Reddit reviews TP-Link Safestream Multi WAN Router | 4 10/100M WAN Ports w/ Load Balance Function | Portal Authencation Access Management | Abundant Security Features | Lightning Protection(TL-R470T+)
We found 15 Reddit comments about TP-Link Safestream Multi WAN Router | 4 10/100M WAN Ports w/ Load Balance Function | Portal Authencation Access Management | Abundant Security Features | Lightning Protection(TL-R470T+). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Up to 4 WAN ports equipped with Advanced load balance to guarantee maximum Bandwidth and backup capabilitiesProvides extensive client account and network management for administrators with supported PPPoE serverMarshals bandwidth resource to specific clients based on their unique application environmentsSmaller case for cost-effective solution in the small office or internet cafes networkUp to 4 WAN ports equipped with advanced load balance to guarantee maximum bandwidth and backup capabilitiesProvides extensive client account and network management for administrators with supported PPPoE ServerMarshals bandwidth resource to specific clients based on their unique application environmentsSmaller case for cost-effective solution in the small office or Internet cafes networkDDNS helps users utilize remote management easily with a domain namePowerful DoS attack protection safeguards your networkIP and MAC binding function effectively prevents ARP virus attacks
You can do it in Windows but, I don't recommend it as it can be very temperamental. i would recommend getting this, I've personally used it with very good results. This video explains how to make the above router operate most effectively.
I have 4 meg ACS in Fairbanks:
Nothing streaming:
Ping statistics for 204.17.140.123: (google.com)
Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% l
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 169ms, Average = 69ms
Streaming a 720p youtube video:
Ping statistics for 204.17.140.123:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% los
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 331ms, Average = 146ms
Last 31 days between my two computers' utorrents I have 100 GB transferred this month.
Depending on your needs, you can actually get a load-balancing router and get one of each service and have them run in tandem or as a failover.
You might want to look into an inexpensive bonded router such as this:
https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-Internal-Universal-Broadband-TL-R470T/dp/B005SYQBN8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1498243192&sr=8-1&keywords=TP-Link+TL-R470T%2B
I've done setups at businesses using two internet connections; usually it's set up for redundancy so you have one that's primary and a slower one that's a different company that's the fallback. I've also set them up for bandwidth sharing; in that arrangement there are a few different options too.
It's not bad. Something like this TP Link load balancer might be a good option since it's a dedicated device and designed for up to four WAN ports. Never used it before so I'd suggest poking around to see how hard it is to configure.
I have Cable and DSL and I use both via one of these:
TP-Link Load Balancing Router
In the one I have, I can designate what computer or device connects to what ISP. I don't know if it will do the job he is wanting, but may be worth a look. And for the price its a great wired-only router. I use a second wireless router (with DHCP disabled) as a wifi access point.
Here is what you need to do. Step by step.
Now for your redundancy, yes you can use the ATT Wireless and have it failover automatically using a loadbalancer device.
Here is the device we are using and is very cheap.
TP-LINK Safestream TL-470T+ 10/100 Broadband Desktop Loadbalance Router
You can use up to 4 different ISP here.
​
Once you are confident that the WAN is working as expected, only then you can fix your problem internally (firewall, DNS, URL blocking etc)
by the time you purchase the additional nics you might have well bought the [TP-Link SafeStream TL-R470T+ Fast Ethernet Load Balance Broadband Router, supports up to 4 WAN ports /VPN pass-through/ IPv6 routing] (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005SYQBN8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_iab.AbMMAPNY8). good for load balancing (true bonding is NOT possible unless you use speedify as like service)
This is good if you have 2 slow connections of the same speed and reliability.
if you have fast modern broadb as nd speeds, they also have a gigabit model for 150
Dual WAN router is the easiest way to do this. I have used. TP-Link TL-R470T+ https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005SYQBN8/
There is 3 WAN version too.
$50 device
NE_TP-Link TL-R470T+
AMZ_TP-Link TL-R470T+
----
Bob's review
Review of device w/ 4G tethered
2nd review kinda loud, decibel alert!
-----
Set up Load Balance to aggregate several WAN links
Configure IP Routing on Dual WAN
Steam services IP list US
Steam services IP list International
Good luck! ~ Bluddy
Alright thanks I'll look into this then. Do you know of any good-cheap routers off the top of your head that can let me setup a profile and make league packets have priority? like this? from one of my other comments. Or will it need to be a more expensive one. I know that one has QoS capabilities. And then this has load balancing capabilities (idk if those are the same thing lol).
Found a good one here . Does this take as input 3 internet connections? Thank you. :-)
https://www.amazon.com/slp/load-balancing-router/v9pu9ck437yc8ov
No longer a Linksys fan, but there is this one:
https://www.amazon.com/Linksys-Business-Gigabit-Router-LRT224/dp/B00GK640D6
Sixty bucks:
https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-SafeStream-TL-R470T-Broadband-pass-through/dp/B005SYQBN8?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_1
https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-Gigabit-Ethernet-Safestream-TL-ER6020/dp/B00A8NWU70?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_10
But that’s not what I’m suggesting at all. I’ve bridged the WiFi and ethernet to my home PC. I could easily just share that out.
Or I could put a bridge (which is not that expensive) after the router and have it bridge the signals. Like this...
TP-Link SafeStream TL-R470T+ Fast Ethernet Load Balance Broadband Router, Multi-WAN, 96M NAT throughput, 30k Concurrent Sessions, 256 DHCP Clients https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005SYQBN8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_P0zgAb23YDVR9
What you’re suggesting would work but is way overkill imo.
I think what you want is a load balancing router that can handle multiple incoming connections as opposed to running ethernet to two different cards in the computer. Running 2 different ethernet cables really isn't very efficient use.
Depending on your needs obviously (wifi, 1gb traffic, etc), a basic load balancing router: http://www.amazon.com/TP-link-TL-R470T-Internal-Universal-Broadband/dp/B005SYQBN8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1465147440&sr=8-1&keywords=tplink+load+balance
This way you have 2 internet connections (WAN) coming in and you can set to load balance where if one connection is bogged down due to something you are doing (youtube), it'll switch and use the other connection for other tasks so you don't have any slowdown. Its all very highly configurable.
I think something like this is really what you should be looking at as opposed to another ethernet card.
Thank you! I was able to find this!
TP-LINK TL-R470T+ Load Balance Broadband Router https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005SYQBN8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_b69lDbR76PQBX