Could someone correct me in responding to the "Diversity and Ethnocentrism Hate Facts"?

------------------

(Detrimental) Effects of Multiculturalism

• More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
  What is being controlled for? I would guess that wealth and diversity are related and so diverse poor neighborhoods would indeed have lower social cohesion, but not due to their diversity.
  
  
• A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. & Diversity increases psychotic experiences. & Diversity increases social adversity.
  This seems absurd on its face: I will have to read this carefully.
  
  
• Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. & Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
  Very promising and enticing title.
  
  
• Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.
  What definition is being used for "civic health"?
  
  
• Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.
  Sure.
  
  
• Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.
  This seems very complex, and we will have to be careful with "X causes Y claims".
  
  
• Babies demonstrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.
  I'll have to read this, but: does "ethnocentrism" demonstrated here imply a preference? It seems also that we would have to see how it changes after: does it become somewhat "neutral" or does it become negative? It doesn't seem contradictory for one to start in associating oneself with those around them. Additionally: are there any non-white babies? Is it a comparison between white babies and non-white people, or are there non-white babies compared with non-whites, of their same race and of different races?
  
  
• Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.
  Sure.
  
  
• Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.
  I'll have to read this to see exactly what is being said, but this seems almost obvious: a dispersal from a dominant group to a spread of groups necessarily leaves them with less than they had. It seems almost tautological that it will affect most the largest group. I have to see what they meant by "hurt".
  
  
• Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.
  Is it that those who are able to cause change with their vocalization are instead occupied with their concern for the diversity, and that if they redirected their focus back to the environment that this reduction of concern would disappear?
  
  
• Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.
  This seems like a base human instinct that we should seek to overcome rather than fall victim to: there are many things that make humans feel in some way "negative" but that we would never suggest getting rid of.
  
  
• Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities.
  What does "reduces" mean?
  
  
• Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.
  What controls are being made? Richer neighborhoods are more likely to be homogeneous when contrasted with poorer heterogeneous neighborhoods, and so better health may be due to the wealth rather than the homogeneity.
  
  
• Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation.
  This is perhaps one of the only links here that seems to maybe hold some value (having not yet read it): why is it that diverse cities are also segregated cities?
  
  
• Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.
  I can accept this: race is a kind of extended family, but I would not say the only one. Additionally, ethnocentrism in a weak sense is genetically rational.
  
  
• It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.
  What is the definition of "friends"?
  
  
• Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.
  
  
• Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.
  I could accept this: civil war is precisely war that is inward facing, and altruism in the context of a polity is similarly inward facing. It would seemingly follow then that less civil war and more altruism could be direct byproducts of homogeneity.
  
  
• States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.
  What definition is being used for "inequality"? "corruption"? "democracy"?
  
  
• There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar.
  Sure.
  
  

  Major Themes
  

• The existence of a preference implies that it is "good".
  
• That something is natural implies that it is "good".
  
• Shaky "X causes Y" claims when X and Y are simply co-occuring.
  
• There is the mistake that "X is good for Y" is equivalent to "not-X is bad for Y".
  
• Little control for major confounding factors: wealth, geography, age distribution, etc.
  
• The same "theme" was stated multiple times with a link to the same article, effectively making it seem as if there are more pieces of evidence than there actually are. This is worsened when academic papers are linked and then media summaries thereof are linked.
  
  

  More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
  

• "community-diversity dialectic": homophily & proximity; integration
  
• integration “provides opportunities for intergroup contact that are necessary to promote respect for diversity, but may prevent the formation of dense interpersonal networks that are necessary to promote sense of community.”
  
• "If diversity is unattainable at the neighborhood level, might it be possible at the level of the city, as essentially a network of more or less similar neighborhoods? Jane Jacobs liked to say that great cities are federations of neighborhoods."
  
• "Neal about this, he sounded a more optimistic note: “Their patchwork of segregated communities allows for both diversity and cohesion. We usually view segregation as problematic, but when it comes in the form of a patchwork of neighborhoods and enclaves that each have their own character, it may actually ‘work.’”
  
• "Robert Putnam distinguished between two types of social capital: “bonding,” which occurs within like-minded groups, and “bridging,” which occurs between them."
  
  

  A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. & Diversity increases psychotic experiences. & Diversity increases social adversity.
  

  This is an increase in risk in the minority group. Moreover, it's precisely due to an exclusionary force from the majority. This effect can not only be mitigated by higher group cohesion within the minority group, but less exclusion by the majority force.
  > In general, people living in areas of lower own-group density experienced greater social adversity that was in turn associated with reporting psychotic experiences.
  > People resident in neighbourhoods of higher own-group density experience ‘buffering’ effects from the social risk factors for psychosis.
  
  

  Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. & Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
  

  > In the long run, however, successful immigrant societies have overcome such fragmentation by creating new, cross-cutting forms of social solidarity and more encompassing identities. Illustrations of becoming comfortable with diversity are drawn from the US military, religious institutions, and earlier waves of American immigration.
  
  (CONTINUED)

Here are some examples of how diversity lowers quality of life for everyone. "Diversity is a strength" is a lie and an empty platitude that's been pushed on the country for the last couple decades and people now regurgitate it mindlessly because they've heard it so many times. In reality, homogeneity is strength, diversity is a weakening agent.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Are you projecting? Who says that? After all, superior is subjective.

Race matters, like it or not, believe me when I say that I wish it didn't..., but then again I wish many things, but I don't get to decide those, Nature does.

If you want to have a honest discussion about race try to inform yourself a little about our actual positions and not some Hollywood stereotype.

