Best camera lens accessories according to redditors
We found 1,909 Reddit comments discussing the best camera lens accessories. We ranked the 704 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
We found 1,909 Reddit comments discussing the best camera lens accessories. We ranked the 704 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
Either he has a mount adapter or he's confused.
Budget Rig
I mainly shoot internet video for my daughter and events.
>The only thing putting me off from upgrading to this camera is that I would have to spend another $1,000 on the Metabones Speedbooster to use my Canon EF lenses.
Nope, not at all. You can get a $70 commlite adapter and use the lenses. It won't do the speed boosting, but there are adapters for around 150 or so that will.
MORE IMPORTANTLY. You can't use two of your lenses on the speedbooster. EF-S lenses don't work on it. It takes full-frame lenses (EF) and compresses the image down to the size of the aps-c sensor. If you could somehow mount an EF-S lens on it, (which would probably involve taking a dremel to the thing) you would see this:
http://www.silvermac.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/DSC047131.jpg
Probably worse than that, really.
So you don't need, and probably don't really even want, a speed booster. You just need an EF-E mount adapter, one with aperture control. http://www.amazon.com/Auto-Focus-Mount-Adapter-EF-NEX-Canon/dp/B00DW0EV2I
There ya go, 70 bucks and you can put your EF lenses on the E mount, with full aperture control. Considering the Metabones have had quite a few issues (crashing, aperture changes cause black frames, etc) I'd go with that anyway.
As for which camera to get... The only real fault I've seen with the a6300 is rolling shutter in 4k mode. So grab a tripod or monopod with foot, or use an image stabilized lens. OR shoot in 1080p mode, where it has nearly no rolling shutter.
Is there a better camera out there for the price in APS-C format? No. There really just isn't. Let's sum it up this way: I'm debating selling my Sony a7s to get an a6300. The only thing you listed that it doesn't do is auto-restart video capture. But no other camera does that. The GH4 has a version with no capture limit, but that's about it.
On the other hand, the c100 mkI is actually on sale for 2500 at BH... Great camera, but lacks 4k, DR isn't as good, and only shoots in AVCHD, which is a crime. If you have some dying need to stay with canon, that's an option. But I think I'd rather spend 1k on the a6300 and the rest on other gear. (lenses, lights, etc)
If I were you, I'd probably get a a6300, and then sell the t3i, and get an a6000 as backup. It lacks the video profiles and such, but still outputs great 1080p, and very much holds it's own.
I'm gonna offer my two cents here, I hope this helps:
Here is pretty much exactly what I would buy with that amount of money:
I believe that totals a little less than $700 for an enviable amount of non garbage, budget friendly equipment. You can even add some lighting and still stay under that bundle price.
I personally use the Kenko equivalent of these. They're a little more expensive on Amazon but I couldn't be more pleased with them. I don't know if they are actually $100 worth of extra quality, but they came highly recommended from another photography forum.
/u/TrumpsTapeWorm - if you want to step up to full frame with a $2000 budget, I recommend a [$1599.99 factory refurbished A7s with a 90 day warranty] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&icep_item=262314831511&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg) plus a [$70.99 Commlite Canon EF to Sony E mount autofocusing adapter] (http://www.amazon.com/Auto-Focus-Mount-Adapter-EF-NEX-Canon/dp/B00DW0EV2I/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) for your EF glass.
With this setup, you'll be able to shoot clean 1080p in ultra low light - and when you want to upgrade to 4K, you can simply [buy] (http://www.amazon.com/Atomos-Assassin-ProRes-Monitor-Recorder/dp/B0152GOHPK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) or [rent] (http://www.shareasale.com/r.cfm?u=526023&b=82482&m=12808&afftrack=&urllink=www%2Eborrowlenses%2Ecom%2Fproduct%2FATOMOS%2DNinja%2DAssassin%2D4K%2DHDMI%2DRecorder%2D7in%2DMonitor) an Atomos Assassin 4K recorder.
The A7s is a great wedding video camera:
And shooters have produced high quality narratives and travel video with it:
Plus, no other camera in this price class can compete with it for low light sensitivity:
Hope this is helpful and good luck with your upgrade!
New:Orion Sirius + Astrotech AT65EDQ + BYEOS Premium + 2 inch prime focus adapter + T-adapter for your DSLR (example) + Orion mini guide scope + ASI120MM (guide cam) + EQDIR cable
Used: Sub out the Sirius and AT65 for Orion Atlas + 80mm Triplet, keep everything else the same.
All this assumes you have a Windows laptop that can run BYEOS, EQMOD (free), PHD2 (free), etc. If not, skip the guide cam/scope and save up until you have a computer that can run those programs (doesn't have to be a laptop, these days you can get an Intel compute stick for $150.)
This are FD mount lenses from what I can see. You can use then with an adapter (FD-EF) but you cant focus to infinity.
I use this one
You can see it in the picture, it extends the distance from the mouth of the lens to the sensor so that it equals the distance it would have been in an old SLR, from the mouth of the lens to the film surface.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NAMD-Minolta-E-Mount-Adapter/dp/B00E5T5BJW
You don't need much more than a portable 3" telescope to image the sun itself, and see planets. You will see the rings of saturn and moons and cloud belts of Jupiter, but not a lot of detail.
As far as being able to record stars next to the sun during a solar eclipse, that's hard to say, and could be very dangerous.
When there is a total solar eclipse, you end up seeing the corona around the sun. But this corona can be quite bright and dense, and obscure stars behind it. What's more is, you can't have a solar filter on during this time if you want to record the stars as it will completely block their light. So you have a very short window in which you can safely record images before enough of the sun shines brightly enough that it burns the image sensor on the camera (or your eye, if you're trying to position it).
Moreover, depending on how close the stars have to be to the edge of the sun in order to measure the effects of its mass, you may need high power. High power means you need a tracking mount, and that may be difficult to get for $250.
All that aside, you'll definitely want a DSLR for this because a cheap webcam will likely produce too much noise/grain and will have too low a resolution when trying to image potentially faint stars near the sun. To couple the DLSR to the telescope requires a T-Adapter and a T-Ring for the particular brand of camera you'll be using.
You can but you will lose auto focus.
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Camera-Digital/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1301417858&sr=8-1
Look up the mount and put in XXX to eos adaptor. and youll be able to fit some glass to your camera.
Some lenses will not be able to accept the conversion because your mirror will strike the back end of the lens, destroying your mirror.
> my school has just got the Rokinon Cine Lenses kit And i wanted to Be 100% sure that i could use those lenses on the GH4?? if not what adapter do i need?
Rokinon makes cine lenses for Canon, Nikon, Sony and micro 4/3 mounts. We would have to know which mount is on the lenses before we recommend a specific adapter. Sorry.
That said, when you find out what adapter you need, you can get one for less than $20, e.g. [Referral Links]:
>lastly if anyone has a suggestion on a sd card to use to shoot cine 4k i would greatly appreciate it!
I use SanDisk Extreme Pro 64GB 95MB/s cards - you can get them for [$88.53 as of this post] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007NDL56A/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B007NDL56A&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Link].
Hope this is helpful and good luck with your film project!
All you really need is a k mount to EF mount adaptor.
You can pretty much throw any lens on Canon with an adaptor, with a few exceptions.
The kit lens is probably the 18-55.
What you're probably asking for is a "macro extension tube".
Info/explanations:
https://digital-photography-school.com/extension-tubes-close-up-photography-lesson-2/
https://www.flickr.com/groups/1484201@N23/discuss/72157633007452475/
https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-photograph-small-objects-Macro-photography-using-my-18-55mm-kit-lens
Here's a cheap one:
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Extension-Cameras-Extreme-Close-ups/dp/B003Y5T464
I can't seem to find a link to a "smart" tube for Nikon that has the electrical connections; maybe someone else can.
There's also "reverse mount" which seems to me like kind of a bizarre way to do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etOqpYlFTQ8
Canon's EF and EF-M mounts are different. They are not mechanically compatible and an adapter is required.
Something such as this is required: Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Auto Adapter - Canon EOS (EF / EF-S) D/SLR Lens to Canon EOS M (EF-M Mount) Mirrorless Camera Body - with Full Automated Functions https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00D9BKWEQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_nb6uzb9XXP506
If you're just getting into it, I would consider a camera body that costs $500 USD or less. My own personal recommendation is the Sony A6000. The body and kit lens is small and compact compared to a traditional DSLR like the Canon T6i and performs just as well. It also has the option of being able to mount vintage lenses on it due to it's smaller form factor and the lens mount being closer to the sensor. This means you can get good but cheap manual lenses from back in the day for often times $100 USD or less plus a $18 USD converter mount.
If you have any questions about this camera system (i own the A6000) or in general, please feel free to ask either through comments or pm me. Shameless plug (https://instagram.com/snappedbyandy for example photos)
Also. It sounds like you want to take a lot of landscapes, and for that you want a lens with a low focal length. Now, the kit lens that comes with cameras is nice and all, but if you want some real stunning pictures, you'll get a better quality prime wide-angle lens. "Prime" meaning the lens can't zoom and "wide-angle" meaning you have a wider field of view. Since it doesn't need to move, there's less glass needed, and the quality of the picture is better. Something that's 12mm to 20mm should do the trick. I'll link a personal recommendation below should you choose to go with the A6000.
Again, i want to emphasize to buy used if possible. Especially on lenses. You'll get severe discounts compared to buying something brand new. Typically people take good care of their lenses, and if you can meet the person before buying, a little legwork can save you a bundle of money.
Camera with kit lens (i recommend buying used/refurb locally if possible)
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digitial-3-0-Inch-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_5?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1539180473&sr=1-5&keywords=a6000&dpID=41AEqhgdLtL&preST=_SX300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Recommended wide angle lens for landscape with the A6000:
https://www.amazon.com/Rokinon-Ultra-Angle-Mount-RK12M/dp/B00JD4TAWI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1539180938&sr=8-1&keywords=rokinon+12+e+mount
an example of a good vintage lens:
https://www.amazon.com/Minolta-MD-50mm-Japan-Mount/dp/B008QFXYYU/ref=sr_1_16?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1539180558&sr=1-16&keywords=minolta+rokkor
an example of a converter to convert the mount of a vintage lens to the Sony E-mount
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00E5T5BJW/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1539180630&sr=1-3&keywords=md+to+e+mount&dpID=41RFJ6J3P1L&preST=_SX300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Guy with a dedicated blog to attaching vintage lenses to the Sony E mount system (he uses a Sony A7, which is more expensive, but the A6000 uses the same mount system, so it still all applies):
https://phillipreeve.net/blog/affordable-manual-lenses-for-the-sony-alpha-77r7ii7rii-and-7s/
Hello :-)
Great advice so far!
As the others said, a dobsonian will be the best, as you can afford a very large aperture and have a stable mount. Not for imaging, but for planets it still works with some patience.
