Top products from r/uncensorednews

https://www.amazon.com/Human-Accomplishment-Pursuit-Excellence-Sciences/dp/0060929642

This is the book in question.

> European people's relied on circumstance?

Once it is a happening. Twice it is coincidence. Thrice it is a pattern. The European land is the best as far as evolutionary benefits goes. Best nutrition, weather, resources etc. Yes. This is why we are here today. This is why by the evolutionary process the achievements of Europeans number 90-95% of all.

> How much of it was won through the spoils of war instead of self innovation?

Precisely? No clue. However when are the means more important than the end? And by what metric do you judge war to be inherently negative? By war men know the fullness of life. By war we reveal the worst of humanity yes, but also the best minds, the most innovative discoveries and forms of progress.

> This "my people" shit just seems like a way for people who haven't accomplished shit to feel a part of the accomplishment of their ancestors.

The idea is simple. Our ancestors fought, bleed, sacrificed and constantly pushed for better. We live on their shoulders and the greatness that was their existence. What we have today: safe and prosperous societies, those things came about because of their goodwill. The conclusion is that we should strive to be as best as we can be. To honor them and ourselves. To match their greatness and eventually surpass it. That is the idea of "my people". A never ending passion to better yourself and what is yours. I believe this is what everyone of all people on Earth should be doing. Love for your own does not need hatred for others.

> However culture is learned and not predetermined by your genetics.

To some degree yes. However genetics dictate the level of intelligence of the individual. They tell about the likelihood for addictions, the speak of capability to understand and innovate. Genes are everything. If the genes of humans coded for roughly the same capacity all across the board then how come there are still groups of people in Africa that are living in mud huts? Surely if the biological capacity were there, they would have evolved beyond that point a long time ago. 5,000 years ago. Culture is an expression of genetics.

What's wrong with Muslims? As human beings, nothing. All my Muslim friends go out of their way to be friendly and hospitable. I have no issue with their friendliness. We have legendary superficial conversations.

It's when we discuss non-trivial things like freedom of speech (Western pluralistic society's freedom to publicly criticize Mohammad and Islam), the place of women in society (women's equality, whether a wife is obligated to obey her husband, and whether a husband has the right to strike his wife or to demand sex of her whenever he wants), and their opinion of homosexuals and what should be done with them, that their teeth come out.

Want to know what they really think? Ask them what the Koran says about these things and, assuming they don't flat out lie to you, watch them squirm. They believe that the Koran is the perfect, unchangeable, literal word of Allah, and the Koran is NOT ambivalent about any of these things. Did you catch that? it cannot be changed. There is no such thing as reforming Islam because that is explicitly forbidden, in the Koran.

Muslims have sharia law, which is a summarized collection of the commands from Allah on how they need to live, and more importantly, how they need to make the world become. Muslims believe they have to ultimately establish sharia over the entire world, whether the world wants it or not. Of course they don't do that immediately; they wait until they have enough numbers in any given area to ensure they won't get much resistance.

This is an amazing short summary of different surveys regarding what Muslims really think on some important issues

The following is taken from this site, which is itself adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.'

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to 'the reasonable' Muslim demands for their 'religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris --car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam - Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.

Edit:

The best thing you can do is to educate yourself on the matter. The second best thing you can do is to tell others.

The myth of the tiny radical Muslim minority

/r/IslamUnveiled

Sebastian Gorka on Jihad and what can be done about it.

Political Islam has subjugated civilizations for 1400 years

Islam Q&A part 1

Farrah Prudence's youtube channel

Other useful links:

http://www.clarionproject.org/

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/

https://www.cspii.org/en/articles/

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Main_Page

https://www.jihadwatch.org/

/r/exmuslim

Remember when they call someone a Nazi or a fascist, throw this at them.


https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0767917189

Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.

Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.

I encourage people interested in this to read the book, Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History. This was a victory for the nation state, which remains the single best ordering for our civil society.

This is actually complicated stuff.

