Reddit reviews Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis
We found 3 Reddit comments about Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Paul R. Hill, Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis
I first encounter this claim, that diesel engines were unaffected when gasoline engine were, in this book https://www.amazon.com/Unconventional-Flying-Objects-Scientific-Analysis/dp/1571740279.
Its worth noting that modern diesel engines are computer controlled now, so newer diesel engines may well be affected by an electrical disturbance.
So here you go, whateveryournameis. Dancing_Lock_Guy was kind enough to provide the very name of the book I was referring to, as he actually recognized the description I gave and named the author as well.
The name of the book is Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis. Here is an Amazon link for the book. The book is a little old, but is still in print and selling.
Additionally, here is a Wikipedia link on the author, Paul R. Hill. Here you can read up a little bit about his extensive career as an Aerodynamicist, as well as his work to this effect with NASA and the military.
Additionally - and now that Dancing_Lock_Guy was kind enough to provide the name - I went ahead and did a bit further research and, if you're simply too poor to actually afford purchasing the book from Amazon, I actually found the book itself online for you so that you can read through it yourself for free.
So there you go. :)
Oh...Wait a minute. What? What was that you said? You don't have time to read it? It's much better to just assume you know what you're talking about and troll people with a sense of self-important haughtiness?
You'd rather not have anything as silly as scientific books take away from your precious time trolling on Reddit and fapping to hentai anime porn and furries? Okay, okay. Very well then, whateveryournameis. I understand. But just please remember this the next time someone says something that sounds foreign to you or that you may have never heard of before.
Yes. Some people (especially here on Reddit) make things up just to support fanciful arguments that mean nothing. Not everyone does this, however - even those like me that may not remember specific sources for you or where exactly they got their initial information. Okay?
Okay. Thanks, buddy.
Now get going! :) I'm sure you just have a ton of cartoons to fap to and I don't want to keep you.
The best or most interesting books I've read on the subject are:
I think it's always important to be highly skeptical of even the "best" sighting. For example, the Belgian UFO wave is always highlighted as a slam dunk of something flying about in the skies that goes beyond technology we currently have. However, on closer inspection it's not so clear cut at all. That's the great thing about "Bad UFOs" - it makes you question the evidence, seek alternative explanations and keeps you on your skeptical toes. The last thing you want to do is fool yourself.