T3i is slightly cheaper). If you do take a lot of still photos, look at the Canon 7D or 5D. Alternately, the Lumix GH2 is another really good DSLR camera.

u/cmVkZGl0 · 0 pointsr/AccidentalRenaissance

> The 2010s will be known for their 0.2MP selfies or 2MP blurred photos, with instagram or Snapchat filters. Or you have a 1000$ canon because you're rich and your photos are artsy.

Ok this is some disinformation I need to immediately squash. I bought a Canon Rebel XTi in like 2007 with a lens for like $700. Even today you can get old APS-C size sensor cameras for extremely cheap. Some examples

u/whomphoto · 0 pointsr/photography

This would be a great starter camera.

u/patrophoto · 0 pointsr/photography

forgot to add, what're you using now?

maybe a 7d ii? it's a crop but has decent low light, good autofocus, and good weathersealing
new 1500
used 1100

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1474601271&sr=8-2&keywords=7d+ii


you can try to find a used 5d iii around $1500 these days

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1474601317&sr=8-2&keywords=5d+iii


if you're rich get a 1dx haha, maybe a 1d iii?

for nikon no clue.. but i might go nikon if i started over haha

u/wanderingangus · 0 pointsr/videography
u/Dijohn17 · 0 pointsr/Filmmakers

I recommend the Canon 70D, Canon has a great selection of lenses. Granted this is APS-C, its still a great budget camera.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC

u/Musicman821 · 0 pointsr/photography
u/Alex_Tro · 0 pointsr/photography

Which one of these three should I get? I'm going on a trip to Europe and would like to have a dedicated camera for pictures and ocassional videos.

Canon EOS M3

Sony A6000

Olympus OM-D E-M 10

Panasonic LUMIX DMC-G7KS DSLM Mirrorless 4K Camera

u/mcpoopybutt · -4 pointsr/photography

Last time I checked, it was $3,499.00 for just the body.

u/GoetheDaChoppa · -5 pointsr/photography

So if LOTR ticket price was $9, and LOTR II was $13... you would be ok with that?

It's not $500. It's nearly $1500.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331523348&sr=8-1

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-21-1MP-Frame-Digital-Camera/dp/B001G5ZTLS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331523359&sr=8-1

It's not like we're going from the 5D to the 1D...we're going from the 2008 model to the 2012 model of the same camera.

With the mere price difference b/n the two models you can practically buy yourself a 7D with that money.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B002NEGTTW/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1331523433&sr=1-1


You're supporting your argument by saying that the Ipad followed with a pricing structure that would match what I'm requesting, then you go on to say the iPad's pricing structure is irrelevant to the discussion.

I can plainly see I'm not exactly going up against a master of logic and will refrain from taxing your mental resources any further.