If you really want to learn more, I'd suggest you start here: https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Hypotheses-E-Wayne-Courtney-ebook/dp/B072J38X28/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1499910514&sr=8-3&keywords=null+hypothesis

When discussing the effects of fast twitch muscle fiber, that gets into an area of biology that I'm not an expert in. I don't have a good reference, but I bet your local community college could give you some good places to start researching.

>The first link you posted is merely a PDF document from the CIA reporting on Syria.

Ha, I thought this was sarcasm, then you went on and made the most retarded argument about how official documents arent evidence because of their size (this document in particular is 28 pages). Good luck using that one in court.

What the fuck do you think intelligence agencies do? The Art of War is from 5th century BC. People have been mastering this craft for over a thousand years. Theres institutes dedicated only to writing up new ideas, from overthrowing governments to you-fucking-name-it, using memetics for population control

If a bank has been robbed, and in my bookcase, you find the plans to rob that bank in particular, no mather how old those plans are, or how thick the plan is, it is reason for suspicion to say the least. In the case of EU/USA deliberatly creating ISIS, not just this document but papertrails, pictures, emails have been released. You're just waiting for the unbiased truthspeakers CNN to cover it.

About books, here's one, go ahead and read up what the founding fathers wrote on criminal governments and militia. Or read this book about the CIA using 'Economic Hitmen'.

Or see what information has come up thanks to the Freedom of Information act..

Just remembered about a good book on radical ideologies I read a few years ago. It's called Rules for Radicals. Hillary Clinton was highly influenced by Alinsky's work and she even wrote her thesis about him.

Piggybacking on /u/haplogreenleaf 's comment, if you're interested in learning more on why this is I'd suggest reading Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power and I'm Not a Racist, But..The Moral Quandary of Race

Fixing these imbalances is the honest to god real question here. What changes can we as a society make to facilitate equality between races. Really tough question. Obama is more the classist type, get people out of the ghetto and you remove the race problem. While others suggest focusing systemic changes based on a race specifically (the problem with this is whites historically don't vote for something that doesn't benefit their worse off).

https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Ascent-1889-1939-Volker-Ullrich/dp/038535438X/ref=la_B001I7UCXO_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1506029592&sr=1-1

I'm a trained historian, and I purchased this book from Amazon, following which I wrote a thoughtful 5-star review. Some days later not only did Amazon delete my review of the book, they deleted all my reviews.

Bezos is an Alt-Left tyrant lying hypocrite cuck and Amazon web-managers are LBGTQIA+ f*ckin' cucks.

You're correct. This is pointless. That you'd refuse to even accept the reality of race and the facets of racial issues in this nation speaks volumes.

Nonetheless I may as well obliterate you by providing more scientific evidence of race existing.

https://archive.is/D9RFT

https://archive.is/dSwjD

https://archive.is/Hbjdb

https://www.amazon.com/Race-The-Reality-Human-Differences/dp/0813340861

https://archive.is/zX5p9

https://archive.is/yoVMj

https://archive.is/x7I7I

I can't convince a person to accept truth when they willingly deny it.

I find it absolutely deplorable that the majority of people in this sub are for the annihilation of the Islamic world. This place is like a breathing stereotype where people come to purposefully mislead themselves into reinforcing their bigotry and hate. There is a picture of battered little white girl on the side bar, asking whose fault it is for Christ's sake(I think it is implied it is non-white person, what apartheid are they talking about and why, the one from 15 years ago in South Africa?).


The United States is a secular government and the scientists who did the research and development were mostly atheists. Scientists and people with advanced degrees tend to be atheists in case you are not aware. I suggest you read a book called the A New History of Western Philosophy to get an idea of how religion has held back human progress since you seem to have no idea what that other person was discuss(or just in denial and engaging in mental gymnastics). Genocide is never the answer and it is ultimately the product of ignorance and simplistic thought processes.

https://www.amazon.com/New-History-Western-Philosophy/dp/0199656495/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=2A0T7TNBN410YCJH24BF

Don't worry, I am actually reading Guns, Germs and Steel at the moment and I have read many of these details within the last 7 days.

