Top products from r/HillaryForPrison

We found 25 product mentions on r/HillaryForPrison. We ranked the 23 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.

Next page

Top comments that mention products on r/HillaryForPrison:

u/RAndrewOhge · 1 pointr/HillaryForPrison

For “House of Cards” fans who can’t get enough of fictional President Frank Underwood and his First Lady Claire, it must be tempting to view Bill and Hillary Clinton as their real-life political doppelgangers.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Cards_%28U.S._TV_series%29]

Certainly there’s fertile ground for those seeking parallels between the main protagonists of this quintessential political soap opera, and our more flesh and blood “heroes.”

Like their imaginary foils, the Clintons’ moral compass is functionally impaired, so much so one suspects the HoC scriptwriters modeled their lead characters on the Democratic Party’s resident “royal couple.”

To be sure, a critical assessment of Hillary Clinton’s fitness for the Oval Office can’t be undertaken absent some reference to the respective roles she and her husband have played in each other’s professional lives.

Many folks will recall their indelible slogan from Bill Clinton’s successful tilt at the top job in 1992, where the campaign pitch to voters was, “Two for the price of one.”

President Bill Clinton, First Lady Hillary Clinton and daughter Chelsea parade down Pennsylvania Avenue on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20, 1997. (White House photo)

Again, one not unlike the mantra the Underwoods might concoct for voters.

One wonders why the Clintons have not retooled that hoary old refrain for 2016, and here I’m thinking, “Buy one, get one free” might fit the bill.

The Clintons then (cue Frank and Claire again) are the consummate political “chancers” (British slang for “opportunists”), with style overwhelming substance, ruthlessness eclipsing truthfulness, and political expediency supplanting personal integrity. Occupying their own “house of cards” is a long, yet not so illustrious history of deception, malice, corruption, duplicity, careerism, avarice, turpitude, warmongering, hubris, incompetence, arrogance, media manipulation, venality, hypocrisy, influence touting, and everything in between that the ugly, sleazy side of politics has on offer.

[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/03/hillary-clintons-foreign-policy-resume-what-the-record-shows/]

This reality was first underscored most notably when — in what must be the modern American narrative’s most indelible “stand by your man” moment — the then “Tammy Wynette” of U.S. politics vigorously defended her husband against allegations of unbridled lechery and sexual predation.

These allegations, along with many others in her view, were invented by what she later defined as a “vast right-wing conspiracy,” one that was unscrupulously trying to take them down and out.

[http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy-is-even-better-funded-now/]

But irrespective of whether this much touted “conspiracy” was actually a reality (the Clintons surely had powerful and well-heeled enemies), a product of Mrs. Clinton’s penchant for self-aggrandizing delusion, or simply dirty politics (the perfect tautology if there is one), it is now safe to say it was going to take much more than a “vast right-wing conspiracy” to stop the Clinton juggernaut in its tracks.

[http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/25/hillaryclinton.uselections2008]

Powerful Juggernaut

That this “juggernaut” shows few signs of losing steam is evident; at the same time it continues to showcase all that’s wrong about Establishment politics — Republican or Democrat.

And whilst we can say now the accusations against her husband contained more than a grain of truth (at least those related to womanizing and self-aggrandizement), both Bill and Hillary were in for the long haul.

That she tendered her impassioned denials in the full knowledge that many were true is difficult to refute, and if nothing else, says much about the candidate’s capacity to deny reality in the service of a larger ambition.

And without placing too fine a point on it, this is one area where given the prevailing zeitgeist in Washington – in both neoliberal and neoconservative circles – Hillary Clinton is most definitely qualified as both the preferred candidate of Democratic insiders and the Establishment’s choice for president (including a number of erstwhile Republicans).

In any event, the Clintons themselves are no slouches when it comes to playing “dirty politics,” for whom we might say all’s fair in love, war and their chosen vocation.

They embody moreover, raw political ambition at its hard-core finest, steeled by narcissistic megalomania, all of it unencumbered by accountability, transparency, humility, ethics, honesty, scruples or altruism.

