Top products from r/debateAMR
We found 10 product mentions on r/debateAMR. We ranked the 9 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
1. Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Farrar Straus Giroux
2. The Mismeasure of Man (Revised and Expanded)
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
4. Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales From Inside The Strange World Of Women's Studies
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
5. Women in Ancient Greece
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
6. Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies
Sentiment score: -2
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
7. Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families
Sentiment score: -2
Number of reviews: 1
More "ridiculous and disgusting" facts:
FGM gives a 60% reduction in HIV infection, and many women report no ill-effects from having their genitals mutilated:
Note: I am against ALL genital mutilation of females, males and intersex. Please don't interpret this post as supporting any of these activities.
Everything I have posted below is factual; but it's supposed to be educational - to help folks clear up their confused thinking around this issue. Thanks
Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female
If the amputation of the mucus membranes of the male genitals results in a lowering of HIV infection; then it would not be unreasonable to assume that the amputation of the mucus membranes of the female genitals would produce the same effect. Indeed, as the total surface area of mucus membranes in females is so much greater than that of males, the effect may be even greater.
However, most western peoples will be repulsed by the idea of amputating parts of an infant female's genitals to obtain some future protection from a disease. All the more so, when nearly 100% protection can be obtain from HIV infection by use of condoms.
But this repulsion does not arise when the prospect of amputating parts of infant male genitals. This is clearly because such activity has become "normalised" in the west. This is the issue.
Like male circumcision, there are plenty of peer reviewed studies that show female circumcision is not a barrier to sexual orgasm and enjoyment. Some studies show that orgasm and enjoyment are reduced; and some show no effect.
You'll often come across members of the medical community saying that FGM has no "health" benefits, and if women have their clitoris amputated, then their sex life comes to an end. Then they say that MGM has lots of "health" benefits and that men's sex life is not affected.
But it's a myth that many women who have suffered FGM are unhappy and cannot have great sex lives. That's why they queue up to have their daughters' circumcised. Plus there are many so-called potential "health benefits" - such as a 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS.
The visible part - the glans clitoris - is only a small part of the whole clitoris. So when a woman suffers partial or total amputation of the external clitoris when undergoing FGM, only a small part of her clitoris is removed. Thus she often can enjoy a full and satisfying sex life.
The truth about the female clitoris
Learn how large the female clitoris is; and how the external glans clitoris is just a small part of it:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/cliteracy_n_3823983.html
http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/sexuality/a/clitoraltruthin.htm
http://www.amazon.com/The-Clitoral-Truth-Secret-Fingertips/dp/1583224734
Female Circumcision & Health Benefits
"Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women,
the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC
was roughly half that of women who had not; the association
remained significant after adjusting for region, household
wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer."
Note: when it's found that circumcising female genitals reduces HIV/AIDS it's called a "conundrum" rather that a wonderfully exciting "medical" opportunity to reduces HIV/AIDS.
http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=11&abstractId=2177677
"Georgia State University, Public Health Theses" — a USA University of international renown:
The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15-49 Years):
"RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS, after adjusting for confounding variables."
"DISCUSSION: The inverse association between FGM and HIV/AIDS established in this study suggests a possible protective effect of female circumcision against HIV/AIDS. This finding suggests therefore the need to authenticate this inverse association in different populations and also to determine the mechanisms for the observed association."
"This study investigated whether there is a direct association between FGM and HIV/AIDS. Surprisingly, the results indicated that the practice of FGM turned out to reduce the risk of HIV. While a positive association was hypothesized, a surprising inverse association between cases of female circumcision and positive HIV serostatus was obtained, hence indicating that FGM may have protective properties against the transmission of HIV."
http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses
"National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania - 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS in women who have have parts of the genitals amputated:"
http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/femalecircumcisionandhivinfectionintanzania.pdf
"International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:
Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract
"The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:
Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975
"The New Scientist" (references a medical journal)
Female Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Activity:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2837-female-circumcision-does-not-reduce-sexual-activity.html#.Uml2H2RDtOQ
"Journal of General Internal Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:
Female "Circumcision" - African Women Confront American Medicine
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497147/
Medical benefits of female circumcision: Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi
http://islamqa.info/en/ref/45528
"Pediatrics (AAP)" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:
Genital Cutting Advocated By American Academy Of Pediatrics
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.short
Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female
A lot of what you're describing are things people do for friends, are you sure you're not just observing behavior men make towards their female friends and assuming there's a gender component? This sort of altruistic behavior isn't uncommon among either men or women.
As for the "ray of sunshine" vs "threatening creep" comment, I honestly can't say I've ever seen that happen when the man making the comparison wasn't actually a crypto-misogynist. One of those "nice guy" types who only have female friends because they're threatened by male competition and believe being nice to their friends entitles them to sexual favors.
> Yeah, women historically aren't at the top. They also historically aren't at the bottom doing harsh labor jobs that kill you. Theres a lot more equalizing to be done
That's also not true, the MRM kinda has this view of gendered labor divisions where men performed backbreaking labor in the fields while the women picked flowers and sold them to others. And if you're a Terper, one of those others is a knight she was fucking.
In agrarian societies women worked alongside men, often doing the same jobs. Here's an article about the division of labor on farms in Uganda, the main dividing factor between the two is the type of crop and not the labor itself, with traditional cash crops seen as the privilege of men. You see similar things in Nigeria with the production of yams, where yam is a cash-crop that was the privilege of men to produce and profit from. There's not a significant division in labor performed, or the intensity of that labor, but you still end up with a system that privileges men over women because of cultural norms.
In the west we can look at the industrial revolution and, well, I'm just going to direct you to this /r/badhistory thread.
Another source to check out would be Women in Ancient Greece by Susan Blendell, which notes that women in most of the ancient Greek polis had a life expectancy ten years shorter than that of their male counterparts, one notable exception being Sparta.
Go read The Mismeasure of Man and get back to me.
Further reading about feminism.
>Feminists have often called Women's Studies the "academic arm of the women's movement." But Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge charge that the attempt to make Women's Studies serve a political agenda has led to deeply problematic results: dubious scholarship, pedagogical practices that resemble indoctrination more than education, and the alienation of countless potential supporters
http://www.amazon.com/Professing-Feminism-Education-Indoctrination-Studies/dp/0739104551
You are in a glass house.
Are you going to produce some of Kimmels bullshit so I can show you what a fraud he is with peer reviewed studies and papers by the real researchers?