I am not trying to name names and point fingers here. The point I am trying to make is that all nations have a history with race. Additionally, think about:

• Australia and the Aboriginals
  
• Native Siberians
  
• South East Asians before the Austronesian expansion (this happened many hundred years ago, though)
  
  Apartheid was bad, but it was certainly not the Holocaust, and the world seems to think that we are all a bunch of white-supremists. Just because Americans killed with Germs instead of Guns doesn't not take the deaths away. But that also does not mean you need to feel guilty. White people were indeed slaves at many points in history.
  
  I didn't have anything to do with Apartheid.
  But I'm still prepared to say sorry for any harm my ancestors caused. And I hope that we can learn to love each other, despite our histories.

>It's pretty funny that this same pattern can be seen in the other direction on the fringier ends of the right-wing subreddits, or even the comments in this one.

(((citation needed)))

>Accuse of violence: (check)

Oh you mean like the thousands of NRA people going around smacking people with bike locks AR15 stocks?

OF COURSE you have people resorting to violence on every side - given the enormous sample size it would be a legit miracle if there weren't any. However, the scale is very much tilted towards the left. You don't see Breitbart glorifying a Shakespear play where Barack Obama gets nailed to a cross and burned alive. However you DO see things - like - this from leftist sources.

Yeah that's not even close to comparable.

>Accuse of "(((parasitism)))": (all the checks)

We're getting there

>Dehumanize: (libtard, commie, shitskin, sweeping generalizations)

Never heard shitskin outside of legitimately racist circles. Citation needed.

Apart from that, those are insults. Not even close to being the same. This is a newspaper suggesting men should not be allowed to vote. Apples and oranges much?

Oh and look at that, Trump is a virus? Now we're 1:1, the NS people used that exact comparison (vermin, bacillus, virus et al) for the jews.

>Condone violence against them: /r/Physical_Removal

A 7000 sub subreddit about people hitting back? Well then I guess I'll concede, that's the overwhelming majority. Oh wait, Trump got some 63 million votes so those 7000 aren't even .012%. Even if I would accept your premise (which I don't), that's one out of 8350 people. Let's go to some leftist college campus like Berkeley and ask there how many of them would be okay with trump supporters getting beaten up - wanna bet it's slightly more than 1/8350?

>So what's the deal?

I guess that?

>Are we into some deep-level human nature victim mentality stuff, here?

No, we're in some "one side is salty they lost the election, now they're stirring up the exact kind of shit they're constantly accusing the other side of" stuff and here's the problem: this is not going to be the 1789 revolution where the glorious people win and drag the evil king to the guillotine, this is going to end up like 1832.

>humans have an affinity for underdog stories.

Bullets don't, and that's the issue.

>Maybe it's just a glitch in our pattern recognition. Law of Fives kinda stuff. The harder you look for something, the more likely you are to find it (even if it isn't, strictly speaking, true).

Or maybe we're slowly coming to the conclusion that intolerance must not be tolerated. The hilarious part being that those accusing of intolerance and those expressing intolerance are not as far apart as they'd like.

> So, genuinely curious, do you have any historical proof for these claims?

Easy reading: http://www.rense.com/general69/invo.htm

If you just want to watch and not read: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAb4DLVZOW8

More in depth jew propaganda: https://www.amazon.com/Jews-Slaves-Slave-Trade-Reappraisals/dp/0814726380
The other perspective: https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Relationship-Between-Blacks-Second/dp/B003XJTE8E

If you want to be extra lazy: https://i.imgur.com/M6k4SBc.jpg

And there's a hell of a lot more if you start to read up on it.

