Top products from r/agnostic
We found 21 product mentions on r/agnostic. We ranked the 25 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
1. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Sentiment score: 2
Number of reviews: 2
Winner of the 2005 PEN/Martha Albrand Award for Nonfiction. In The End of Faith, Sam Harris delivers a startling analysis of the clash between reason and religion in the modern world.

2. The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1

4. Coming Out Atheist: How to Do It, How to Help Each Other, and Why
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1

5. Faith In Doubt: Do You Question Your Faith?
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1

7. The Case Against The Case For Christ: A New Testament Scholar Refutes the Reverend Lee Strobel
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition

8. Life, Death, and Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1

9. The Demon-haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1

10. Mindfulness in Plain English
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Mindfulness in Plain English

11. In Faith and In Doubt: How Religious Believers and Nonbelievers Can Create Strong Marriages and Loving Families
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1

12. Fire in the Mind: Science, Faith, and the Search for Order
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1

13. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Sapiens A Brief History of Humankind

14. Why Evolution Is True
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition

15. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition

17. The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten: 100 Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Plume Books

18. The Rocks Don't Lie: A Geologist Investigates Noah's Flood
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1

You're clearly well-versed in this subject, I actually wasn't expecting a response that involved knowledge of quantum entanglement and particle/wave duality!
> You haven't even functionally defined consciousness, so how could I possibly explain it?
Were you aware, in your mind ("consciousness") that you were alive and typing this at the time you did? If so, that would make you conscious and not a "philosophical zombie".
Of course I could veer this completely off course and say that I don't even known that you exist, and I could just be playing a game in the only consciousness there is. My own.
Solipsism
> I'd have to argue that it's pretty much exclusively your unconscious mind that takes input from the photo-receptors in your mind. This is not a conscious process.
Correct.
> I would certainly agree with your point about quantum uncertainty, but I fail to see how it relates to the discussion of consciousness.
In my personal opinion, it has everything to do with it. It's the only possible solution to how we can have free-will and are not just unconscious robots ("philosophical zombies"). Without quantum effects, we could not be sentient beings that are free to make our own decisions, based on our own choices.
Not just (input in = input out) ... but (input in = conscious decisions = input out).
This quick search on Amazon will show how many books deal with this very subject.
I've read most of them. Some much more interesting than others. I'd say the best book I've ever read on these matters is by Paul Davies ... The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. "Biocentrism" was also somewhat interesting, as was Fire in the Mind: Science, Faith, and the Search for Order.
Your points are all valid, and I won't go over every single one of them.
Should I assume that you believe in the emergent theory of consciousness? Where it arises at a certain neural threshold, for reasons we have no idea?
And where is the "seat of consciousness"? For a while, it was thought it was the pineal gland, then other places. Then we started removing half of people's physical brain matter and that made them better. So exactly where is this consciousness?
If it's emergent, that means I myself as a software developer just need to write a complex enough system. And then, like magic, my creation is self-aware?
For the record, I did really enjoy the movie Ex Machina.
Book [The End of Faith] (https://www.amazon.com/End-Faith-Religion-Terror-Future/dp/0393327655) By Sam Harris
-This book was the support I needed to feel comfortable saying I do not believe in organized religion. (I felt guilty for never being a believer but this book helped me find my voice to explain why.)
-He also has a fascinating podcast on the topic along with youtube videos, just type in Sam Harris and you will easily find it.
[Stephen Fry Annihilates God] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-d4otHE-YI) Short video but fantastic.
EDIT: The link I posted for this all you need to watch is the first two minutes.
Other than those two sources that is pretty much all I have. I am fairly new to giving a voice to my lack of belief in organized religion so I do not have many sources yet.
Hope this provides some use to you.
A good resource is Dale McGowan’s In Faith and In Doubt: How Religious Believers and Nonbelievers Can Create Strong Marriages and Loving Families. The author is an atheist married to a Christian. To prepare for the book, he interviewed many couples in religiously mixed relationships. The book has lots of good advice and suggestions on how to make things work with your spouse, your kids, and all those “helpful” people who are trying to push their noses into your business.
Honestly, that's a truly awful book. Even by apologetics standards. Here is a good book that takes Strobel's points chapter by chapter. Strobel, like most apologists, is speaking to an audience of believers, attempting to give them some reason to think their faith is rational.
BTW, have an upvote to cancel out the person who downvoted. I might not agree with you, but it seems you posted that in good faith.
If anyone prefers the physical edition. If you would like an explanation for the drastic price differences, I explain in a blog post.
Update: Due to popular feedback, I decided to make split versions of the ebook edition for anyone who found 2554 pages too daunting but are still interested in reading my book. In case any of you are still interested.
Part I Only.
Part II Only.
Explanation on pricing can be read here.
Mindfulness in Plain English. It is a buddhist book about how to think objectively and clearly. It is very insightful and I know people are recommending atheist books so here is your religious book recommendation. Even though it focuses more on how to think properly and objectively more than anything else. I accidentally ordered an extra copy and would be willing to ship it to you, under the stipulation that you have to ship it or recommend to someone else on /r/agnosticism to read it, that is if you like it.
Edit: You gave me a topic idea! Thank you!
When it comes to understanding evolution, Why Evolution is True is a very entertaining, easily read introduction. I would also recommend The End of Faith by Sam Harris.
Eww I have a book and video for you. The video uses the book as a reference. It's a super easy read and informative.
Book:
http://www.amazon.com/History-God-000-Year-Judaism-Christianity/dp/0345384563
Video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=21vPrlX6Yx4
Book: The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan. It presents a strong case for a secular view and discusses the basic underpinnings of a skeptical mindset with a bit more subtlety than can be found in works by other famous atheist authors.
Book: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. This book has nothing to do with atheism or agnosticism; in fact is was written by a Mormon. But it does provide some principle centered practices that are useful to people, particularly if you are feeling rudderless in the absence of a religious moral code.
I love Carl Sagan's The Demon-haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark
I am not a physicist but I have never heard one claim the Universe is infinite. As was mentioned before, the universe has no edge so it appears to be infinite. Watch this video if you can make it through:
http://www.universetoday.com/103790/zogg-from-betelgeuse-explains-why-the-universe-has-no-edge/
Understanding the universe is exceedingly difficult even for the smartest people (which I am not one of). Crazy stuff happens in the universe, this is one of the reasons I am not atheist, it is just too wild.
Time dilation for one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation
For instance, time is moving quicker for satellites relative to us here on earth, since we feel a larger effect of gravity. They had to slow down the clocks on the GPS satellites:http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
Long story short, there are a lot of really wild things happening in the universe, maybe take a look at a book called Brief History of Time written by Stephen Hawkins.
http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377011140&sr=8-1&keywords=brief+history+of+time
Here's a book on agnosticism, in case that's what you're looking for:
http://www.amazon.ca/Divinity-Doubt-The-God-Question/dp/1593156294
I haven't read it, but your claim checks out. Amazon 59 reviews, 4.5 out of 5 stars average
The pig that wants to be eaten (collection of philosophical thought experiments with short commentary, i dont think its useful for someone with 0 background in philosophy except maybe as a taster but the more experienced people will see what they know and appreciate it).
[Contemporary debates in the philosophy of religion] (http://www.amazon.com/Contemporary-Debates-Philosophy-Religion-Peterson/dp/0631200436) (looks at arguments from both sides which im sure us agnostics looking for the truth will appreciate)
Life, Death, and Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions
And for some (thought provoking) philosophical humour:
Antitheism - A reflection (essentially they turned the problem of evil on its head, they said all the good in the world disproves an all evil God in humour)
*Pascals Mugging