Reddit Reddit reviews Two Views on Women in Ministry (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology)

We found 4 Reddit comments about Two Views on Women in Ministry (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Christian Books & Bibles
Christian Living
Christian Women's Issues
Two Views on Women in Ministry (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology)
Zondervan Publishing Company
Check price on Amazon

4 Reddit comments about Two Views on Women in Ministry (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology):

u/wildgwest · 6 pointsr/Christianity

Two Views on Women in Ministry has four different authors [two egalitarians, and two complimentarians] each write a chapter, and then the other three respond to it. It's a round robin of sorts. I highly recommend it as it's a great book on the discussion between egalitarians and complementarians. I don't think the authors particularly use much of Catholic or Orthodox arguments, as they most heavily rely on scripture as opposed to tradition. However, I would still recommend this book as an introduction to the debate. I've read it and it is phenomenal.

u/hearthebeard · 6 pointsr/Reformed

Hey if you are particularly interested in this topic and want to read the thoughts of several New Testament scholars that disagree and walks through all of the pertinent passages - I found this book to be super helpful.

In the end, I thought Craig Blomberg's position seemed to be the most scripturally faithful position. He would approve of your situation precisely, but only under those particular limitations.

u/INTJustAFleshWound · 5 pointsr/TrueChristian

As /u/Liquid_Boss says, context matters, and I don't think 1 Tim 2 is speaking in generalities, but about roles within a specific context.

This is actually a smaller part of a much bigger topic: Complementarianism vs. Egalitarianism. I'm researching it right now and if you want to do the same, this is a good book to explore the various views. Warning: It can be very academic/dry, but that's what I'd expect from a book using well-reasoned/cited arguments over faulty petitions.