$300 can get you a 6" dobsonian, or a "2nd"/refurbished XT8. It doesn't get better than this. 8" already shows a lot regarding deep-sky! ...under a dark sky at least.
 
> upgradable
The main mirror (or lens) is the heart of a telescope, and can't be upgraded. Thus a 8" would show you the most in the long run, even if you can't afford as many accessories as with a 5" or 6".
With other eyepieces you can later add a wider field of view or more magnification. Even at $20 you can get some decent ones (e.g. the 6mm 66° for planets).
For DSLR, you need a barlow both to reach focus and get the planets "large enough". A $15-$20 with T-thread can work (a cheap one introduces a lot of chromatic aberration though), and a $10 adapter for your DSLR to the T mount.
A decent barlow set can go in the $100s.
 
...And "turn left at Orion" - The missing manual :-) Do you have binoculars?
Clear skies!
Specifically, you need to look for lenses that say "macro".
The actual focal length really depends on exactly what you hope to shoot.
The reality is that you're stepping into "specialty" accessories for photography which means "more expensive".
Most likely you're looking at the 60mm f/2.8 Macro, or the 100mm f/2.8 Macro.
These are the Kenko Extension Tubes, which you mount between the body and the lens.
They move the focal plane further from the rear element in the lens which means you can focus more closely. They're very handy, but if you're at a point where you need to spend money anyway, I'd advise that you just go for a proper macro lens because the 55-250 lens you already own isn't exactly the most amazing image quality. (it's very much a starter / kit lens).
Good luck!
This. Although I would like to add the danger of bumping your glass when free-lensing and scratching the elements. If you're going to reverse the lens, you can get a reverse adapter (yes, they sell those) that will help keep errant dust out, or you can just make sure to air blow the lens and sensor before reattaching the lens.
Si pentru /u/beer_and_pain
Daca vrei sa ai niste wow moments ia un obiectiv decent de 50mm f1/8
E cea mai buna chestie pe care o poti cumpara pentru aparatul tau.
in plus poti sa iei ceva de genul : https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Reverse-Camera-Adapter-filter/dp/B001G4NBSC/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1536862281&sr=1-1&keywords=Fotodiox+52mm+Macro+Reverse+Ring+Camera+Mount+Adapter+for+using+Nikon+SLR+Camera+and+lens+with+52mm+filter+thread si ai o lentila macro bestiala (fara autofocus dar e tot wow).
Gonna kinda buck the system. I bought a D3200 with the 18-55 and 55-200 kit lenses. For macro shots, I bought this reversing ring that I put onto the 18-55, and it's pretty fun to play with. I also grabbed this aperture ring sui that I wouldn't have to hold the little finger by hand.
Obviously this isn't really a professional setup, but it does everything I need, and takes plenty good quality pictures for me.
You need a Nikon F to EOS adapter, like this:
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-07LAnkeos-Mount-Adapter-Camera/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1370203196&sr=8-1&keywords=nikon+to+canon+adapter
As far as I know Nikon has not changed their mount in decades, so any AI or AIS lens should work fine (albeit fully manual) on Canon.
Well it is an old camera, so it's definitely not going to perform at the same level as the new hotness, but that could also be a straight out of camera JPEG with no raw editing too.
Have a look through the Flickr D200 pool and see if you're cool with the quality before buying for sure: https://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond200/pool/
I mean, don't expect miracles, but people still do use older cameras (for example, I'm still using my decade-old 5D and love it) with great effect.
Also just for another random suggestion: if you're not committed to Nikon cameras, Canon EOS cameras (anything that has the EF mount) can adapt Nikon F lenses with a simple adapter. A benefit of going with Canon in this particular instance is that stop down metering should work with any camera, not just their mid-range and higher ones.
If this is an attractive option, looking at some used T3s or T1is could be another choice to consider.
In the last few years, I have owned and/or used Canon 5DII, 7D, Blackmagic Pocket and now GH4. Lots of pictures (hey, I'm visual).
The basic Field Of View (FOV) of lenses don't change - a 50mm is a 50mm, no matter if the lens is made for a full-frame 35mm film camera, or a native Micro Four Thirds cam like the GH4. The only difference is the image circle a lens projects behind it is (usually) designed for the size of sensor it has to cover. If the lens is designed for a larger sensor, it can usually be used on a smaller sensor, but the FOV will appear smaller. The lens will appear more telephoto, just as if you cropped out the center of a photo on a larger camera. thus, "crop factor".
Here are the basic video shooting modes for the GH4. Now, that picture compares the modes to the full MFT sensor. 1080 uses the full width of the sensor, but not the full height, due to the 16x9 Aspect Ratio. the MFT sensor is quite a bit smaller than a "Full Frame" camera such as the Canon 5D, or an APS-C Like the 7D.
Sidenote: I said basic video shooting modes, because the v2 firmware has added several other 4K modes only really useful for pulling stills, or special-use videos in more square-ish aspect ratios (like shooting with an anamorphic lens).
Various sensor sizes, and modes within them can seem super complicated, and difficult to wrap your head around. Mainly, I think it's due to the wealth of choices available: with mirrorless cameras, you can adapt almost any lens made for stills or cinema, and quite a few lenses originally made for video. This is because the Flange Focal Distance, or the distance between the sensor and the lens mount, is so short. As long as the FFD is longer, you can adapt the lens easily with a basically a dumb tube that moves the lens farther out, and has the proper mounts at each end.
That's fine for all-manual lenses, where you can adjust the iris, focus and (for zoom lenses) focal length manually. But for more modern lenses that require electronic control, you need a "smart" adapter like the ones from Metabones. Metabones also make Speedboosters, which "condense" the image circle of a larger lens into the size of a smaller sensor, giving you three advantages: .7x wider FOV than a "dumb" adapter; 1 stop more light; and, better image detail.
If you compare the GH4s sensor sizes to other common film/video formats, it's rather on the small-ish size for either motion picture or still photography, but larger than most 1/3" or 1/2" pro video cameras of the last few decades. In 4K, it's a bit larger than the BMPCC, which is almost identical to Super-16mm film. Add a Speedbooster, and it's very similar to APS-C or Super 35mm film.
I like this general range a lot. Many of the fast & small C-mount lenses that cover the Pocket also cover 4K, and using a Speedbooster opens up (relatively) inexpensive and high-quality Canon lenses. Like any camera with a smaller sensor, telephoto is easy. Getting a true wide-angle rectilinear is where it starts to get hard and pricey. 18mm is NOT a wide angle on this size sensor without a speedbooster.
That said, my single, ideal all purpose lens would be the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC, Canon Mount on a Canon Speedbooster. Why Canon instead of Nikon? Because of the flange distance, I could also use old manual Nikon lenses with a simple cheap adapter. Can't do that the other way around.
This gives me a very nice, nearly parfocal, constant f2.0 lens that goes from a nice wide to a medium telephoto. This lens and the Speedbooster are abouth 30% more than the most popular native MFT lens, but you only have to buy the SB once. If you don't need stabilization, the lens is even less.
For video, I'd go with the canon t3i with the magiclantern firmware: http://vimeo.com/30803116
That being said, Nikon has the 35mm f/1.8, to which Canon really has no comparably priced option (except the too-long in APS-C nifty fifty). A very popular kit is a Canon body with old Nikon lenses via an adapter like this one: http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Camera-Digital/dp/B001G4QXLE
I also have a Nikkormat, and I can tell you that it uses a Nikon F Mount. All you have to do is get a simple mechanical adapter, since aperture and focus are manual. I have this Fotodiox one https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G4QXLE and it works okay, it is not designed to be removed too often however.
And for the lazy: http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-thread-Digital/dp/B001G4QXN2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1373270663&sr=8-1&keywords=m42+to+ef
You can use an adapter to use them on some cameras, including Canons, I use a few different Canon FD lenses on my Sony camera.
Buy this and have fun
Definitely not a stupid question. I have this lens adapted to my a6500 as well. I use this adapter:
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B003X1FSCS
Downsides being: aperture isn't translated to the body and you have to do everything manually on the lens, I find it fun though. Also the adapter adds a lot to the length of Nikon lenses, but with this lens specifically it's around the same length as the Sony 10-18mm.
Do the Tamron lenses have an FD mount like the Canon 50mm?
If they do, I'd actually recommend getting a mirrorless camera, like a Sony a6x00 series, so the lenses when adapted can focus to infinity without adding any additional optics that degrade image quality.
Here are some adapters for the Sony E mount:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1150786-REG/fotodiox_fd_nex_p_pro_lens_mount_adapter.html
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Lens-Mount-Adapter-Mount/dp/B003Y302CG
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00EDBT440
 
If you're dead set on getting the Nikon D5300, I found a couple adapters for it:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/995088-REG/fotodiox_fd_nk_g_pro_nikon_f_adapter.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1349608-REG/vello_la_nf_cfd_canon_fd_lens_mount.html
I have an a6000, and am hoping to get an a7ii in the coming months. I have a question regarding adapters for legacy glass. Any insights on the difference between the $99 Metabones adapter, the $29 Fotodiox adapter, and the $17 Foatsy adapter? Is it all just build quality? Or something else?
Also any recommendation for a fast prime telephoto somewhere in the 90-200mm range? I've been looking at Canon FD/FL but I'm open to anything really!
Thanks in advance for your time! :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_T90
:(
The T90 is incompatible with EOS (The lens system on modern Canon cameras)
You can use an adapter, but it won't be as good.
If you're going to adapt lenses, I think the Nex system is best, because they have peak focusing which is fucking awesome. Other camera systems should get this in a few years... in fact they could get it from a firmware update tomorrow.. but for some reason nobody else is implementing it :(
With this adapter and a Nex 5 you could use your old FD lenses quite well... (Nex 5 is a slightly older model, the Nex 5N is the newest version, but it's not actually that much better, the old one is still good) it seems slightly out of your price range, but I see them on sale second hand quite often, so if you keep your eye out on craigslist/gumtree/etc. you could get lucky. Or you could just go for the Nex 3 (I think this would be best, since you should have some kit lenses with autofocus, manual is fun, but it's better to go out and take photos and not worry about fiddling around with manual lenses.....)
No, that's for M42 mount lenses.
This one is not chipped: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Maxim-Pentax-adaptor-adapter-Supplies/dp/B003LIUJGI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1309789739&sr=8-1
This one is: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fotodiox-Adapter-Dandelion-Confirmation-adapter/dp/B003Y3EJMU/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1309789739&sr=8-3
You need a Pentax K mount to Canon EF mount adapter, like this one, which includes focus confirmation.
My go to lately has been the olympus 25 f1.8 . It's the 'Nifty Fifty' of the m43 world and does well in lo-light/indoor situations. they used to be $399 but have dropped to $299 recently.