• For normie entry level see this:
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q
  
  
• For a more critical view read this book:
  
  https://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462
  

.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.
http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities.
https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.
http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar.
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n2005-1.pdf

Thanks. I just found this:
https://www.amazon.com/BABYLONIAN-TALMUD-ALL-VOLUMES-ILLUSTRATED-ebook/dp/B01GY0FCGQ/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1480292460&sr=1-2&keywords=the+talmud

I went to hear a Christian convert out of Islam who is a scholar of both the Bible and the Q'uran, that the Q'uran is not accurately translated into English in order to make it more palatable to the Westerner. I wonder if this same problem exists in the Talmud?

Do you have a particular Talmud that you recommend?

Besides his own work which I think reads best chronologically I enjoy Young's books. Both his biography and "Nietzsche's Philosophy of Religion" https://www.amazon.com/Nietzsches-Philosophy-Religion-Julian-Young/dp/0521681049

This. For those of you who are interested, read "Why We Get Fat and What to Do About It." Also, /r/keto is a very active community with an abundance of information and support.

I read Across Atlantic Ice when it was released. While their theory is interesting, it's still far from being accepted.

Edit: Here's a video presenting some of the interesting DNA evidence.

That book is on my reading list, I would be in if you, or anyone else interested, can set up a good way to run a discussion.

If you don't want to spend any money and you have a kindle, there is a free kindle edition on Amazon.

Amazon link to the book. Don't forget leaving a creative one star review.

Might want to visit some other books by Kidner. Apparently the most important person in Europe since 1550 was Lenin.

If you go to the book on amazong, "look inside" and read a little after the preface it refers to vitality as young colored people going into the work force for developed countries with an old aging population. I dont agree with it just saying.

https://www.amazon.com/Diversity-Explosion-Demographics-Remaking-America/dp/081572649X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480844290&sr=8-1&keywords=diversity+explosion

Science says otherwise:

• https://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462
  
  
• https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/the-new-enemies-of-evolutionary-science/
  
  
• http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/12/the-new-inquisitorsheretical-scientists-purged-from-academia/
  
  

You draw this conclusion from the fact that I recognize that hybrids exist? Or the fact that I still recognize the existence of different races? And I have an interpreted the Jewish holy books to mean anything. I know what they say and I do not believe or follow any of it. Here's a book for you to read.

https://www.amazon.com/Race-Reality-Differences-Vincent-Sarich/dp/0813340861

Here is the mobile version of your link

Here is an entire book full of peer reviewed research: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bounce-Myth-Talent-Power-Practice/dp/0007350546

Sapolsky's "Why Zebras Don't get Ulcers" goes into why forcing mixed groups is harmful. Want to stress the fuck out of a monkey? Put him with a group that's not his own.

The first time I went to Europe I landed in Amsterdam and in the airport even I felt like I had landed at a family reunion. I was palpably happier. I'm not some cranky fucking racist, it's natural.

https://www.amazon.com/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095

This isn't news or anything. What constitutes white was far more restricted before.

He just SHREDDED the alt-right with his feelings when all we have are facts. We should hang our heads in shame.

https://www.amazon.com/Welfare-Ethnicity-Altruism-Evolutionary-Nationalism/dp/0714683523/

I was thinking about posting something about Anglish here. The Norman conquest was a great tragedy and many evils can be traced back to it. Check this out: https://www.amazon.com/Gospels-Anglish-Julian-Montinaro/dp/0557831326/

There were probably no marching orders, per se. Nor a shady cabal. Even if it's not 100% right, COC suggests a reasonable hypothesis. tl;dr It's an evolutionary strategy. Individual Jews acted in their rational self-interest or out of hatred of a system they saw as authoritarian/bigoted/restraining, and the crippled post-WW1 West gave them a receptive audience. These individual actions compounded into larger movements that benefited them all as a group.

It just so happens that sprawling urban societies filled with atomized, deracinated peoples suits middle minorities like the Jews quite well, keeps them safe from movements that lash out against minorities (especially wealthy influential ones), and allows them to nepotistically keep themselves in positions of power and influence.

This is not to say certain groups didn't collude or operate purely out of hatred or greed (e.g. Soros, Bolsheviks, post-1960s feminists, pornographers...), or that the White elite were guiltless, just that there isn't necessarily some all-encompassing conspiracy.

tl;dr read MacDonald's works. And World on Fire.

edit: clarification

edit2: In case it wasn't clear, Jews never stopped identifying as White because it would be contrary to their interest. Why out yourself when it could expose yourself to persecution? What they did do was stop operating within the West's zeitgeist and forced us to adopt theirs.

Of course the book is fake, that's why it was removed from Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Stolen-Soul-Story-Courage-Survival/dp/0646434462

Did you read the book "Night" By Elie Wiesel that we all had to read in High School?

He lied under oath and lied about the things he saw.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiRKv8Fd3HM

> their racism

you're again confusing (maybe in purpose?) what I intended to say. If you've read the Torah, you either read it in a completely superficial manner or you're twisting the facts. Read the book and put some critical thought in the process.

You know the story about Jacob and Edom, right? Do you know what it symbolises? Are you aware how emotions are created in human beings?

Maybe read this book, too

We can go "Not all x" until we get to 1% vs 99%. At what point do you call it a systemic problem?

>To discriminate against somebody because they like to have sex is immoral.

No this is perfectly moral. You can have all the sex you want, just with your one, or at worst, several partners. Not hundreds. This again comes from the perspective of public health concerns, both physically and psychologically.

I've got facts for this point:

[Women with more than 20 sexual partners have an 80% chance of divorce.]
(http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2003/pdf/Bookofcharts.pdf)

[Traditional societies have 'very low' rates of suicide.]
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3067529)

Gay men are six times more likely to commit suicide than straight men.

These behaviors do not lead to happiness in societies, and breaks the social contract. We do not tolerate that here.