Top products from r/anonymous
We found 23 product mentions on r/anonymous. We ranked the 23 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
1. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 2
Verso
2. Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Portfolio
3. Guy Fawkes Mask with Vinyl Sticker
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
High Quality Resin Construction.Adjustable Strap with Buckle.Powdered Matte Finish.Authentic V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes / Anonymous Mask.It Comes with Vinyl Sticker.
4. Invisibility & Levitation: How-To Keys To Personal Performance
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
5. Epson? Photo-Quality Self-Adhesive Inkjet Paper, White, A4 (8-3/8 x 11-3/4), ...
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Sold as 1 EA. Use Self-Adhesive Sheets to create signs, stickers and labels. A cutting grid is printed on the reverse side for easy custom trimming. Smooth, bright white surface with a matte finish produces photo quality color images with a matte finish.
6. Rust-Oleum 7718830 7718-830 Automotive Accessories, Each, Metallic Chrome
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Ideal for creating a shiny metallic finish on any interior metal, wood, concrete or masonry projectsPaint features excellent chip resistance and color retention will keep your projects looking good over timeDries to the touch or handle in 60 minutes for quick project completionTough, attractive fini...
7. Disguise Blank Male Mask Standard
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Size: StandardHalf maskMolded male facial features on frontHoles for eyes, nose and mouthFits with an elastic strap
8. Rust-Oleum 1915830 Spray Paint, Each, Silver
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Creates a rich metallic shine on interior surfaces including wood, metal, plaster and moreFormula contains actual metal flakes in the paint to create an ultra bright and shiny metal lookLeafing metallic for use on interior accent pieces only, do not use with a clear top coat as it may dull the finis...
9. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
10. Debt: The First 5,000 Years
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
11. Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Encounter Books
12. The Dynamics of Human Communication: A Laboratory Approach
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
13. Epic Win for Anonymous: How 4chan's Army Conquered the Web
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
14. Fatal System Error: The Hunt for the New Crime Lords Who Are Bringing Down the Internet
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
15. Disrupting Dark Networks (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences)
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
16. The Black Swan: Second Edition: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: With a new section: "On Robustness and Fragility" (Incerto)
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Random House Trade
17. NATO's Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe (Contemporary Security Studies)
Sentiment score: -2
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
18. The next 200 years: A scenario for America and the world
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
It depends on how seriously you think people are taking Anonymous as a potential threat. If Anonymous as a group really is seen as worth monitoring (and with all the infiltration popping up time and again, how could it not be?) I doubt those doing the strategic legwork give a damn about "free speech".
From everything I've read, these days it's all about preemption. In other words, what better time to gather information on people in a potentially threatening network than BEFORE they go underground? Chances are they want everyone mapped, IDed and pinned down like bugs on a board before any op ever gets off the ground. It makes sense to me.
Just to make sure I wasn't pulling all this out of my ass, I racked my memory and remembered this quote for you from Dr. Sean Everton's 2012 work on tracking, destabilizing, and disrupting dark networks with social network analysis, Disrupting Dark Networks.
>Strategic Options for Disrupting Dark Networks: Tracking and Monitoring
>While it may seem counter-intuitive, sometimes the best strategy may be to do nothing. Well, not exactly nothing, but because information on a particular dark network is often incomplete, rather than taking immediate action, it is sometimes better in the short run to track and monitor certain actors with the hope of improving knowledge of the network, which will in turn improve the selection of strategies adopted down the road. (Arquilla 2008). As John Arquilla notes:
>[...] the key doctrinal approach was to wait and watch for a considerable period, then to swarm the targets at their moment of maximum illumination. This strategic patience grew out of the understanding that striking at nodes as they were identified might actually reduce the ability to detect and track other cells in the networks in question. It is a curious doctrinal point about netwar: the more that is disrupted, the less that is known.
>When using this approach, then, analysts will want to draw on those SNA metrics that help identify the individuals, subgroups, organizations and so on that appear to be worth tracking.
So yeah. You might not be doing anything technically "wrong", but with all the proven infiltration, do you really want to take risks you don't have to? People should take care not to end up like that Australian kid: he didn't do anything of value, but the government sure was motivated to paint it out that way.