Only downside is no image stabelization as Pani does it in lens and Olympus does it in body, but at that focal length it is not usually an issue.
If you are on a budget but want to play around to see what it's like having a prime lens with low f-stop i highly recomend the Fotasy line. I call them toy lenses but they can actually produce some very nice pictures with interesting boke due to it's super low f-stop. I picked up a few of these at different focal lengths and it taught me a lot about my camera. upside, lenses are 20-30 bucks, downside, no auto anything, but they can be great learning tools.
You could get a GH3, however that wouldn't leave you much money left over for a lens, let alone all the other bits you need.
The camera is one of three parts that make up a quality production; you also need to consider sound and lighting.
If you're just experimenting, then you could go for this little combination:
That leaves you about $40 for media and spare batteries. The links are for illustrative purposes - shop around to find better prices and you can save even more!
I'm using the Commlite Adapter on my A7s and I have no problems whatsoever. AF is slow as expected. Build quality is decent.
cheapest solution I can
recommendcome up with if you want auto focushttps://www.amazon.com/Commlite-Auto-Focus-Mount-Adapter-EF-NEX/dp/B00DW0EV2I/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1494447703&sr=8-2&keywords=ef+to+sony+e+mount+auto+focus
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Yongnuo-EF-50mm-F-1-8-AF-MF-Standard-Prime-Lens-same-as-Canon-EF-50mm-F-1-8-II-/161645531246?hash=item25a2d3106e:g:GasAAOSwEeFVDUVM
USB to laptop with this for the 500D. Camera to telescope with this for the 500D. Good Luck!
This is everything you need to attack the camera to the back of the scope:
TRing for camera: http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-93419-T-Ring-Canon-Camera/dp/B000237C9M?ie=UTF8&keywords=canon%20t%20ring&qid=1463021630&ref_=sr_1_1&sr=8-1
T-Adapter (connect T-Ring to scope): http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-T-adapter-Schmidt-Cassegrains-Threads-Cell/dp/B00009X3V8?ie=UTF8&keywords=t%20adapter&qid=1463021693&ref_=sr_1_3&sr=8-3
Only thing I'm unsure about is that you might need an additional adapter to convert the threads on the mak to SCT threads (not sure if it has SCT threads or something different)
For a Cell phone, just hold it up to the eyepiece. For extra stability, you could get an eyepiece adapter. With few exceptions (newer cell phone cameras are getting sophisticated enough for long~ish exposure on bright objects), the only objects you will be able to snap will be planets and the Moon.
For a DSLR, you will need 2 components, a T-Ring which acts as a lens attachment (and you will need to find one for your specific camera brand), and a T-Adapter which will allow the camera to insert into the telescope like an eyepice. Given you are going to an actual observatory, they likely use 2" eyepieces, so a 2" T-adapter will probably be needed.
You should also make sure they are OK with you taking pictures like this. I help run a local public observatory (ie no research, just open nights for the public to look up) and we host monthly photo nights, but setting up the scope for photography requires changing the focus and if you are taking photos that means you'll be tying up any lines behind you for several minutes. On the other hand, if this is a private observatory and you don't have to worry about lines, then great. I would call ahead to make sure either way - maybe they already have the adapters you need
Basically, yes, but you'll also need a few relatively cheap things to make sure you have power and a way to mount the camera to the scope. And you can definitely go much cheaper (especially on the camera). I just had the camera prior to getting into astrophotography because I do photography as well.
To answer your question, the only other thing I purchased separately that was involved in my setup for this shot was the battery pack that powers the mount, a T-Ring, and a T-Adapter that allows me to mount my camera to the scope.
Power Tank
T-Ring
T-Adapter
Again. You can go much cheaper on the camera and can actually just use a webcam to shoot the video that you'll stack into a still. Registax is free. Autostakkert is free. And there are free photoshop alternatives. You'll also want to use this program called BackyardEOS to shoot the videos at 5x zoom (My computer was acting up for this shot, so I didn't use it this time around) but it's well worth the $30 I think I paid for it. You can get even clearer shots like this one I got a while back. The program allows you to digitally zoom in at 5x using and use only a part of the camera's sensor. Please let me know if you need any other information. I'd be glad to help. Hope this helps some!
That's the scope I started with :)
The easiest way to get involved (IMHO) is to get a DSLR and a T-mount. This will allow you to attach a canon DSLR to the back of your scope. Now you can easily take pictures of the moon, planets, and brighter objects in the sky.
Deep Sky Stacker is a free image pre-processing program that will help you stack all of your images together with their calibration frames to get ready to do the processing to get the detail out of the image.
As for image processing, Pixinsight is what I use, and it's a hefty pricetag, but it's a one-stop-shop. It does everything you need it to do. I've seen others with exceptional results from using photoshop, but I have no training or expertise in it at all. Here is a fantastic book that explains the intricacies of PI.
For long exposure stuff, you'll need a high quality equatorial mount, and for even longer exposure stuff, you might need a guide camera, but you'd be surprised what a well aligned unguided mount can get you, especially for brighter objects (like M42 here) and shorter exposures. Instead of the 3 minute exposures I took here, you can take 45-second exposures and just collect buckets of them and stack them all together.
That's the same scope I have... camera too. I mounted it on a cg5 mount and use http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000237C9M/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1398011436&sr=8-1&pi=SX200_QL40 it's all you should need to connect your camera.
As for pictures... eh, I haven't been very successful with much yet... but it was cold and I'm completely new to the hobby.
You generally get one of these to adapt from the telescope eyepiece tube to the "T-mount" standard (a dead simple lowest common denominator camera lens mount originally used by Tamron – basically just a threaded ring), plus a T-mount to whatever your camera takes – e.g. Nikon F mount, or Canon EF mount in the OP's case – adapter ring.
So about $15 for the telescope to T adapter and $9 for the T to EF ring.
I'm surprised I haven't seen more recommendations for macro extension tubes.
https://www.amazon.com/Kenko-Auto-Extension-Canon-Mount/dp/B000U8Y88M
I eventually purchased the Canon 100mm macro and the Laowa 25mm f/2.8 2.5-5x, but before that, the extension tubes let me really play with Macro photography and get some good shots. There are a lot of limitations (aka, shallow depth of field) to Macro photography that it will behoove you to get some practice with. Especially once you go with higher magnification.
http://www.amazon.com/Kenko-Auto-Extension-Canon-Mount/dp/B000U8Y88M/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1301327465&sr=8-2
I have heard good things about these Kenko's, though no first hand experience. The description says you maintain AF, but you'll need a fast prime to maintain enough light for it to work.
Macro is one of the most technical sides of photography, a good starter lens is the 100mm macro from canon http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00004XOM3?pc_redir=1410422622&robot_redir=1
If you want more magnification after that you can add extension tubes to the lens, but then is getting hard to manage the focus of the lens and the working distance can be awkward http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000U8Y88M?pc_redir=1410295973&robot_redir=1
Finally if what you are really after is a microscope like magnification the 65mm macro from canon will do the trick, This is a highly specialised lens and I will not recommend it to a beginner. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00009XVD5/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1410489652&sr=8-1&pi=SX200_QL40
what camera do you have? and what lenses?
The best macro you will get on the cheap is using a reverse ring filter or
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Reverse-Camera-Adapter-filter/dp/B001G4NBSC/
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Extension-Cameras-Extreme-Close-ups/dp/B003Y5T464
good luck
If you want to get started much cheaper try out any reverse lens mounts. It allows you to mount your lens using the threads on the front. It's produces fantastic macro images.
https://www.amazon.ca/Fotodiox-Reverse-Camera-Adapter-filter/dp/B001G4NBSC
Something like this. Now I shoot canon but nothing is different. I've used this method many times. It will work great with you 18-55. The zoom will allow you to make some slight adjustments to how close you want to be.
One of the downfalls though is you physically have to move to get your image to be in focus. The pay off is marvellous though.
I know I didn't answer your question but hopefully I was if help. Happy shooting.
Extension tubes have no glass, air is air. Kenko tubes perform every bit as good optically as Nikon. A set of three is $129. Not much chance finding a set for $40.
They will probably perform best with the prime 35mm, but you may prefer the focal length of one of the zooms, and quality may be acceptable.
What does fit in your budget is a reversing ring for that 35mm - $35. There are off brands that are cheaper, but I have not researched the mechanical quality.
Considering the cost, reversing rings give great results. A very common way to find out if you like macro. This writer likes the generic brand of rings. $12.00
If I might recommend one more thing to spice up your macro world, it would be a reversing ring. Stick it on your fast 50mm (or 35mm) and it's pretty neat. Definately leaning more in the artsy/lomo world doing this, as the DOF is super tiny, and you basically have to get 'right on top' of your subject, but, hey, it is cheap, cool fun. I have been using a pair of cheap LED flashlights to illuminate whatever it is I'm messing with.
I don't use nikon, so I'm not too sure here.
But I would get:
So you can either use the 50mm on tubes for regular macro, the 50mm reversed for a little bit closer, or the 50mm reversed on tubes for Thomas Shahan super macro.
Fotodiox is the go-to adapter brand. I have both the expensive and the cheap adapters and honestly couldn't tell you the difference. They both work exactly the same!
If you know what to look for, you can get a good older dedicated macro lens for less than a hundred.
The oldest Nikon "F" lenses do not work on most any modern Nikon camera. So, they tend to be some of the cheapest good quality lenses.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Nikon-Manual-Focus-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-NK060090331510?r=FE
Pick up one, plus a $10-$30 F-to-EOS filter, and you're all set.
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-07LAnkeos-Mount-Adapter-Camera/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1371055469&sr=8-2&keywords=f-to-eos+adapter
Yeah. I bought my canon xsi off cregslit complete with a canon 18-55mm and a 55-250mm with 3 SD's a tripod and a case for $450 and i have never had any complaints with that gear.
also if your looking for a nice lens but don't have the dough you can pick up one of these for pretty cheap and get 40 year old nikon lenses that are just as sharp as new ones for much much less.
or if you go nikon you don't have to use the ring. :P
also I would like to see your work! I haven't read the whole thread to see if you posted a link of some kind, but i would love to see some of ur stuff!
So, I've got a Rebel T7i that I use for stop animation projects. After some research, it's been recommended that I use a Nikon lens with the T7i in order to reduce some of the flicker issues that occur with stop animation.
Would this adapter allow me to attach a Nikon - AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D Standard lens:
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Lens-Mount-Adapter-Nikkor/dp/B001G4QXLE?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_1
to my canon body?
Thanks for any suggestions/comments.
Bingo.
Since it's an older style lens with aperture ring (as opposed to G lenses without one), any cheap F->EF adapter should work, such as this Fotodiox one:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001G4QXLE/
I have this adapter for my Nikon 1.4 full manual glass. Works really well and for video I prefer my Nikon lens over my Canon Nifty Fifty.
