Top products from r/exatheist
We found 15 product mentions on r/exatheist. We ranked the 15 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
2. Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
3. Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Yale University Press
4. Catechism of the Catholic Church: Second Edition
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Catechism of the Catholic Church (White, Hardcover)
5. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Basic Books AZ
6. The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
7. God without Parts: Divine Simplicity and the Metaphysics of God's Absoluteness
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
9. Faith In Doubt: Do You Question Your Faith?
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
10. Behold: The Prince of Darkness: A Complete Introduction to Setian Religion
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
11. Answering Atheism: How to Make the Case for God with Logic and Charity
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
12. The Faith Instinct: How Religion Evolved and Why It Endures
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Well there are many in my experience in Catholicism that live a dry faith, meaning they don't feel fancy feelings rather they know through knowledge and study.
I cannot of course say that my feelings are more valid than another's we're all biased but that would be a terrible thing to say overall. As if someone else's personal feeling are less important than my own. However, I cannot also say that my feelings are no different from a muslim or mormon or any other religious because then it would seem that other religious feel the same as I do, so therefore something must be amiss as if there is a true religion in this world, feelings such as those should under reasoning only happen with that particular one.
I do not deny their feelings or doubt my own so what else do I have up my sleeve.
I'm a Catholic as you can probably tell from my username (also I hope you enjoy your time I reddit since I think you're new?). This means that along with feelings of ecstasy or not, how would I ever believe the Catholic Church to be the one correct religion.
Catholicism is easy to understand at a basic level, but going further reveals a large web of complicated reasoning dating back hundreds even over a thousand years ago.
Honestly I could ramble all day, verring off topic at the slightest thought, but I'll stop here and just give some resources if that may interest you.
The first is New Advent which is a completely free site where you can have access to church documents (in the library) access to the bible in both Greek, Latin and English, a full version of the Summa written by Thomas Aquinas and many other writing of some early Christian figures that helped define many of the beliefs of Christianity in the world of the 1st century and onward.
The second is r/Catholicism, assuming you don't spam (I believe the limit is 3 posts a week) you can ask all the questions you like from people who may correct misunderstandings or give additional resources.
For two book recommendations I recommend The Catechism of the Catholic Church which can found online for free on the Vatican's website keep in the mind it's a very small font or by buying it from Amazon which also offers a kindle version for very cheap and an audiobook if that is more your thing.
The other is (the less subtlety named) Answering Atheism which I've heard many good things about from some friends of mine and folks from r/Catholicism.
I thank you most of all for being polite and courteous and I hope our exchange was educational for both of us. Always feel free to DM me for anything else.
>rather suddenly, came abstract thought, art, religion, jewelry, and eventually things like language and alphabets. Our consciousness greatly leaped forwards, and began exponentially increasing on such a level that it still hasn't stopped. Interestingly, interference from something like Set is by far more parsimonious than the entire humans species magically sharing the same mutation which overwrites the previous genetic makeup of the whole species, or even worse, having a massive leap forwards as some sort of uncaused event.
Some have argued that not all ethnic groups were equally involved in that leap, and that we only know of the advances of those which did.
>Scientists have long believed that the 'great leap forward' that occurred some 40,000 to 50,000 years ago in Europe marked the end of significant biological evolution in humans. In this stunning account of our evolutionary history, top scholars Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending reject this conventional wisdom and reveal that the human species has undergone a storm of genetic change much more recently. Human evolution in fact accelerated after civilisation arose, they contend, and these ongoing changes have played a pivotal role in human history. They argue that biology explains the expansion of the Indo-Europeans, the European conquest of the Americas, and European Jews' rise to intellectual prominence. In each of these cases, the key was recent genetic change: adult milk tolerance in the early Indo-Europeans that allowed for a new way of life, increased disease resistance among the Europeans settling America, and new versions of neurological genes among European Jews. Ranging across subjects as diverse as human domestication, Neanderthal hybridization, and IQ tests, Cochran and Harpending's analysis demonstrates convincingly that human genetics have changed and can continue to change much more rapidly than scientists have previously believed.
Physical edition and reasons for price difference.
Update: Due to popular feedback, I decided to make split versions of the ebook edition for anyone who found 2554 pages too daunting but are still interested in reading my book. In case any of you are still interested.
Part I Only.
Part II Only.
Explanation on pricing can be read here.
My group maintains a decent sized recommendation library here: http://orderoftheserpent.org/library.html
Additionally I wrote a book on the topic, which can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Behold-Darkness-Complete-Introduction-Religion/dp/1793962340
Always happy to answer anything specific :)
Is atheism caused by high mutational load? The Industrial Revolution removed all Darwinian selection in the West. (Infant mortality used to be 40%.)
Religiosity was actively selected for over a period of hundreds of thousands of years. See Darwin's Cathedral and The Faith Instinct.
Nobody is saying that beliefs of type X being selected for entails their metaphysical truth. Dutton wants to explain the maladaptive contagion of r/atheism in terms of evo-bio, rather than a sudden enlightenment courtesy of Hitchens & Dawkins (LOL!)
A Response to Dutton
Feser's Greatest Hits:
Why Is There Anything At All? It's Simple
So You Think You Understand the Cosmological Argument?
Cosmological Argument Roundup
The New Atheists and the Cosmological Argument
The Road from Atheism
Adventures in the Old Atheism, Part I: Nietzsche
Adventures in the Old Atheism, Part II: Sartre
Classical Theism
Classical Theism Roundup
Rosenberg Roundup
Five Proofs of the Existence of God
Incoming: Aristotle's Revenge!
Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism by Galen Strawson
> This is so foreign to my way of thinking that I struggle to guess what you mean.
I know, because most atheists have not studied philosophy. (Hence you have never heard of Hume's argument which is considered basic philosophy 101.) You will find the entire who's who of philosophy throughout history have had to address theism because nearly every major philosophical problem from day one seems to be related to concepts of God in some way or another and so to flat out reject God often can be difficult philosophically.
For instance, one way to reject God is to say we should believe in nothing that can't be empirically verified. But that leads to the problem described by the comic. (It's self defeating!)
Another approach is to say we should not believe in the existence of things that are not physical. Well, the laws of physics are not physical. (Their immaterial equations!) And neither are moral principles and so once again (assuming you believe in the laws of physics are real or there is right and wrong) you are in quite the conundrum.
Anyways, as you study deeper philosophy you will find how much morality, logic, science and philosophy is tied to concepts related to God. So to reject God usually becomes a major problem. If you want a deep powerful treatment of this I invite you to read this.