Her seemingly inevitable selection as the 2016 Democratic flag-bearer — and from there most likely the presidency — is ample indication of that “long haul” ambition.

To their credit as political survivors, they’ve been effectively dodging political snipers ever since they parachuted into public consciousness during the 1992 campaign.

And if the current contest is any guide, the Clintons have not lost their innate talent in this regard.

As for Hillary Clinton, one suspects even her most zealous detractors could not help but admire — if begrudgingly — the mix of chutzpah and resilience that have been key to her longevity, with her not always subtle campaign “trump” cards: “It’s my turn!”

Even without playing the “elect me as your first woman president” card, the palpable sense of quasi-regal entitlement becomes icing on the Clinton cake!

[http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/trump-hillary-clinton-woman-card/480129/]

We might argue that given the weight of mounting evidence against her fitness for office — a modicum of which would deep-six most politicians’ career ambitions — they have become ever more adept at keeping their political ducks flying in a row, and well out of the range of the shooters.

Not that they’ve achieved this all on their own.

In this the Clintons have been ably served by the mainstream media (MSM), who’ve generally eschewed the forensic analysis — whether political, policy or personal — vital to objectively evaluating her fitness as the Democratic nominee (and therefore president).

[http://whowhatwhy.org/2016/04/28/new-york-times-helped-hillary-hide-hawk/]

Mistress of Malevolent Mayhem

The prospect then of another Clinton presidency should make all right-thinking Americans increasingly concerned – even afraid – about the direction in which their country is heading. I know I am, and I’m not even an American!

Like many of America’s key allies over recent years, our country Australia is no different in that more and more Aussies are harboring anxious — one might say existential — fears about the respective agendas of the U.S. neoconservative and neoliberal establishments.

And notwithstanding her blandly reassuring campaign rhetoric on both counts, Clinton hasn’t just aligned herself with these agendas; it’s increasingly clear she’s the preferred standard bearer of the authors.

With this in mind, outside of her aforementioned Tammy Wynette moment, we should explore a little more of the aspiring president’s résumé.

In an excellent book, aptly titled Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton, Diana Johnstone does just this.

[http://www.amazon.com/Queen-Chaos-Misadventures-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0989763765]

The author chronicles in a clear-eyed manner her subject’s back story in excruciating detail.

What makes Johnstone’s tome all the more remarkable and essential is the depth and breadth of her narrative, one that goes way beyond the outwardly narrow focus suggested by the book’s title.

For Johnstone, Clinton’s “misadventures” aren’t simply a reflection of the warmongering misadventures of the country she aspires to lead and whose dubious “virtues” Clinton obsequiously and glibly extols at every turn...

More: https://consortiumnews.com/2016/05/21/hillary-clintons-house-of-cards/

u/jlalbrecht · 1 pointr/HillaryForPrison

Again, I don't like Trump and didn't vote for him, but also again, I totally agree that #Russiagate is all bullshit. Just because I don't like Trump doesn't mean he wasn't fairly (or mostly fairly) elected. At least the Republicans didn't brazenly rig their primary like the Democrats did.

If you're interested in a relatively long read on how Nixon may have been set up with Watergate, here is Part 1 (of 5) called "Watergate and the Downing of Nixon," taken from a book, "Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America's Invisible Government, and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years.". I don't know if it is true, but it is certainly plausible, and is a really interesting read.

u/fiendzone · 2 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

He also wrote a pretty good book called "No One Left to Lie To: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton" that calls the Clintons out on their flip-flopping and willingness to throw their loyal underlings under the bus.

u/anthropophagus · 2 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

oh, you sweet summer child..

here's a tip of an iceberg. it's only one example of cancer growing inside the US government.

crucial follow up reading would be public enemies. shame they made it into such a terrible movie. life gives you the greatest script and hollywood fucking changes it.

the rabbit hole is deep. might be better off not jumping in, but the truth is out there if you care enough to find it.

u/WhiskeyDancer · 2 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

Christopher Hitchen's No One Left to Lie to: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton is a good short read on the young Arkansas governor's rise to power.

u/rdancer · 5 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

The two parties are the product of the voting system. The corruption is a separate issue, having to do with elite immunity.

u/A_Colostomy_Bag · 1 pointr/HillaryForPrison

And I LITERALLY said that he may not leak it but the dems always do. Please read before replying.