I wouldn't mind most adapters as long as they don't need glass adapters. Meaning I wouldn't get FD glasses for EF mounts.
So far, I know, this is what works quite well for video and without losing focus to infinity:
Nikon lens -> EF Mount
EF Lens -> M43 Mount
Nikon Lens ->M43 Mount
Pentax Lens -> EF Mount
This is based on fully manual lens though.
Would getting a Nikon lens/adapter be a good idea as apposed to settling for a wider focus? This is what I'm looking at:
Lens
Adapter
This adapter.
Look here for lenses.
From the above link, I would look for 24 or 28mm 2.8 lenses. It doesn't matter if they are non AI, AI, or AI-S, since that's only an issue for people who own Nikon bodies. The cheapest will be the 28mm f/2.8 E series, followed by the non-AI, then AI-S lenses. They are all fine on your camera, but the AI-S is arguably the best. As for KEH, even their ugly lenses are quite good, and I highly recommend buying from them.
Just remember, you will be in full manual mode. That means setting the f-stop yourself, in addition to the focus. If you plan on buying more than one, I'd also suggest buying an adapter ring for each one, so you spend less time unscrewing/screwing.
Sorry about the delayed reply. This is a pretty detailed description of my newest setup:
I have
All of that in this order:
Mount Adapter > Teleconverter > Extension Tube > Reversing Ring > UV Filter > Reversed Prime
Shot on a Rebel XT body.
The kit lens that comes with the G7 is pretty sharp for a kit lens, but it's aperture doesn't get very wide. It's overall pretty good for a beginner, because of the ISO sensitivity of the camera it's less important to have a lens with a wide aperture. That being said, it's not perfect for everything and one of the first lenses that many G7 shooters get after they've outgrown the kit lens is the Panasonic 25mm f1.7.
And yes, one of the advantages of the Micro Four Thirds sensor and mount system the Panasonic G7 uses, is its wide compatibility with adapted lenses using either a basic "metal ring" adapter, a focal reducer (which reduces the crop inherent to the Micro Four Thirds format while adding an extra stop of light to your lens), a smart adapter
(which retains electronic lens features like autofocus and image stabilization), or a speedbooster (which does the job of both a focal reducer and a smart adapter in one).
I picked this adapter up to use Canon FD lenses. Real solid and didn't cost much either. The only drawback using an adapter is that any controls from the lens such as autofocus can't be used. You actually have to setup the GH2 to have it shoot without a lens, because it won't register your Canon glass.
While that doesn't sound good, I've gotten incredible results using it. Never had a problem with this thing falling apart and using Canon glass makes my clients happy.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003EAVUMK?pf_rd_mnb=ATVPDKIKX0D34&pf_rd_stb=center-2&pf_rd_rat=0817NMRY4ZRQZM6P18TH&pf_rd_t3r=101&pf_rd_ptd=470938631&pf_rd_ied=507846&tag=buaazs-20&pf_rd_ptd=470938631&pf_rd_ied=507846
EDIT: Forgot to mention the hack. I've heard quite a few things about the hack too and was going to try it myself a few months ago for a short I was working on, but I was a bit intimidated by it and was worried about corrupting the firmware and making it unreliable. Probably just me being paranoid, but if you do decide to go for it, make sure you're using a trusted source and you know what you're doing when hacking it.
http://www.amazon.com/RainbowImaging-Camera-Adapter-Panasonic-Olympus/dp/B002U4RRTG
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic-Cameras/dp/B003EAVUMK
If they are canon FD lenses, either of these should adapt them to the pocket cam. I have the rainbowimaging one for my pocket cam and it works pretty well, you just have to get used to the weird locking mechanism that FD lenses use.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic-Cameras/dp/B003EAVUMK
> a Canon FD to EOS adapter that isn't $2000 and that also isn't utter shite at a reasonable price
Never used one but this one on Amazon is less than $40 and has 300+ reviews with an average of 4/5 -- is it "utter shite"...? ;-)
It has a Canon FD mount . This is the mount Canon used prior to switching to the EF (EOS) mount back in 1987. You can buy adapters like this that will let you mount it on your new Canon body, but you won't have autofocus, or control of the aperture from the camera
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Lens-Mount-Adapter-Built/dp/B003EB0AXY
This one is a basic adapter. Or this for a speedboosting adapter with aperture control.
1.4 blur refers to having a sharp subject and the background out of focus. Fast lenses have a high aperture (which is a small number, 1.4 is faster than 2.8 etc). Search "bokeh" and you'll see a lot of examples.
You can get any old lens - minolta, nikon, canon, olympus, pentax, and others. Here's an example from KEH - very well trusted and respected dealer. If you search their site, look for 35mm equipment - fixed focal length lenses.
Remember that a 50 mm lens (like the one above) will act as a telephoto on your micro 4/3 format, like a 100mm lens (there are other changes too but later for those) and bring the subject twice as close. If you bought a 100mm lens, it would act like a 200mm and bring the subject 4 times as close. (No free lunch: focusing is difficult and must be done manually.)
You need one of these to connect it to your camera. There are some made for all kinds of lenses.
I'd say start with the a 50. Check with your local craigslist. Usually something there.
Post some photos!
yes, but they are mostly manual unless you want to spend hundreds of dollars for an electric one and the electric ones are relatively new and unreliable
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Mirrorless-Camera/dp/B003G49V70
you are better off selling the 50 1.8 with the d3200 or by itself when it's time and buy the g7
Yes, I've used this adapter to successfully attach a few different lenses to my GH2.
Everything goes manual (of course), and the focal length is basically double the lens' listing, but otherwise pretty straight-forward, and works just fine.
I use a few old Nikon/Nikkor lenses. Get a F mount to E-mount adapter, go on c-list or ebay and get a cheap lens. You will have to do manual focus, but focus peaking is really the best thing ever for that. You will also have to manage the aperture which is pretty easy.
Look up Ken Rockwell's manual Nikon lens reviews for good details. I have a 55mm 1.2, 135mm 2.8, 28mm 2.8, 35mm 2, and a 300mm 4.5. All these lenses can be had for under $250 if you look carefully. Also, the old nikon lenses are built like tanks, and if you do destroy one, it's not the end of the world as they are cheap. I have been hard on my 55mm and 35mm not a tear was shed when I broke one, as it cost $100 and got many good shots with it.
A HUGE plus is that the camera will use a lot less power, I can shoot 1200+ photos with my a7 and a7s and still have ~60% battery left. Also, after about 2 years of heavy manual focus, I can focus pretty quickly, sometimes better than auto focus (with low light).
Just recently started getting into photography because of how influential it is in design (so please take what I say as a grain of salt). To start things off, photography in general is more equipment heavy than graphic design I will say. A lot of people will argue that you can replicate any photo style on any camera, but I typically disagree with this.
With that being said, price points can also be a be a bit subjective and relate with your experience level. A professional might consider a $1,500 lens to be cheap, while newcomers might find spending $1,000+ on a full kit to be expensive.
I might be a bit biased as it was the first camera I've ever bought, but I personally love Sony cameras! While Cannon, Nikon and Pentax have made names for themselves, Sony is quickly catching up with their market. In general, Sony's line of cameras are extremely universal, with their e-mount lenses the possibilities are endless. They've even provided lens adapters for many of the top camera companies, if you ever wanted to buy additional lenses.
My first camera was a Sony A6000, and I highly recommend it as a beginner level camera! They have a more updated Sony A6300, but it's entirely up to you and what you plan on using it for.
You're probably right. Shot was already a bit under exposed and I try my best to never go higher than 400 on this camera.
This is the lens in question.
85MM
Adapted with this.
Adapter
I am using a Canon 60d with an old kit lens 35-80mm with the front glass removed. http://petapixel.com/2012/11/03/turn-an-old-kit-lens-into-a-macro-lens-by-removing-the-front-element/ Not a true macro lens but takes great pictures.
Edit: you can try using an EF to Sony adapter https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003XY8DF4/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_V5ikybDF2G1T4 and pick up an old Canon kit lens https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Camera-Zoom-Lens-35-80mm/dp/B01011A8LI/ref=sr_1_10?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1479053122&sr=1-10&keywords=Canon+35-80 should only cost around $75.
You could also try a set of these that will fit a lens you already have. https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Dphoto&field-keywords=macro+filter
EF lenses control aperture electronically so you have three options for adapters.
There are the standard adapters like this: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B003XY8DF4/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1427148607&sr=8-2&keywords=e+to+ef&dpPl=1&dpID=41YAoZJChtL&ref=plSrch&pi=AC_SX200_QL40 with these you won't be able to change the aperture .
Then you have manual aperture adapters like this:http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Built-Aperture-Camera/dp/B005ODK5LC#immersive-view_1418836744849
Lastly you have adapters which are able to control aperture and autofocus like this:http://metabones.com/products/details/MB-EF-E-BM3
Its a good camera. The only thing I wouldn't like is the lack of a viewfinder.
As for lenses, you might want to check out the Sony 50 f1.8 for low light images. Any third party alternative would work for that as well.
For example:
http://www.keh.com/camera/Canon-Manual-Focus-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-CA0601040019706?r=FE
and
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-E-Mount-Camera-NEX-5N/dp/B003Y302CG/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1396994347&sr=1-1&keywords=fd+to+nex
Any adapter from FD to NEX E mount will work though. That one is kind of pricy.
Fd lenses: http://www.keh.com/Camera/format-35mm/system-Canon-Manual-Focus/category-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses?s=1&bcode=CA&ccode=6&cc=3115&r=WG&f
Huge list of used lenses:
http://www.keh.com/camera/format-35mm?s=1&bc=39
Adapter
They would adapt to anything with a shorter flange distance.
So something like a Sony NEX series would work great with an adapter like this:
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-E-mount-NEX-VG10-Original/dp/B003Y302CG
I am using M42, Leica M, and Pentax K mount lenses on my NEX-5N.
Looks like a canon FD mount.
You'll want something like this: https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Lens-Mount-Adapter-Mount/dp/B003Y302CG
I typed that response up on a tablet, and I wanted to take the time to give you a better response.
I have a D3100, and it does pretty well. The reason I recommend the D5200 is because DxOmark rates the sensor quality much higher than my D3100. If you can afford it, you might as well get it. The tilting screen might also be handy, and has a better resolution to boot.
Fotodiox Extension Tubes <-- These are the extension tubes I have for my camera.
I also made an album of pictures using the tubes.
With 135mm lens
With 50mm lens
I will say that the 135mm allows you to be farther away, which will help prevent getting shadows from the lens in your picture.
The thing about extension tubes is that they really seem to mess with your exposure. Therefore, you can't really use the "Sunny 16 rule" very well. Most of the time I have to "chimp." Take a picture, look at the histogram, adjust.