Europe is a great example, of course. Behind the iron curtain, communists imposed atheism (sometimes by imprisoning and torturing clergy to death), Christmas became "the Festival of Lights", discussing the theological part of philosophy became taboo, etc. Result: destruction of cohesion, collapse in national pride (not that there was much left to be proud of, and pride itself was outlawed for being 'nationalist'), promotion of paedophilia - actively at that, the Green party in Germany had adults diddling children to 'explore their sexuality' as part of kindergarten education, and overall the exploitation of people became easier because people are just animals, right? Fuck 'em, no big deal, nothing sacred about human life. Of course the former communists states have largely learnt their lesson, they're far more Christian than western Europe.

Western Europe, by the by, is a cultural mess. It's in full swing of demographic collapse, collapse in cohesion/trust among citizens, the past (including the Christian part of it) is something to be ashamed of so good-bye national pride, and with it personal pride (education is down-stream from this, because you can't teach the truth if the truth would result in a resurgence of pride; the education system is in consequence an absolute mess of political correctness and worshipping of the multiculti model). Gay marriage is a-ok, and what do we see pop up? Movements promoting the legalization of paedophilia, bestiality, and necrophilia! Yay, doesn't that sound familiar!

The US is the same. MENA is the same too, Christianity first rose to prominence there before spreading to Europe, then they were conquered and forcibly converted to Islam: one guess as to what that did for the region's progress.

There isn't a lot of research on this, because researchers are afraid of being shunned for saying it (and they are), but Christian communities have:

• better cohesion/trust between members
  
  
• lower rates of mental diseases, particularly of depression and anxiety
  
  
• lower rates of alcoholism and drug abuse
  
  
• lower rates of violent crime
  
  
• greater satisfaction in marriage between couples (which leads to more emotionally healthy children, which by extension leads to that low criminality and alcoholism)
  
  
• greater longevity, because people look after each other (especially within a long and stable marriage)
  
  
• Christians are also highly involved in charity and health treatment, to a degree waaaay higher than atheists; most medieval hospitals were Church-founded and led, and many still are religious institutions today
  
  
• lower rates of mutilation of children needless to say; traditionally Christian Europe never developed the barbaric practice of circumcising baby boys, to say nothing of female genital mutilation (and please don't try to argue the US is a "Christian" country; it never has been and sure as fuck isn't now)
  
  
• Universities developed in Europe under the patronage of the Church. US colleges are largely "secular" and if you live in the US... I don't need to tell you what the culture there is like right now, it's pathetic and regressive
  
  And much more. I'll leave you some sources for this and others, if you'll care to inform yourself about this phenomenon further (some might seem unrelated but brave through them, they all touch on this topic):
  
  

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9dcXOGD3fo
   
2. http://www.omp.org.pl/stareomp/scruton_tot_ang_ang.html
   
3. https://newrepublic.com/article/120379/german-green-party-pedophilia-scandal
   
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-Wn0J0eC6I
   
5. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/ways-with-words/10178109/Christians-deserve-respect-says-Melvyn-Bragg.html
   
6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
   
7. https://www.amazon.com/Church-Market-Catholic-Defense-Economics/dp/0739110365/
   
8. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1443871303/
   
9. http://baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/levin_religion_mental_health.pdf
   
10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3512217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    
11. http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2003/pdf/Bookofcharts.pdf
    
12. http://public.psych.iastate.edu/ccutrona/psych592a/articles/Sexual%20infidelity%20in%20women.pdf
    
13. https://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/46840032.pdf
    
14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40959036?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    
15. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Scott_Schieman/publication/286179196_Religion_and_Mental_Health/links/56eff02608ae52f8ad7f8373.pdf
    
16. http://www.mrctv.org/blog/swedish-youth-party-wants-incest-and-necrophilia-legalized
    
17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27512816?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    
18. http://66.165.148.44/pdfs/2005/ReligionandHealthReview.pdf
    
    (for the science journals, if you're not particularly inclined toward research, just scroll down to the "Discussion" or the "Conclusion" section where they summarise their findings)

> due to anecdotal observations and irrational thinking.

[That’s where you’re wrong, kiddo](
https://www.amazon.com/Social-Perception-Reality-Dominates-Self-Fulfilling/dp/0195366603/)

Yeah, I'm going to want a source for that claim.

