Reddit reviews Styles Of Writs, And Forms Of Procedure, In The Church Courts Of Scotland: Revised And Adapted To The Present State Of The Law Of The Church
We found 2 Reddit comments about Styles Of Writs, And Forms Of Procedure, In The Church Courts Of Scotland: Revised And Adapted To The Present State Of The Law Of The Church. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
"According to the US constitution CP is legal... More good would be accomplished by legalizing the ownership of CP, including a reduction in actual abuse" [43+]
---
In reply to /u/freetheloli on "Google builds new system to eradicate child porn images from the web":
> Inb4 misused for random censoring everything.. And if somebody stands up against it they got brandet cp suporters.
At 2013-06-16 15:59:43 UTC, /u/sirhotalot wrote [+44 points: +74, -30]:
> People need to read Falkvinge's opinion on this:
>
> http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/
>
> http://falkvinge.net/2012/02/14/sex-tech-and-harm-to-children/
>
> http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/11/child-porn-laws-arent-as-bad-as-you-think-theyre-much-much-worse/
>
> According to the US constitution CP is legal (the images, not the creation of it, though most is made by the kids themselves ('sexting') and could be constitutionally legal), in fact a lot of legal CP exists that the government doesn't go after because of how prevalent it is and you can even buy some on Amazon and eBay. It's ridiculous.
>
> These ridiculous laws are already being used to censor people for political reasons. They have not protected a single person and have ruined hundreds of thousands of innocent lives (most registered sex offenders are forced to register at the age of 14, sometimes for owning nude pictures of their GFs). More good would be accomplished by legalizing the ownership of CP, including a reduction in actual abuse (access to porn decreases sex crimes).
Screenshot
Vote History on srscharts
 ^This comment posted by a bot | Report an error
SRScreenshot wrote:
"According to the US constitution CP is legal... More good would be accomplished by legalizing the ownership of CP, including a reduction in actual abuse" [43+]
In reply to /u/freetheloli on "Google builds new system to eradicate child porn images from the web":
> Inb4 misused for random censoring everything.. And if somebody stands up against it they got brandet cp suporters.
At 2013-06-16 15:59:43 UTC, /u/sirhotalot wrote [+44 points: +74, -30]:
> People need to read Falkvinge's opinion on this:
http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/
http://falkvinge.net/2012/02/14/sex-tech-and-harm-to-children/
http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/11/child-porn-laws-arent-as-bad-as-you-think-theyre-much-much-worse/
According to the US constitution CP is legal (the images, not the creation of it, though most is made by the kids themselves ('sexting') and could be constitutionally legal), in fact a lot of legal CP exists that the government doesn't go after because of how prevalent it is and you can even buy some on Amazon and eBay. It's ridiculous.
These ridiculous laws are already being used to censor people for political reasons. They have not protected a single person and have ruined hundreds of thousands of innocent lives (most registered sex offenders are forced to register at the age of 14, sometimes for owning nude pictures of their GFs). More good would be accomplished by legalizing the ownership of CP, including a reduction in actual abuse (access to porn decreases sex crimes).
Screenshot
Vote History on srscharts
 This comment posted by a bot | Report an error