I've only had my tubes for a few days, but I would also recommend a tripod. As you can see from my pictures, there are large areas that are out of focus. You can increase the "depth of field" by "stopping down" the aperture, but that means you have to lengthen the exposure. Longer shutter times = more blur.
The image link is blocked from external linking, but I copied it here.
Everyone is right that the best choice is a macro len. You can also try using the much less expensive option of extension tubes (with or without AF).
Also don't forget about light. When you get this close your DOF (depth of field) shrinks to almost nothing (notice in your example picture how almost everything except the ladybug is a green blur). To handle this macro is often shot with very small apertures (f/11 - f/32), which means you need a lot of light. I don't shoot macro (gratuitous personal shot) very often, but when I do I like to use a couple of flashes on either side of my subject. This gives me lots of light and handles the shadows better than a single strobe.
People who are big into macro photography tend to use dedicated flash systems and other crazy rigs.
Have fun!
> Is anyone aware of a lens that is only a prism to cast a spectrum across the sensor of a camera body?
I don't know of a lens like that, but I can't imagine it would be too hard to fabricate. Maybe turn down a prism and stuff it into a cheap extension tube set?
it is a c mount lens but it's not for a 16mm camera. it really is for a CCTV camera /u/devonmorehouse
this looks similar to mine
just search CCTV lens on ebay / amazon or try and search some videos on youtube - they'll probably link to the lens they bought.
I bought my adapter (c mount to m43 off amazon from fotasy for cheap and it works fine).
On top of my 25mm f1.4 I also have a 50mm (or maybe it's also 25mm?) Fujinon c mount CCTV lens. I bought this because I a saw a video that I can't seem to find anymore about how you could get EXTREME macro shots with this lens. The vignetting is HUGE but if you use the telepho setting on the gh3/4/5 then you punch it and remove the vignetting. Beautiful video, but unfortunately the lens is pretty much unusable for me. the focus is so shallow and so close to the lens you basically have to touch it. I bought this for $11, not a big deal, but just as a warning you may have issues.
edit: it's not silver and it's not the same lens but this could work. I got mine a year or two ago and it looks like people have already caught on to the popularity and have been increasing prices.
also here's two more random examples I found of mine https://imgur.com/a/kkaUe
There is actually some really nice Sony glass, but generally not the consumer photography level stuff.
The metabones can do a few more things too, there is a speedbooster version, but in reality a cheaper adapter will be just as good for you if you are used to manual focusing.
This one I've used on the 6500, 7sii's and FS7s without issue: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fotodiox-Fusion-Adapter-Smart-Mount/dp/B00D9BKLX8
It does have electrical points so technically can autofocus, although I wouldn't bother unless you want to wait a while and then have to resort to doing manually anyway.
I have native sony lenses i'll use if I want to use autofocus (generally this is for a B-camera on an interview or something, where I don't have a secondary op)
Hi itsmee - there are a couple of things you should know about the T2i before you and your wife make a decision:
With a $400 budget, I recommend you take a serious look at a brand new, [$395 Canon EOS M with a 22mm low light lens] (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A/?tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Link] and a [$60 Canon EF to EF M adapter] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00D9BKWEQ/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00D9BKWEQ&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=battleforthew-20) so your wife can use standard Canon lenses later on.
This camera has a 30 minute recording time limit, video autofocus and manual audio gain control (another capability the T2i lacks).
In addition, buying a used camera is risky - I just paid $309 to have an out-of-warranty camera repaired.
Here is what the EOS M can do (some of these were shot with Magic Lantern RAW firmware):
Live music (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/75122636#t=38s
Fashion (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/72938179
Travel (shot in h.264): http://vimeo.com/55604121
Travel (shot in h.264): http://vimeo.com/61150313
Skate (shot in h.264): http://vimeo.com/80326419
This camera can produce great results with a fairly small upfront investment.
Hope this is helpful!
Bill
The adapter is cheap simple and small and being knocked off by third parties for $12-$40.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00D9BKWEQ/
Contrast that to the situation with my A6000 where the apapter is an expensive ($300) rube golberg device with it's own SLT mirror and focusing system.
Best of all worlds, you get the size saving from mirroless and the adapters are so cheap you can get one for each lens.
There have been a lot of issues with past "M" models but affordable, seamless adaption of EF-S and EF glass has not been one of them.
BTW Pentax did make a mirrorless (K-01) that could take their DSLR lenses without an adapter. It made things simpler for them as they did not have to come out with a new line of mirrorless compatible lens but they ended up with a huge clunky but ugly box that (almost) everyone hated.
Would this adapter enable you to mount EF lenses on the body?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00D9BKWEQ/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_2?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1&amp;smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE
No, I've never used the Commlite adapter. I've heard that their adapter is very hit or miss though. Focus will either work fine or not at all. Same for their Nikon auto-focus adapter. They do have a compatibility list here: https://www.amazon.com/Commlite-Auto-Focus-Mount-Adapter-EF-NEX/dp/B00DW0EV2I
using the
Commlite Auto-Focus Mount Adapter EF-NEX for Canon EF to Sony NEX Mount on my a6300 with my canon 24-105 f4 lens.
auto focus is fast, hit or miss sometimes but doesn't stop me from using it.
My go-to lens right now with the a7s is the Canon 24-105 f/4 L.
I previously shot exclusively on Rokinon primes with my Canon 7D since I was always running into lowlight situations for event coverage. But the a7s being the lowlight monster it is, there's really no point in carrying around 3-4 different primes at one time and constantly switching out when I have all those focal lengths available in one really great zoom. Also, the image stabilization is extremely helpful. I shoot pretty much 100% handheld with the 24-105 and my footage (motion-wise) looks better than it ever did with my primes + monopod.
If you wanted to get a feel for what your footage would look like, you can check out this video. I shot all of the b-roll at the beginning of it with the 24-105 and my a7s. The singing portion starting around 1:12 was shot with Rokinon primes so you can just ignore it from that part onwards.
https://vimeo.com/120457369
password: lindalindalinda
You can probably snatch a good version of the lens for around $600. A lot of people are buying up 5D and 6D packages these days that come with the 24-105 as a kit lens. It's possible you could get a new one for around that price. My used copy has worked well for me though.
And I know the metabones adapter seems like the more legit option but most other a7s users I've encountered, myself included, prefer the Commlite Adapter over it. Only $100, works like a charm, and there's no need to mess around with firmware updates. Only problem you may encounter with it is light flaring more than usual. Personally though, I think it looks cool. But there are ways to insulate the adapter to get rid of it.
If you think you still need some 3rd or 4th opinions, feel free to head over to the Sony A7s Cinematography & Video User Group or the Sony A7S Video Shooters Group on Facebook. I'm sure they'll have much more insight to offer.
> Canon SX60 HS
That's fairly expensive for what it is. For that money, if you are willing to learn the technical side of macro photography, you can buy a used DSLR/mirrorless + old film macro lens and get full control over your results.
https://www.keh.com/shop/sony-nex-5n-silver-digital-camera-body-16-1-m-p.html
https://www.keh.com/shop/minolta-50mm-f-3-5-macro-md-mount-manual-focus-lens-55.html
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00E5T5BJW/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1492957911&amp;sr=1-3&amp;keywords=nex+minolta+md
Nope. You need an MD to E/FE adapter. Sometimes referred to as MD-NEX adapter. Not too expensive, ~$15 on Amazon, cheaper on eBay if you want to wait.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00E5T5BJW
There are dozens of mount types, you need an adapter for that specific mount. In the case of Rokkor/Minolta, it's called the MD or MC mount (both are the same). It's the most popular mount type for vintage glass, especially when it comes to lenses I find at thrift and antique stores in New York (not as dominant when you go world wide with online) and something like this works.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E5T5BJW/
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00E5T5BJW/ref=lp_3028724011_1_14?srs=3028724011&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1503411558&amp;sr=8-14
This has been a solid one for me if your lenses are all manual. Haven't noticed any quality loss since it does nothing more than adapt the mounts.
Buy this Fotasy NAMD Pro Minolta MD MC Lens to Sony NEX E-Mount Camera Adapter (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E5T5BJW/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_N3rkyb6KZPHJ1 (sorry on mobile).
I have a few Minolta md or sd mount lenses, one of which is a 70-210 and I used that adapter. Not sure what you're looking to get out of the adapter, but there's obviously no autofocus. It just works..
If you go with it or probably any adapter there is a setting to allow shutter release with no lens, this has to be on because the camera won't recognize this as a lens.
Edit: OP if you are simply looking to use a vintage lens on a Sony emount look up the "x" to emount adapter. Here is an af to emount Fotasy ANAF Sony Minolta MA AF Lens to Sony NEX E-Mount Camera Adapter (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004G3D61W/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_rQIkybZKDN0R9
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NAFD-Mount-Camera-Adapter/dp/B00EDBT440
Works great!
I use this one. I've had no issues with it. These adapters are pretty simple so IMO it's fine to go cheap.
http://smile.amazon.com/Fotasy-NAFD-Mount-Camera-Adapter/dp/B00EDBT440?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1&amp;redirect=true&amp;ref_=oh_aui_search_detailpage
Yep; just like this cheap guy:
http://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NAFD-E-Mount-Camera-Adapter/dp/B00EDBT440/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1457464973&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=fd+to+emount
You can get a cheap, 3-6 year old used mirrorless camera, 16-20 megapixels with manual controls and electronic viewfinder (important!) for $150. That is without a lens. You can get a $10-15 adapter from amazon (I've used the Fotasy brand) and use just about any cheapo 50mm thrift store lens (provided you get the correct mount adapter).
Camera: https://www.keh.com/shop/sony-a3000-digital-camera-body-20-1-m-p-672701.html
Adapter, for old canon lenses: https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00EDBT440/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1522030603&amp;sr=1-2&amp;keywords=fotasy%2Be%2Bmount&amp;th=1
Cameras have never been cheaper or better, and when you buy used... well it's like buying a luxury car. The vast majority of depreciation has already taken place. If she has a "garbage" phone, it's more likely to kill her interest in the hobby. Especially since only recent versions of android have the ability to adjust the camera controls manually & shoot raw files. I'd suggest paying for some baseline hardware instead of lessons (youtube should have everything you need, lesson-wise, for free). With pay lessons, you're out money if she decides not to "stick with it." With hardware, you can re-sell it or use it yourself or re-gift it to someone else who wants to explore photography. And the image quality will be 10x better.
Good luck.
I like to search ebay for FD lenses under $50 with a Buy-It-Now price. You can find perfectly good third-party FD lenses for dirt cheap. And FD - E mount adapters are about $13 a piece on Amazon.
got it on Amazon
This inexpensive $14 mount will allow canon FD lens to be mounted to Sony emount cameras. And the lens is manual aperture and manual focus.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NAFD-Mount-Camera-Adapter/dp/B00EDBT440
this goes on the camera. Then something like this screws into the first adapter and connects you to the telescope. You need to check whether your scope can take 2" eye pieces or not. If it only take the 1.25" size, then you would need this instead. On a crop sensor it probably doesn't make a huge difference, but you'll get less vignetting with the 2" adapter.