Muller may be republican the same way john mccain is, the same way jeff flake is.... You realize Trump is unique and many in the republican party want him gone as bad as the enraged democrats?

Muller's got quite the collection of crooked democrat bootlickers on his team of minions. But I suppose you see that as an impartial team of professionals. lol

I was wrong about the pillow, this is probably more to your liking That may help you get through watching Hillary in her demise to irrelevancy.

u/adelie42 · 6 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

Legally Kidnapped: The Case Against Child Protective Services https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00OO03Y64/

u/rshorning · 8 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

I can't vouch for this specific quote (which I would love to get a good source for as well), but that she was a part of the Democratic Party's team of lawyers who was in charge of setting up the case for Richard Nixon's impeachment is pretty much an accepted fact in her history... that and she was fired before the committee hearing even took place that ultimately forced Nixon to resign.

One tertiary source to look at would be Dinesh D'Souza's "Hillary's America" or perhaps any well written biography of HRC.

u/TheGrim1 · 2 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

Either this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B008ZT8K1Y (ear radio).

or the transmitter for a lapel mic.

u/reaperbot6000 · 1 pointr/HillaryForPrison

The Daily Mail's quote about Chelsea referring to the Secret Service as "pigs" is from a quote from Ronn Payne, a White House florist, and recorded in the book "The Residence: Inside the Private World of The White House". I recommend you take up your argument with Kate Andersen Brower, the author.

Your caustic attitude is not appreciated here. Keep it in check.

u/BernieSandInMyPants · 2 pointsr/HillaryForPrison
u/CantRememberOldPW · 25 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

I cannot stress how much this destroys the 'overclassification run amok' narrative. The author provides a link to an abridged version, but I highly recommend reading the write-up in its entirety, especially if you're interested in the legal aspects (the author goes into depth on each of the misdemeanor/felony charges the FBI is likely to push for, and which ones are most likely to stick, how each side will argue the issue, and more).



Don't be disuaded by the pseudo defense of some of Clinton's tenure at the beginning, you can tell that this guy has fully jumped on the trump train in some of his closing remarks ~25k words in. And frankly I don't know how anyone could in good conscience vote for Clinton after reading this in its entirety. I think she could seriously lose double-digit %'s of her voter base overnight if they all read this at once.

Edit: Shameless but sorta relevant plug for a friend's family member's book called a "perilous path" which highlights the disastrous tenure of the Obama administration's foreign policy during Hillary's tenure. Comes out July and should have some preview sections on its amazon page soon if anyone wants to throw it on their watch list. Will be loaded with foreign policy ammo against HRC to add to the ever growing list. She has some articles on her website, one recent one that blisters the pathetic concessions of the Obama adminstration to Iran and Russia recently (dealmaking F-).

u/IronMaverick · 9 pointsr/HillaryForPrison

Wanna have yourself a laugh? Look at the amazon reviews...

https://www.amazon.com/Stronger-Together-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton/dp/1501161733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1474037332&sr=8-1&keywords=stronger+together

" was going to read this book.....I really was. But just as I got started, I found myself under sniper fire, passed out, and fell and hit my head. After that I got double vision and had to wear glasses that were so damn thick I couldn't even see to read. Then I had an allergic reaction to something and started coughing so hard I spit out what looked like a couple of lizard's eyeballs, my limbs locked up, and I passed out and fell down again, waking up only to find out I had been diagnosed with pneumonia 2 days earlier. It's a good thing I was able to make a small fortune making this random small trade in the commodities market (cattle futures or some such thing) and then, miracle of all miracles, a few banks offered me a few million to just talk to their employees for a few minutes - and all that really helped out because I swear I was dead broke and couldn't figure out how I was gonna come up with the 6 bucks to pay for this book, let alone pay the $1,500 for my health insurance this month. I still want to read it, but, hell, what difference at this point does it make? I hear it sucks anyway."