Reddit Reddit reviews Philosophy: The Basics

We found 4 Reddit comments about Philosophy: The Basics. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Philosophy
Philosophy History & Survey
Politics & Social Sciences
Philosophy: The Basics
Routledge
Check price on Amazon

4 Reddit comments about Philosophy: The Basics:

u/JasonMacker · 2 pointsr/TrueAtheism

Philosophy: The Basics by Nigel Warburton

It's an excellent book intended for laymen that explains a lot of philosophy in an easy-to-read format. If you look a the reviews, the only ones that are low are from angry theists who whine that he's presenting arguments against the existence of God.

u/Themoopanator123 · 2 pointsr/askphilosophy

I don't study philosophy academically at the moment although I did take a course in A-level philosophy which I have just finished. I currently and previously only studied out of interest (I'm also 19). And I haven't been doing so "properly" for that long but perhaps that will help my answer a little bit.

Argumentation

As for the first question, it is fairly important to understand the basics of argumentation. In reading philosophical texts you want to be able to "extract" an argument because most don't provide or describe arguments in simple syllogistic form (that is, with premises and conclusions clearly laid out in a list). Most arguments are 'within' the text, often mixed in with lengthy defences of certain premises or elaboration on the meanings of key words used in the argument itself. Learning a little bit of propositional logic might be helpful. It's fairly straight forward and intuitive to learn about the different kind of argument structures you'll be encountering. Being able to look at a text and then reconstruct the text as a kind of structured argument is a learning technique I've seen used a lot.

Reading Recommendations

As for reading, it really depends on what you're interested in. I can't really give you recommendations based on the information you've given because philosophy is a gigantic field. Like, gigantic. If you can think of a thing, there is probably a "philosophy of" that thing. Case in point. But that's not particularly a problem. What you should probably do if you're not so sure of what areas of philosophy you're interested in is read some introductory texts that take you through many areas and see which catch your attention. These texts will often point you towards the key ideas in those areas of philosophy and recommend further reading of the big players in those areas.

Frequently I've seen recommended, Think by Simon Blackburn. You may also consider An Introduction to Philosophy by Paul Nuttall or Philosophy: The Basics by Nigel Warburton. The first real read I had in philosophy when I was younger was A Little History of Philosophy by Nigel Warburton also. None of these texts are exhaustive, of course. They simply open doors.

I might be able to recommend other reading if you say you have some particular interest in philosophy. Otherwise, those are good introductory texts to philosophy as a whole.

What do I wish I was told when starting to read about philosophy?

To be honest, I wish that it was made clear how important our intuitions are in philosophy. I came from a 'background' in enjoying sciences. (Background maybe isn't the right word since I was fairly young but I liked science). My interest in philosophy was perhaps mostly spurred on by my growing interest in the sciences. They grew up together, lets say. I liked science because I liked having good reasons for beliefs about profound things. Since I didn't see the use of intuitions in the sciences, I believed out-right that intuition should be avoided as a basis for reasoning. Now I see how absurd this is. Philosophers spend a lot of time considering what makes something rational or what kind of justification for our beliefs are good and which are bad. Intuition is something we come equipped to these discussions with and is something we are forced to work with and you should make friends with it.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think the processes of science should be heavily relying on intuitions. But intuitions are very much required to 'kick-start' philosophical inquiry. And it took a while for me to really deal with this.

Maybe there's other stuff I would say too, but that's the big one. I have unambiguously thought to myself before that I wish I was told this and forced to deal with it earlier on in the process.

Edit: Added in the advice section.

u/chiobu69 · 1 pointr/Showerthoughts

Your words are unclear and you know not what you speak of.

I encourage you to learn Philosophy, which uses reason and evidence, rather than Religion which uses superstition.

Here is a good book on philosophy:

Philosophy: The Basics by Nigel Warburton

The first chapter is on whether God exists, and gives several arguments for and against the existence of God. Interesting stuff.

u/monkeyx · 1 pointr/askphilosophy

Because you need to star somewhere and this is pretty accessible and short:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philosophy-Basics-Nigel-Warburton/dp/0415693160