> AstroTech AT65EDQ
It has a 2" focuser, so you could get a 2" T-Adapter and a Canon T-ring You could probably get away with a 1.25" T-adapter since your have a crop sensor T3i.
So I've been doing astronomy for several years now and decided to try to venture into astrophotography. I bought a Canon T6 Rebel, this T-ring, and this adapter to use with my smallish Celestron refractor (not sure the exact model atm, sorry) and my computerized Celestron mount.
I'm fairly sure I'm missing something obvious here but how do I use an eyepiece with this set-up? They don't seem to fit in the extension tube.
Also, can someone recommend what settings I use on the Canon or recommend some good resources for someone new to DSLR and astrophotography. Right now I'm mainly looking to photograph Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and the Moon.
Thanks!
The first link (extension tubes) seems to be non-coupled (no contact between lens and body) meaning you can't properly control the aperture setting and your metering will be out of whack. Electronically coupled extension tubes will cost a lot more.
The second link (diopter filters) will degrade image quality, especially near the edges. However, you will retain autofocus, autoexposure and aperture control.
Disregard the third link.
Yeah, macro is one of the areas where a crop body might be argued to be an advantage.
Since you already have the fine 100 macro, I would suggest you look into extension tubes. It's not clear to me that the 65 macro would let you do anything you cannot already do.
Thanks guys. Ya, I don't need manual focus, but I do need to control my aperture.
The Kenko set seems like the best one, but it's kind of expensive at $250 and is more than I was hoping to spend.
https://www.amazon.ca/Kenko-Auto-Extension-Canon-Mount/dp/B000U8Y88M/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1501421408&amp;sr=8-14&amp;keywords=extension+tube
My alternatives are:
Fotodiox for $70
https://www.amazon.ca/Fotodiox-Extension-Lenses-Extreme-Close-Up/dp/B00CYLLF16/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1501421641&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=extension+tube+canon
Neewer for $36
https://www.amazon.ca/Neewer-3-piece-12-20-36mm-Automatic-Extension/dp/B00GJJBO4C/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1501421661&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=extension+tube+canon
No-Name Brand - $58
https://www.amazon.ca/Focus-Extension-Camera-Complete-Starter/dp/B00HJX1LYK/ref=sr_1_6?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1501422011&amp;sr=1-6&amp;keywords=extension+tube+canon
right here. They are really great for the price usually I use the 12mm or 20mm one on my 55-250mm lens.
Ah, okay... so it seems like cheap tubes like this one don't have wiring built in, while pricier ones like this one do.
It seems like it would be so simple to just have the electrical connections, the cheaper ones could do it...
Oh wait, here's a cheap one with the stuff built in.
I bought a set of Kenko Macro Tubes the other day and they are fun to play with. They aren't the cheapest tubes but they have electrical contact pass thru so you can have auto focus and aperture control. Here's the first test shot I did with it.
I only advise that if time is an issue, maybe buy the ring from a reputable shop rather than an ebayer in china. they come up with the goods but it can take upwards of a month to get to you. Here's one on amazon for 9 dollars or adorama for 12. Otherwise the product is identical.
Lol x_x
I think you were looking for this though? Lol
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Reverse-Camera-Adapter-filter/dp/B001G4NBSC
Nikon D90 with a set of extension tubes and a reverse mounted, decently small aperture 50mm lens. It's also possible to mount two lenses together for even more magnification.
Just a Nikon D5100 and a kit lens. For the picture of my Wham'n Watermelons, I used this Reverse Mount
That's the lens I used to take this picture with on my D80! I love it. Probably my favorite lens. I also bought this reverse ring to use with this lens and take macros. I haven't done many, but I'm experimenting.
I think they just put out a canon one this week. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1064603-REG/metabones_mb_spef_bmpcc_bm1_canon_ef_to_bmpcc.html
I have a canon stills camera so I am thinking it may be easier to go with the canon speed booster. Does anyone think the fotodiox adapter for nikon lenses would be a problem stacked on the speedbooster?
These are the adapters I am talking about http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Camera-Digital/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1406294139&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=fotodiox+adapter+nikon
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-07LAnkeos-Mount-Adapter-Camera/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1371271556&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=nikon+to+canon+lens+adapter
I've heard some people say this adapter is not tight but I've got a few of them and never had a that with them. They are pretty cheap and very simple, and unlike some adapter (like the minolta lens adapter) it does not have a piece of glass on it. You can go to a photo supply store and get a "better" adapter for maybe 40 or 50 bucks, but it's the exact same thing.
But you can use a Nikon lens on a Canon.
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Nikon-Camera/dp/B001G4QXLE/ref=sr_1_1/188-9403202-1447122?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1463888290&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=nikon+f+to+ef+adapter
There are converters to adapt nikon f mount lenses to canon EOS.
well, TYL :P
Simply put, Nikon (F mount) lenses are 'shorter' than Canon (EF lenses), so you can add an adapter add the right size and use the lens. Only issue is the aperture - with modern Nikon glass it's closed by default, and most adapters (at least the ones for £5) won't allow your Canon body to adjust the Nikon aperture. So, unless you've got a full manual lens, you need a Nikon body to adjust the aperture, take the lens off with the aperture open and attach it to the adapter on the Canon body.
(at least I believe that's how it works. I've only ever used all manual glass)
On the other hand, old Canon FD lenses are 'longer' than EF lenses, so adding an adapter of any length can't make them usable on modern cameras - and the same for Canon EF lenses on Nikon bodies.
PS: $7 at amazon.com: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Camera-Digital/dp/B001G4QXLE
>...if you really really want to be able to use those 1960s lenses, and just want to manually meter and manually focus everything, sure Nikon gives you more options.
I've never actually used one of these things, but in theory, at least, all that funky old Nikon glass will work on an EOS body with the aid of a cheap no-optics adapter. And the metering will more-or-less work, too. Olympus-to-EF, Pentax-to-EF, and M42-to-EF adapters are available as well.
something like this?
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Camera-Digital/dp/B001G4QXLE
That is true, but there are many people who use a small brass adapter such as this which allows adaptation that maintains infinity focus with no corrective optics.
That’s interesting. That would mean that a cheap F to EF Adapter should work just fine.
u/mrgold1016
I've used these:
M42
PentaxK
Nikon
and have gotten pretty good results shooting video with my 60D.
i was thinking of picking up one of these: link
it isn't chipped, but it would work fine for the pc lenses i would think? I already have a nifty 50 for the canon, and it works well enough that i don't think i'd be hopping to use the 50 1.4 for much since it is manual focus.
No get this one. I have one, it works just fine.
Actually...this just occurred to me. Since you're making films you might want to look into a metabones speed booster (http://www.metabones.com/products/details/mb_spef-m43-bm1). It increases the max aperture by a stop and decreases field of view by 0.73x. This makes the crop factor of the camera effectively 1.4x and then you can use canon lenses or with this (http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B001G4QXLE/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1451232714&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=SY200_QL40&amp;keywords=nikon+to+canon+lens+adapter&amp;dpPl=1&amp;dpID=41kEDBwEXKL&amp;ref=plSrch) adapter you can convert older Nikon lenses to work as well. It's a bit expensive but I think for a camera with this size sensor a worthwhile investment.
So something like this?
If you don't need autoexposure this is what I'm using. Keep in mind not all copies have the cool made in USSR text so you'll have to do some eBay digging.
just search ebay, choose buy it now, and sort by lowest price with shipping.
i have a $6 Fotodiox and i took a chance on a cheap chinese one. functionally they're equally as good. go cheap & get one for each lens.
go ahead & get a rear lens cap for each one too so you can just leave the adapter on the lens. Lens Rear Cap Cover for CANON
You think if I used this adapter + this adapter it would mount on my Nikon? Perhaps another combination of adapters?
I use several takumar lenses on my canon with these. They work flawlessly. http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-thread-Digital/dp/B001G4QXN2/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1368311006&amp;sr=1-3&amp;keywords=photodiox
Misunderstanding.
Check out this http://amzn.com/B001G4QXN2 for a quick idea of what it does. They're basically all the same thing. Some have electrical contacts, but most, if not all, of the m42 lenses are fully manual anyway.
No dismantling of lenses. Check out the pictures on the product page.
14-42mm kit lens, 25mm f1.7, and Canon 17-85mm using this adaptor. Thanks!
http://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-AMEF-Thirds-System-Adapter/dp/B003150B6O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1415129152&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=m43+to+canon+adapter
Would that one do the trick?
Not OP but I'm in a similar boat. I have some Canon EF lenses, from looking around on Google this seems like it should work https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-AMEF-Thirds-System-Adapter/dp/B003150B6O
Curious why that one is so cheap compared to B&H ones that are listed >$200. Just cuz it requires manual focus?
here are some examples,
Basically you use one of the adapters to make certain type of lens fit on to your camera. Micro 4/3rds is unique in that you can adapt more lenses to it that most other sensors because of the field of view.
http://www.four-thirds.org/en/microft/accessories.html
http://www.amazon.com/RAINBOWIMAGING-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic-USD27-99/dp/B003150B6O
http://www.adorama.com/searchsite/default.aspx?searchinfo=micro+four+thirds+adapter
As per here
you should :
> Pull the trigger pin on the adapter towards the body of the camera and turn the lens counter clock-wise while you are facing the front of the camera.
Hey, there!
I have a G7 as well as a Canon EOS camera with EF-S lenses. So far I haven't been able to find an adapter for the EF-S lenses to fit the G7 which have a focal reducer / booster. The only ones I've found which do work are the adapters with no glass in them. It's just an adapter to fit the lens onto the G7 body. They work but you'll need to keep in mind of the crop factor. Mine was about $15 from Amazon. It's this one: Fotasy AMEF Canon EOS EF Lens to M43 Micro Four Thirds System Camera Adapter
I use this adapter on my B-Cam and I enjoy it. There is no glass, it's just a metal tube.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003150B6O/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
for skateboarding videos, you may wish to go full manual focus since the subjects will be moving around a lot, with deep focus (stopped down aperture).
...
Mounting inexpensive wide-angle manual lenses from 20+ years ago using adapters (eg. Canon FD to 4/3rds adapter) and using those cheaper, older manual lenses (tons at used camera shops, ebay, keh.com) can allow you to build a lens kit cheap. A benefit of the 4/3rds format on the G7.
eg. https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic-Cameras/dp/B003EAVUMK?ie=UTF8&amp;*Version*=1&amp;*entries*=0
eg https://www.keh.com/shop/canon-20mm-f-2-8-fd-mount-lens-72-canon-20mm-f-2-8-fd-mount-lens-72.html
20mm Canon FD manual lens $238
20mm Canon EF auto lens $539
...but this isn't the best example because the Lumix 20mm is only $269
http://shop.panasonic.com/cameras-and-camcorders/lumix-camera-lenses/H-H020A.html
But you get the idea.
