Reddit reviews Hitler's Table Talk, 1941-1944: His Private Conversations
We found 13 Reddit comments about Hitler's Table Talk, 1941-1944: His Private Conversations. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
More of his own words on Christianity, ripped straight from Hitler's Table Talk (Adolf Hitler, London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1953).
While this is interesting for its uniqueness, there is a book called "Hitler's Table Talk" that is much more extensive.
https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944-Conversations/dp/1929631057
[Here are some excerpts][1] from Hitler's Table Talk, which is probably what he has in mind.
[1]: http://www.davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html
https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944-Conversations/dp/1929631057
The burden of proof is on you to prove he was a Christian. What churches revere Saint Hitler?
http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-Adolf-Hitler/dp/1929631057
Hitlers platform was a lie. It might surprise you that Hitler lied but it should be quite obvious that his claim of being a “Christian Party” is proven false based on his belief that Christianity is false and his hope that it will soon die. This proves completely that he was not a Christian, because you can’t be Christian if you don’t believe in the Christian Faith. It should come as no surprise then that he would lie in his 1920 platform.
The quote above was said by Hitler between 1941 and 1944, it is found in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations (Amazon USA) (Amazon UK) .
Here is a link to the page I found the quote on:
https://enzaferreri.blogspot.com/2014/01/hitlers-neopaganism-anti-christianity.html?m=1
Here is a link to the book:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1929631057/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1929631057&linkCode=as2&tag=villagonlinema00
And lastly, you said that if two Christian Parties kill each other this does not prove they are not Christian. But these events usually take place on theological disagreements, especially during the medieval and Renaissance eras. Hitler killed the Confessing Church for purely Secular reasons. Thus the Nazi Party elevated Secular goals above Theological ones showing that as a Party it valued pragmatic Secular goals first. This by definition invalidates any claim of them being a Faith based party in Germany and lands them firmly in a Secular camp. The Nazi Party was not a Christian organization, and Hitler was not a Christian. I am still looking for his preferences for paganism in his table talks, I will post it here once I find it.
>https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944-Conversations/dp/1929631057
Hitler's Table Talk. Specifically, p26.
>>"I shall no longer be there to see it, but I rejoice on behalf of the German people at the idea that one day we will see England and Germany marching together against America"
> That's generally considered a good thing.
...You are now advocating violence based on ideological grounds when you say you do not know what those grounds are. If you do not understand how the Nazis think, you have no authority to speak on them. Read this. Or a free pdf. If you do not understand Nazis you have no base to speak on them.
>lol oh ok, i guess he wasn't that bad.
I never said that. Never would. He slaughtered the better part of my family.
>To Nazis, maybe.
To anyone who is not on board with the belief he is evil. He comes across as the peaceful easy going guy, while the people punching him come across as violent authoritarians. If you let him speak, he will look as bad as he is. If you attack him, it doesn't.
>To the rest of us it's still a fucking hilarious stroke of righteous karma.
No matter what you say violence is not a reasonable response. Period.
>Hitler, as well as many other predominant Nazis were actually two leprechauns. The initial plan was to round up the population and send nukes at them.
In "Hitler's Table Talks", Hitler stated that he was against nuclear weapons; calling atomic weapons "Jew Physics". He thought the the use of such weapons of mass destruction was barbaric and inhumane. (go figure!) But, I'm sure that he would have used any means possible to save his ass at the end of the war, and that includes nuclear bombs.
https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944-Conversations/dp/1929631057
> I think Hitler was not evil in the sense that he thought he did the right thing for humanity. And I think he was and idealist.
Umm, no that's not true. If you read this
http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-Adolf-Hitler/dp/1929631057
he was anything but an idealist. And towards the end he said something along the lines of "if the Russians win the war it shows they are the superior race so why worry about the German people". I'd say he was a manipulative sociopath - I don't think he much cared for humanity. Of course he didn't say this in public because he'd never have got power. Once he was in power though and talking to his minions his misanthropy is very obvious.
http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-Adolf-Hitler/dp/1929631057
Hitler is a politician what he feeds to the public is just playing to the crowd and you fell for it and took his public statements literally word by word? I'm not saying you're wrong, Hitler is a Christian no doubt about it, but what he says and how he really felt are two different things.
This literally sounds like something Hitler would say about Jews. He thought they were vermin, a plague, a disease, or as you said, a mold. He didn't hate them, he was utterly repulsed by them. This book gives some really great lesser known insight into his kind of psychopathy.
Disgust is a much more powerful emotion than hate as it triggers our survival instinct. Be careful.
Also, read Hitler's Table Talk, 1941-1944: His Private Conversations