Reddit Reddit reviews Diaspora

We found 12 Reddit comments about Diaspora. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Science Fiction & Fantasy
Books
Science Fiction
Hard Science Fiction
Diaspora
Check price on Amazon

12 Reddit comments about Diaspora:

u/dnew · 9 pointsr/atheism

Go read the first chapter of this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Diaspora-Greg-Egan/dp/0061057983/

It does a pretty good job of explaining it, in spite of being fiction. It's also an excellent novel about the difference between being human and thinking you're human, as is most of Greg Egan's work.

> What other explanation could there be?

In summary: Your brain is a computer, processing data and experience. Your brain is sufficiently complex enough to model the universe, providing you with things like memory and expectations.

That is, there's a set of patterns in your nerves that are approximately mapped to things in reality outside of you. When you see the apple on the table, and then you turn around, you know the apple is still there because in your brain are some patterns in some nerves that represent the table and some others that represent the apple. Those patterns are your knowledge of the apple, and those patterns behave in ways equivalent to a real apple. (Sort of like how the text in a word processor, which is nothing but patterns of electricity, can behave thru the "miracle" of computer programming in much the same way that ink on paper behaves, with cut&paste, scrolling, and so on.) OK so far?

Now, in that model of the universe and how it works you have a model of yourself. That's the difference between a conscious creature and a non-conscious creature. This model of yourself starts out being not very clear when you're a baby. Infants reach for things and learn what their limits are. They don't understand that dolls represent people, because they have no model of what a person is. A sufficiently young child will bang a doll against a toy car. A bit older and they'll pose the doll and sit it up on the car seat: their model of the world now understands people and cars and can relate dolls to people in the model. "Peek a boo" teaches children that objects persist even when they can't see those objects, "programming" that part of the model of the universe.

But the thing that differentiates self-aware creatures (like humans, apes, elephants, etc) from those that aren't (like wasps, earthworms, etc) is that the self-aware creatures have a model in their brain of themselves. This is what lets you plan ahead. You can take that model of yourself, make it do things and interact with the model of the universe, and figure out what will result. You can figure out what would happen if you (say) went to your office on a saturday at midnight and turned left getting off the elevator. You know there would be few if any other people there because you have models of your coworkers in your head. You know there would be the boss' office in front of you if you turned left and the restroom if you turned right because you have a model of the office in your head and you can put the model of yourself outside the elevator and simulate it turning and looking, and calculate what you'd find.

A being who doesn't understand peek-a-boo (say, an ant) isn't going to manage to figure out what the office looks like at night. A bird that flies at its reflection in the mirror and never realizes it's behaving the same as it is will not be able to think "what if I was on the other side of the park?" Scientists test this sort of thing by (for example) putting a blob of catsup on an animal's forehead and seeing if they wipe it off when they see themselves in a reflection. If the animal can recognise that the thing in the mirror is the same as themself, then they probably have a mental structure representing themself that they can map to also be behind the glass of the mirror.

And that, my friend, is consciousness. When the model of the universe you keep in your head also holds a model of you, then you know that you exist and how you behave.

The stuff that makes up your consciousness is patterns of information. Microsoft Word isn't material in nature, but that doesn't mean it isn't clear where it came from. The thing that makes your "cells" self-aware is the patterns they take on when you're a baby and the training that every (normal) child goes through.

The reason it might feel like "something out there" is that your model does not effectively model the model. You are often aware when you're planning things that you're manipulating a model of yourself. You envision going to the various places you need to go, see the road you'll drive to stop at the three stores where you need to shop, remember that traffic is bad on a particular stretch and need to go around it.

But you're not often aware of thinking about this model. You rarely catch yourself saying "I know I'm planning this, and I intended to plan it." No, you just plan. It's built in. Basically, the "you" in the model generally does not have a very good model of the model inside the model. There's a little "you" inside your brain that you use for planning, but that "you" in your head does not in turn do any planning itself. It's run from the outside, from the real brain that holds the model.

There's also a little "him" and a little "her" for each person in your head. That's how you can say things like "the boss would really get mad if he heard me say that" or "the wife will be pleased I remembered her birthday." You know your wife will be pleased because the model of your wife would - basically, you run the program of your wife that you have in your head and evaluate that program's reaction. When many peoples' models of Jim don't align with what Jim actually does in real life, people start to say things like "He's not himself this week." Think about what this is actually saying. Of course he's himself. The saying is "he's not behaving like my mental model predicts he should behave."

Some people have very poor models of others (or themselves), and this makes them socially awkward. They don't easily calculate what the reaction of others in their models may be, even if they understand themselves very well. Other people do a very good job of modeling others in their little universes, but do not sympathize. They do not map those other people onto the same sort of "thing" as they map the model of themselves. They can predict their behavior, but not their emotions. These people are cold and manipulative, not understanding why others are hurt by their behavior even though they're behaving as predicted.

u/Zerpilicious · 7 pointsr/sciencefiction

Diaspora by Greg Egan

u/gabwyn · 3 pointsr/printSF

We've started reading Diaspora by Greg Egan this month in /r/SF_Book_Club

I'm about 2/3rds through the book and my mind has been completely blown, it's the first of his books I've read and I think this is the start of yet another SF addiction.

u/1point618 · 3 pointsr/SF_Book_Club

back to the beginning

---

Current Selection#####


u/i_am_a_bot · 2 pointsr/scifi

I really enjoyed Diaspora because it was such a different sort of story. It also may me terrified of gamma ray bursters. Forget asteroids, that's what will get us!

u/Hypersapien · 2 pointsr/technology

See, I don't think the name is bad, but only because I associate it with the book by Greg Egan

u/[deleted] · 2 pointsr/scifi

The guy at Barnes and Nobles said that this book has been out of print since '99, but you can get it on Amazon right now: http://www.amazon.com/Diaspora-Greg-Egan/dp/0061057983/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213862539&sr=8-2

u/MrSparkle666 · 2 pointsr/offbeat

Funny you should mention that. The only place I've ever seen this used is in Diaspora by Greg Egan. I thought he made it up. TIL.

u/IamaRead · 1 pointr/AskReddit

Diaspora

> In the 30th century, few humans remain on Earth. Most have downloaded themselves into robot bodies or solar-system-spanning virtual realities, escaping death--or so they believe, until the collision of nearby neutron stars threatens life in every form.

Want to become the Matrix? It's your chance.

u/chucksense · 1 pointr/postearth

Diaspora by Greg Egan is an interesting read, albeit slightly less realistic than some of those listed in this thread. That is, it may become more or less far-fetched depending on how technology advances.

u/LordSutter · 1 pointr/scifi

Greg Egan is a good one that no-one else has mentioned.
Amazon link to one of his best