In my opinion, staying off the radar as much as possible seems to be a winning move.
It's not just Zero Hedge that expects the dollar to fall.
Rick Falkvinge: http://falkvinge.net/2011/06/17/the-imminent-dollar-collaps-explained-to-an-8-year-old/
Nassim Taleb: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-02-04/news/28430704_1_treasuries-bond-buying-program-bonds-next-week
Max Keiser: http://rt.com/op-edge/keiser-international-confidence-crumbling-snowden-182/#.UcloP9kuGEs.twitter
These are just a couple of links which I found within two minutes, kind of from the top of my head. I could find a lot more of them if I'd take the time, but I kind of feel like you're not reading any of them anyways - since apparently I'm just 'attributing poverty to a scapegoat'.
Like, seriously, if you're still convinced that the financial cartel is ran by a bunch of nice people who mean the best for the world - I don't know what to say. That honestly, truly, seems like some weird form of the Stockholm complex to me - but I believe I have said that already.
You have read about the Libor schandal, right? You must be aware of the '08 bail-outs - based on fraudulent financial products? And the fact that nobody has gone to jail over that? Like, surely you are familiar with the whole to-big-to-fail and to-big-for-jail concept... You know what, I'm just gonna copy/paste the urls I linked to before, 'cause I really don't know what else to say.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/joris-luyendijk-banking-blog/2013/jun/20/bankers-predators-proto-fascist-ideology
http://www.economist.com/node/21558281
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2174785/HSBC-scandal-Britains-biggest-bank-let-drug-gangs-launder-millions--faces-640million-fine.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/greek-debt-crisis-how-goldman-sachs-helped-greece-to-mask-its-true-debt-a-676634.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-owns-the-federal-reserve/10489
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/12/bigger-than-barclays-global-regulation
If none of these things - or any other of the many many scandals coming to light almost on a weekly basis now (like this one that surfaced yesterday) are enough to convince you that this isn't all fine and dandy or even incompetence, nothing will.
At some point, you will have to recognize all of this for what it really is: an inherently corrupt system.
I'm not just 'looking for a scapegoat'. In fact, I find that remark kind of insulting - it's obvious you're not taking anything I say seriously - or anything any of the sources I supply for that matter.
I am most certainly not getting lost in some 'echo-chamber'. Yes, I use the internet a lot - obviously. But if the Guardian, der Spiegel, the Economist are all part of some 'echo-chamber'... I... like... whatever.
Besides that, I actually read books on the issue. Currency wars and The Black Swan are very good - I think.
>you're trying to attribute poverty to a scapegoat. It's counterproductive, because the evidence does not support that hypothesis
Yeah, except for all of the evidence that I am supplying.
Sorry, this is kind of turning into a rant by now. Maybe we should just agree to disagree.
This is a common misconception of the groups entirety. Anonymous was not made for the sole purpose of hacking. It was made for fighting against the corrupt and doing the right thinking, helping people when they couldn't help themselves. They are believers in freedom of speech as well as freedom of information. To you point of "joining anonymous", there is not application for join anonymous it is more of an ideology it is something that will never go away as long a people remain associated with it. I can go on and on but if you would like to learn more about anonymous I would recommend reading Gabriella Coleman book (Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous). You can find it here https://www.amazon.com/Hacker-Hoaxer-Whistleblower-Spy-Faces/dp/1781689830
As far as hacking goes you can read up on some books, enroll in some classes, or reach out to people (harder than it sounds). Knowledge is power, if you want something you have to be committed.
>One interesting way of looking at ourselves is in terms of the groups we are trying to impress.
>We feel responsible for doing and saying those things which receive approval (or disapproval) from a combination of people looking at us, not only those present, but also those out of the past, and possibly those we anticipate in our future.
Mind = blown. I've seen people talk about this on /r/raisedbynarcissists, where their actions are influenced by parents when there's no longer any good reason to be influenced by them, but I hadn't thought about it in a broader sense.
I'll check out the book. The Amazon listing is funny:
> 1 New from $2,432.64 | 29 Used from $1.48
I guess the bots are still at it!
Have you read epic win for anonymous?
I dont see why people just dont get some blank white masks
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01AN3GHQ4?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share