The consensus in the field is that intelligence and race are not correlated, and that any claimed differences are due to factors correlated to (but not caused by) race, such as access to proper nutrition, healthcare, and education (for more on this, I would suggest [Human Intelligence by Earl Hunt](http://www.Human.com/ Intelligence https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521707811/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_lLbxzbX9PJQXQ)). Controlled for those factors, there is no difference in measured intelligence between racial groups, which makes sense since the genetic differences between racial groups are tiny relative to inter-individual genetic variance. Here's some further reading on the subject.


Edit: Ooh, lots of downvotes but no replies and no cited sources. Guess people allergic to reality around here. Racism has never has had a grounding in facts, sorry.

Well shit I wonder why? Maybe because businesses don't want to have a Nazi sympathizer handling their business? With how interconnected this world is becoming having a person in your business who believes many of their clients and customers are inferior to them is just a walking time bomb of a PR disaster. Not to mention the fact that you will inevitably cause issues with many of your coworkers (who may be non-white minorities or just don't like White Supremacists who gleefully admit they're racist). So many potential problems you have. Your "opinions" shape your character, and your character isn't something that any business that at LEAST wants to mitigate risk would want to hire you.

It would be like a hospital deciding whether or not to hire a doctor who expresses beliefs that women enjoy being fondled by strangers. It would be fucking stupid for them to hire that doctor because that guy is a walking disaster that could get the hospital sued.

Likewise, your "opinions" are a walking disaster. Why would any company want to invest in you, when your stupidity and insane beliefs can cause damage to them? I don't have to worry about it because I'm not a dumbass who holds racist beliefs or other any other antiquated or extreme beliefs that would result in me creating unnecessary problems for the company. But if I did hold beliefs that could make me a liability to the company, then I would perfectly understand why they wouldn't hire me. How about you stop being entitled and man up to who you are? I'm Conservative, it rubs some people the wrong way, so fucking what? A company that has a problem with my beliefs isn't a company I want to work for anyways. Then again I was raised to have self respect and integrity, and not an insincere kiss ass. I'll always stand up for my beliefs. Apparently you lack that kind of ideological resolve. Which isn't surprising, racist people are known for being weak-willed and weak minded.

Also yes Sociology classes are incredibly fucking easy. However, many of them do have the data and evidence to back up their claims. Then again I'm American and you're from Ireland and I don't even know what college you went too. So I have no idea what the educational standards of your classes are, especially your sociology department.

Also if you really want to have your thinking challenged. Go see a psychologist. I heard cultural psychologists are trained in challenging racist thinking, but I don't know of any institutions that exist outside of the US.

In fact, I'd recommend you take psychology classes. Specifically cross-cultural psychology (if it even exists at your college). I've read a few books on the topic and it did challenge a lot of my pre-conceived notions about humans in general.

You know what, I'll even do you a solid and recommend you a book

Well, it is proven that IQ and criminality are correlated, and it is also a fact that population differences in IQ among disparate ethnic groups in the US exist beyond all doubt. That these average IQ scores for disadvantaged groups are lower isn't controversial at all, the academic debate is currently centered on "Why do these large racial disparities in average IQ scores exist?"

I'm not saying whether the reason that the population IQ averages are lower because of nature or nurture, but the fact is that they are undeniably lower.

Maybe being poor means that they have a lot of lead poisoning and poor learning environments as children, causing lower IQs, and they're trapped in a vicious cycle. Who can say?

edit: This book is mostly centered on IQ and criminality but the last few chapters address race as well.

Here is a journal article addressing the issue.

Of course if you tell me that IQ doesn't exist or is a racist concept, or that IQ tests are biased against black but not against Koreans/Chinese/Vietnamese immigrants who barely speak English, you'd be wrong in a way that shuts down this conversation. Regardless of what you think about IQ, it is a fact that children who can do math in their head more quickly than others are far less likely to ever go to jail.