...
Also, look at Olympus lenses in addition to Panasonic lenses in the 4/3rds format. Compatible, and often Olympus lenses are higher quality.
http://m43.co/best-micro-four-thirds-lenses-the-ultimate-guide/
http://www.cameralabs.com/lenses/lens_buyers_guide/Micro_Four_Thirds_lenses/Recommended_MFT_lenses.shtml
http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2011/09/lens-buyers-guide.html
...
and olympus has unique lens cap sized lenses.
http://admiringlight.com/blog/review-olympus-15mm-f8-body-cap-lens/2/
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_9mm_f_8_fisheye_body_cap_review/
Hey /u/M1K194 You should consider using an adapter with vintage manual focus prime lenses. These lenses often have solid optical performance and are easy to find online. I would recommend you purchase an adapter similar to this one and a Canon FD mount prime lens such as this Canon FD 28mm f/2, or this Canon FD 50mm f/1.4. Using this setup you can get good low light performance without breaking the bank. All together the adapter and two lenses would be less than $300.
I hope this was helpful. Happy shooting!
you can buy a cheap FD mount for the t3i, also
So my dad had a Canon TLb from the 70's with a Canon FD lens mount, and a few lenses. He recently got a Rebel T3i. Now he wants to use the old lenses with the T3i. I showed him this but it doesn't work with the automatic zoom/diaphram etc.
Is there a better option? Thanks.
You could try this- Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Adapter - Canon FD & FL 35mm SLR lens to Canon EOS (EF, EF-S) Mount SLR Camera Body, with Built-In Aperture Control Dial https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003EB0AXY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_2dFWBb7TMA4SJ
I picked up this FD to EOS adapter for $35 +shipping on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003EB0AXY/
Take the other $165, go to your local used camera shop, and pick up a couple old Canon FD lenses. I got a 28mm for $50, a 2X Extender for $20, and a 35-70mm for $20. I think they also had 50mm f1.8 lenses for $30 and 70-200mm zoom lenses starting at $50. All FD
Couple things you should know: You will only be able to use manual focus with an FD to EOS adapter (which tends to be better for video). The adapter will also make you lose about a stop of light as well as increasing the focal length, makes a 28mm function like a 35mm.
Thanks mj, can you tell me which one on amazon you think might fit? Do you think this one would?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003EB0AXY/ref=s9_simh_gw_p421_d0_g421_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-2&amp;pf_rd_r=0R1HP24R57W02A799XFT&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=470938631&amp;pf_rd_i=507846
I was planning on using a adapter such as this one: http://amzn.com/B003EB0AXY
The reviews do talk about losing crispness of focus :(
Looks like I'll be returning all of this :(
There's a couple options you could go with.
If I was you, I'd probably go with a MFT to Nikon dummy adapter, then search Ebay for some used Nikkor glass (AIS lenses are much better if you can afford it). Nikkor glass is all manual so a dummy adapter will work just fine. You can find a good Nikkor lens for under $150. Just remember, get as wide of a lens as possible since the BMPCC has a 2.88x crop factor.
Dummy adapter
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Mount-Adapter-Thirds-Cameras/dp/B003G49V70
Another thing you could do is just buy some Panasonic Lumix glass then you won't need an adapter. This option is a bit more expensive.
Here's a 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6. This lens is in your budget but it's a rather slow lens and has a variable aperture, which is quite annoying.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/682980-REG/Panasonic_Lumix_G_Vario_14_42mm.html
Here's another Lumix lens that is a little over your budget but I think it's definitely worth the money. It's pretty wide at 14mm which equates to about 40mm on the BMPCC, close to a standard focal length. And it's fast at f/2.5.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/736393-REG/Panasonic_H_H014_Lumix_G_14mm_F2_5.html
The reason I suggest the first option is because Nikkor lenses are great and can work on so many cameras. Also, eventually you could save up and buy a Metabones Nikon to BMPCC Speedbooster. It's pretty pricey at $490 but it does some amazing things, like decrease the crop factor from 2.88x to 1.75x and adds almost 2 stops of light.
Also, don't expect to get your BMPCC anytime soon. I ordered mine two weeks ago and I still expect to wait a few more before it even ships.
The biggest drawback of the Sony A7s is terrible rolling shutter, it would not be a good for sports and fast motion video. The Black Magic Pocket is a haphazard novelty camcorder in my opinion. I've had a few on rental that had operating issues, there's a reason the price dropped so drastically on those. Consider maybe the Panasonic GH4 for your video needs. This adapter should work for your Nikon F mount lenses to micro-fourthirds. Not the best for low light however.
Honestly, it's on its way to being outdated but a Canon 5d Mark III works well in low light, shoots full-frame video, and is still a powerhouse of a stills camera.
Correct. This is a manual lens, so the adapter is essentially just a spacer..
I'm actually selling a Micro-Nikkor 55 for $50; the older non-Ai version is potentially even less because you can't fit it to much these days.
$210 for this (link: http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-35mm-1-8G-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1411639558&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=nikon+35mm+1.8 ) and this (link http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-E-Mount-Camera-Mount-Adapter/dp/B003X1FSCS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1411639592&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=nikon+to+emount ) but I thought these types of adapters caused issues with things like vignetting and auto focus?
It's just a cheapo from Amazon. Because the lens I used is ancient, I didn't need any electronics on it.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003X1FSCS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_ka-oDbJT9DY2J
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003X1FSCS/ref=sr_ph_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1483465637&amp;sr=sr-1&amp;keywords=nikon+e+mount+adapter
http://www.ebay.com/bhp/nikon-lens-to-sony-nex-adapter
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-E-Mount-Camera-Mount-Adapter/dp/B003X1FSCS
Do note that it is for manual aperature lenses only, not G lenses
Fotasy NAEF Pro Canon EOS EF Lens to Sony NEX E-Mount Camera Mount Adapter https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B003XY8DF4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_.lEACbZMQ2WGM
here is for the cheap adapters. this does not allow any use of auto focus or in lens stabilization. Thisone does support all the lens features. although the auto focus doesn't always work depending on the lens.
Get the Canon EF Lens Mount Versions. You will get more use and life out of your lenses. If you get the Sony E-Mount versions, you can only use them on Sony cameras. The Canon EF Mount Lenses are adaptable to everything including Red and ARRI cameras if you ever upgrade, you don't have to re-buy all new lenses if you are on a budget.
Get the $13 Fotasy Lens adaptor. They are both fully manual lenses with no electronics and it will save you $500 on getting a Metabones Adapter.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B003XY8DF4?th=1
From what I understand, there will be no aperture control, but I should still have MF if I set my camera to Manual mode/No lense attached. I ordered this one here
I use this one and haven't had any issues thus far.
Thanks for putting my mind at ease but https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003Y302CG?tag=briasmitphot-20 says explicitly at the bottom of the product description:
Compatible Cameras (Including, but not limited to): Sony Alpha a7, a7r, NEX-3, NEX-5, NEX-C3, NEX-5N, NEX-7, NEX-F3, NEX-5R, NEX-6, NEX-VG10, NEX-VG20, NEX-VG30, NEX-VG900, NEX-FS100, NEX-FS700, NEX-EA50
Actual product packaging and contents may differ from image shown due to packaging or product updates by manufacturer.
NOTE: This adapter will NOT fit on the Sony a7S, a7 II, a7S II, and a7R II. However, in the questions answered people say they are using it with the a7II just fine. But then Fotodiox says: This will fit Sony A7II (aka ICLE-7M2; E-mount; full frame). I am currently using it on A7II with a Canon FD 20mm f2.8.
Maybe this will help - https://www.fotodioxpro.com/fotodiox-canon-fd-new-fd-fl-lens-to-sony-alpha-nex-e-mount-camera-lens-mount-adapter.html
By Sri on October 6, 2015
This adapter is designed for Sony E-Mount lenses. The A7II uses Sony FE-Mount lenses for a full frame sensor.
By SomeGuy on October 6, 2015
yes
By Dustin W. on October 6, 2015
As stated in our listing: NOTE: This adapter will NOT fit on the Sony a7s, a7 II, or a7 RII
By fotodiox Inc. on October 6, 2015
Always so confused with Sony... what adapter do you use with your FD lenses? could you link to amazon brother?
I'm using this one. No issues at all really, but I've only had it a day or two so no extensive testing out in the field yet.
yup, http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-E-Mount-Camera-NEX-5N/dp/B003Y302CG
I know people below have already mentioned the benefits of a smaller profile in regards to the Sony A6000, but another thing to consider is since the A6000 is a mirrorless camera, you can adapt legacy/vintage lenses from many different brands. The Canon FD 85mm f/1.8 and appropriate adapter (https://www.amazon.com/FotodioX-FD-NEX-Adapter-Mount-Camera/dp/B003Y302CG) can be had for under $275 total and produce images equivalent to a lens costing 4 times as much. Granted you'll have to manually focus the lens, but with mirrorless aids such as focus peaking and mapping a custom button to zoom in on live view and preview your focus, it isn't too difficult. Here are some example photos: https://www.flickr.com/groups/2797149@N22/pool/
If you meant Sony A6000
https://www.amazon.ca/Fotodiox-Adapter-Mount-Camera-NEX-5N/dp/B003Y302CG
I have a Sony NEX-5n and my favorite lens is a Canon FD 50mm f/1.8 via a cheap fotodiox FD -> NEX adapter. I just ordered a Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm f/2 and I plan on buying a NEX -> FD focal reducer / speed booster. Sorry for the messy set up lol.
Would using a M42 (helios) TO FD adapter ON an FD to NEX adapter be too much distance from the sensor? The M42 to FD is meant to be mounted to an FD body, so I assume the distance provided by the FD -> NEX adapter would suffice so that adding an admittedly thin M42 -> FD adapter ON that wouldn't hinder focus distance too much?? I researched this for a bit but couldn't really find anything.
this is my adapter I've had for years: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y302CG/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
This is the M42 to FD adapter: http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/221942704552?lpid=82&amp;chn=ps&amp;ul_noapp=true
Thanks
I bought a Canon AE-1 on eBay for a photography class I took a couple of years ago. It came with a 50mm 1.8 lens that's completely mechanical- no sensors, wiring, etc. I've since gotten this adapter and a couple more old Canon-compatible lenses to use with the NEX and everything coalesces perfectly.
There are loads of pretty cheap, functioning FD (or third-party brands compatible with Canon) lenses on eBay. You already have the Nikon lens, so maybe the 50mm wouldn't be right for you, but I'm sure that you could find a decent wide-angle or something for a sliver of the price that you'd pay for the E-mount lens. Good luck! Let me know if you have any more questions.
