Reddit reviews Jesus in the Talmud

gimme a break

those passages are for real and calling them "complex" is bullshit

https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Talmud-Peter-Sch%C3%A4fer/dp/0691143188

>Furthermore, Schafer shows that Celsus and early church fathers such as Justin Martyr fought against similar polemics to that in the Balvi in pagan sources. While Schafer points out that this is not evidence of historicity, it shows clear trends in counter-Christian polemics. Christians will find this slanderous: calling Mary licentious, Jesus a magician and corruptor of Rabbis out of Egypt, and seeing him depicted in the afterlife in his excrement, and one of the few who damned as opposed to merely annihilated in Jewish thought is clear. However, Schafer also shows how deeply counter to Jewish tradition, not just Pharisees but even to Temple Judaism, many of the claims of Christianity would have seemed, particularly, once again, as stated in the Gospel of John.

You clearly haven't read Jesus in the Talmud.

I am at least speaking metaphorically and I see metaphor as theater. Whether you are "disturbed" may depend on whether or not you see humanity as one race with one origin or many races with many origins. Self-identified Jews clearly see themselves as a race, and they will likely pay a price for their racist views. For a Jew to dodge my assault, they would simply have to see humanity as having one origin, there are no "races," and they could opt to step down from their view of being "chosen ones." Or if a Jew were to insist they are a race and that races come from multiple origins, they will have to own up to their racist anti-Gentilism, take responsibility for their criticisms of "Gentiles," and take responsibility for their irreverence of other religions written about in their Talmud - specifically Christianity. Alas, that is impossible, for Talmedic laws permit lying, and there is no way to tell if a Jew is lying unless he leaves the religion entirely.

The Talmud is the first anti-Christian bible, and in a way you could call it the first "Satanic" bible. Anton LaVey's "Satanic" bible is benevolent by comparison and barely "Satanic" if at all, considering it insists it is atheist-based.

Your being disturbed is your own ethnocentrism and inability to see through the eyes of a Jew, to understand the Jew, and to understand Jewish motivations and intentions.