Then its Pentax K mount. That can be adapted pretty easily. The camera won't be able to control aperture, and no autofocus. Other than that it'll work fine. Just use the aperture ring on the lens. Manually focusing is a bit hard on a DSLR particularly with a small viewfinder like yours, I'd use live view and maybe magnify it.
Edit: heres one that allows for focus confirm. http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Dandelion-Confirmation-Digital/dp/B003Y3EJMU
I gotta agree with Sloore on the Pentax glass. Search "SMC Pentax-M" on ebay and tons of lenses will pop up. I also recommend buying an adapter for every lens. They can be kind of a pain in the ass to switch and when speed is important it can really bog you down.
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Dandelion-Confirmation-adapter/dp/B003Y3EJMU/ref=pd_sim_sbs_p_2
These are what I use, I was a little weary with how inexpensive they were but I haven't had any issues yet.
I had these before, but I accidentally threw them away :(
I never even got to use them! My friend, that I went to school with (natch for Photography) got them at the same time and she said they're amazing and that I need to got them. I recently received this amazing piece of equipment and it would really help me use it to its full potential!!!
here is my $8 wonder set. lol.
Extension tube?
I've got an old Nikon Micro 55mm 3.5 and it comes with a 27.5mm tube. Very accurate. True 1:1 on full frame.
Exactly. The tubes I got are these. They are really cheap and are totally manual. There are tubes that include the circuitry that allows autofocus and more control, and those are closer to 100 bucks.
I'm still new to macro photography. I'm not sure what makes a "macro" lens what it is, but I was able to use any of my lenses that have manual aperture controls on the lens itself.
You can get a $10-$15 adapter and use canon fd or Minolta rokkor lenses. These vintage lenses can be bought pretty cheap on eBay.
The cheapest option would be this, Fotasy M2514 25MM F1.4 TV Movie Lens and Lens Adapter Kit for Olympus Panasonic MFT Micro 4/3 M43 Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004WIMB9E/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_uX0IAbGGKD8Z3. It’s a 25mm cctv lens, so you’ll get the same field of view is as the 25 1.7. I know it’s pretty easy to have issues with these lenses and adapters though. It is only $32.
Get extra batteries! And if you want to experiment with a fun dirt cheap lens, I enjoyed this very much https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-M2514-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic/dp/B004WIMB9E/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1493324879&amp;sr=8-4&amp;keywords=lens+25mm
(Extremely stylized, cool look)
Absolute cheapest possible is a CCTV lens like this one https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-M2514-Adapter-Olympus-Panasonic/dp/B004WIMB9E because it comes with adapter.
I don't recommend it for most uses but if you just want a lens for the smallest possible pile of money, this is probably it - less than $30 total cost.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004WIMB9E/ref=ya_aw_oh_bia_dp?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
If I remember I'll post some sample images too. It's not great, but on my copy the center really is pretty decent, and I'd use it for portraits maybe. It's $25 for a lens so if you like swirly bokeh it's probably worth it.
There is no good cheap adapter. You can have good or cheap but not both.
Bad (no autofocus or aperture control) + cheap ($15): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00VVZ4A8G/
Okay (aperture control, AF works decent on many lenses) but a little expensive ($100): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00D9BKLX8
Good (works a little better on more lenses) but expensive ($400): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0716RHXRB/
I strongly advise you to sell the Canon lens and buy an equivalent Sony lens. Continuing to use Canon glass on a Sony body is going to give you endless frustration. You can get a
Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 for $350ish new if you buy grey market or as low as $240 used.
Even with a top of the line Metabones adapter, you're going to have issues with autofocus speed and reliability. It's really not worth using adapters unless you have a significant collection of glass already or the lens to need just doesn't exist on Sony.
Plus as others have said, that lens is crop and your body is full frame. The Canon lens is worth more to you as cash towards a Sony lens than it is as a lens.
> Canon EF 75-300mm
A crap lens to begin with, definitely worse than your 55-210.
> EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Basically a worse version of your 16-50.
> Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
Excellent if you want to do portraits. You need an adapter to fit that (and the others) on your camera. It just attaches to your camera like a lens, and allows Canon lens to fit. You want a EF (or EOS) to E mount (or NEX) adapter. They vary in price quite a bit based on if you want autofocus or not, as well as build quality.
You need something like this, this, or this. If you don't care about autofocus and only want to use the 85 (again the other 2 are worse versions of what you have), this or this would work just as well.
I haven't tried that lens / camera combination myself, but there is a chance autofocus is slow / inaccurate enough to be borderline unusable, so you'd have to manual focus.
That comparable lens in a Sony mount is around $600, which would likely be somewhat sharper, but quite a bit quicker and more accurate autofocus. You could also get a lens that does something similar for about $250.
This is the one I have. No CA links. If your local camera shop has the lens and adapter in stock I would run by there and test it out first.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-EF-Sny-Adapter-EOS-E-Mount/dp/B00D9BKLX8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1491413448&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=EOS%28AUTO%29-NEX-P
Hey there! My a6300 will be here Monday. It's my upgrade from my (5 years of use) t3i! I've been wanting an a7s / a7s ii ever since they were released but the a6300 seems like a much better option right now as my budget is even lower than yours. I purchased this adapter and I will be using it with a Rokinon 14mm, 35mm, and 85mm until I can afford a Sony 50mm f/1.8 and Sony Zeiss 16-70 f/4.
I will be testing this camera out Tuesday with my setup and can let you know my thoughts if I remember!
Extras: Instead of purchasing Sony lenses in the future, I may purchase Sigmas new adapter and invest in a line of sigma lenses. If I had $1500 left like you, I'd sell my t3i, my lenses, purchase that adapter when it is available, and purchase sigma lenses. Here is a great video of the new sigma adapter.
Here is the one I have, like 50 bucks.
Canon to sony e-mount
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00D9BKLX8/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
l bracket I am using 15 bucks:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07W3RRDJD/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
I use these to adapt my tripods and I have one with a nylon webbing for rock climbing as a sling over the shoulder strap. again 15 bucks
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00KNPITI2/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
Thanks for the advice. I believe this one would work correctly, right?
Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Auto Adapter - Canon EOS (EF / EF-S) D/SLR Lens to Canon EOS M (EF-M Mount) Mirrorless Camera Body - with Full Automated Functions https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00D9BKWEQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_O..gDbYVHK8RP
Also, would it change the focusing at all with the ef lenses? I have some rolleiflex lenses that I adapted to my canon ef system and the farthest they can focus is like 10m away, but not infinity, because they can’t be put any closer to the sensor. Would this also happen while adapting ef lenses to ef m, or would it work at the same focus lengths.
Thanks!
This works fine with autofocus on my M100, and it's only $39.95.
Yes, I meant computers too.
You will need an adapter, but the good thing about canon is, if you adapt your bigger canon lenses to the M, all the auto functionality works perfectly, whereas if you adapt your lens to other bodies, there may be some discrepancies. Adapters aren't too pricey either, this one works as good as the 'official' canon adapter for a fraction of the price https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Lens-Mount-Auto-Adapter/dp/B00D9BKWEQ/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1527005918&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=ef+to+m+adapter
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Commlite-Focus-EF-NEX-EF-EMOUNT-Adapter/dp/B00DW0EV2I
Allows you to control the aperture - do everything a normal lens can do.
28mm F/2 is the cheapest. List of lenses with AF (ignore the Loxia ones): http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?atclk=Brand_Zeiss&amp;Ns=p_PRICE_2|0&amp;ci=17912&amp;N=4196380428+3999800997+4291215468+4291107378
Another short list: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ipp=100&amp;atclk=Brand_Zeiss&amp;ci=25249&amp;N=3908282151+4190025432+3908282174+4291215468
If you're shooting with a a7ii or better then using the commlite canon adapter with canon glass might be the cheapest route for you
Yes, that is a downside. There are always the options to extend such as battery packs or dummy batteries with a USB cable. Of course it all adds weight, but I have 3 batteries and have never had to worry about battery life (assuming I remember to charge them!) You could also charge batteries from a backup pack while you're shooting. The biggest thing to remember is to turn off the camera when not using it. There is an auto off option so that's nice. I've also never been on a shoot more than 4 hours. I can get a battery to last about 2 hours if I'm being mindful to turn off when not shooting. If you shoot continually for an hour at 120 though, you'll lose it quick.
There are other options for converters, but I went with this to save money. I got it for a 70-300. I don't use my 70-300 for videos so I can't speak to the AF abilities in terms of that, but at 300 it hunted and never got it right. Could be a lens problem because it's an old one with a very slow focus drive as well. Here's the link!
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00DW0EV2I/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1527005591&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&amp;keywords=Commlite
For those that might turn this post up with a search in the future: I did find an adapter that works! Commlite brand. About $60 on Amazon. https://amzn.com/B00DW0EV2I
Adapter: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E5T5BJW/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_4wUuzbD3D0Q4F
And lens was only about $50-$60.
Glad to help.
Yeah, you need an adapter. MD to e-mount, they are just dumb adapters and only around $12. This is the one I use
I have the Fotasy MD-NEX.
you need a FD to E-Mount they also go by FD to NEX adaptors. I bought this one for a FD 50mm 1.8 and it works great. I even used it on some Vivitar lens a friend found and it also worked.
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00EDBT440/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1510258353&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=fd+to+e+mount&amp;dpID=41qOUoV4bWL&amp;preST=_SX300_QL70_&amp;dpSrc=srch
https://www.amazon.com/Fotasy-NEX-VG30-NEX-VG900-NEX-FS100-NEX-FS700/dp/B00EDBT440
Fotasy is the best bang for your buck
I got a body from Amazon warehouse deals for $385 a few weeks ago. It said the screen was scratched but I didn't notice any issues. (Looks like prices went up a little though).
Lenses: I just bought an adapter for some old manual focus Canon FD lenses I had laying around. The adapter was $15 and the 3 lenses probably cost me $100ish on eBay.
So I just bought an SD card, 2 batteries, and a dual charger for another ~$50.
I do plan on getting newer lenses later, but so far I'm enjoying the manual set up. A lot of bang for your buck.
Focus peaking can make it easier to focus manually. It highlights what's in focus like this.
Sure. I have one for Canon and one for Nikon, both work fine on all the glass I have They are both Fotasy brand and ordered from Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00EDBT440/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
cool. so something like this?
https://www.amazon.ca/Fotodiox-Reverse-Camera-Adapter-filter/dp/B001G4NBSC
Nice! Get a reverse ring adapter and you can turn a regular lens into a macro. Just have to get the right size threading for your lens.
Here is the mobile version of your link
Ignore the other guy. Metabones isn't the only option.
Get the Commlite adapter, it's just as good, and WAY cheaper.